In this episode of The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast, Simon Baron-Cohen and Peterson discuss the complexities of autism spectrum conditions. Baron-Cohen explains his empathy-systemizing framework, which suggests that autistic individuals often excel at pattern recognition and systematic thinking while experiencing differences in empathy. He challenges traditional methods of categorizing autism severity and explores how autism manifests differently across individuals.
The conversation examines how the detail-oriented nature of autism can lead to achievements in engineering and innovation, using Temple Grandin as an example. Baron-Cohen and Peterson also delve into the relationship between empathy and cruel behavior, distinguishing between cognitive and affective empathy, and discussing how these differences manifest in both autistic individuals and psychopaths. The discussion explores how various factors, including power dynamics and political rhetoric, influence empathy at societal levels.
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
In their discussion, Simon Baron-Cohen and Jordan Peterson explore the multifaceted nature of autism. Baron-Cohen emphasizes that autism isn't a single condition but rather encompasses various dimensions affecting social relationships, communication, and adaptability to change. He challenges traditional ways of categorizing autism severity based solely on language delay or intellectual disability, noting that these features don't necessarily indicate the true nature of a person's autism.
Baron-Cohen presents his empathy-systemizing framework, explaining that autistic individuals often display stronger systemizing abilities compared to empathizing skills. He notes that while population-level differences exist between men and women in these areas (with women typically scoring higher in empathy and men in systemizing), these trends shouldn't be used to make assumptions about individuals. The framework helps explain behavioral differences beyond traditional gender stereotypes.
Baron-Cohen discusses how the detail-oriented nature and pattern recognition abilities often seen in autistic individuals can lead to significant achievements in engineering and invention. He explains that the human capacity for complex tool building and innovation is driven by "if-then" logic, a type of systemizing that's particularly strong in some autistic individuals. Using Temple Grandin as an example, he illustrates how exceptional attention to detail can lead to unique insights and innovations.
Baron-Cohen examines the relationship between empathy and cruel behavior, distinguishing between cognitive empathy (understanding others' thoughts) and affective empathy (emotional response to others' pain). He notes that psychopaths often possess strong cognitive empathy but reduced affective empathy, while autistic individuals may show the opposite pattern. Together with Peterson, they explore how factors beyond empathy, such as power dynamics and status-seeking behavior, can drive cruelty, and how political rhetoric can erode empathy at a societal level.
1-Page Summary
Autism is a multifaceted condition that impacts individuals in numerous ways. Simon Baron-Cohen and Jordan Peterson discuss the complexity, highlighting the importance of understanding its diverse nature rather than oversimplifying it.
Autism encompasses a spectrum of differences and challenges in social relationships, communication, and adaptability to change. Baron-Cohen emphasizes that autism is not a monolithic disorder; rather, it involves many dimensions and factors. He points out that autism can affect understanding others' intentions, coping with environmental changes, and finding comfort in predictable domains.
Communication can be notably impacted in autism, with delays observed in the ability to produce joint or shared attention gestures, such as pointing, which impacts establishing a topic of conversation. Autistic individuals may also have difficulties in reading body language, facial expressions, and tone of voice due to variances in cognitive empathy or theory of mind. Additionally, coping with unexpected changes at a sensory level or within the environment can cause significant distress.
Baron-Cohen challenges the idea of categorizing autism into "severe" and "not severe" based solely on language delay or intellectual disability. He argues that these features do not necessarily correspond to the true nature or severity of a person’s autism. To illustrate this, he shares the story of an autistic individual who faced language and literacy delays but ultimately became a university professor, indicating that language delay does not always correlate with intellectual incapability.
Discussing the term "lack of theory of mind," Baron-Cohen explains that it involves varying degrees of difficulty with theory of mind rather than a total absence. He points out that autistic individuals can ...
The Conceptualization and Core Features of Autism
Simon Baron-Cohen explores the empathy-systemizing framework's relationship to autism, gender differences, and individual behavior.
A cognitive style emblematic of many individuals with autism prioritizes understanding of systems and patterns over engaging with social cues, suggests Baron-Cohen.
