In this section, the author explores the initiation of European engagement in the global cotton market as the medieval era drew to a close. Initially, European entrepreneurs, merchants, and political leaders faced formidable competition and did not succeed, but in the early modern period, they created a system for cotton production based on forceful colonial expansion and slavery, which laid the groundwork for the transformative industrial growth that surged across Europe with the waning years of the eighteenth century.
This part of the book describes the early European endeavors in cultivating and trading cotton, which began during the latter part of the medieval period and saw the rise of significant, though small-scale, cotton production in areas such as northern Italy and southern Germany, driven by trade with Islamic countries. Beckert notes that the failure of these ventures stemmed from their dependence on regions outside their control. As a result, during the 16th and 17th centuries, European manufacturers and political leaders initiated a transformative strategy aimed at expanding their dominions, dominating established trade routes, and aggressively securing land and labor in the Americas and Africa to provide their emerging domestic industries with essential cotton and potential markets. He argues that this system should be described as a practice with economic foundations and a militaristic essence.
During the twelfth century, northern Italy experienced a burgeoning industry in cotton textiles, propelling cities like Milan, Verona, and Venice into prominence, even though linen and wool were the predominant materials for European clothing at the time. Drawing on their extensive background in woolens, Venetian producers adopted cotton and integrated production methods that were initially developed in Anatolia, thereby positioning Venice, with the aid of Syrian know-how, as Europe's leading center for cotton manufacturing. The stability of the cotton industry was compromised when the Ottoman Empire took over the trade routes, which encouraged domestic production and resulted in a decline of the industry in northern Italy. The prosperity of the northern Italians diminished due to their inability to adapt to changes in the source of their raw materials and technological resources.
During the 15th century, textile manufacturers in southern Germany were inspired by the methods employed by their counterparts in northern Italy. Merchants from Augsburg and Ulm, drawing on their linen trade experience and capital, created a thriving network by employing the readily available and inexpensive workforce from surrounding areas, enabling rural residents to produce textiles in their homes for the merchants' business endeavors. The production of cotton textiles required substantial labor from families, mirroring the textile traditions present in India and other parts of the world. The sector's ability to outcompete Italian producers stemmed not only from its affordable labor but also from securing raw cotton supplies from Anatolia's western territories and Syria. The German industry faced a decline when the Ottoman Empire seized control of specific regions and implemented policies that hindered the commerce of cotton. The cotton industry's downturn in Germany and northern Italy was bound to happen because they depended on imported cotton and had no control over the trade and social structures in the areas where cotton was grown.
In the 1500s, Europeans set up a global network for production which depended on aggressive trade, territorial expansion by force, mandatory acquisition of land and labor, and the establishment of slavery. Beckert argues that merchants from Europe forcefully entered the existing worldwide market for Indian cotton textiles, with ambitions to control the trade not only in the Indian Ocean but also across distant lands.
From the fifteenth century onward, merchants from Portugal, France, England, and the Netherlands were eager to integrate into these trading networks, primarily by establishing officially approved entities such as the British East India Company. The enterprises, motivated by the potential for substantial profits and backed by their governments, employed a mix of business tactics and military might to secure a dominant position in the worldwide trade of Indian cotton textiles, thereby reducing the influence of merchants from India and the Arab world. Yet while they could successfully capture transoceanic trade routes, they remained largely dependent on local networks within Asia and Africa for their supply of cotton textiles. In these regions, the sway of European political forces was limited. Chartered companies and independent merchants formed partnerships with local traders, regional authorities, and indigenous cultivators and textile artisans to guarantee a consistent flow of essential cotton from India.
In the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, Europeans created a new system of production that would make possible for the first time large-scale, industrial agricultural production and reshape the global economy: plantations worked by slave labor. Beckert observes that the expansion into Asia was made possible through the influx of capital gained by Spanish, Portuguese, Dutch, French, and eventually British efforts first to capture gold and silver from the Americas, and then to organize...
Unlock the full book summary of Empire of Cotton by signing up for Shortform.
Shortform summaries help you learn 10x better by:
Here's a preview of the rest of Shortform's Empire of Cotton summary:
In this section, the focus shifts to the rapid expansion of new cotton processing technologies after 1780. Beckert illustrates that while these changes originated within communities with strong yet typically brief social ties, their emergence was facilitated by the earlier creation of war capitalism, a structural change that redefined the world. Beckert argues that the significant increase in productivity within the cotton sector allowed British entrepreneurs, and subsequently their European peers, to create the first factories that employed wage-earning workers, establishing a model that would be replicated in numerous industries.
In this part, Beckert focuses on the dawn of the industrial era in Britain. He demonstrates that the changes brought about by the Industrial Revolution were as impactful on the social and political landscapes as they were on technological progress. British industrialists, motivated by the achievements of those who came before them, utilized cutting-edge technologies to increase production and developed new systems of organization, notably factories that...
In this section, the focus shifts to the crucial role that merchants played in distributing unprocessed cotton and manufactured cotton goods globally, connecting the dots between those who grew the cotton, the manufacturing stages, and the commercial sphere. Beckert acknowledges the crucial influence that the development of spinning and weaving equipment had on the rise of industrial capitalism. He also demonstrates how the worldwide spread of capitalism was influenced by the harsh realities of colonialism and the slave trade.
Cotton manufacturing ascended to a pivotal role within Britain's industrial landscape, concurrently developing with and depending on the creation of an unprecedented worldwide trade network. Beckert describes how, over the two centuries after 1600, the cotton trade network underwent substantial expansion, with European capitalist merchants becoming more involved in various aspects of production, distribution, and consumption, leading to the economic supremacy of European, especially British, interests in Liverpool's coastal city. Beckert argues that a powerful alliance of...
This is the best summary of How to Win Friends and Influence People I've ever read. The way you explained the ideas and connected them to other books was amazing.
The discussion now shifts to the global transition of cotton cultivation towards the southern hemisphere. The shift that began in the 1860s, as depicted by Beckert, occurred because of a significant reorganization of capitalist systems and the changing roles of the nation-state. The cotton industry has undergone continual transformations within the global capitalist system. The crucial elements for their continuous transformation were the deeply intertwined relationships among land, labor, financial resources, and governmental power.
Beckert argues that the growth of cotton farming in the world's southern areas was contingent upon complex and interconnected developments. The considerable driving force was the expanding influence of industrial capitalism, which brought together labor, capital, and markets on a global scale.
The well-being of cotton growers in Japan, the southern United States, and Brazil depended on numerous factors, as Beckert demonstrates. They...
Empire of Cotton