In this episode of On Purpose with Jay Shetty, genetics expert Giles Yeo challenges common assumptions about weight loss and calorie counting. He explains how different foods affect the body in distinct ways, revealing that calorie counts alone do not tell the complete story of how food impacts weight management. The discussion covers how factors like food processing, fiber content, and cooking methods influence the way our bodies extract and use calories.
Yeo and Shetty examine the role of genetics in weight management, noting that about half of weight tendency is inherited, while environmental factors like food availability and portion sizes also play key roles. The episode outlines practical dietary guidelines, including specific recommendations for protein and fiber intake, while addressing the challenges of maintaining weight loss due to biological and psychological factors.
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
Giles Yeo challenges the conventional wisdom of calorie counting for weight management, arguing that this approach oversimplifies the complex relationship between food and the body. He explains that the way our bodies metabolize different foods matters more than simple calorie counts, and that focusing solely on calories often leads people to overlook nutritional quality.
Different macronutrients require varying amounts of energy to metabolize, Yeo explains. For instance, only 70% of protein calories are available for use, while fat is almost fully available. The way food is processed also impacts calorie extraction - cooking and processing foods generally makes their calories more accessible than in their raw state. Yeo notes that whole foods, like almonds, yield fewer calories due to their fiber content and the physical effort required to consume them.
According to Yeo, about 50% of weight tendency is genetically determined, affecting how individuals metabolize and expend calories. He explains that the brain actively resists weight loss by increasing hunger and reducing metabolism, making it particularly challenging for those who have lost weight to maintain their new weight compared to those who have always been at that weight naturally.
In conversation with Jay Shetty, Yeo discusses how environmental factors like the increased availability of fast food and larger portion sizes contribute significantly to weight gain, while emphasizing that willpower and discipline remain crucial for overcoming these challenges.
Yeo recommends focusing on weekly dietary patterns rather than individual meals, suggesting that 16% of calories should come from protein, with 30g of daily fiber and less than 5% of calories from added sugar. He and Shetty discuss the importance of understanding marketing tactics and reading labels carefully, noting that even "healthy" protein bars can contain excessive sugar. They suggest creating an environment conducive to healthy eating by keeping unhealthy foods out of the house and having healthy alternatives readily available when cravings strike.
1-Page Summary
Giles Yeo challenges the longstanding belief that counting calories is the key to weight management, shedding light on why the calorie-centric approach to dieting may be flawed.
Yeo argues that the complexity of how the body metabolizes food plays a more significant role in weight change than the mere act of counting calories.
Yeo asserts that understanding how the body processes and extracts calories from various foods is crucial. This metabolic process requires varying amounts of energy depending on the type of food, meaning that calorie counting oversimplifies the body's complex relationship with food.
Furthermore, Yeo believes that focusing solely on the quantity of calories consumed neglects the importance of the nutritional quality of the food. He notes that diets have not improved and that the preoccupation with calorie quantity overlooks essential aspects such as the presence of vitamins, minerals, and other nutrients in our food.
Yeo highlights that the practice of calorie counting, despite its long history, has significant limitations when it comes to making healthy dietary choices.
Calorie counting gained popularity in the early 1900s, especially after Lou Hunt Peters' bestselling book was published post-World War II. Peter ...
The Myth of Calories
Giles Yeo discusses the efficiency of calorie release and nutrient partitioning, explaining how different macronutrients require varying amounts of energy for metabolism.
Yeo states that consuming 100 calories of protein means that only 70 calories are available for use because 30% of the protein content is given off as heat during metabolism. This indicates that protein counts could essentially be 30% wrong in general dietary calculations.
Fat, as Yeo highlights, is almost fully available to the body for energy due to its density, indicating efficient calorie availability from fat metabolism.
Yeo also points out that fiber-rich carbohydrates require more energy to metabolize compared to refined carbohydrates. For instance, refined carbs, like white bread, take about 5% of the energy to metabolize, whereas fiber-rich carbs use about 10%.
Yeo explains that cooking has revolutionized calorie extraction, making calories in cooked foods more accessible than in their raw counterparts. If you eat 100 calories of raw corn on the cob, for example, not all calories will be absorbed. On the other hand, if that corn is processed into cornbread, more calories become available. Similarly, a steak cooked briefly versus one cooked longer in a dish like lasagna will result in the lasagna's calories being more readily accessible.
The conversation also notes that calorie counts often differ by five to ten percent due to the energy expended to metabolize macronutrients. This implies that the method of food processing, such as raw versus cooked or whole versus processed, can significantly influence actual calorie absorption.
Yeo mentions that we absorb fewer calories from whole foods, like almonds, due to their fiber content and the physical effort required to bite through them. Moreover, he refers to the process of bomb calorimetry developed by Atwater, which measures calories by burning food. However, Yeo emphasizes that this method differs from how our bodies act ...
Macronutrient Composition and Metabolism
Giles Yeo and Jay Shetty discuss the complex interplay of genetics, biology, and behavior in weight loss, emphasizing the challenges of overcoming one's genetic predispositions within a context of abundant unhealthy food options and lifestyle habits.
Giles Yeo explains that genetics significantly impacts one's ability to metabolize and expend calories, as well as determining where on the body weight is gained or lost. While the conversation does not specify an exact percentage, Yeo indicates that genetics play a significant role, suggesting heritability ranges from 40 to 70%, with an average of around 50%.
Yeo argues that it’s always harder for someone genetically predisposed to eating more to lose weight, likening it to never being able to run as fast as Usain Bolt despite training. Despite the genetic differences, he underlines the possibility for improvement with effort.
Yeo mentions that the brain resists weight loss because it perceives it as a threat, leading to increased hunger and reduced metabolism. This biological response is significant for someone who has lost weight to reach 80 kilograms compared to someone who has always weighed 80 kilograms without weight fluctuations. Giles Yeo discusses the brain's inclination to return to a previously higher weight, making weight maintenance quite a struggle. He points out that individuals who have lost weight will always have to consume fewer calories than those who have never fluctuated, to maintain their new, lower weight.
Yeo points to the rise in obesity correlating with increased availability and convenience of fast food. He describes how drive-throughs and delivery services such as Deliveroo and Uber Eats make it easier to access unhealthy foods, thus contributing to weight gain. Additionally, the cultural association of larger portion sizes with meal quality leads to consumption of larger quantities of often unhealthy food.
While metabolism plays a small role in weight ...
Genetics, Biology, and the Psychology of Weight Loss
Giles Yeo and Jay Shetty share valuable insights on adopting a healthier diet through practical strategies focusing on macronutrient composition, understanding marketing tactics, and cultivating better habits.
Yeo emphasizes the need to consider your diet on a weekly basis rather than focusing on single meals or days. This encompasses both workdays and weekends, as well as any special occasions, to ensure overall intake of protein and fiber is maintained.
Understanding and managing the macronutrient composition is critical for healthy eating. Yeo recommends that 16% of the calories in our diet should come from protein, but also warns against overconsumption, as excess protein can be turned into fat. He highlights the importance of doubling fiber intake to reach a goal of 30 grams daily, noting that people in the United States and the UK currently consume about half that amount. Yeo also stresses the importance of limiting free sugars to less than 5% of total energy intake, which includes sugars detached from fiber found in products like honey and maple syrup as well as added sugars in processed foods.
Yeo cautions against marketing tactics that make products appear healthier than they are, such as using pictures of berries on cereal boxes, and he advises focusing on added sugars when reading food labels, as items like shredded wheat cereal have no added sugar. He emphasizes vigilance in avoiding unnecessary sugars by reading labels carefully, as evidenced by his own experience with a beetroot product that unexpectedly contained added sugar.
Processed foods, including those that are marketed as healthy due to added protein like certain bars or protein chips, often still contain high amounts of sugars and fats. According to Yeo, a health food bar marketed for its protein content, contained only 13% protein and 22% sugar, which was too high, especially for those who are not exercising.
Jay Shetty also points out the value of understanding product labeling through his personal experience with health bars, which he didn’t realize were high in sugar ...
Practical Strategies for Healthy Eating
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser