In "Power and Progress," Acemoglu and Johnson explore the idea that technology reflects the desires and values of society's influential figures. Technological progress often leads to innovations that predominantly benefit a small elite, intensifying disparities and causing unrest among the wider community when they do not experience comparable advantages. The authors emphasize that although technological progress does not always lead to widespread prosperity, the direction of economic expansion and the distribution of its benefits are shaped by the dynamics of power and the economic, social, and political choices guided by prevailing ideologies and structures of power.
The authors propose that the interaction between power and vision is pivotal in shaping the course of technological progress. In this context, power is characterized by the ability to direct the trajectory of technological development and its utilization, whereas vision encompasses our shared foresight and understanding of what technology might achieve. Entities or individuals with substantial control over financial, political, or social spheres can direct the course of technological development to benefit their own agendas, potentially resulting in pronounced imbalances in how wealth and authority are apportioned.
Daron Acemoglu and Simon Johnson argue that the role of technology is not limited to dominating the natural world but also often plays a crucial part in shaping societal interactions. The authors highlight that throughout history, advancements in technology have often reinforced the dominance of the ruling elite, intensifying power imbalances and heightening the oppression of the wider populace. During the Middle Ages, feudal lords leveraged improvements in agricultural processing to extract more work from serfs, whereas the creation of the cotton gin amplified both the profitability and severity of slavery in the southern United States, and modern AI-driven monitoring technologies enhance the ability of authoritarian governments to suppress dissent and closely monitor their citizens.
Acemoglu and Johnson highlight that the impact of technology extends beyond mere overt force in its shaping of social governance. Subtler forms of control exert their influence by monitoring, utilizing mechanized processes, and molding societal standards and anticipations. For instance, the implementation of manufacturing settings necessitates stricter timetables, reducing employee autonomy, whereas online platforms gather data and sway shopper choices through tailored ads, and the incorporation of artificial intelligence in devising work timetables contributes to the unpredictability of employees' daily routines by causing variations in their shifts.
Other Perspectives
- The assertion that technology shapes societal interactions might overlook the role of cultural, economic, and political factors that can be equally or more influential in shaping society.
- Technological progress has often disrupted existing power structures, leading to the decline of some ruling elites and the rise of new leaders or social classes.
- Technological advancements in agriculture could have also led to increased efficiency, which might have reduced the overall workload for serfs rather than increasing it, as they could accomplish more with less effort.
- The cotton gin itself was a neutral technology; the way it was utilized to perpetuate slavery reflects the choices of the society at the time, rather than an inherent quality of the technology.
- AI-driven technologies can empower citizens as well, providing them with tools for communication, organization, and accessing information, which can be used to counteract government surveillance and suppression.
- Mechanized processes can lead to greater efficiency and safety in workplaces, which can enhance worker autonomy by reducing the need for direct oversight and physically demanding tasks.
- Stricter timetables in technology-driven manufacturing environments may lead to more predictable work hours, which some employees might prefer for personal planning and work-life balance.
- Some shoppers may use ad-blocking tools or ignore ads, which diminishes the impact that tailored ads have on influencing shopper choices.
- AI-driven scheduling systems can potentially reduce human biases in the scheduling process, leading to fairer distribution of shifts among employees.
The authors contest the common belief that technological progress automatically results in economic gains for every person. The authors demonstrate that improvements in productivity do not necessarily equate to higher wages for all workers. Workers' benefits from productivity enhancements depend on how new technologies enhance output per worker and how fairly these gains are shared between employers and their workforce.
Technological progress, particularly when it introduces new roles or augments staff abilities, tends to incrementally boost employee efficiency, yet some innovations, notably in the realm of automation, could lead to a decrease in job numbers and diminish the incremental contribution of human effort in manufacturing. Moreover, even when productivity increases do boost demand for labor, this need not translate into higher wages if employers have excessive power over workers, for example, in the form of coercive employment relationships, limited labor market competition, or a lack of worker bargaining power.
Context
- There can be a time lag between the introduction of new technologies and the realization of their economic benefits,...
Unlock the full book summary of Power and Progress by signing up for Shortform.
Shortform summaries help you learn 10x better by:
Here's a preview of the rest of Shortform's Power and Progress summary:
The authors draw on detailed historical analyses to illustrate how different technological advancements have shaped economic and social outcomes, effectively revealing how these advancements often benefit specific social frameworks and emphasizing the importance of counterbalancing elements in mitigating their impact. Historical instances demonstrate the connection between bygone occurrences and the current challenges emerging with the progression of artificial intelligence and digital technologies, highlighting the value of understanding history in shaping a society that is fairer and more equitable.
Acemoglu and Johnson challenge the notion that the Industrial Revolution was a period of unyielding progress for all, highlighting that its onset caused considerable difficulties for workers and widened social inequalities. The authors highlight that while unprecedented new technologies such as spinning frames and steam engines increased economic productivity, many of these innovations were implemented in a way that primarily benefited entrepreneurs and capital owners, while displacing workers from their...
The authors, following a comprehensive examination of historical trends and analytical perspectives, outline the essential conditions necessary for achieving broad economic prosperity in contemporary times. The situation calls for a dual strategy: first, to promote a more equitable distribution of power within society by creating frameworks that strengthen the position of employees and guarantee a more equitable division of economic benefits, and then to guide the direction of technological progress in manners that enhance human abilities and create new, rewarding opportunities for workers.
Daron Acemoglu and Simon Johnson emphasize the importance of steering innovation towards promoting fairness and creating structures and norms that support laborers and ensure the equitable sharing of prosperity. The authors argue that without a fair allocation of increased productivity and profit benefits between laborers and capital holders, technological progress that improves individual worker efficiency will fail to result in widespread wealth.
This is the best summary of How to Win Friends and Influence People I've ever read. The way you explained the ideas and connected them to other books was amazing.
The authors propose a range of strategies and conceptual models aimed at guiding the development of technology in a direction that promotes inclusivity and equity, emphasizing that the current trajectory, shaped by corporate interests and the dominance of the AI fallacy, is not inevitable nor beneficial for the wider society. Acemoglu and Johnson argue that to lay the groundwork for broad prosperity in the 21st century, it is essential to question the prevailing narratives about technology, encourage balancing dynamics, and implement strategies that support a wide range of inventive advancements.
Acemoglu and Johnson argue that a major obstacle to changing the course of technological progress is the prevalent misconception about artificial intelligence among those who create and fund technology. This misunderstanding stems from an unwavering conviction in the transformative power of artificial intelligence, which elevates tech magnates to a status of extraordinary intellect and views ordinary workers as prone to error and expendable....
Power and Progress