#272 Elizabeth Phillips - Inside Camp Kanakuk: One of America’s Darkest Child Summer Camps
In this episode of the Shawn Ryan Show, Elizabeth Phillips discusses the history of systemic abuse at Kanakuk Ministries, a large evangelical summer camp organization. Phillips shares her personal connection to the case through her brother Trey, whose death by suicide followed an abuse settlement with the camp, and explains how the organization used NDAs and intimidation to prevent victims from speaking out.
The discussion examines the broader issues of summer camp safety regulations, including gaps in oversight and exemptions for faith-based organizations. Phillips details her work on "Trey's Law" and other legislative reforms to eliminate NDAs in abuse cases, extend statutes of limitations, and improve camp safety standards. The episode also explores how insurance companies' practices can enable abuse by encouraging victim silence through NDAs and maintaining inadequate child protection standards.
This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Jan 19, 2026 episode of the Shawn Ryan Show
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
1-Page Summary
The Systemic Abuse and Cover-Up at Kanakuk Ministries
Elizabeth Phillips and Shawn Ryan discuss the disturbing history of systemic abuse at Kanakuk Ministries, a massive evangelical camp organization operating since the 1920s. The camp, which generates $35-45 million annually and has served 500,000 alumni, became the site of widespread child sexual abuse under CEO Joe White's leadership.
Impact of Abuse on Survivors and Families
Phillips shares the tragic story of her brother Trey, who died by suicide after settling an abuse case under a restrictive NDA. The psychological impact on survivors was severe, with many experiencing PTSD and other trauma responses. Kanakuk used NDAs and intimidation tactics to silence victims, though some families, like the Alarcons, refused to sign and maintained their right to speak out.
Regulatory and Oversight Gaps in Summer Camps
Phillips reveals alarming gaps in summer camp oversight, with many states lacking basic safety requirements like criminal background checks. Faith-based camps often receive exemptions from even minimal regulations. The American Camp Association's inability to implement effective child protection measures over its 115-year history highlights the industry's prioritization of profits over safety.
Elizabeth's Legislative Advocacy and Reform Efforts
Motivated by her brother's death, Phillips championed "Trey's Law" in Texas and Missouri, successfully eliminating NDAs in sexual abuse cases and extending statutes of limitations. Working with survivors, lobbyists, and legislators, she expanded her advocacy efforts to multiple states. Through initiatives like the Campaign for Camp Safety and partnerships with advocates like Gretchen Carlson, Phillips continues to fight for accountability and reform.
Insurance Companies & Private Sector Enabling Abuse
Phillips explains how insurance companies often encourage the use of NDAs to avoid liability, effectively silencing abuse victims. She notes that insurance standards are too lax regarding child safeguarding, allowing negligent organizations to maintain coverage. Through initiatives like the Safe Childhoods Initiative, private sector involvement is emerging as a key factor in driving meaningful child protection reforms.
1-Page Summary
Additional Materials
Clarifications
- Kanakuk Ministries is one of the largest Christian summer camp organizations in the United States, known for its focus on faith-based youth development. It operates multiple camps that combine recreational activities with religious teachings. The organization has a long history, dating back nearly a century, making it influential in evangelical Christian communities. Its size and reputation have made the abuse scandal particularly impactful and widely discussed.
- Joe White, as CEO, held ultimate authority over Kanakuk Ministries during the abuse period. His leadership environment allowed systemic abuse to occur unchecked. He failed to implement or enforce adequate child protection policies. His role was central to both enabling abuse and the subsequent cover-up.
- NDAs are legal contracts that prevent individuals from sharing specific information publicly. In abuse cases, they often require victims to keep details of the abuse and settlement confidential. This can protect organizations from reputational damage and limit public awareness of wrongdoing. Critics argue NDAs can silence victims and hinder justice.
- "Trey's Law" is legislation that prohibits the use of nondisclosure agreements (NDAs) in cases involving sexual abuse, ensuring survivors can speak openly. It also extends the statute of limitations, allowing victims more time to file legal claims. The law aims to increase transparency and accountability in abuse cases. It represents a shift toward prioritizing survivor rights over organizational secrecy.
- The American Camp Association (ACA) is a nonprofit organization that accredits and supports summer camps in the United States. It sets voluntary standards for camp safety, health, and program quality but does not have legal authority to enforce regulations. Membership and accreditation by the ACA are optional, so many camps operate without its oversight. The ACA's influence depends on camps choosing to follow its guidelines rather than government mandate.
- Faith-based camps often receive exemptions due to religious freedom protections in laws like the First Amendment in the U.S. These exemptions aim to prevent government interference in religious practices. Legislators may also believe faith groups self-regulate effectively or want to respect their autonomy. However, this can lead to gaps in safety oversight.
- Summer camps are generally regulated at the state level, with requirements varying widely. Common regulations include health and safety standards, staff background checks, emergency preparedness, and facility inspections. Some states mandate licensing or certification, while others have minimal or no oversight, especially for faith-based camps. National organizations like the American Camp Association provide voluntary accreditation with safety guidelines but do not enforce legal requirements.
- Insurance companies often require organizations to use NDAs in abuse settlements to limit public exposure and reduce the risk of costly lawsuits. By encouraging secrecy, insurers protect their financial interests and minimize claims payouts. This practice can prevent victims from speaking out, hindering broader accountability and reform. Insurance policies typically lack strict child protection criteria, allowing risky organizations to remain insured.
- The Safe Childhoods Initiative is a collaborative effort involving private sector companies to improve child protection standards. It aims to hold organizations accountable by promoting transparency and better safety policies. The initiative encourages insurers and businesses to adopt stricter requirements to prevent abuse. This approach helps create systemic change beyond government regulations.
- Gretchen Carlson is a former television journalist and Miss America winner who became a prominent advocate against workplace sexual harassment. She filed a high-profile lawsuit against Fox News CEO Roger Ailes, helping to spark the #MeToo movement. Carlson has since worked on various initiatives to support survivors and promote legal reforms. Her involvement lends visibility and influence to campaigns like the one for camp safety.
- Extending statutes of limitations allows survivors more time to file legal claims after abuse, often decades beyond the original deadline. This change acknowledges that trauma can delay reporting and seeking justice. It increases the likelihood that perpetrators and organizations can be held accountable. Without extension, many survivors lose the chance to pursue legal remedies due to time limits.
- Legislative advocacy involves identifying harmful laws or gaps and proposing new bills or amendments to address them. Advocates collaborate with survivors, experts, and lawmakers to draft legislation and build support through lobbying and public campaigns. The reform process includes committee reviews, debates, and votes before a bill becomes law. Once enacted, reforms require enforcement and ongoing monitoring to ensure effectiveness.
Get access to the context and additional materials
The Systemic Abuse and Cover-Up at Kanakuk Ministries
Elizabeth Phillips and Shawn Ryan shed light on the systemic abuse and cover-up at Kanakuk Ministries, a large-scale evangelical camp empire that has operated since the 1920s.
Kanakuk Ministries: Evangelical Camp With Abuse History
Kanakuk Ministries, having a history of child sexual abuse and cover-ups, is a mega evangelical camp based in southwest Missouri. Phillips talks about her own family's grooming during their time at Kanakuk and righteous anger towards the abuse within the camp.
The camp attracts children from all over the globe and has amassed 500,000 alumni and around 50,000 staff members. Phillips indicates that Kanakuk's scale is empire-like, with an annual revenue between $35 to $45 million.
Joe White's Organization Enabled Child Sexual Abuse Cover-Ups
Founded by C.L. Ford, Kanakuk Ministries saw Joe White become a pivotal figure, especially in the 1990s, when he served as both CEO and board chair, a position that enabled the abuse cover-ups within the organization. Phillips describes her family being specifically targeted due to their ability to host events and financial propensity to benefit the camp.
Joe White, after a reported incident, visited Phillips' family on his private plane, attempting to minimize the abuse by referring to it as "boys being boys." Despite Pete Newman's red flag-raising behavior, such as engaging in naked activities with campers, he was promoted within the organization, even to director of K-Country. Rick Brashler's "Canicuck Child Protection Plan" was implemented across youth organizations as a cover-up method similar to Kanakuk's handling of Newman.
Phillips founded No More Victims and set up the Facts About Kanakuk website, sharing deposition tapes from the John Doe 1 case to illuminate the historical abuse cover-ups at the hands of Joe White's administration. Financial entanglements between Kanakuk Ministries and the White family are discussed, with the former earning millions in revenue that were funneled through the Whites' for-profit holding companies that avoided taxes due to county relief.
Kanakuk's Negligence and Lack of Accountability Enabled High-Profile Abusers Like Pete Newman
Phillips highlights the response and handling of abuse cases by Joe White and Kanakuk Ministries, detailing how Joe White was dismissive of accusations and Joe White's complicity at the leadership level. Pete Newman, using Joe White's philosophy and theology, would integrate elements of spirituality to desensitize his victims. Despite disciplinary measures, such as signing a contract to avoid certain behaviors like spending too much time in hot tubs—a prevalent abuse setting for Newman—Kanakuk failed to effectively intervene.
When accused of continued inappropriate behavior, Newman completed a questionnaire aimed at avoiding allegations rather than addressing his misconduct. As early as 2003, Kanakuk Ministries had set boundaries for Newman, but actions taken by the organization point to an awareness without substantial corrective measures. Pete Newman was eventually sentenced to prison for multiple counts of child sexual abuse.
Furthermore, Phillips elaborates on the network of therapists tied to Kanakuk Ministries providing backchannel information used to conceal abuse cases. Similarly, victims faced surveillance and intimidati ...
Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary
The Systemic Abuse and Cover-Up at Kanakuk Ministries
Additional Materials
Clarifications
- Joe White held both the CEO and board chair positions, concentrating executive and oversight power in one person. This dual role reduced checks and balances, allowing him to control decisions and suppress dissent. It enabled him to influence investigations and limit transparency regarding abuse allegations. Such consolidation of authority often facilitates organizational cover-ups.
- Rick Brashler's "Canicuck Child Protection Plan" was a strategy designed to create the appearance of safeguarding children while actually enabling abuse cover-ups. It involved superficial policies and procedures that discouraged reporting and investigation of misconduct. This plan was adopted by Kanakuk Ministries to maintain secrecy and protect abusers within their organization. Essentially, it functioned as a tool to deflect accountability rather than ensure child safety.
- Grooming is a manipulative process where abusers build trust and emotional connections with victims to exploit them. Awards and praise are often used to create a false sense of safety and approval, making victims more compliant. This tactic isolates victims by making them feel special and less likely to report abuse. It also helps abusers maintain control and conceal their actions.
- "Backchannel information" refers to private or unofficial communication shared secretly between therapists and Kanakuk Ministries. This information was likely used to monitor or control abuse allegations without involving legal authorities. It implies therapists acted as intermediaries to protect the organization rather than support victims. Such practices undermine trust in therapy and obstruct justice.
- The White family's for-profit holding companies are business entities that own and manage assets or investments related to Kanakuk Ministries. These companies generate revenue from the camp's operations but are structured to operate as taxable businesses rather than nonprofits. County relief refers to local government tax exemptions or reductions granted to certain entities, which these holding companies exploited to reduce or avoid paying property or business taxes. This arrangement allowed the White family to benefit financially while minimizing their tax liabilities.
- Nondisclosure agreements (NDAs) are legal contracts that prevent victims from publicly discussing their abuse or the details of settlements. They often include financial compensation in exchange for silence, which can protect organizations from reputational damage. NDAs limit victims' ability to warn others or seek broader justice, perpetuating secrecy and enabling ongoing abuse. This legal tool can hinder transparency and accountability in abuse cases.
- Statutes of limitations set a deadline for filing legal claims, often limiting the time victims can sue for abuse. These deadlines vary by jurisdiction and can be especially restrictive in child abuse cases, where victims may not come forward until years later. Some regions have extended or eliminated these limits for abuse cases to allow delayed reporting. Legal reforms aim to balance timely justice with victims' psychological barriers to early disclosure.
- Kanakuk Ministries operates multiple large-scale summer camps and youth programs across various locations, creating a vast network that reaches tens of thousands annually. Its influence extends through extensive alumni connections, partnerships with churches, and significant financial resources. The organization’s structure includes centralized leadership with control over local camp operations, enabling coordinated policies and practices. This scale and integration give it a dominant presence in evangelical youth ministry circles, akin to a corporate empire.
- Pete Newman exploited religious teachings by framing abusive behavior as spiritual discipline or tests of faith, making victims feel complicit or chosen. He used scripture selectively to justify control and silence, fostering confusion and guilt. This manipulation created a false sense of trust and obedience, hindering victims from recognizing abuse. Such tactics are common in spiritual abuse to maintain power and prevent disclosure.
- The "John Doe 1 case" refers to a legal lawsuit filed by an anonymous victim against Kanakuk Ministries for child sexual abuse. It is significant because it brought to light internal documents and deposition tapes revealing how the organization systematically covered up abuse. The case provided concrete evidence of leadership's complicity and negligence in protecting abusers ...
Get access to the context and additional materials
Impact of Abuse on Survivors and Families
The discussions center on the profound and long-lasting impact of abuse on survivors and their families, with particular emphasis on the tragic story of Elizabeth Phillips' brother Trey, who died by suicide after reaching a settlement that included a restrictive NDA.
Abuse Had Lasting Effects on Survivors Like Elizabeth's Brother Trey, Who Died By Suicide After Settling Under a Restrictive NDA
Trey, a victim of abuse at Camp Kanakuk, struggled significantly until his death at age 28. He pursued civil litigation against Kanakuk after Pete Newman's criminal case was closed. Despite being named a victim, the litigation process was mentally damaging, leading to a psychotic break. The settlement included a restrictive NDA which silenced Trey, contributing to his feeling unseen and his eventual suicide. Trey's struggle was exacerbated by aggressive depositions by Kanakuk's lawyers. Four days before his death, Trey expressed to a therapist that he felt perpetually controlled and never free.
Survivors Often Experienced PTSD, Dissociative Identity Disorder, and Trauma Responses Due to Abuse
Although not explicitly mentioned in the discussion, the description of Trey's struggles implies that he suffered from severe psychological effects such as dissociative episodes. A therapist remarked that Trey's symptoms resembled those endured by survivors of extreme traumas, such as satanic ritualistic abuse or MK Ultra-like experiments. Elizabeth educated herself on serious trauma responses, equating Trey's symptoms with those of patients treated for severe trauma.
Kanakuk Silenced Victims Through Ndas and Intimidation
Kanakuk Ministries used non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) to silence victims, a tactic that included offering favoritism to families, possibly to prevent them from speaking out. Joe White, associated with the camp, tried to influence the narrative and minimize the abuse. After the release of a podcast about the abuse, Elizabeth hopes attendance at the camp will decrease due to the danger to children. The Alarcon family, however, refused to sign the NDA and fought against their own lawyer to maintain their right to tell their story. ...
Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary
Impact of Abuse on Survivors and Families
Additional Materials
Actionables
- You can support survivors by learning about and advocating against the use of NDAs in abuse cases, which can be done by writing to local representatives or supporting organizations that fight for survivors' rights to speak. For example, you might draft a letter to your local lawmaker explaining the detrimental effects of NDAs on abuse survivors and asking for legislative changes to protect their freedom of speech.
- Create a personal ritual to honor the memory of those affected by abuse, such as planting a tree or dedicating a yearly day of remembrance, which can serve as a healing practice and a reminder of the importance of addressing and preventing abuse. This could involve choosing a day that holds significance to you or the community and engaging in activities that promote healing and remembrance, like a candlelight vigil or a communal art project.
- Educate yourself on the signs of trauma and mental heal ...
Get access to the context and additional materials
Regulatory and Oversight Gaps in Summer Camps
The podcast reveals considerable discrepancies in how camps are regulated, highlighting the potential dangers that stem from a lax system that fails to adequately protect children.
Most States Lack Summer Camp Regulation, Oversight, or Staff Background Checks
Elizabeth Phillips reveals that the summer camp industry ironically suffers from a lack of sufficient oversight, despite the vulnerable audience it serves.
Lack of Licensing, Inspections, and Safety Standards at Camps Fosters Abuse and Negligence
Elizabeth Phillips cites a deeply concerning situation where many states do not require basic safety measures such as criminal background checks for camp staff. Nine states do not require day camps to be licensed, and eight states do not require the same for residential camps. Philips refers to incidents where this regulatory oversight has had fatal outcomes, such as the preventable tragedy at Camp Mystic that led to the death of 27 girls. Elizabeth points out that only about 300 of over a thousand camps in Texas were licensed before the introduction of the Heavens 27 Camp Safety Act and the Youth Camper Act in reaction to past negligence.
Faith-Based Camps Often Exempt From Minimal Regulations, Allowing Less Accountability
The podcast highlights an additional aspect of the oversight issue: faith-based camps are often exempt from even the minimal licensing requirements that exist. Phillips expresses concern over the lower standards held for such camps, which she argues should operate to a higher ethical standard given their standing in the community. This lack of regulation is particularly evident in Missouri, where additional freedoms afforded to faith-based camps in the name of religious practice appear to allow them to avoid standard regulation and accountability.
Elizabeth draws attention to the case where Kanakuk Ministries transitioned to non-profit status and cites the hiring of Rick Brashler, a former Pizza Hut manager, as the director of risk management in 2003 as an indicator of potential previous liability issues. This is evidenced by the subsequent 4,000% increase in insurance coverage, which hints at a foreknowledge of potential claims.
Camp Industry Prioritized Profits, Lax Oversight Over Century of Safety Improvements
The broader criticism is that the camp industry has prioritized profits over safety for more than a century. The American Camp Association's inability to implement effective child protection measures is called into question, given the association's 115-year history. Cases of abuse, including multiple suicides related ...
Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary
Regulatory and Oversight Gaps in Summer Camps
Additional Materials
Counterarguments
- Some states may argue that existing regulations are sufficient and that additional oversight could be burdensome and costly for summer camps, potentially limiting access for children due to increased costs.
- The camp industry might contend that the majority of camps operate safely and that the incidents cited are not representative of the industry as a whole.
- Faith-based camps could argue that their moral and ethical teachings contribute to a safe environment and that additional regulation may infringe on religious freedoms.
- The American Camp Association might assert that it has made significant strides in child protection and that its accreditation process is a robust form of self-regulation.
- Camps could argue that they are capable of self-regulation and that the industry has developed best practices that ensure child safety without the need for extensive government intervention.
- It could be argued that the creation of a database for "gray area perpetrators" raises concerns about due process and the potential for individuals to be unfairly labeled or stigmatized.
- Some may suggest that the focus on profit is not inherently at odds with safety and that many camps successfully balance the two.
- There may be a perspective that ...
Actionables
- You can vet summer camps more thoroughly by requesting their accreditation status, safety protocols, and staff training details before enrolling your child. Ask for written proof of background checks, emergency preparedness plans, and inquire about the ratio of staff to campers to ensure close supervision.
- Create a community forum online for local parents to share experiences and information about summer camps. This platform would allow for the exchange of insights regarding camp safety, staff qualifications, and the overall quality of care, helping parents make informed decisions.
- Advocate for stronger camp ...
Get access to the context and additional materials
Elizabeth's Legislative Advocacy and Reform Efforts
Elizabeth's passionate commitment towards enacting "Trey's Law" and reshaping the legislative framework to protect children from sexual abuse is a profound example of advocacy driving change.
Elizabeth Championed "Trey's Law" to End NDAs In Child Sexual Abuse Cases and Extend Statutes of Limitations
Elizabeth Phillips, founder of No More Victims, successfully pushed for "Trey's Law" in Texas and Missouri. Moved by her brother's suicide after he settled under a restrictive NDA, Elizabeth championed the legislation initially passed in Texas in 2025. This law eliminated NDAs in sexual abuse cases and extended the statutes of limitations, allowing victims to take legal action into adulthood, beyond the age of 26.
Partnering with survivors and leveraging her extensive network, Elizabeth rallied lobbyists, like Mark, a former firefighter with a track record in Missouri legislative success in mental health for first responders, to propel "Trey's Law" into enactment.
In Texas, with allies like Representative Jeff Leach, whose wife is an abuse survivor, and Senator Angela Paxton, connected through a former student under an NDA, the law became the most comprehensive NDA reform in the country. Representative Mitch Little crafted the bill's language, resolving constitutional issues and creating a loophole voiding NDAs post-September 1st, 2025, unless legally ordered otherwise.
Elizabeth's law became a reality in Missouri by working closely with bill sponsors, tailoring the legislation to address minor victims of child sexual abuse and trafficking, effective from August 28th, 2025.
In addition to Texas and Missouri, Elizabeth pursued legislative efforts in various other states and at the federal level. She engaged with representatives in Tennessee, Alabama, Oklahoma, and Ted Cruz's team, advocating for broader adoption of reforms mirrored in Trey's Law.
Advocacy Partnerships and Widespread Legislative Efforts
Beyond her work for Trey's Law, Elizabeth collaborated with individuals and organizations to extend her impact. She connected with Gretchen Carlson, who led similar NDA workplace reform, and gained media coverage and credibility from advocates such as Nancy French, a ghostwriter and clergy abuse survivor, and David at The New York Times.
Elizabeth spoke at numerous hearings to share her story and the pain suffered by survivors. Through tangible actions, such as setting up a protest website against Pete Newman's parole and initiating the Campaign for Camp Safety, she pushed for greater public awareness and reform.
Facing staunch opposition from organizations like Kanakuk, which spent heavily on lobbying a ...
Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary
Elizabeth's Legislative Advocacy and Reform Efforts
Additional Materials
Actionables
- You can educate yourself on the current laws and statutes regarding child safety and sexual abuse in your state by visiting government websites or legal resources. Understanding the legal framework helps you become more informed about where reforms are needed and how you might support or advocate for changes similar to those Elizabeth Phillips worked on.
- Start a book club or discussion group focused on literature related to child safety, survivor stories, and advocacy to raise awareness in your community. By selecting books and resources that delve into these topics, you and your group can learn more about the issues and discuss ways to support survivors and promote legislative reform in your area.
- Vo ...
Get access to the context and additional materials
Insurance Companies & Private Sector Enabling Abuse
The dialogue touches on the troubling practices by insurance companies and the private sector that facilitate the silencing of abuse victims and prevent meaningful reforms aimed at child protection.
Insurance Firms Urge Camps to Use NDAs to Avoid Abuse Liability, Silencing Victims
Elizabeth Phillips mentions that it’s common practice for insurance firms to urge organizations to use Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs) to mitigate liability from abuse cases, which effectively silences victims. This practice was implicated in a discussion about civil conspiracy, where an insurance company was added to the complaint, suggesting collusion with Kanakuk Ministries to cover up abuse. Shawn Ryan responds by implying that these NDAs were indeed employed to skew the narrative and silent those harmed.
Lax Insurance Standards on Child Safeguarding Allow Negligent Organizations to Maintain Coverage
Phillips points out that insurance companies play a role in the continued issue of abuse within institutions by setting a precedent of dropping coverage under certain circumstances rather than addressing the core problem. She indicates that institutions are guided by what insurance will cover for abuse claims, leading indirectly to the continuation of abusive practices. She strongly suggests that insurance companies could require organizations to have expert-based child safety practices as a condition for coverage, which is not the current standard.
Private Investment in Camps and Youth Organizations Is Key to Child Protection Reform
Elizabeth Phillips highlights the importance of private investment through initiatives like the Safe Childhoods Initiative, a collaborative effort involvin ...
Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary
Insurance Companies & Private Sector Enabling Abuse
Additional Materials
Counterarguments
- Insurance companies may argue that NDAs are standard legal tools used across various sectors to protect the confidentiality of settlements and that their use is not inherently intended to silence victims but to resolve disputes efficiently.
- It could be argued that the responsibility for child safeguarding should not rest solely on insurance companies, but also on the organizations themselves, regulatory bodies, and law enforcement.
- Some may contend that insurance companies are businesses that must manage their risk and that requiring stringent child safety practices could lead to higher premiums, potentially making insurance unaffordable for some organizations.
- There might be a perspective that while private investment initiatives are beneficial, they should complement, not replace, public sector responsibility and oversight in child protection reforms.
- It could be suggested that the use of specific counselors by organizations is not necessarily to control the narrative but to ensure that victims receive care from professionals familiar with the organization's context and the specific nature of the incidents.
- ...
Actionables
- You can research and choose to support organizations that have transparent child protection policies and do not use NDAs in abuse cases. By looking into the policies of organizations you're involved with or support, you can make informed decisions about where to volunteer or donate money. For example, before getting involved with a new group, ask for their child protection policy and inquire about their stance on NDAs in the event of abuse allegations.
- Encourage your workplace or any organizations you're part of to adopt child safety standards that go beyond what insurance companies require. Start by suggesting the creation of a committee to review and enhance current child safety practices, ensuring they are based on expert recommendations rather than insurance minimums. This could involve consulting with child welfare experts to assess and improve existing protocols.
- Advocate for the use of independent counselors for abuse victims within your community or organizations you're affiliate ...
Get access to the context and additional materials
Create Summaries for anything on the web
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser
