Free Will vs Determinism: When Can You Make Proactive Choices?

This article is an excerpt from the Shortform summary of "The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People" by Stephen Covey. Shortform has the world's best summaries of books you should be reading.

Like this article? Sign up for a free trial here.

Humans have free will to decide how they will respond in any situation- also known as free will. But many people believe that they are bound to their past or their circumstances. This is called determinism.

How does understanding free will vs determinism help us to make proactive decisions? Understanding the space between stimulus and response can slow down decision making, and enable you to choose how you respond to any situation.

Free Will vs Determinism

Society and popular culture often tells us that we are the products of our conditions and conditioning — our upbringing, environment, era, culture, and other external influences. However, this popular deterministic view robs us of our personal power to create our own results. The main difference between free will vs determinism is that free will grants you the power to choose your response.

Determinism is based on the stimulus/response theory, the idea that you’re conditioned to respond in a certain way to a given stimulus — just like the dog in Ivan Pavlov’s experiment was conditioned to salivate when he heard the whistle that indicated food was coming. However, this theory does not allow a space between stimulus and response, and helps demonstrate on of the key factors between free will vs determinism. There are three theories of determinism, each of which credits your conditioning to a different source. 

  • Genetic determinism claims that your DNA dictates your temperament, personality, and other traits; this is the “nature” side of nature vs. nurture. According to this theory, you’re hardwired to be the way you are. 
  • Psychic determinism says that your parents, upbringing, and experiences mold your character and make you who you are; this is the “nurture” side of nature vs. nurture. 
  • Environmental determinism claims you’re a victim of the people and environment around you. These forces create your situation, and there’s no escaping your situation. 

Humans play an important part in the free will vs determinism debate. Because in contrast to Pavlov’s dog, humans have four endowments that give you the option to choose your response to a stimulus. The space between stimulus and response is when you have the chance to make that choice.

  1. Self-awareness lets you know that you have a choice outside the stimulus/response theory. 
  2. Imagination gives you the ability to think of an alternative response that gets you closer to the result you want. 
  3. Conscience allows you to understand how well your actions align with your principles. 
  4. Free will gives you the power to choose your response and act outside of your conditioning. 

Viktor Frankl on the Space Between Stimulus and Response

Victor Frankl was an Austrian psychologist who came of age in the Freudian school of thought, which subscribed to psychic determinism — that your childhood and upbringing shapes who you are, and his experience and theories add an interesting element to the free will vs determinism debate.

Frankl was a prisoner of Nazi death camps during the Holocaust for several months (his brother, parents, and wife ultimately died in the camps). Amid the suffering, Frankl had the realization one day that he had a freedom the Nazis could never take: He had the freedom to choose his response to this — and any — situation. Though he’d been taught the ideas of determinism, he was changing his stance when it came to free will vs determinism.

Viktor Frankl’s space between stimulus and response was defined by his choice to imagine he was elsewhere. Frankl imagined himself in the classroom, lecturing his students about the lessons he was learning there in the camp. The more he practiced this, the stronger this ability became and his mental freedom grew along with it, along with his understanding that between stimulus and response, there is a space.

Frankl’s practice inspired other prisoners and even some of the guards. After his liberation from the camp, Frankl wrote a book titled “Man’s Search for Meaning” that became renowned worldwide, as he detailed the effects of free will vs determinism on the human psyche.

In every situation, you have the choice of being reactive or proactive. Viktor Frankl’s space between stimulus and response led to his proactive choices. If you’re reactive, you let your conditioning dictate how you respond to the people and circumstances around you; if you’re proactive, you decide how you’ll respond to create the results you want. Between stimulus and response, there is a space that allows us to make proactive choice.

Using Free Will vs Determinism to be Proactive

When it comes to free will vs determinism, part of free will is the ability to choose- between stimulus and response, there is a space- and choosing to act proactively instead of reactively. Being proactive requires you to take responsibility for your actions and their consequences. You can’t blame anything on other people or the cards you were dealt because you recognize that you always have a choice of how you act and how you respond to something.

Reactive people allow their physical environment (e.g. the weather) and their social environment (e.g. how people treat them) to determine how they feel and act. This is the outside-in approach; they let things on the outside affect how they feel inside. You can see that this fits more closely with deterministic people when we talk about free will vs determinism.

Proactive people experience these external forces too, but they take the inside-out approach, choosing how to respond to those outside conditions. They see the space between stimulus and response, and can choose how they react. Proactive people exercise the ability to suppress a reactive emotional impulse in order to act in accordance with the values they’ve mindfully chosen, cultivated, and internalized.  So they see, like Viktor Frankl, between stimulus and response there is a space for them to enact their free will.

Being proactive means that you choose to act, rather than be acted upon; you create your circumstances, rather than being subject to them. 

Free Will vs Determinism: When Can You Make Proactive Choices?

———End of Preview———

Like what you just read? Read the rest of the world's best summary of "The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People" at Shortform. Learn the book's critical concepts in 20 minutes or less.

Here's what you'll find in our full The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People summary:

  • How to prioritize the hundred tasks you have to focus on the one or two that really matter
  • The right way to resolve every disagreement and argument
  • How to avoid burning out and succeed over 20+ years

Carrie Cabral

Carrie has been reading and writing for as long as she can remember, and has always been open to reading anything put in front of her. She wrote her first short story at the age of six, about a lost dog who meets animal friends on his journey home. Surprisingly, it was never picked up by any major publishers, but did spark her passion for books. Carrie worked in book publishing for several years before getting an MFA in Creative Writing. She especially loves literary fiction, historical fiction, and social, cultural, and historical nonfiction that gets into the weeds of daily life.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *