This is a preview of the Shortform book summary of How to Be Perfect by Michael Schur.
Read Full Summary

1-Page Summary1-Page Book Summary of How to Be Perfect

In How to Be Perfect, Michael Schur explores the complexities of moral philosophy and how we can apply its principles to our daily lives. Schur, a television writer and producer known for his work on The Good Place, The Office, and Parks and Recreation, draws on his experience creating characters who grapple with ethical dilemmas to make philosophical concepts accessible and engaging.

Schur argues that while achieving moral perfection may be impossible, striving to be a better person is a...

Want to learn the ideas in How to Be Perfect better than ever?

Unlock the full book summary of How to Be Perfect by signing up for Shortform.

Shortform summaries help you learn 10x better by:

  • Being 100% clear and logical: you learn complicated ideas, explained simply
  • Adding original insights and analysis, expanding on the book
  • Interactive exercises: apply the book's ideas to your own life with our educators' guidance.
READ FULL SUMMARY OF HOW TO BE PERFECT

Here's a preview of the rest of Shortform's How to Be Perfect summary:

How to Be Perfect Summary Core Ethical Frameworks

In this section, we will outline the key ethical theories Schur presents in the book and then discuss several complexities and critiques of these frameworks.

Foundational Ethical Theories

Schur explores foundational ethical approaches like deontology, virtue ethics, and utilitarianism. Virtue ethics views those who are morally good as having developed specific virtues over time. Deontology relies on the concept that we must identify principles that we could envision everyone else following too. Utilitarianism focuses on maximizing joy.

(Shortform note: Many contemporary utilitarians, like Peter Singer in Practical Ethics, argue that utilitarianism is about maximizing the fulfillment of people’s preferences, not their joy. This means that utilitarianism can sometimes require us to make choices that make people less joyful in the moment.)

We will first describe Kantian ethics and Aristotle’s ideas on virtue, which Schur classifies as classical theories. Then we will discuss two modern frameworks: contractualism and existentialism.

Classical & Foundational Ethical...

Try Shortform for free

Read full summary of How to Be Perfect

Sign up for free

How to Be Perfect Summary Applying Ethical Principles to Daily Life

Schur emphasizes that offering apologies is essential for ethical growth, even though it can be difficult. Apologizing means admitting our mistakes to people, yet it’s a necessary step in becoming a better person. An apology is necessary to fully heal the damage from a moral mistake. The shame we experience when saying we're sorry is a good thing. It indicates we experience the hurt we inflicted and feel regret for doing so.

(Shortform note: In Why Won’t You Apologize?, Harriet Lerner argues that offering apologies and leaning into the shame we experience when saying we're sorry can be harmful in certain situations. In relationships characterized by chronic disrespect, emotional abuse, or a severe imbalance of power, apologizing can strengthen the other person’s control over you. Instead of promoting healing or moral growth, repeated apologies in these contexts can reinforce the other person’s sense of entitlement and diminish your own self-respect.)

In the following sections, we’ll explore how choices regarding ethics are influenced by societal norms and personal values and how to accept failure as part of the...

How to Be Perfect

Additional Materials

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free

What Our Readers Say

This is the best summary of How to Win Friends and Influence People I've ever read. The way you explained the ideas and connected them to other books was amazing.
Learn more about our summaries →

Shortform Exercise: Navigating the Trolley Problem

Explore your decision-making process in a classic ethical dilemma using the principles discussed in "How to Be Perfect" by Michael Schur.


Imagine you're facing the Trolley Problem where you can pull a lever to save five people but will end up sacrificing one person. What factors would you consider in making your decision?

Try Shortform for free

Read full summary of How to Be Perfect

Sign up for free