Autistic individuals, according to Baron-Cohen, may systemize persistently, displaying a fascination with how things work. These individuals might expend considerable effort in comprehending the components of a system or envision ways to alter existing systems to create new ones. Autism, he explains, often involves challenges in understanding others' beliefs, which is related to the concept of theory of mind—a field where Baron-Cohen has previously worked. Autistic individuals may have difficulty with non-literal communication but excel in activities involving systematic and pattern-based thinking. Jacob Jordan Peterson references Temple Grandin as an example of an autistic individual focusing on concrete examples rather than abstract generalizations, a pattern also observed by Baron-Cohen.
Research has shown that women often score higher in empathy, while men show an advantage in systemizing, according to Baron-Cohen.
Baron-Cohen clarifies that these trends seen in studies—such as the EYES test where women infer feelings more accurately, or mechanical reasoning tests where men perform better—are averages among populations, not rules for individuals. He emphasizes that while general tendencies in sex differences exist, they should not influence assumptions about what jobs or roles individuals of any gender should pursue. The trends are indicative of brain type preferences, not gender itself, and there can be significant overlap a ...
Empathy-Systemizing Framework: Links to Autism, Sex Differences, and Behavior
Simon Baron-Cohen's research illuminates the connection between systemizing cognitive styles, seen often in autistic individuals, and human invention. He discusses how detail orientation and pattern recognition can lead to breakthroughs in engineering, music, and beyond.
Baron-Cohen's work suggests autistic individuals often have an innate advantage in understanding systems and pattern recognition. This focus on detail enables them to decipher the underlying rules that govern systems, such as an iPhone's operating system or the mechanics inside a toaster. Autistic children, for instance, might spend hours building complex Lego structures or deconstructing household objects to understand their operation, thus exhibiting mechanical reasoning—an early indication of potential abilities in systemizing or engineering.
Such detailed focus, while it may result in losing some information at a general level, is often a trade-off for being particularly attentive to variations in those details, which is advantageous in specific tasks and environments. Baron-Cohen acknowledges that girls with Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia (CAH) display a heightened interest in systems, which correlates with more autistic traits and fundamentally ties to abilities in detail orientation and pattern recognition.
Baron-Cohen discusses the human capacity for generative invention, distinguishing the simple tool use seen in other species from the complex and generative invention process of human beings, which relies heavily on "if-then" logic. This logic, he argues, can be traced back to the invention of complex tools such as the bow and arrow approximately 70,000 years ago. Such innovation requires understanding the properties of the materials involved and the logic of their potential combinations to achieve desired outcomes.
Highlighting an example, Baron-Cohen notes an ...
Links Between Systemizing, Tool Use, and Human Invention
Simon Baron-Cohen elaborates on the complex interplay between empathy, or the lack thereof, and the inclination toward callousness, cruelty, and malevolence.
Baron-Cohen depicts two-year-olds' natural inclination to alleviate another's suffering, demonstrating innate empathetic responses that counteract malevolence and cruelty. He distinguishes between cognitive empathy, the ability to understand another’s thoughts and feelings, and affective empathy, the emotional response to another's pain.
Psychopaths might possess strong cognitive empathy, allowing them to comprehend others' feelings, but significantly reduced affective empathy, which leads to a lack of concern for others' well-being. This is evidenced by psychopaths' ability to deceive others for their own gain without moral regard. Conversely, autistic individuals may demonstrate the opposite profile: good affective empathy but struggles with cognitive empathy.
Jordan Peterson and Simon Baron-Cohen discuss how a mere absence of empathy might not fully account for instances of positive cruelty; knowing someone's emotional state doesn't necessarily result in compassionate responses. They introduce the concept of “schadenfreude,” or taking pleasure in another’s misfortune, and discuss how factors like the competition for status or attention, and the feeling of elevation with higher status or more power, can drive behavior beyond empathy itself. Peterson notes that power as an adaptive strategy can lead to choosing domination over reciprocity and cooperation, and in some instances, individuals may maintain a cruel disposition due to a fixation on self-centered goals.
Psychopathy and antisocial behavior could be viewed as a form of delayed emotional maturation, where individuals continue self-centered and aggressive be ...
Role of Empathy in Malevolence and Cruelty
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser