This section examines the influence of Nike within the running communty, how they built their brand to be the biggest in the world, and the origins of the Nike Oregon Project.
The author explores the culture of the Nike Oregon venture, examining the values and motivations within Nike's pursuit of winning at all costs, creating a program with a dysfunctional structure where everyone involved was expected to live up to expectations or be unceremoniously kicked out.
Hart meticulously reveals a culture at Nike built around an intense pursuit of winning at the highest level that began with Phil Knight's "Nike Principles", in which one of the guiding ethos's is "Perfect results count - not a perfect process. Violate the regulations. Defy the law.” This mentality is manifest in the Oregon-based Nike program itself, where coach Alberto Salazar was viewed as being untouchable and above scrutiny, provided his athletes delivered the results Nike desired.
Numerous examples of ethically dubious actions, both large and small, are detailed. For instance, Nike executives paid college coaches and gifted them with free gear under the table with no concern that this broke NCAA rules. And, ignoring the clear message in the "Buttface Meetings" controversy, Nike persisted in behaving as if winning justified whatever tactics they deployed. Perhaps the most egregious instance is what happened to Danny Mackey, a former Nike employee and current running coach for Brooks, who received a death threat from Nike's VP of Global Sports Marketing, John Capriotti, at the 2015 USA National Track and Field Meet after he exposed their dubious tactics to the BBC.
Practical Tips
- You can protect your integrity by documenting interactions in high-stakes situations. When you're involved in discussions or negotiations that could lead to conflicts or disputes, keep detailed records of what was said and agreed upon. This could be as simple as taking notes during meetings, saving emails, or using a voice recorder during conversations (with consent where required). These records can serve as evidence if you ever need to defend your actions or expose unethical behavior.
Other Perspectives
- A winning-centric culture might attract top talent who are motivated by high achievement and success.
- A focus on results without considering the process can negatively impact employee morale and create a toxic work environment.
- The notion that a coach should be above scrutiny is inherently flawed, as accountability is crucial in maintaining the integrity of any sport.
- The provision of free gear to college coaches could be interpreted as a form of sponsorship or marketing strategy, which is a common practice in the sports industry to increase brand visibility.
- It's possible that Nike believes the controversy was based on misunderstandings or misrepresentations of their practices, and therefore feels justified in maintaining their approach to winning.
The author describes Nike's corporate headquarters as a setting where almost no one, besides the public relations department, seems influenced by the ongoing stream of concerning news about the company. He highlights Nike's past labor disputes with factories that construct their products. Nike workers were also prohibited from talking to the media. For instance, shortly after taking a job researching perceptions, Danny Mackey was told on his second day of employment that he couldn't wear competitors' footwear on campus. Any employee caught speaking to reporters without using the proper channels was threatened with "getting disappeared" by the company.
Practical Tips
- Volunteer to be part of a culture committee or start one if it doesn't exist, aiming to shape the company culture consciously. Propose initiatives like regular feedback sessions, cultural audits, or the introduction of new traditions that align with the company's values and the well-being of its employees.
- You can foster resilience in your workplace by creating a peer recognition program where employees acknowledge each other's positive contributions, regardless of external circumstances. This strategy helps build a supportive culture that can buffer the impact of negative news. For example, set up a simple bulletin board or digital platform where team members can post 'shout-outs' to their colleagues for work well done or challenges overcome.
- Make a habit of supporting local businesses and artisans where labor practices are more transparent. By purchasing from local markets or directly from artisans, you can often speak to the creators themselves about their working conditions and the materials they use, giving you a clearer picture of the labor involved in the products you buy.
- Implement a feedback loop with close contacts regarding information sharing. After social gatherings or team meetings, check in with friends or colleagues to ensure that everyone is on the same page about what information is not meant to be shared publicly. This could be as simple as a group text or a quick debrief. It's a way to ensure that boundaries are respected and that private information stays private.
- Organize a swap event with coworkers to exchange any competitor items for those of your company or preferred brands. This not only cleanses your wardrobe of conflicting brand items but also promotes solidarity and can be a fun team-building activity.
- Create a feedback loop within your organization where employees can anonymously submit concerns or suggestions about company practices, including media communication. This can help management understand the employees' perspective and potentially adjust policies to be more inclusive and less threatening.
Unlock the full book summary of Win at All Costs by signing up for Shortform.
Shortform summaries help you learn 10x better by:
Here's a preview of the rest of Shortform's Win at All Costs summary:
This section covers the events, accusations, and investigations surrounding the accusations of cheating and doping by Nike.
After years of rumors, in 2015, the BBC and ProPublica published their joint investigative reporting efforts, prompting USADA to open an official investigation of the Oregon Project. Hart soon became involved in this as well, first publishing his story "This Doesn't Sound Legal': Inside Nike's Oregon Project" in The New York Times, then through his efforts writing Win at All Costs.
In 2012, after Steve Magness emailed USADA reporting that he had seen [restricted term] listed in Galen Rupp's blood panels and suspected Salazar of personally taking the drug, a full-blown investigation was initiated, and over the next decade the agency would interview almost everyone associated with Nike's running team.
Practical Tips
- You can foster transparency in your workplace by anonymously reporting any unethical practices you observe to relevant authorities or internal compliance departments. If you notice something that doesn't align with the ethical...
Hart examines the stark contrast between the experiences of those who were part of the Nike Oregon Project and those who stayed independent. In this section he outlines how Kara Goucher's quest for a family almost derailed her running career, and how Adam Goucher's struggle with injuries effectively ended his while trapped within Salazar's team.
In an ideal world, elite professional runners would be financially incentivized to train hard and to focus exclusively on athletic pursuits that would result in them becoming leaders in the sport. However, in some employer/employee relationships, when a private-sector entity controls competitors' income and career, issues arise when the competing goals of athletic performance and personal fulfillment collide.
When Kara Goucher found out she was pregnant, she and Adam were ecstatic but concerned. Hart explains how they meticulously reviewed her contract to make sure Nike would keep paying her, since taking time off for childbearing was inevitable then. After being assured by Salazar that Nike would have her back, Kara got...
This is the best summary of How to Win Friends and Influence People I've ever read. The way you explained the ideas and connected them to other books was amazing.
This section outlines the challenges to running as it transitions to a professional career path.
Many within the sport now see performance-enhancing drugs as essential to winning. Salazar acknowledged this point personally at a Duke University symposium on doping in 1999. He stated that doping was an unfortunate reality, and in some ways a necessary one, for athletes to rival people abusing the system. Hart concludes that because of the financial rewards for winners, the problem is worsening, and every sport is dealing with it in their own way. To be an elite athlete in a sport like running, where there's high impact and repetition, one has to navigate an ethical gray area, especially when it comes to medical professionals.
As athletes in every sport began using substances that boosted their performance, it became increasingly apparent to others who wished to compete at the highest echelon that they too had to embrace questionable tactics in training, recovery, or even surgery if they wanted to win. This was exacerbated because efforts to regulate doping were...
Win at All Costs