In this episode of the Shawn Ryan Show, host Shawn Ryan and guest Jeremy Slate explore the parallels between the decline of the Roman Empire and current challenges facing the United States. They examine how Rome's economic struggles, including severe hyperinflation and currency debasement, mirror modern U.S. monetary policies and inflation concerns. The discussion also covers how Rome's approach to citizenship and immigration evolved over time, and how its military transformed from a citizen force to a mercenary army.
The conversation delves into how Rome's power became increasingly centralized as its republic weakened, drawing comparisons to changes in U.S. governance through amendments and executive orders. Slate and Ryan analyze how the erosion of Roman institutional strength and traditional values contributed to the empire's decline, and discuss similar patterns they observe in contemporary American society.

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
In a discussion between Jeremy Slate and Shawn Ryan, striking parallels are drawn between the Roman Empire's economic decline and current US economic challenges. The Roman Empire experienced severe hyperinflation, reaching 15,000% by the 280s, driven by currency debasement and military pay increases. Similarly, Slate points out that recent US Federal Reserve policies, particularly quantitative easing during the COVID-19 pandemic, have contributed to record inflation rates and potential risks to the US dollar's reserve status.
The conversation explores how Rome's citizenship practices evolved from an assimilative to a transactional system. Initially, citizenship was earned through military service and was highly valued. However, as Slate explains, this value diminished when citizenship was given more freely to meet military demands. The hosts draw parallels to current US immigration challenges, discussing how rapid demographic changes can transform national identity and cultural values, similar to Rome's experience with increased immigration during its decline.
The hosts examine how Roman commanders like Caesar and Sulla destabilized the Republic through power consolidation. They draw connections to modern US governance, with Slate noting how the 17th Amendment and increased use of executive orders have concentrated power in the federal government. The discussion emphasizes how both ancient Rome and the current US show patterns of eroding checks and balances and democratic institutions.
The podcast explores Rome's military evolution from a citizen force to a mercenary army, where loyalty shifted from the state to individual commanders. This transformation is compared to current concerns about the US military, where there's worry about service members prioritizing personal advancement over constitutional duties. The hosts particularly note how the Roman Praetorian Guard's influence in choosing emperors mirrors modern concerns about military loyalty to institutional principles.
The hosts discuss the Roman Empire's moral decline, using Emperor Elagabalus's reign as an example of how decadent behavior and erosion of traditional values weakened Roman institutions. Ryan highlights the importance of shared values in maintaining societal stability, while Slate warns that a society focused solely on money and power, without strong moral foundations, risks collapse – drawing direct parallels to current cultural challenges in the United States.
1-Page Summary
Jeremy Slate and Shawn Ryan have addressed critical concerns regarding the US economy's current trajectory by drawing parallels with the Roman Empire's economic decline.
The Roman Empire faced severe financial woes, particularly hyperinflation and currency debasement.
In the late Roman Empire, military commanders turned emperors doubled military pay as a loyalty bid, leading to worsening inflation. Septimius Severus originally doubled the pay of the legions, with subsequent emperors following suit. These commanders also frequently gave donatives to the legions upon accession.
By the 280s, the Roman Empire's inflation rate had soared to 15,000%. With the purity of silver coins rapidly diminishing, public trust eroded, leading to a rise in barter trade and black markets. Diocletian heightened taxes to meet monetary demands, which further fueled the financial crisis and led to the hoarding of gold, thus exacerbating the shortage of gold in circulation. His edict of maximum prices, aimed at price control, led to even more reliance on black markets.
Recent trends in the US economy reflect patterns observable in the Roman financial crisis, triggering concerns for the current state and management of the US economy.
Slate points out that a significant portion of the US money supply has been created since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, diluting the value of the US dollar. This is akin to Rome's monetary dilution, and Ryan and Slate suggest that the Federal Reserve's quantitative easing policies have contributed to record inflation rates in the US.
The discussion implies that if solutions for the currency issues are not ...
Parallels Between Roman Economic Decline and US Currency, Inflation, and Monetary Policy
Slate and Ryan address the historical dynamics of citizenship and immigration during the Roman Empire and draw parallels to modern US immigration challenges, hinting at issues of national identity and cultural values in the face of rapid demographic changes.
The discussion highlights a shift in the Roman Empire's practices, evolving from a system that embraced the assimilation of conquered peoples to one that became transactional.
Initially, people sought to be part of Rome, serving in the legions as a pathway to a better life, and in return, Rome offered protection. Jeremy Slate discusses that legionaries could earn citizenship, which was highly valued, but as emperors attacked each other, citizenship was handed out more frequently to meet the demand for soldiers, leading to a diluted sense of its value.
Slate also mentions that Rome expanded by conquering new lands and offered opportunities for some to become more Roman. This contributed to the diversity within the Empire. The historical shift, such as when 30 million people were given citizenship overnight through the Edict of Caracalla, began to alter the value of citizenship as Rome's power diminished.
Present-day issues around immigration in the US are compared to those faced by the late Roman Empire. The podcast suggests a correlation between the past inclusion of barbarians in the Roman military and contemporary immigration, indicating concerns about national identity and cultural integrity.
Slate discusses the challenge of defining "immigrant" in Rome due to the integration of conquered peoples. The conversation highlights influential Roman figures born in annexed lands, like Hadrian and Septimius Severus, who despite their non-Roman ethnicity, ascended to power—a demonstration of Rome's ability to assimilate diverse populations.
Both Slate and Ryan acknowledge the importance of a common culture in holding a society together. Sl ...
Roman Empire and US Immigration Issues
Jeremy Slate and other commentators discuss how Roman commanders like Caesar and Sulla were central figures in destabilizing the Republic and paving the way for the Empire.
Generals Marius and Sulla had conflicts over military credit and power, leading to unprecedented confrontations such as Sulla's attack on Rome. Marius deviated from the norm by being elected consul seven times, disrupting the traditional Roman cycle of political offices. The conflict escalated with Sulla's proscriptions, which decimated social structures by targeting individuals for their wealth and property. Julius Caesar's rise to power also marked a departure from Roman governance traditions, especially his transition from term-limited leadership to ruling for life.
Septimius Severus's enlargement of the Roman army and his staffing of the Praetorian Guard with loyal men contributed to power centralization. The concept of dictatorship as a temporary emergency measure was eroded by Sulla, who held the position for four years. Caesar's appointment as dictator for life continued this centralization. The Praetorian Guard emerged as a power with the ability to make or break emperors, akin to a 'deep state' behind the throne. Constantine's disbandment of the Guard highlighted the decline of the checks and balance system in Roman governance.
The commentators draw parallels between the centralization of power in ancient Rome and the contemporary US political landscape, warning of similar trends and their implications.
The 17th Amendment, which changed senatorial elections from legislative to public votes, is cited as contributing to the erosion of state representation and a move away from the republic structure. FDR's presidency, marked by the New Deal and rule by executive order, is seen as pivoting power towards the executive branch. Subsequent presidents have further utilized executive orders, which critics liken to imperi ...
Centralization of Power: From Rome's Republic to Us Democracy Erosion
The Roman military's evolution and concerns about loyalty in the US military today highlight the impact of personal gain on military institutions and their fundamental values.
Jeremy Slate discusses Rome's transformation from a citizen army to a mercenary force. This shift in military organization marked a departure from allegiance to the Roman state towards loyalty to individual commanders, underlying the fractures within Roman society and governance.
During the third century, Rome's military became more transactional, and its soldiers' loyalty shifted with fluctuations in pay or currency value. Slate notes that as the value of currency fell, soldiers might switch allegiances, revealing an erosion of loyalty to Rome itself. This was further evidenced through the military's acceptance of coin and salt as payment, underscoring the material incentives structuring soldiers' commitments.
The incorporation of barbarians into the ranks and the creation of the futurati, a group of military barbarians who lived on the borders exempt from Roman law, symbolized the disintegration of Romanness within the legions. As loyalty shifted towards military commanders, rather than Rome, the stage was set for both the empire’s rise and eventual fall.
The Praetorian Guard, initially the private bodyguards of Emperor Augustus, grew in influence to the point where they could make or unmake emperors. These elite soldiers were complicit in the assassination of emperors and held enough power to auction the empire, placing their financial interests above that of the empire. This behavior culminated in events like the killing of Emperor Pertinax and their open auctioning of the empire, laying bare their actual allegiances.
The issues faced by Rome find their echoes in contemporary times, where concerns are rising over members of the US military prioritizing personal advancement over their constitutional duties.
Military's Role in Rome's Transition to Transactional Force and US Military Loyalty Concerns Today
The discussion examines the decline of moral values in the later Roman Empire and draws parallels to current concerns about cultural decay in the United States.
The hosts discuss the erosion of traditional values during the Roman Empire, particularly under the rule of certain emperors.
The Roman emperor Elagabalus, who reigned in the early 220s, is cited as an example of the change in societal norms. Elagabalus engaged in significantly decadent behavior, including orchestrating orgies which he pushed the Senate to participate in. He is also noted for his part in behaviors that were once taboo, such as gender transformation. Additionally, Elagabalus was known for having wild parties and for the peculiar act of arranging a wedding for his Black Rock, which was then paraded through Rome led by prostitutes. Such public debauchery and conduct deviated from Roman values at the time.
The hosts suggest that the decadence of rulers like Elagabalus played a role in the weakening of Roman institutions. The moral decline during the third century is portrayed as a period of institutional weakening, culminating in Elagabalus' assassination and his body being dragged through the streets, which symbolized the societal backlash against his rule.
The conversation shifts to concerns regarding current US trends regarding morality and cultural identity.
Shawn Ryan highlights the importance of a common ethos, or a set of shared beliefs and values, ...
Decline of Moral Values in the Later Roman Empire and Its Relation to US Cultural Decay
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser
