In this episode of The Game w/ Alex Hormozi, eight entrepreneurs compete for a $100,000 investment by implementing growth strategies under Hormozi's guidance. Over 90 days, contestants applied tactical changes across pricing, sales processes, hiring, marketing channels, and automation—with participating businesses achieving an average 2.4x revenue increase and over $1 million in total gains.
The episode explores how focused execution on the right strategies drives rapid growth, regardless of industry. Hormozi and his team of advisors evaluate contestants through multiple elimination rounds, assessing not just revenue growth but also strategic adherence, technical proficiency, scalability, unit economics, and founder coachability. The competition demonstrates how compressed, committed execution can achieve transformative results and reveals what investors prioritize when evaluating business potential and founder capability.

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
Alex Hormozi and a group of business advisors discuss tactical improvements that drove explosive growth across various companies, demonstrating how pricing, structural changes, targeted marketing, and automation drive revenue and scalable expansion.
Tina Su doubled her annual run rate from $918,000 to $1.84 million in 90 days by raising her package price to $2,500, switching to a 6-month billing cycle, and repositioning upsells to occur three months in. Kaleb Mitchell scaled from $370,000 to $2 million by making repairs his primary service, raising average tickets from $2,500 to $5,000, and introducing speed upsells. Joey Goone's cost-basis quote generator with prepay discounts raised his average contract from $44,000 to $200,000, achieving a 48% close rate despite nearly quintupling prices.
Tina Su condensed her webinar from three hours to 45 minutes, skyrocketing enrollments from 75 to 232 in 13 weeks. Joey Goone restructured his sales team to focus on setting appointments while he handled closing, and Kaleb Mitchell adopted Hormozi's four-step menu close script to build trust and attract experienced salespeople.
Hasee Nazir hired two dental associates, allowing his father to shift from direct patient care to coaching, though full benefits await completion of their year-long implant cycle. Kaleb Mitchell hired experienced technicians and salespeople, freeing himself to focus on scaling door-to-door teams. Tina Su built an AI dashboard that automated client inquiries, eliminating herself as a bottleneck.
Following Hormozi's recommendation, Joey Goone invested $15,000 in an event booth and quickly closed $670,000 in business—a nearly 200x return. Zyad Asi pivoted to leveraging patient relationships and hosting country club events, generating word-of-mouth inquiries with minimal acquisition cost and increasing his run rate from $4 million to $4.5 million. Nas Elakkad introduced flat-rate pricing with a VIP tier, closed a $15,000 move, and scaled from a $360,000 to $1.03 million run rate.
Tina Su developed nine automation tools to scale delivery without added personal time investment. Hasee Nazir shifted to upfront payment collection, improving his cash collection ratio from 2.5:1 to 1.11:1. Kaleb Mitchell built replicable systems and scripts for door-to-door sales, enabling seamless training and independent operation.
A 90-day period of focused execution led contestants to achieve transformative growth, with participating businesses seeing an average 2.4x revenue increase and over $1 million in total gains.
Hormozi highlights that compressed, all-in execution on the right strategy delivers outsized financial impact regardless of industry. Hasee Nazir grew from $1.73 million to a $4 million run rate, Kaleb Mitchell reached $2 million in just six weeks, and Tina Su, Joey Goone, and Mim Jenkinson all doubled their revenue within 90 days.
Top performers executed all suggested tactics completely. Tina Su hosted 13 weekly webinars and tripled her results by implementing everything on the roadmap. Joey Goone instituted pricing formulas, sales team restructuring, and B2B events, surging toward a $4.1 million run rate. Even Mim Jenkinson, who executed everything on the list, was eliminated for slightly less growth than top contestants.
Tina Su overcame her fear of being seen as "greedy" by accepting that earning enables greater impact. Kaleb Mitchell learned to trust employees to perform well without direct oversight, releasing the belief that "they can't do it the same way I do." Hasee Nazir secured $70,000 upfront from dental patients, disproving family-held limiting beliefs.
Joey Goone worked 16-hour days for 90 days, making significant short-term sacrifices. Leila Hormozi highlights that a dedicated 90-day push is far preferable to years of slower progress, allowing entrepreneurs to seize results quickly and return to balanced life. The 90-day sprint acts as a proving ground to demonstrate new strategies and build momentum.
The judges stress that revenue growth alone isn't enough—strategic adherence, technical proficiency, unit economics, scalability, and founder coachability are all essential for investment and sustainable growth.
Paul Fontanelli generated over 3,700 leads and reached a $4.8 million run rate, but struggled with conversion and cash flow, ultimately investing his 401k just to keep operations afloat. Despite improved metrics, his run rate dipped to $4 million, leading to elimination. Mim Jenkinson achieved nearly $800,000 in annualized growth but was eliminated for having the lowest growth among remaining competitors. Hormozi emphasizes that the fastest path to $10 million differs from the path to $100 million, and sustainable growth rooted in fundamentals is vital.
Hormozi praises Tina Su for leveraging her affiliate marketing background to rapidly develop effective tools. Hasee Nazir's adoption of Video Sales Letters and publishing 100 pieces of content daily demonstrates his facility for executing ambitious marketing at scale. Kaleb Mitchell's implementation of menu scripts shows he can absorb feedback and refine his process—qualities that directly impact scalability.
Hormozi singles out Joey Goone's strong LTV to CAC ratio, though questions linger over scalability. Sharran Srivatsaa votes for Tina Su over Joey, reasoning that event planning lacks the online scalability of Tina's model. Despite Joey's excellent execution, Leila Hormozi notes his business is "mid compared to other opportunities" they've considered, stressing the necessity for scalable models.
Hormozi points out that Joey Goone's business suffers from unsatisfactory cash flow and thin margins despite impressive execution. Paul Fontanelli's cash flow issues were so severe he depleted his retirement savings. The judges emphasize that proof of growth, profitability, and defensibility are intertwined imperatives for investment.
Kaleb Mitchell is praised for acknowledging his delegation struggle, showing real growth. Hasee Nazir is receptive to advice around using VSLs. Tina Su stands out as "incredibly coachable," signaling strong potential to execute and scale. The judges' evaluation framework balances revenue growth with strategic fundamentals, technical proficiency, scalability, robust unit economics, and founder qualities.
The competition uses a multi-round elimination format to test entrepreneurial capabilities, with each round revealing strengths and weaknesses that predict long-term success.
Round one tested revenue growth, eliminating Paul Fontanelli for minimal growth despite high capital. Round two tested roadmap adherence and implementation, eliminating Kaleb Mitchell and retaining Hasee Nazir and Tina Su as finalists. Round three evaluated the founder's pitch, assessing communication, self-awareness, and understanding of investor priorities.
During final pitches, Hormozi critiqued both Tina Su and Joey Goone for neglecting investor priorities such as profitability, margins, defensibility, and value proposition. Hormozi stressed the importance of reverse engineering pitches from what investors want: rapid growth, high profits, and strong competitive defenses. Despite Tina Su's scalable online model, Hormozi chose Joey Goone, highlighting his recurring revenue ($4 million already booked), resilience during COVID, and high commitment. The judges prioritized business model fundamentals, founder commitment, execution record, and concrete financials over any single metric.
Hormozi's "scaling roadmap" helped six contestants achieve 2.4x average revenue growth, with some adding over a million dollars in revenue in 90 days. Leila Hormozi emphasized the direct correlation between a founder's conviction in their plan and their results. The competition demonstrated that with the right strategy, unwavering commitment, and massive action, entrepreneurs can "change your stars" quickly—compressing years of typical growth into 90 days.
1-Page Summary
A group of business owners and advisors, led by Alex Hormozi, discusses the tactical improvements that catalyzed explosive growth across various companies. Their insights demonstrate how pricing, structural changes, targeted marketing, and workflow automation drive revenue, unlock leadership potential, and support scalable expansion.
Tina Su’s run rate soared from $918,000 to $1.84 million in just 90 days following strategic changes. She discontinued lower-priced offerings (such as the $150 one-on-one sessions), consolidated her flagship package to $2,500, switched from a 12-month to a 6-month billing cycle, and repositioned upsells to occur three months in—rather than at the end of the contract. These moves rapidly doubled her revenue.
Kaleb Mitchell’s business previously hovered at $370,000, but rose to $2 million after making repairs, rather than replacements, the primary service. He raised average ticket prices from $2,500 to $5,000 and introduced a speed upsell. Hiring a specialist technician accelerated job completion and fueled volume growth.
Joey Goone developed a cost-basis quote generator with prepay and multi-event discounts, which, when paired with a price lock guarantee, raised his company’s average contract price from $44,000 to $200,000. The implementation of multi-year contracts and this pricing tool yielded a 48% close rate, up from 44%, all while raising prices nearly fivefold.
After condensing her webinar pitch from three hours to a tight 45-minute session, Tina Su’s enrollments skyrocketed from 75 to 232 across 13 weeks. Clear separation of teaching versus selling and relentless execution played key roles.
Joey Goone restructured his sales operation so team members primarily set appointments. Since Goone closed deals more effectively than his team, the sales pipeline shifted to have others book meetings, freeing him up to focus solely on high-leverage closing.
Alex Hormozi’s four-step menu close script, adopted by Kaleb Mitchell, became a cornerstone for building trust and clarity. Kaleb’s authentic recommendations moved customers to eagerly purchase, while the system’s transparency attracted seasoned sales professionals.
Hasee Nazir’s business was previously capped by his father being the sole dentist across three practices. Hiring two highly qualified dental associates allowed his father to move from direct patient care to coaching incoming dentists. However, full revenue and operational benefits will take time, as their implant cycle lasts a year.
By hiring skilled technicians and salespeople—including those with over a million in prior production—Kaleb freed himself from technical bottlenecks and focused on scaling door-to-door sales teams. The company’s mature, dedicated work culture proved a magnet for high-caliber recruits.
Tina Su automated routine question handling by building an AI dashboard and supplementary tools that removed her as a bottleneck. Now, her business operates independently from hands-on leadership in daily client communications.
After following Alex Hormozi’s recommendation to experiment with acquisition channels, Joey Goone invested $15,000 in an event booth, quickly closing $670,000 in business for a nearly 200x return. His team continues to benefit, sometimes closing six-figure deals in ...
Business Growth Strategies and Tactical Implementation
A 90-day period of focused execution and unwavering commitment has led contestants to achieve transformative revenue growth, breakthrough mindsets, and lasting business momentum.
Alex Hormozi highlights that participating businesses saw, on average, a 2.4x increase in revenue within just 90 days, with total gains exceeding $1 million in absolute revenue and over $500,000 in profit. These results demonstrate that compressed, all-in execution on the right strategy delivers outsized financial impact, regardless of industry.
Hasee Nazir shares, "In the past 90 days, we have grown more than he [my father] has in the past 30 years." Specifically, his business revenue climbed from $1.73 million to a $4 million run rate, proving the power of focusing on execution over a short duration.
Kaleb Mitchell's business soared from $370,000 to a $2 million run rate in just six weeks by implementing the roadmap’s strategies. His accelerated growth exemplifies what is possible with decisive action.
Tina Su, Joey Goone, and Mim Jenkinson all doubled their revenue within 90 days, underscoring that the strategic principles and tactical roadmaps can drive exponential outcomes across varied sectors.
Consistent across top performers is the full execution of all suggested tactics and strategies.
Tina Su says, "I did everything. I executed everything." She hosted 13 weekly webinars and increased enrollments from 75 to 232—more than tripling her results and reflecting the direct relationship between full implementation and rapid expansion.
Joey Goone adhered strictly to all advised actions, instituting changes such as pricing formulas for consistent margin, realigning his sales team's focus, and investing in B2B events. A single event sponsorship led to $670,000 in closed business, with total business surging toward a $4.1 million run rate—nearly tripling required targets.
Mim Jenkinson also executed every item on the action list and saw impressive revenue growth; however, her growth narrowly trailed that of the top contestants, illustrating how even small differences in outcomes can be significant at the highest levels.
Success stories all feature profound mindset changes, particularly in attitudes toward earning, delegation, and leadership.
Tina Su openly faced and overcame her fear of being seen as “greedy” by internalizing the principle that increased earnings fuel greater impact and service. This shift empowered her to sell assertively and scale confidently.
Kaleb Mitchell describes his most difficult but crucial challenge as learning to let go of the belief that team members "can’t do it the same way I do." By trusting his people to execute well, he stepped fully into the role of ...
Rapid Results Through Execution and Commitment
Evaluating the long-term success of businesses requires more than just impressive revenue growth. The judges stress that adherence to strategy, technical proficiency, unit economics, scalability, business fundamentals, and founder coachability are all essential criteria for investment and sustainable growth.
Paul Fontanelli of Boulder Adventure Park embodies the challenge of converting strong lead generation into meaningful business growth. Despite implementing a major campaign that generated over 3,700 leads and reaching a $4.8 million run rate, Paul’s company struggled with conversion and cash flow. He confesses that, due to limited team capacity, focus had to be placed on a single “Grand Slam offer” to remedy cash shortages, which led him to invest his personal 401k into the business just to keep operations afloat. Despite his efforts and improved business metrics, struggles with efficient execution and an actual dip in run rate to $4 million led to his elimination. The judges highlighted that even with high activity and improved reporting, sustained conversion and cash flow are non-negotiable for business viability.
Similarly, Mim Jenkinson achieved nearly $800,000 in annualized revenue growth, an impressive feat labeled “monster growth.” However, when stacked against the remaining competitors, this level of growth was the lowest, resulting in her elimination. These eliminations demonstrate that rapid growth alone isn’t sufficient; businesses must also be structurally sound, efficiently run, and set up to scale.
The judges, especially Alex Hormozi, reiterate that the fastest way to reach $10 million in revenue is different from the path to $100 million. They stress that sustainable growth—rooted in fundamentals rather than sacrificing critical elements for speed—is vital to building the right type of business.
Technical proficiency and execution capability are major criteria for selecting investable businesses. Alex Hormozi praises Tina Su for leveraging her affiliate marketing background and quickly developing effective tools and strategies for her new online venture. Her ability to improve client delivery and implement guidance rapidly proves her technical strength and sets her business up for scalable growth.
Hasee Nazir’s adoption of modern marketing tactics, such as utilizing a Video Sales Letter (VSL) strategy and publishing 100 pieces of content daily, demonstrates his facility for executing ambitious, up-to-date marketing at scale. The judges underscore that producing and deploying VSLs not only drives sales efficiency but also slashes sales cycles and increases conversion rates.
Kaleb Mitchell impresses by following detailed menu scripts and adapting his sales approach, showing he can implement feedback and refine his process. These examples illustrate that an entrepreneur’s ability to absorb advice, build tools, and execute complex tactics directly impacts their ability to scale.
The discussion turns to assessing businesses for investment: strong unit economics and scalability are indispensable. Alex Hormozi singles out Joey Goone’s strong lifetime value to customer acquisition cost (LTV to CAC) ratio as a significant strength, noting it’s among the best featured. However, questions linger over scalability. Sharran Srivatsaa votes for Tina Su over Joey Goone, reasoning that Joey's event planning business model lacks the online scalability potential of Tina’s business.
Leila Hormozi echoes that, despite Joey’s excellent execution and commitment, his business is “mid compared to other opportunities” they've considered. She and the panel stress the necessity for a scalable business model, not j ...
Evaluation Criteria for Sustainable Business Success
The competition challenges entrepreneurs through a multi-round elimination format designed to test a range of capabilities, ultimately identifying which founder has the qualities most predictive of long-term business success.
Each round of the competition targets a specific skill set or outcome crucial to entrepreneurial achievement.
The first round focused solely on revenue growth as a qualifier. Paul Fontanelli was eliminated because, despite running a business with significant capital, he showed minimal growth, which did not meet the competition’s threshold for advancement.
In the second round, contestants were judged on adherence to the provided business roadmap and how well they implemented expert recommendations. This phase emphasized disciplined execution and the ability to follow a proven strategy, leading to the elimination of Kaleb Mitchell and narrowing the field to Hasee Nazir and Tina Su for the final showdown.
The final round placed a premium on salesmanship and communication. Contestants were required to pitch their business directly to the judges, highlighting communication skills, self-awareness, and, critically, their understanding of what investors look for in a winning business.
During the final pitches, both Tina Su and Joey Goone were critiqued by Alex Hormozi for neglecting to address primary investor priorities, such as profitability, margins, business defensibility, and a compelling value proposition. Hormozi stressed that when selling to investors, it is vital to reverse engineer the pitch from the perspective of what the prospect—in this case, the investor—wants: rapid growth, high profits, and strong defenses against competition.
Neither finalist focused explicitly on these investor-centric elements in their pitches, which Hormozi cited as the "biggest miss" of the round.
Although Tina Su presented a scalable online model, the decision ultimately went to Joey Goone. Hormozi highlighted Goone’s business strengths, including recurring revenue (with $4 million already booked for the coming year), demonstrated resilience during the COVID crisis, and high levels of founder commitment and follow-through. These factors—lifetime value to customer acquisition cost (LTV to CAC), recurring revenue, and resilience—held more weight than the mere potential for scale.
The judges were clear that the primary considerations for investment were the business model’s fundamentals, the founder’s commitment, the record of execution, and concrete financials, rather than relying on one standout metric.
The Competition Format and Selection Process
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser
