Podcasts > The Joe Rogan Experience > #2396 - Andrew Schulz

#2396 - Andrew Schulz

By Joe Rogan

In this episode of The Joe Rogan Experience, Joe Rogan and Andrew Schulz examine how the comedy industry has evolved and the challenges facing today's comedians. They discuss how young performers must navigate a fragmented media landscape while developing their own style, and explore how social media affects public figures' ability to handle controversy and backlash.

The conversation also covers unexplained phenomena and historical mysteries. Rogan and Schulz discuss various claims about UFOs, examine ancient historical texts, and consider recent archaeological findings that challenge current understandings of human history. They address how some previously dismissed theories have gained credibility through new evidence, while noting humans' natural attraction to mysterious narratives.

#2396 - Andrew Schulz

This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Oct 18, 2025 episode of the The Joe Rogan Experience

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.

#2396 - Andrew Schulz

1-Page Summary

State of Comedy Industry and Challenges For Comedians

In a discussion between Joe Rogan and Andrew Schulz, they explore the evolving landscape of the comedy industry. Schulz notes that while previous generations had clear paths to success through HBO specials or podcast appearances, today's young comedians face a more fragmented media landscape with less defined routes to building their careers. According to Schulz, it typically takes about 10 years for comedians to find their voice, and many new performers struggle with originality, often imitating successful comics like Dave Chappelle.

The conversation reveals a generational tension in comedy, with Rogan criticizing veteran comedians like Marc Maron for attacking younger performers out of what he perceives as jealousy over losing relevance. Rogan advocates for established comedians to show more compassion toward their younger colleagues.

Controversies, Backlash, and Social Media's Impact

Rogan and Schulz discuss how social media and the internet have transformed the way public figures navigate controversy. They note that supporting controversial comedians today can trigger organized campaigns against them, unlike in past decades. The hosts explain how comedians' statements are often taken out of context through misleading TikTok clips and manipulated content.

Veteran comedians like Tony Hinchcliffe and Chris Rock have shown resilience in facing controversies, benefiting from established platforms and support systems. However, Schulz emphasizes that younger, less established comics are more vulnerable to career derailment from online backlash, highlighting the importance of having a strong support network.

Fringe Theories, Unexplained Phenomena, and Human Nature

The conversation shifts to exploring various mysterious phenomena, with Rogan and Schulz discussing figures like Bob Lazar and his claims about UFOs and secret government programs. They note how some previously dismissed "fringe" beliefs have gained credibility through emerging evidence.

The hosts delve into discussions about ancient history, including biblical texts like the Book of Enoch and historical accounts by Herodotus. Rogan suggests the possibility of alien influence on human evolution, while both hosts acknowledge the human tendency to be drawn to mysterious stories despite limited evidence. They discuss recent archaeological findings that challenge current understanding of human history, demonstrating the ongoing evolution of our historical knowledge.

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Joe Rogan is a stand-up comedian, podcast host, and UFC commentator known for his candid interviews and diverse range of guests. He rose to fame through his podcast, "The Joe Rogan Experience," which became one of the most popular podcasts globally. Andrew Schulz is a comedian, actor, and podcaster who gained recognition for his stand-up specials and viral content on social media platforms like YouTube and Instagram. Schulz is known for his independent approach to comedy and for challenging traditional industry norms.
  • Bob Lazar is known for claiming to have worked on reverse-engineering alien spacecraft at Area 51's S-4 facility in the late 1980s. His assertions about studying advanced propulsion systems and alleged encounters with extraterrestrial technology have sparked both intrigue and skepticism in the UFO community. Lazar's story gained attention through interviews and documentaries, contributing to ongoing debates about government secrecy, UFOs, and the potential existence of advanced extraterrestrial civilizations.
  • The Book of Enoch is an ancient Jewish religious work attributed to Enoch, a figure from the Hebrew Bible. It is not considered canonical by most branches of Judaism or Christianity. The text contains apocalyptic themes, visions of heaven and hell, and discussions on angels and the end times. The Book of Enoch is significant for its influence on early Jewish and Christian thought, particularly in understanding angelology and eschatology.
  • The comedy industry's media landscape has shifted, making it harder for new comedians to follow traditional paths to success. Young comedians face challenges in finding their unique voice and navigating a fragmented industry with less clear career trajectories. Established platforms like HBO specials are no longer the sole route to recognition, with social media and podcasts playing significant roles in shaping comedians' careers. This shift has led to a more competitive and diverse environment for comedians to establish themselves and reach audiences.
  • Generational tension in comedy arises from differing perspectives and approaches between veteran comedians and newer performers. Established comedians may feel threatened by the rising talent and changing landscape, leading to criticism or resistance towards the emerging generation. Younger comedians, on the other hand, may perceive the older generation as out of touch or resistant to change, creating a dynamic of competition and sometimes conflict within the industry. This tension can stem from issues like evolving comedic styles, changing audience preferences, and the impact of new technologies on the craft of comedy.
  • Social media has changed how comedians deal with controversies by amplifying public scrutiny and enabling organized backlash. Comedians' statements can be easily taken out of context through platforms like TikTok, leading to swift and widespread criticism. Established comedians may have more support to weather controversies, while newer comedians without strong networks can face significant career challenges from online backlash. The speed and reach of social media make it crucial for comedians to navigate controversies carefully to protect their careers and reputations.

Counterarguments

  • While it's true that the media landscape is fragmented, this also means there are more opportunities for exposure through various platforms like YouTube, TikTok, and Instagram, which can be leveraged for success in ways not possible before.
  • The 10-year timeline to find one's voice in comedy is not a hard rule; some comedians may achieve this faster with the right combination of talent, work ethic, and opportunity.
  • Imitation in comedy, while not ideal, can be a phase of learning and development; many artists start by emulating their idols before developing their unique style.
  • Generational tension might not always stem from jealousy; it could also arise from differing values, perspectives on comedy, or resistance to change in the industry.
  • Compassion from established comedians is important, but so is constructive criticism that can help new comedians grow and improve their craft.
  • Social media has indeed changed the landscape of public discourse, but it also provides a platform for comedians to directly engage with their audience and build a following without traditional gatekeepers.
  • The organized backlash against controversial comedians can sometimes lead to a Streisand effect, inadvertently increasing a comedian's popularity or exposure.
  • While statements can be taken out of context, this also challenges comedians to be more precise and thoughtful in their expression, potentially leading to higher quality content.
  • Established support systems are beneficial, but they can also create echo chambers that reinforce controversial or offensive material without critical feedback.
  • Vulnerability to online backlash is not limited to younger comedians; established comedians can also face significant career impacts if the public sentiment turns against them.
  • The credibility of fringe theories should be carefully evaluated; emerging evidence should be scrutinized by the scientific community before being accepted as credible.
  • Interest in mysterious phenomena should not overshadow the importance of critical thinking and evidence-based conclusions.
  • Speculation about alien influence on human evolution is a fascinating topic, but it remains speculative without concrete evidence.
  • While human nature is drawn to mysterious stories, there is also a growing interest in skepticism and the demand for empirical evidence before accepting extraordinary claims.
  • Archaeological findings that challenge current understanding are important, but they must be peer-reviewed and replicated before they can lead to a paradigm shift in our historical knowledge.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
#2396 - Andrew Schulz

State of Comedy Industry and Challenges For Comedians

The comedy industry is going through a period of uncertainty, especially for young comics trying to forge their careers amidst rapidly changing trends and mediums.

Young Comics Uncertain About Successful Careers

Andrew Schulz and Joe Rogan discuss the uncertainty young comedians face in the current comedy economy. They reflect on the natural funniness of individuals who choose not to pursue comedy, highlighting the personal choices and uncertainties that can affect a comedic career. Schulz advises young comics that it typically takes about 10 years to find one's comedy voice and suggests that they reflect on how they are humorous among friends.

Rogan and Schulz observe that new comedians often emulate successful ones, like Dave Chappelle, leading to imitation rather than innovation in style. Discussing the changing industry, Schulz mentions a previously clear path to success, such as obtaining an HBO special or appearing on the Joe Rogan podcast, which granted a substantial boost to the comedian's popularity. However, the current landscape is less defined, with many platforms and YouTube specials contributing to a sense of uncertainty about how to become popular.

Older Comedians Found Success Through HBO Specials, Joe Rogan's Podcast, etc.; Today's Industry Landscape Is Less Defined

Schulz notes how older comedians like Joe Rogan found success through clear avenues such as HBO specials or podcast appearances. However, the path to mainstream success has become then less straightforward, as reflected in the vast array of platforms available today.

Young Comedians Struggle to Gain Popularity in Fragmented Media

There's a recognition that young comedians are struggling to gain popularity in a fragmented media landscape. As the ways to become known and successful have multiplied, young comics may feel overwhelmed by the choices and the lack of a clear direction to success.

Comedians May Alienate Younger Comics By Criticizing the Current Scene

Joe Rogan criticizes veteran comedians like Marc Maron for attacking younger comedians out of what he perceives as jealousy for their success. Rogan suggests that older comedians should demonstrate compassion ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

State of Comedy Industry and Challenges For Comedians

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • The uncertainty in the comedy industry for young comics stems from rapidly changing trends and mediums, making it challenging for them to establish successful careers. Factors like the evolving landscape of platforms and the lack of clear paths to mainstream success contribute to this uncertainty. Young comedians may feel overwhelmed by the multitude of choices available to gain popularity and the absence of a defined route to success. This uncertainty can lead to challenges in finding one's comedic voice and standing out in a competitive industry.
  • Finding one's comedy voice typically takes around 10 years in the comedy industry. This process involves developing a unique style, perspective, and delivery that sets a comedian apart. It requires years of practice, experimentation, and honing one's craft to truly establish a distinct comedic identity. This journey is essential for comedians to resonate with audiences and stand out in a competitive field.
  • Imitation of successful comedians can hinder innovation in the comedy industry by discouraging originality and creativity among emerging talents. When new comedians closely mimic established figures like Dave Chappelle, it can lead to a lack of fresh perspectives and unique comedic styles. This trend may limit the growth of the comedy landscape by perpetuating familiar tropes and routines instead of fostering new and groundbreaking approaches. Encouraging young comics to find their authentic voice and comedic style can help break away from imitation and drive innovation within the industry.
  • In the current comedy industry landscape, there is no longer a straightforward or universally recognized path to success for comedians. Traditional routes to fame, like securing an HBO special or appearing on specific platforms, have been supplemented by a multitude of new avenues, such as social media and YouTube, leading to a more fragmented and uncertain journey for aspiring comedians. This shift has created a challenging environment where emerging comics must navigate a diverse range of platforms and mediums to establish their careers, without a clear blueprint for achieving widespread recognition. The evolving nature of the industry means that success now often depends on adaptability, creativity, and strategic use of the various available platforms and opportunities.
  • In a fragmented media environment, young comedians struggle to stand out due to the multitude of platforms available for content consumption. This abundance of options can lead to difficulty in gaining visibility and building a dedicated audience. The traditional paths to success, like securing an HBO special or appearing on popular podcasts, are no longer the sole avenues for recognition, adding to the challenge of navigating the industry. As a result, emerging comedians may find it challenging to determine the most ...

Counterarguments

  • While it may take some comedians about 10 years to find their comedic voice, others may achieve this in a shorter time frame due to a variety of factors such as natural talent, intensive practice, or unique experiences that shape their perspective more quickly.
  • Imitation in comedy, especially for new comedians, can be a phase of learning and development rather than a hindrance to innovation; many artists start by emulating their idols before developing their own style.
  • The undefined industry landscape today could be seen as an opportunity for creativity and diversification, allowing comedians to carve out unique niches and build personal brands in ways that were not possible before.
  • The fragmented media landscape might actually benefit young comedians by providing more platforms to showcase their talent, thus increasing the chances of being discovered by a wider audience.
  • Veteran comedians' criticisms of ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
#2396 - Andrew Schulz

Controversies, Backlash, and Social Media's Impact on Public Figures

Joe Rogan and Andrew Schulz delve into the modern challenges faced by comedians and public figures in light of the Internet and social media age, discussing how these platforms impact reputations and careers.

Internet and Social Media Amplify Outrage Around Public Figures

Rogan and Schulz discuss the contemporary climate of outrage, noting that individuals often distance themselves from others amidst online heat to protect their interests. They comment on the cultural shift from past decades, where figures like Andrew Dice Clay could be supported without fearing backlash. Now, supporting a controversial comedian could trigger an organized campaign against them.

Comedians' Past Statements Are Often Misused to Vilify Through Misleading Clips

They criticize journalists and others who spread misinformation based on misinterpreted 30-second TikTok clips. Rogan addresses how videos that falsely claimed he was "ripping on his guests" manipulate content to generate clicks, exemplifying how comedians' past statements can be taken out of context.

Public Figures Face Online Scrutiny For Minor Missteps, Making Them Cautious About Honesty

The hosts discuss the phenomenon of being labeled by people based on simplified internet caricatures, like "manosphere" or "podcast bros," emphasizing how social media amplifies minor mistakes and creates outrage. This generates an environment where public figures may become more guarded and less honest to avoid backlash.

Veteran Comedians Endure Controversy; Younger Comics Face Pitfalls

Veteran Comics Like Tony Hinchcliffe

Rogan suggests that veteran comedians understand the unfairness of being attacked, contrasting their experiences with those of young comedians pressured to join public criticism. He reflects on the resilie ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Controversies, Backlash, and Social Media's Impact on Public Figures

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Andrew Dice Clay is an American stand-up comedian and actor known for his brash and offensive persona in the late 1980s. He achieved significant success in his career, including being the first comedian to sell out Madison Square Garden for two consecutive nights in 1990. Clay has appeared in various films and TV shows, showcasing his talent beyond stand-up comedy.
  • The "manosphere" is an online subculture consisting of various websites, forums, and social media platforms where discussions around masculinity, men's rights, and anti-feminism take place. "Podcast bros" typically refers to a stereotype of men who host or frequent podcasts that cover topics like comedy, pop culture, and current events, often characterized by a casual and conversational style. These terms are used to categorize and label individuals based on perceived attitudes, behaviors, or affiliations within online and media spaces. The labels can sometimes oversimplify complex identities or viewpoints, leading to misunderstandings or misrepresentations.
  • Tony Hinchcliffe is an American comedian known for his roast comedy style and hosting the podcast Kill Tony. He has faced controversies for using offensive language during his performances, leading to backlash and professional repercussions. Hinchcliffe's career has been marked by a mix of success in the comedy industry and challenges due to his provocative humor.
  • Chris Rock is an American comedian, actor, and filmmaker known for his stand-up comedy routines that touch on various social issues. He has received numerous awards for his work in comedy, television, and film. Rock gained fame as a cast member on Saturday Night Live in the early 1990s and has been recognized as one of the greatest stand-up ...

Counterarguments

  • Social media also provides a platform for marginalized voices to call out genuinely harmful behavior, which can lead to positive social change.
  • Some public figures may use the narrative of being unfairly targeted to deflect from legitimate criticism of their words or actions.
  • The amplification of outrage on social media can sometimes lead to greater accountability and ethical behavior among public figures.
  • The concept of "cancel culture" is often more complex, with some arguing that it is a form of social consequence rather than unjust persecution.
  • Veteran comedians may also adapt to changing social norms and use their experience to navigate controversies more skillfully, rather than simply enduring them.
  • Young comedians have access to social media as a tool to build their own platforms and engage directly with their audience, which can offer resilience against backlash.
  • Public figures can use social media to clarify misunderstandings or apologize for missteps, potentially mitigating backlash and fostering a more forgiving public discourse.
  • The pressure to join public criticism can sometimes stem from a genuine desire for social justice and accountability, rather than ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
#2396 - Andrew Schulz

Fringe Theories, Unexplained Phenomena, and Human Nature

In discussions surrounding fringe theories, Joe Rogan and Andrew Schulz delve into the realm of unexplained phenomena and human nature, revealing deep-seated human tendencies toward curiosity and gullibility.

Interest and Debate On Ufos, Ancient Civilizations, and Conspiracy Theories

Joe Rogan and Andrew Schulz discuss a range of topics from UFOs to ancient history, reflecting the human fascination with mysterious stories.

