Podcasts > The Game w/ Alex Hormozi > 15. Back End. The Value Grid. | $100M Lost Chapters Audiobook

15. Back End. The Value Grid. | $100M Lost Chapters Audiobook

By Alex Hormozi

In this episode of The Game, Alex Hormozi addresses the critical business concept of customer lifetime value (LTV) and its role in gaining competitive advantages. He explains how businesses that maximize their customer value can outperform competitors in advertising and market presence, while potentially creating barriers to entry for new competition through higher customer acquisition spending power.

Hormozi introduces his value grid framework as an alternative to traditional value ladder models, demonstrating how businesses can better understand customer purchasing patterns and key metrics. He outlines practical strategies for increasing customer value, including offer stacking, strategic upsells, and implementing alternative revenue streams for non-core customers who decline primary offers.

Listen to the original

15. Back End. The Value Grid. | $100M Lost Chapters Audiobook

This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Nov 14, 2025 episode of the The Game w/ Alex Hormozi

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.

15. Back End. The Value Grid. | $100M Lost Chapters Audiobook

1-Page Summary

Increasing Customer Lifetime Value (LTV) for Business Success

Alex Hormozi explains that businesses can gain a significant competitive advantage by maximizing their customer lifetime value (LTV). He argues that when a business makes its customers more valuable than competitors can, it becomes virtually unbeatable in the marketplace.

The Power of High LTV in Marketing

According to Hormozi, businesses with higher LTV can afford to spend more on customer acquisition than their competitors. This advantage allows them to dominate market advertising space and potentially deter new competitors from entering the market due to high customer acquisition costs.

Value Grid vs Value Ladder Framework

Hormozi introduces the value grid as a superior alternative to the traditional value ladder model. Unlike the linear value ladder, the value grid acknowledges that customers don't necessarily make purchases in a sequential order. He explains that this framework helps businesses better understand and optimize key metrics like LTV, customer acquisition costs, and 30-day cash value while revealing opportunities to offer complementary high-ticket products and services.

Growing LTV Through Offer Stacking

Hormozi describes how businesses can multiply customer value through strategic offer stacking and upsells. He recommends combining high-ticket items with subsequent downsells and upsells within the first 30 days of customer engagement. Additionally, he suggests implementing a "free with alternative revenue stream" model to monetize non-core customers who decline primary offers, ensuring value capture from all customer interactions.

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Customer lifetime value (LTV) measures the total revenue a business expects to earn from a single customer over the entire relationship. It helps businesses understand how much they can invest in acquiring and retaining customers profitably. Higher LTV means customers spend more or stay longer, increasing overall profitability. Focusing on LTV guides marketing and product strategies to maximize long-term business success.
  • Customer acquisition costs (CAC) refer to the total expenses a business incurs to attract and convert a new customer. This includes marketing and advertising spend, sales team salaries, promotional offers, and any other costs directly related to gaining customers. CAC is a critical metric because it impacts profitability and helps determine how much a business can invest in acquiring customers relative to their lifetime value. Lowering CAC while maintaining customer quality improves overall business efficiency and growth potential.
  • The value ladder is a linear model where customers move step-by-step from low-priced to higher-priced offers. The value grid, however, is a multi-dimensional model recognizing that customers may buy products in any order or combination. It maps various offers across different categories and price points simultaneously. This approach helps identify cross-selling and bundling opportunities beyond a simple progression.
  • 30-day cash value refers to the total revenue a business generates from a customer within the first 30 days after acquisition. It helps measure the immediate profitability and cash flow impact of new customers. This metric is crucial for assessing short-term marketing effectiveness and optimizing initial offers. It differs from lifetime value, which considers the entire customer relationship span.
  • Offer stacking is the practice of presenting multiple related products or services together to increase the total purchase value. It leverages customer interest by bundling high-value items with complementary offers, encouraging more spending. This approach maximizes revenue per customer by creating a package that feels more valuable than individual purchases. It also helps businesses capture more customer lifetime value by increasing engagement and sales opportunities early in the customer relationship.
  • Upsells are offers to buy a more expensive or upgraded version of a product after the initial purchase decision. Downsells are lower-priced alternatives presented when a customer declines the upsell, aiming to retain the sale. Both strategies increase overall revenue by maximizing the value of each customer interaction. They are typically used within a short time frame to capitalize on the customer's buying intent.
  • A "free with alternative revenue stream" model offers a product or service at no cost to attract users who might not buy the main offer. Income is generated by monetizing these users through other means, such as advertising, affiliate sales, or premium upgrades. This approach captures value from customers who would otherwise provide no revenue. It broadens the customer base while still contributing to overall profitability.
  • Combining high-ticket items with downsells and upsells increases customer value by capturing more revenue from each customer through multiple purchase opportunities. High-ticket items generate significant initial revenue, while downsells offer lower-priced alternatives to retain customers who hesitate. Upsells provide additional, often complementary products or services that enhance the original purchase. This layered approach maximizes total spend per customer and improves overall profitability.
  • When a business dominates advertising space, it drives up the cost of ads in that market. New competitors face higher expenses to gain visibility, reducing their profit margins. This financial barrier discourages them from entering or scaling in the market. Essentially, the dominant advertiser creates a costly environment that limits competition.
  • Making customers "more valuable than competitors' customers" means increasing the total revenue a business earns from each customer over time compared to rivals. This can be achieved by encouraging repeat purchases, upselling, and cross-selling additional products or services. Higher customer value allows a business to invest more in acquiring new customers profitably. Ultimately, it creates a stronger, more loyal customer base that competitors find hard to match.

Counterarguments

  • While maximizing LTV is beneficial, focusing solely on LTV might lead to neglecting other important aspects of the business, such as product quality, customer service, or innovation.
  • Making customers more valuable does not automatically make a business unbeatable; other factors like brand reputation, market trends, and technological advancements also play significant roles.
  • Spending more on customer acquisition is not always feasible or sustainable, especially for small businesses or startups with limited budgets.
  • Dominating market advertising space could lead to a perception of market saturation or monopolistic behavior, which might turn off some customers or attract regulatory scrutiny.
  • The value grid framework may not be suitable for all businesses, especially those with a straightforward product line or those that operate in industries where the purchase process is inherently sequential.
  • The focus on high-ticket items and upsells might not align with the needs or preferences of all customer segments, potentially alienating more price-sensitive customers.
  • The "free with alternative revenue stream" model may not be applicable or effective in all industries, particularly where alternative revenue streams are not easily identified or implemented.
  • Offer stacking and aggressive upselling within the first 30 days might overwhelm or annoy some customers, leading to higher churn rates.
  • There is a risk that focusing too much on monetizing every interaction could lead to short-term gains at the expense of long-term customer relationships and brand loyalty.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
15. Back End. The Value Grid. | $100M Lost Chapters Audiobook

Increasing Customer Lifetime Value (Ltv) for Business Success

Alex Hormozi argues that the business which can maximize its customer's value, thereby increasing Customer Lifetime Value (LTV), gains a competitive edge that is crucial for growth and market dominance.

Optimize Ltv for Competitive Edge and Growth

Businesses Maximizing Customer Value Will Become Unbeatable

Hormozi states that the business owner who makes his customer more valuable to his business than to his competition's business wins. According to him, the higher the LTV, the more untouchable a business becomes, allowing it to inflict more damage on competition and possibly starve them out of the marketplace.

Rising Ltv Allows Companies to Outspend Competitors in Marketing

High Ltv Businesses Can Pay More per Lead Profitably

Alex Hormozi discusses how a business with a higher revenue per client can outspend competitors on marketing. A high LTV enables a company to affordably pay more to acquire a customer than competitors can, which is a substantial advantage ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Increasing Customer Lifetime Value (Ltv) for Business Success

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Customer Lifetime Value (LTV) measures the total revenue a business expects to earn from a single customer over the entire duration of their relationship. It is calculated by multiplying the average purchase value, purchase frequency, and the average customer lifespan. LTV helps businesses understand how much they can spend to acquire and retain customers profitably. A higher LTV indicates more long-term value from each customer, guiding marketing and service investments.
  • Increasing Customer Lifetime Value (LTV) means each customer generates more revenue over time, improving profitability. Higher LTV allows businesses to invest more in acquiring and retaining customers without losing money. This financial flexibility strengthens market position and resources for growth. Competitors with lower LTV struggle to match these investments, losing market share.
  • Customer Lifetime Value (LTV) represents the total revenue a business expects from a single customer over time. Higher LTV means each customer generates more profit, allowing the business to spend more on acquiring that customer while still making money. This increased marketing spend per lead can outbid competitors for advertising space and customer attention. Essentially, higher LTV funds more aggressive and effective marketing strategies.
  • A higher Customer Lifetime Value (LTV) means a business earns more profit from each customer over time. This allows the business to spend more money upfront to acquire each customer while still making a profit. Competitors with lower LTVs cannot afford to spend as much on acquiring customers without losing money. Therefore, businesses with higher LTVs can invest more in marketing and customer acquisition efforts.
  • "Making a customer more valuable to a business than to competitors" means increasing the total profit a customer generates for one company compared to others. This can be done by enhancing customer loyalty, increasing purchase frequency, or offering unique products and services. It creates a stronger relationship that competitors find hard to replicate or disrupt. Ultimately, it secures a more stable and profitable customer base for that business.
  • Dominating market advertising space means a company’s ads appear more frequently and prominently than competitors’. This constant visibility builds stronger brand recog ...

Counterarguments

  • While increasing LTV is beneficial, focusing solely on LTV might lead to neglecting other important aspects of the business, such as product innovation, customer service, and operational efficiency.
  • Maximizing customer value could potentially lead to short-term gains at the expense of long-term customer relationships if customers feel they are being over-monetized.
  • The strategy of outspending competitors on marketing to dominate market share may not be sustainable for all businesses, especially smaller ones with limited budgets.
  • High marketing spend does not guarantee customer loyalty or satisfaction; it may attract customers initially, but without a strong value proposition or product quality, it may not lead to increased LTV.
  • Dominating ad space and deterring new entrants could lead to a less competitive market, which might not always be beneficial for consumers in terms of innovation and price.
  • There is a risk that focusing too much on beating the competition can create a negative business culture and could potentially lead to unethical business practices.
  • The assumption that a higher LTV always leads to marke ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
15. Back End. The Value Grid. | $100M Lost Chapters Audiobook

Frameworks for Growing Ltv: Value Grid vs Ladder

Alex Hormozi presents a comparative analysis of two models for optimizing customer lifetime value (LTV): the value grid and the value ladder, advocating for the superiority of the value grid.

Value Grid More Effective Than Value Ladder For Optimizing Ltv

Value Grid Captures Non-linear Customer Purchase Behavior

Hormozi challenges the traditional value ladder or stair-step model, which implies that customer purchases occur in a linear sequence. He argues that the value grid is preferred as it allows for a more accurate, non-linear representation of how customers actually navigate through purchasing options. The value grid presents multiple offers at the same price point, each catering to different needs, thereby acknowledging that customer behavior isn't necessarily progressive nor sequential.

Value Grid Clarifies Ltv, Enhancing Acquisition Cost and 30-day Cash Value Analysis

Hormozi explains that the value grid serves as a practical tool for understanding and optimizing metrics critical to a business's financial health, such as lifetime value (LTV), customer acquisition cost (CAC), and the 30-day cash value. By assessing the total revenue generated from clients against the number of prospects, the value grid helps businesses determine the maximum cost they can afford per lead and the cash collected within the first 30 days of trials.

Value Grid Reveals Untapped Potential in Increasing Ltv

Businesses Can B ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Frameworks for Growing Ltv: Value Grid vs Ladder

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Customer lifetime value (LTV) is the total revenue a business expects to earn from a customer over the entire relationship. It helps businesses understand how much they can spend to acquire and retain customers profitably. Higher LTV means more revenue per customer, improving overall business sustainability. Tracking LTV guides marketing, sales, and product strategies to maximize long-term profits.
  • Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC) is the total expense a business incurs to attract and convert a new customer. It includes marketing, sales, and promotional costs divided by the number of customers gained. CAC is crucial because it helps determine if acquiring customers is profitable relative to their lifetime value. Lowering CAC while maintaining customer quality improves overall business profitability.
  • The "30-day cash value" measures the actual revenue a business collects from customers within the first 30 days after acquisition. It helps assess short-term cash flow and the immediate return on marketing investments. This metric is crucial for managing operational expenses and ensuring early profitability. It also informs decisions on how much can be spent on acquiring new customers without risking cash shortages.
  • The value ladder is a marketing model where customers move through a series of progressively more expensive or valuable offers. Each step builds on the previous one, encouraging customers to buy higher-priced products or services over time. It assumes a linear progression, meaning customers typically purchase in a set order. This model helps businesses increase customer lifetime value by gradually increasing purchase size.
  • The value grid is a matrix that organizes multiple product or service offers across different price points and customer needs simultaneously. It contrasts with the value ladder by allowing customers to choose offers non-linearly rather than progressing step-by-step. Each cell in the grid represents a unique combination of value and price, catering to diverse customer preferences at the same time. This structure helps businesses identify and present varied purchase options that can be bought independently or in any sequence.
  • Linear or sequential purchase behavior means customers buy products in a fixed, step-by-step order. Non-linear behavior means customers choose products in any order, based on their individual needs or preferences. This reflects real-world buying patterns where customers skip steps or select multiple options simultaneously. Understanding this helps businesses tailor offers more effectively.
  • "High-ticket" products or services are those sold at a significantly higher price than standard offerings. They matter because they generate more revenue per sale, boosting overall customer lifetim ...

Counterarguments

  • The value ladder model may still be effective for certain types of businesses or industries where customer behavior tends to follow a more predictable and sequential pattern.
  • The value grid could potentially overwhelm customers with too many options, leading to decision fatigue and possibly reducing conversion rates.
  • Implementing a value grid requires a more complex understanding of customer behavior and may demand more sophisticated data analysis and segmentation strategies, which could be resource-intensive for smaller businesses.
  • The value ladder's simplicity can be advantageous for clear messaging and marketing, helping customers understand the natural progression of products or services.
  • The value grid approach might not be as effective for businesses with a limited range of products or services, where a ladder approach could be more suitable for upselling and cross-selling.
  • The value ladder can be easier to manage and scale for businesses, especially those with limited resources, as it provides a clear framework for product or service development and marketing strategies.
  • The value grid's emphasis on non-linear purchase behavior may not account for t ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
15. Back End. The Value Grid. | $100M Lost Chapters Audiobook

Ltv Growth via Offer Stacking and Upsells

Alex Hormozi shares strategies for businesses to increase lifetime value (LTV) of customers through offer stacking and upsells.

Stacking High-Value Offers Can Multiply Revenue per Customer

Businesses can multiply a customer's lifetime value by stacking offers.

Increasing Customer Value Through Upsells and Complementary Products

Hormozi describes how a business can amplify its LTV by selling additional products within a short period of time. This approach can lead to more significant revenue generation. Adding upsells and complementary products to offers is another encouraged method to elevate LTV.

By offering a high ticket item with subsequent downsells followed by a series of upsell opportunities within the first 30 days of engagement, businesses can see a substantial rise in revenue per client. While not every customer will accept every upsell, the accumulated acceptance percentages contribute to a higher overall revenue for the business.

Offering "Free With Alternative Revenue" Can Monetize Non-core Customers

Hormozi explains that the "free with altern ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Ltv Growth via Offer Stacking and Upsells

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Lifetime value (LTV) measures the total revenue a business expects from a single customer over the entire relationship. It helps businesses understand how much they can spend on acquiring and retaining customers profitably. Higher LTV means more revenue per customer, improving overall business sustainability. Focusing on LTV guides strategies to increase customer loyalty and maximize earnings.
  • Offer stacking involves presenting multiple related products or services together as a combined package to increase the total purchase value. It works by layering offers so customers receive more perceived value, encouraging them to buy more than a single item. This strategy leverages psychological principles like scarcity and urgency by timing offers closely. In practice, businesses sequence these offers to maximize acceptance rates and overall revenue per customer.
  • Upsells are higher-priced or enhanced versions of the original product offered after the initial purchase. Downsells are lower-priced alternatives presented when a customer declines the upsell. Complementary products are additional items that naturally pair with the original purchase to enhance its use or value. These strategies aim to increase overall customer spending by offering relevant options at different price points.
  • A high-ticket item is a premium product or service with a higher price point that attracts serious buyers. Downsells are lower-priced alternatives offered to customers who decline the high-ticket item, capturing sales that might otherwise be lost. Upsells are additional products or services offered after the initial purchase to increase the total transaction value. This sequence maximizes revenue by appealing to different customer budgets and encouraging multiple purchases.
  • "Free with alternative revenue stream" means offering a no-cost service or product to attract customers who might not buy the main offer. The business then earns money by selling related items or services to these customers later. This approach leverages initial free engagement to build trust and create new sales opportunities. It turns non-buyers into revenue sources through secondary offers.
  • Non-core customers are individuals who are not the primary target audience for a business's main product or servic ...

Counterarguments

  • Offer stacking and upselling can sometimes lead to customer fatigue or perception of aggressive sales tactics, which might harm customer relationships and brand reputation.
  • Not all customer segments may respond positively to upsells and offer stacking, potentially leading to decreased satisfaction among more conservative buyers who prefer simpler purchasing processes.
  • There is a risk of diminishing returns if the upsells and additional offers are not carefully aligned with customer needs and preferences, which could result in lower conversion rates and potential loss of trust.
  • The strategy of offering high-ticket items followed by downsells and upsells requires careful pricing strategy to avoid devaluing the core product or service.
  • The "free with alternative revenue" model may not be sustainable for all business types, especially if the cost of the free service outweighs the revenue generated from the alternative stream.
  • Relying too heavily on upsells and alternative revenue streams may distract from investing in the core product or service quality, which is often the primary ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free

Create Summaries for anything on the web

Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser

Shortform Extension CTA