Book SummaryI Don't Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist, by Norman L. Geisler and Frank Turek

1-Page Summary1-Page Book Summary of I Don't Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist

Truth exists and can be known.

Geisler and Turek begin their dialogue by emphasizing a critical element often overlooked in modern conversations: the fundamental nature of truth. They argue that despite the prevalence of relativism, the notion of truth persists as unchanging, unique, and intelligible. Assertions that dismiss the capability to discern truth ultimately lead to self-defeating contradictions.

Grasping the fundamental nature of truth.

Geisler and Turek characterize truth as an accurate reflection of what is real. It represents a proclamation that aligns accurately with reality. They emphasize that truth is unequivocally absolute and not influenced by personal interpretation or varying circumstances. The veracity of a fact remains constant for every person, irrespective of time or location.

Cultural boundaries do not shape the nature of truth, nor is it altered by relativity.

The authors contend that truth is discovered, not created. The operation of gravity was not dependent on its identification by Newton, just as the existence of something does not rely on human recognition. The truth of a statement is not limited by cultural borders; it is unchanging and pertains to people no matter their cultural background or location. The authors employ clear examples to underscore their argument: the universally acknowledged truth that when two is added to another two the result is always four, and the unvarying effect of gravity on every person, regardless of their beliefs. Our understanding and convictions may shift over time, yet the essence of truth remains constant. Our understanding of the Earth's shape transitioned from a flat conception to an acknowledgment of its sphericity, but this change in perspective did not modify the Earth's inherent properties.

The inherent contradiction in rejecting the existence of truth.

Geisler and Turek offer a persuasive approach for identifying fallacies in thought, particularly prevalent in postmodern perspectives, by likening it to the elusive tactics that are characteristic of the "Road Runner" cartoons. This strategy reveals the inherent contradiction in assertions that undermine their own validity. The claim that there is no such thing as truth contradicts itself, as it assumes that this very statement is true. The claim that all truths are relative contradicts itself by presenting as an absolute certainty. The authors amusingly compare it to an instance where the animated figure Wile E. Coyote runs beyond the cliff's brink and, realizing there's nothing beneath, plummets swiftly to the earth beneath. The approach similar to that of the Road Runner uses undeniable principles to demonstrate that a relativist's position is unsustainable.

Indications that point to the existence of a supreme being

The authors begin by asserting that truth is absolute and comprehensible, and proceed to scrutinize the evidence that underpins the belief in a deity who created and oversees the universe. They methodically confront and refute common skepticisms associated with atheism by employing a series of arguments grounded in logic, science, and empirical evidence.

The cosmological contention maintains that the inception of the universe from a singular origin necessitates the existence of a causative agent.

The authors argue that the clear evidence of the universe's beginning points to a definitive originating force. The core principle of the Cosmological Argument is articulated through a logical progression, beginning with the assertion that every entity that begins to exist must have a cause, a principle referred to as the principle of cause and effect. The universe came into being. As a result, the initiation of the universe can be attributed to a causative force.

Evidence suggests that the cosmos originated from a singular point, marking the commencement of the universe's expansion.

Geisler and Turek offer compelling scientific evidence supporting the universe's beginning, which they summarize with the acronym "SURGE."

The cosmos is inexorably progressing toward a condition where all accessible energy will have been used up, consistent with the law governing energy conversion and the rise of entropy. If the universe were infinitely old, it would have reached this state already. Edwin Hubble's discoveries indicate that far-off galaxies are receding from us, implying an ongoing expansion of the universe. The cosmos has expanded from a single point of origin. Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson accidentally discovered the cosmic microwave background radiation, which is the residual heat from the birth of the universe, thus confirming the thermal history of the Big Bang. The COBE satellite detected subtle variations in the cosmic microwave background's temperature, which are known as Great Galaxy Seeds. The oscillations functioned as the primary gravitational influences that initiated the development of galactic formations. The General Theory of Relativity, a foundational concept in modern physics, clearly requires an...

I Don't Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist Summary The reliability of the historical narratives found within the New Testament.

After confirming the existence of a deity and the possibility of occurrences beyond the natural realm, Geisler and Turek redirect their examination toward the core scriptures central to Christianity, often known as the New Testament. They confront prevalent doubts by presenting persuasive arguments that the New Testament originated promptly and was derived from those who directly observed the events, thus solidly affirming its trustworthiness.

The age of the documents indicates they were created in the initial stages.

The authors put forth persuasive reasoning to support the assertion that the texts of the New Testament were written shortly after the events they describe.

Every book written before the year AD 100 was based on earlier writings. During the period from 95 to 110 AD, three influential leaders of the early Christian community—Clement, Ignatius, and Polycarp—made references to texts from 25 of the 27 books that now form the New Testament. The extensive distribution of these texts suggests they originated well before the current period. Significant historical occurrences, including the destruction of Jerusalem's temple and the passing of James, have shaped the...

I Don't Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist Summary The reliability of the scriptural manuscripts and the deity of Jesus.

Having established the historical reliability of the New Testament and the fact of Jesus' resurrection, Geisler and Turek examine Jesus' claims to divinity and consider the resulting implications for the trustworthiness of biblical teachings.

The prophecies concerning the Messiah

The authors present a thorough examination of the many Old Testament prophecies that were fulfilled by Jesus. The predictions cover a range of details about his life, such as his ancestry, birthplace, the manner of his demise, and his return from death.

Many predictions found in the Old Testament came to clear fruition through the life and deeds of Jesus.

Geisler and Turek offer several persuasive examples where Jesus clearly fulfilled specific prophecies concerning the Messiah. The predictions found throughout the scriptures, from Genesis to Daniel, specify details including Jesus' lineage, highlighting his birth to a woman, his heritage from Abraham, his connection to David's line via a distinct tribal association, and pinpointing Bethlehem as the location of his birth, as well as indicating the time of his death to be around 33 AD.

The prophecy in Isaiah 53 precisely predicted the...

I Don't Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist Summary Addressing Objections

The authors methodically address common objections raised against Christianity, providing comprehensive counterarguments and underscoring the contradictions present in the skeptics' reasoning.

The issue of malevolence

The authors tackle the timeless question, "Why does evil persist if there is a deity?" They engage in a dialogue with a hypothetical atheist, critically examining the argument's foundational assumptions and offering persuasive explanations for the presence of evil within the divine eternal plan.

The presence of evil is attributed to the necessity of human free will, which is essential in creating a world where morality is possible.

The authors emphasize that the root cause of malevolence stems from the utilization of human freedom of choice. God possessed the capability to establish a universe where creatures could not commit misdeeds, but such a world would lack genuine ethical principles. Genuine virtue necessitates the availability of a choice to commit misdeeds. Our ability to experience love, show bravery, withstand difficulties, and develop empathy stems from the decisions we make of our own volition.

Humanity's downfall, the scourge on...