Wells argues that the existing global structure, marked by a growing number of autonomous, rival nations, cannot be sustained any longer. Technological progress has rendered geographical boundaries obsolete and has substantially transformed the scale of human endeavors. The tumultuous agents at play necessitate a thorough transformation of our governance and fiscal structures, ushering in an era characterized by worldwide collectivism.
Before the 20th century, numerous independent nations seemed to maintain a consistent balance on the international political stage. The era's technological constraints necessitated the creation of this structure. In the past, the scope of government and business dealings was greatly restricted due to limitations in transportation and communication methods. Technological progress has utterly changed the situation over the course of the last century.
Wells describes the prevailing conviction of the late 19th century as an acknowledgment of the planet's consistent progression towards becoming a unified entity. International organizations like the Postal Union, coupled with the expansion of global commerce and the enduring peace among leading countries, all contributed to the formation of this perspective. However, Wells pointed out that beneath a veneer of peaceful advancement, various factors were surreptitiously establishing the foundations for future conflict. The growth of the military-industrial sector, coupled with imperial ambitions, resource rivalry, and the intricate strategies of diplomatic powers vying for dominance, gradually undermined the traditional order.
Context
- There was a rise in cultural exchanges and international exhibitions, such as the World's Fairs, which showcased global achievements and fostered a sense of international community.
- The establishment of the UPU marked a significant step towards globalization by enabling more efficient and reliable communication between nations, which was essential for international trade, diplomacy, and cultural exchange.
- Economic theories such as free trade gained popularity, encouraging countries to reduce tariffs and trade barriers, which facilitated a more unified global market.
- The establishment of diplomatic alliances and treaties, like the Concert of Europe, aimed to maintain balance and prevent large-scale conflicts among major powers.
- The focus on military growth often requires substantial natural and financial resources, which can lead to competition and conflict over these resources, further destabilizing international relations.
- The rise of nationalism fueled imperial ambitions, as countries sought to assert their dominance and prestige on the global stage. This often resulted in aggressive foreign policies and...
Unlock the full book summary of The New World Order by signing up for Shortform.
Shortform summaries help you learn 10x better by:
Here's a preview of the rest of Shortform's The New World Order summary:
Wells outlines a set of fundamental principles for navigating this transition toward a new global order. He champions a profound shift in the way we engage in communal discourse. Unrestricted and transparent discussion is crucial for cultivating a common vision for what lies ahead, enabling thorough scrutiny of concepts, and nurturing a unified sense of direction. Wells underscores the necessity of formulating and implementing a systematic approach to collectivization that avoids the pitfalls of Marxist ideology, with the objective of creating an equitable and free system that enhances the well-being of the whole society.
The author underscores the necessity for clear and straightforward dialogue when creating a new international framework. He argues vehemently against the use of censorship and propaganda, advocating instead for a spirit of free inquiry and robust debate.
The author emphasizes the necessity of examining ideas without...
Wells examines essential structures and suggests practical steps to advance a more equitable and lasting international arrangement, highlighting the establishment of a novel global organization. Wells explores the concept of a unified governing framework, as suggested by Clarence Streit in "Union Now," recognizing its potential to lay the groundwork for global cooperation. Wells emphasizes the imperative for profound changes in our understanding and handling of governance and economic issues. He also explores the potential transition to socialism, observing that countries like the United States and the United Kingdom are gravitating toward a more communal framework.
Wells recognizes the merit in Clarence Streit's "Union Now" proposals, which call for the formation of a federation among democratic countries, perceiving its potential to lay the groundwork for global cooperation, peace, and shared governance.
This is the best summary of How to Win Friends and Influence People I've ever read. The way you explained the ideas and connected them to other books was amazing.
H.G. Wells underscores the importance of building the new world order on a basis of joint cooperation, structured legal frameworks, and the pursuit of intellectual advancement. He argues that these elements are essential in creating a global society that is not just fairer and more peaceful, but also supportive of the complete range of individual human potential.
Wells argues that ensuring a lasting future requires adopting a worldwide system that prioritizes communal resource management and fair control of production and distribution for the benefit of all individuals.
He argues that the period defined by autonomous commercial activities, driven by monetary profit and fierce rivalry for resources, has concluded. The framework, propelled by technological advancements, has developed into a powerful entity due to the immense scope of contemporary industrial activities,...
Wells holds an optimistic perspective on the formation of global unity, even while acknowledging the significant psychological and customary obstacles that need to be surmounted. He acknowledges that human behavior isn't always guided by logic, and that entrenched biases, habitual patterns, along with an inherent reluctance to alter the status quo, could render the shift challenging and fraught with upheaval.
Wells observes that, despite the professed democratic values of some societies, a deep-seated hesitance to fully accept true equality is prevalent among numerous individuals. He ascribes this opposition to an intrinsic human desire for dominance over others, a desire that becomes apparent through the quest for affluence, authority, and societal standing. He foresees that individuals recognizing the importance of a more equitable society will continue to grapple with the reduced prestige and advantages associated with collective ownership.
The New World Order
"I LOVE Shortform as these are the BEST summaries I’ve ever seen...and I’ve looked at lots of similar sites. The 1-page summary and then the longer, complete version are so useful. I read Shortform nearly every day."