This section explores the tactics that corporations, whose interests are jeopardized by scientific findings, use to cast doubt on the validity of the research and to cultivate doubt among the public. This approach has established a foundation for the current trend of dismissing the broadly acknowledged consensus among scientists on the subject of climate change.
Mann highlights the tobacco sector's masterful strategies as a key illustration of how they obscured the harmful effects of smoking. Tobacco companies, for many years, knew the damage their products could inflict and actively engaged in campaigns to cast doubt on the well-established links between smoking and numerous health problems, such as cancer. In 1969, a tobacco industry executive admitted that their strategy involved cultivating skepticism to protect their economic interests by sowing confusion among the public.
The author emphasizes the deliberate propagation of doubt by skeptics of climate change as a key tactic. Proponents of the fossil fuel industry endeavor to delay meaningful measures, aiming to extend reliance on energy sources that damage the environment by undermining the reliability of climate science and exaggerating its uncertainties. Efforts to address the issues caused by global warming have been significantly impeded, in a manner akin to the prolonged postponement of measures targeting the tobacco industry.
Rachel Carson’s groundbreaking book, "Silent Spring," exposed the devastating impact of DDT and other pesticides on wildlife and the environment. The chemical industry initiated a forceful campaign to undermine Carson's credibility and her research, accusing her of scientific misconduct and even attributing numerous deaths to her. Carson's research endured rigorous scrutiny and ultimately led to the United States banning DDT.
Mann draws parallels between the initial attacks on a scientist who uncovered inconvenient truths for a specific sector and the subsequent challenges encountered by climate researchers. Mann emphasizes that the conversation surrounding climate change transcends simple scientific discussion and includes the protection of established influential groups. Strategies designed to obstruct climate action have reemerged, now focusing on undermining the credibility of the messenger, akin to tactics employed against Carson to safeguard profits in the chemical industry, which currently take the form of disparaging and maligning scientists who highlight the perils of carbon emissions.
The passage then transitions to discussing how tactics for disseminating false information, initially developed by corporate groups, were further advanced by prominent organizations like the George C. Marshall Institute to tackle growing ecological concerns worldwide.
During the 1970s and 1980s, as the public became more conscious of ecological threats like the harmful effects of acid rain and the thinning of the ozone layer, there was a rise in industrial resistance against the scientists and their research that brought these environmental concerns to light. The George C. Marshall Institute, founded by physicist Frederick Seitz, was instrumental in these efforts, with Seitz having prior involvement in the tobacco sector. The individuals who established the GMI, despite lacking expertise in environmental studies, promoted a free market approach and were doubtful of any kind of government intervention or regulatory actions.
Mann...
Unlock the full book summary of The New Climate War by signing up for Shortform.
Shortform summaries help you learn 10x better by:
Here's a preview of the rest of Shortform's The New Climate War summary:
This section delves into specific tactics employed by climate inactivists to shift blame away from polluting interests and onto individuals, using classic deflection campaign strategies from prior controversies.
Mann draws a parallel between the iconic 1970s "Crying Indian" public service announcements and contemporary campaigns that prioritize individual behavior as the primary solution to address climate change. The "Crying Indian" public service announcement effectively shifted the responsibility for littering away from major corporations and onto individuals. An advertisement depicted an Indigenous individual shedding tears upon seeing the devastation of the environment, underscoring how individual habits of disposing of waste affect the natural world. The initiative significantly diminished public support for potential laws...
The text examines various proposed actions that seem to be supported by those resistant to change, yet are actually designed to delay or shift focus away from meaningful interventions to tackle the climate crisis. The narrative also promotes the utilization of natural gas as a transitional energy solution, delves into the possibilities associated with climate intervention techniques, and underscores the importance of adjusting to climatic shifts, while also upholding the viability of the notion of "clean coal."
This section of the text confronts the false belief that supporting natural gas as an interim measure is advantageous, emphasizing that such an approach falls short in tackling climate change and hinders the progression toward renewable energy sources.
Mann disputes the common perception that natural gas acts as an intermediary energy source paving the way toward a...
This is the best summary of How to Win Friends and Influence People I've ever read. The way you explained the ideas and connected them to other books was amazing.
This section critiques the spread of climate doomism, arguing that this despair-mongering is not only unfounded, but actually undermines efforts to build a unified movement for change.
Mann cautions that adopting a pessimistic outlook could be as obstructive to climate change action as outright denial. He underscores that portraying an unavoidable disaster, while seemingly opposing denial, is often employed by opponents of proactive measures to diminish the essential momentum and political determination to tackle the problem.
Doomism cultivates an atmosphere of despair and capitulation, convincing people that the environmental emergency is a challenge insurmountable. This could lead to an outcome similar to outright denial, potentially discouraging individuals from participating in measures that could mitigate the effects of...
The New Climate War