Figures Like Bob Lazar, Claiming Insider Ufo and Secret Government Program Knowledge, Generate Fascination and Skepticism

Bob Lazar is mentioned as a controversial figure due to his claims of having insider knowledge about UFOs and secret government programs. Rogan speaks of an encounter with Lazar, noting his shell-shocked demeanor, while Schulz expresses a belief in Lazar’s sincerity. In Lazar's narratives, defense contractors are accused of accessing information about UFOs and lying to Congress, adding a layer of conspiracy to the debate.

Rogan comments on how individuals previously deemed as "kooks" for believing in UFOs gained some corroboration through emerging footage, linking public skepticism with the validation of fringe beliefs. The mention of other countries influencing entertainment via bots, made during Rogan's interview with Palmer Lucky, resonates with discussions about fringe theories explored by podcasters.

Podcasters and Commentators Explore Fringe Theories, Though Often Questioned

Rogan and Schulz's exploration extends to ancient history and its embellishment over time. They discuss the fascination with historical accounts like the Bible, ancient texts like the Book of Enoch, and historical documentation by Herodotus, which contain elements of giants, watchers, and other supernatural phenomena.

The hosts ponder the canonical status of texts, questioning the exclusion of the Book of Enoch from the Bible. They speculate about alternate human history narratives involving the Nephilim and different types of humans, with Rogan suggesting that aliens might have influenced human evolution.

Discussions Reveal Human Tendencies Towards Curiosity and Gullibility

The conversation often circles back to human tendencies like fabrication, embellishment, and the attraction to the sensational. Rogan and Schulz advise caution and skepticism, relating to the concept of "outrage farming" and the spread of manipulative content.

Attracted To Mysterious Stories Despite Weak Evidence

The hosts show a pronounced attraction to mysterious stories, like that of the Nephilim, despite weak evidence or mainstream exclusion. They reflect on human history filled with unknowns, mentioning new ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Fringe Theories, Unexplained Phenomena, and Human Nature

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • Skepticism towards Bob Lazar's claims is warranted due to a lack of corroborating evidence and inconsistencies in his story.
  • The validation of fringe beliefs through emerging footage does not necessarily confirm the phenomena; it could also be due to misinterpretation or lack of context for the footage.
  • The influence of other countries through bots in entertainment and discourse could be overstated and might not have a significant impact on the popularity or belief in fringe theories.
  • The exploration of fringe theories by podcasters can sometimes perpetuate misinformation if not approached with critical thinking and fact-checking.
  • The fascination with ancient texts and their supernatural elements may reflect a cultural or psychological interest rather than historical accuracy.
  • Speculations about alternate human history and alien influence on human evolution often lack empirical support and can detract from scientific understandings of human development.
  • Attraction to mysterious stories despite weak evidence can lead to the spread of pseudoscience and diminish public understanding of scientific methodology.
  • The idea that new findings always challenge current understanding can be misleading; often, they contribute to a more nuanced view rather than a complete overhaul of accepted knowledge.
  • A tribal mentality may not always lead to the rejection of outsiders or alternative theories; in some cases, it can foster a sense of community and shared learning.
  • Skepticism from Egyptologists and other experts regardi ...

Actionables

  • You can enhance critical thinking by starting a "Skeptic's Journal" where you document and analyze claims of unexplained phenomena you come across in media or conversation, noting down initial impressions, potential biases, and after some research, a reasoned perspective on the validity of the claim.
    • This practice encourages you to not take information at face value and to develop a habit of questioning and researching before forming an opinion. For example, if you read a sensational article about a new archaeological discovery, instead of immediately believing or dismissing it, you would investigate the sources, check for peer-reviewed research, and then write down your findings and final thoughts.
  • You can cultivate a balanced view on historical narratives by organizing a book club focused on contrasting historical accounts, where each month members read two books on the same historical event or figure, one mainstream and one alternative perspective.
    • This activity promotes understanding of different viewpoints and the realization that history can be interpreted in various ways. For instance, one month the club could read a traditional account of the construction of the pyramids and pair it with a book proposing an alternative theory, followed by a group discussion on the merits and evidence of each.
  • You can d ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free

Create Summaries for anything on the web

Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser

Shortform Extension CTA