In this episode of The Diary Of A CEO, Steven Bartlett speaks with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy about the ongoing war with Russia. Zelenskyy shares his path from entertainment to the presidency, explaining how his unconventional background shaped his leadership during Ukraine's greatest crisis. He discusses the opening days of Russia's 2022 invasion, detailing his decision to remain in Kyiv, the strategic battle for Hostomel Airport, and Russia's miscalculations that prevented the capital's fall.
The conversation also covers Putin's motivations rooted in Soviet nostalgia, the psychological toll of war on Zelenskyy and the Ukrainian people, and the atrocities witnessed in liberated territories like Bucha. Zelenskyy addresses the current state of the conflict, diplomatic pressures for territorial compromise, and his insistence that genuine peace requires justice, security guarantees, and accountability for war crimes rather than simply freezing the conflict along current lines.

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
Volodymyr Zelenskyy's path to the Ukrainian presidency is unusual, shaped by growing up in both the Soviet Union and independent Ukraine. Born in Soviet-controlled Ukraine, Zelenskyy experienced the restrictive "fish tank" of Soviet life before witnessing the emergence of Ukrainian national identity after independence. He credits his parents—particularly his professor father—with instilling values of education, honesty, and integrity that would later guide his political career.
Before entering politics, Zelenskyy built a career in entertainment and satire. His most notable role was in the TV series "Servant of the People," where he played a history teacher who unexpectedly becomes president of Ukraine. The show resonated with Ukrainians disillusioned by political instability, and its central message—that an honest, ordinary citizen could lead—proved prophetic.
Russia's 2014 occupation of Crimea and Donbas became a turning point for Zelenskyy, shifting his focus from entertainment to activism. In 2019, he registered "Servant of the People" as a real political party and won the presidency, reflecting the nation's desire for a leader without political baggage who could communicate authentically with citizens.
On February 24, 2022, Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine with between 150,000 and 200,000 troops, aiming to capture Kyiv within three days. Russian forces carried limited rations and even parade uniforms, expecting swift victory. The invasion came from multiple directions—north via Belarus, and from the east and south—with the goal of encircling Kyiv, seizing strategic assets, and forcing the government to flee.
Zelenskyy's decision to stay in Kyiv proved crucial. Despite offers of evacuation from President Biden and European leaders, he famously responded, "I need ammunition, not a ride." His visible presence in the capital countered Russian disinformation and motivated Ukrainian soldiers and citizens. Ukraine's army rapidly expanded from 200,000 to 800,000 as volunteers mobilized, while civilians aided defense efforts by burning Russian vehicles and destroying infrastructure.
The Battle of Hostomel Airport became a decisive turning point. Russian paratroopers initially captured this crucial airfield, hoping to establish an air bridge for reinforcements. Ukrainian forces launched repeated counterattacks, destroyed the runway, and shot down Russian helicopters. Both Zelenskyy and military analysts agree that if Russia had controlled Hostomel, Kyiv would likely have fallen within days.
Russia's most significant miscalculation was underestimating the logistical and manpower needs for urban occupation. Zelenskyy notes that holding Kyiv would have required three to four hundred thousand troops—far more than Russia deployed. The relative ease of the 2014 Crimea occupation had inflated Russian confidence, leading to catastrophic miscalculation in 2022.
Once Russia's offensive stalled, Ukrainian counterattacks forced a full retreat from Kyiv and surrounding regions. The failure to take Kyiv fundamentally extended the war, and Russia shifted focus to a prolonged eastern offensive in Donbas.
Vladimir Putin, a former KGB officer, has openly called the Soviet Union's collapse "the 20th century's greatest tragedy," revealing his nostalgia for lost Soviet power. Ukraine holds unique strategic value in Putin's imperial vision. The Soviet Union regarded Ukraine as a "forge of talent," producing leading scientists and engineers. Ukraine also housed key manufacturing facilities for rockets and nuclear weapons, making it vital for any Russian attempt to reassert regional dominance.
Putin's practical pursuit of restoration began with Crimea in 2014. Russian forces—disguised "little green men" wearing unmarked uniforms—took control with minimal resistance. Ukrainian leadership admits that failing to resist militarily emboldened Putin and set the stage for the 2022 full-scale invasion.
Putin's ideology denies Ukraine's legitimacy as a nation, claiming it's merely an artificial Soviet construct created by Bolshevik Russia. He frames Russian aggression as "liberation" from Nazi influence, despite Ukraine's profound suffering under Nazi occupation during World War II. By branding Ukraine as fiction, Putin seeks to recast conquest as restoring Russian dominion rather than invasion.
Putin exploited language and ethnic divides to justify intervention, claiming to protect Russian-speaking Ukrainians from oppression despite no evidence of discrimination. In reality, Ukrainian society is multilingual and multiethnic, with Russian speakers, Ukrainians, and others living peacefully together. Putin's insistence on the need for "protection" cynically weaponized linguistic diversity to provide rationale for invasion.
For nearly five years of war, Zelenskyy has willingly abandoned normal sleep, maintaining nightly communications with air defense operators and military commanders. In the earliest days of invasion, he survived on just 15 minutes of sleep at a time. Despite the severe psychological toll, he views this sacrifice as necessary responsibility, stating, "I have this trait... to pull yourself together when, you know, shock... you realize that you need to act right now."
Visiting Bucha after its liberation became a defining trauma for Zelenskyy. He witnessed mass graves containing around 500 people—men, women, children—many tortured before execution. Russian forces engaged in systematic cruelty: hunting civilians for sport, looting, sexual violence, and torture. Elderly survivors who lived through both WWII and Russian occupation told Zelenskyy that even the Nazis "never treated people like that."
Before Bucha, Zelenskyy believed in forgiveness. Witnessing such atrocities transformed that belief into hatred and a sense that certain acts cannot be forgiven. These experiences left psychological wounds that, by his own account, "will never fully heal."
Another acute burden is presenting Ukraine's highest military honor posthumously to parents who lost children in service. Zelenskyy describes these moments: "I cease to exist... it's not pain, it's something terrible." Many parents request only a simple embrace, valuing human connection over formal recognition.
The war's impact extends to Ukrainian children, many of whom have never known life without sirens, bomb shelters, and shelling. Zelenskyy describes this as "horrifying," a national trauma requiring decades of psychological recovery even after the conflict ends.
Zelenskyy's wife, Alina, serves as his emotional anchor, providing stability through constant danger. Yet he admits that years of war have made them strangers at times, the habit of focusing on work leaving him emotionally distant even when family is near. The brutality and losses of war have made clear that "everything is secondary. These people right here, that's what matters most," though wartime demands continue to hinder his ability to prioritize family presence.
Russian forces currently occupy between 18 and 19 percent of Ukrainian territory, concentrating control on Crimea, the Azov Sea coast—including Mariupol and Berdyansk—and significant portions of Donetsk and Luhansk. Russia now targets eastern cities like Sloviansk, Kramatorsk, and Drushkiivka for access to Ukraine's industrial heartland. While Russian forces hold territory mainly in the south and east, they also launch frequent missile and drone strikes across Ukraine, targeting energy infrastructure and causing widespread power outages.
Despite enormous pressure, Ukrainian forces retain control of significant territories, including Kherson (the only regional capital Russia captured, which Ukraine has since liberated), Zaporizhia, and Mykolaiv. However, these areas endure ongoing Russian shelling. Zelenskyy warns that fortified positions in eastern Ukraine are vital; losing them risks exposing the industrial heartland and enabling Russian access to major population centers.
Recent diplomatic pressure, especially from former President Trump, urges Ukraine to agree to a ceasefire and possible territorial compromise. Trump blames Ukraine for U.S. diesel price hikes, alleging that Ukrainian attacks on Russian energy infrastructure contribute to higher prices. Zelenskyy refutes this, explaining that Russian diesel exports are so limited they do not impact U.S. prices, and Ukraine's strikes are direct responses to Russian attacks destroying Ukraine's electricity grid.
Polling shows 76% of Ukrainians oppose elections under current conditions and prefer continued resistance over territorial compromise. Yet Trump advocates for a change in Ukrainian leadership as a bargaining chip. Zelenskyy's primary demand is for more air defense systems to protect cities and infrastructure, emphasizing defense needs over concessions.
Zelenskyy insists that genuine peace must include justice for war crimes, security guarantees (ideally through NATO), and clear accountability for Russian aggression—not simply freezing the conflict along current frontlines. He calls the ceasefire itself a profound compromise and emphasizes that real peace requires justice for victims, including trials for those responsible for atrocities. Zelenskyy explains that it is impossible to simply forgive without justice: "That hatred isn't going anywhere. It takes time and justice... It's just totally impossible to simply forgive."
Zelenskyy acknowledges that Trump could pressure Putin to negotiate but doubts his willingness. Although Congress voted for significant sanctions against Russia, Trump has not fully enforced them. Zelenskyy hints at potential undisclosed deals or "special relationships" between Trump and Putin, urging that only by confronting Putin with the same pressure Trump uses with Ukraine can meaningful progress be made.
Sustained Western support remains essential for Ukraine's victory. Zelenskyy observes that "time is on Ukraine's side," as Ukrainian resistance, fueled by popular determination, stands in contrast to the exhaustion of the Russian military. While Ukraine is open to discussing security guarantees, such talks are meaningful only when they include restoration of territorial integrity and a path to justice. Zelenskyy's final message to Americans is one of gratitude for support, accompanied by a plea: choose justice and peace over energy arrangements with aggressor states, emphasizing Ukraine's determination to end the war only through a just settlement with accountability for Russian crimes, secure borders, and respect for the Ukrainian people's will.
1-Page Summary
Volodymyr Zelenskyy grows up straddling two eras: he is born in the Soviet Union when Ukraine is still a Soviet republic, and comes of age in an independent Ukraine. He describes his generation as one that experienced both the restrictions of life under a controlled empire and the emergence of national identity when Ukraine gained its independence. Growing up in post-Soviet Ukraine, he observes the stark difference between the oppressive, gray environment of the Soviet "fish tank" and the vibrant possibilities of an open society. Zelenskyy sees the fall of the Soviet Union as a natural consequence of people’s desire to be free and to shape their own identities, languages, and cultures.
Zelenskyy is raised in Kryvyi Rih, in an academic but ordinary family who, like many academics in Soviet times, do not have wealth but do have strong principles. He credits his father, an honest man and professor, and his loving mother for instilling in him traditional values: the importance of education, honesty, integrity, and receiving the right upbringing. He expresses gratitude for the love and values passed on by his parents, believing those three gifts to be foundational.
Zelenskyy’s career in entertainment forms his unique pathway to politics. Initially, he gains fame as a creator, writer, and actor in television and satire, not as a political figure.
One of his most notable roles is in the satirical TV series “Servant of the People,” where he plays a school history teacher who unexpectedly becomes the president of Ukraine. The premise of an ordinary person with no political background taking the highest office becomes a source of inspiration and curiosity—especially since, at that time, Zelenskyy himself has no plans for political office. The uncanny overlap of fiction and reality eventually unfolds as his actual political career takes off.
“Servant of the People” resonates with Ukrainians, who are living through a period of political instability and disillusionment with traditional politics. The show’s central message—that an honest, unconnected citizen can lead—is widely popular and paves the way for the launch of a real political movement.
The Russian occupation of Crimea and Donbas in 2014 becomes a turning point for Zelenskyy. The events deeply affect him, stirring a sense that something has fundamentally changed in Ukraine. What wa ...
Zelenskyy's Personal Journey: From Entertainment to Politics
On February 24, 2022, Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine, aiming for a swift victory by quickly capturing the capital, Kyiv. Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy recalls the outbreak of war as missiles rained down in the early morning hours, sparking widespread chaos, terror, and disbelief as families fled and children screamed.
Intelligence briefings and satellite imagery from late 2021 had already indicated Russia’s buildup near the Ukrainian border. By the time of the invasion, reports estimate that Russia deployed between 150,000 and 200,000 troops—nearly equal to the size of Ukraine’s active military at the time. Russian planners presumed Ukraine would quickly fall. Captured Russian assault units carried only three to ten days of combat rations and even included parade uniforms, confident they would stage a victory spectacle in Kyiv within days. Russian state media inadvertently released a preemptive declaration of victory on the third day of the invasion.
The invasion came from multiple directions. Troops entered from the north via Belarus, exploiting the lack of strong Ukrainian forces near the capital. Simultaneous attacks also targeted eastern and southern regions, including Donetsk, Luhansk, Kharkiv, and Mariupol, leveraging the concentration of Ukraine’s main military units in the east to hold back separatists and Russian troops.
Russia’s plan was to rapidly advance toward Kyiv—occupying outlying towns, seizing strategic assets like airports and TV towers, and encircling the city to cut off food and water. They expected the Ukrainian government would flee, allowing them to install a puppet regime and claim swift victory. Zelenskyy notes that Putin regarded Kyiv as fundamentally Russian, believing that a display of overwhelming force would induce mass surrender and the government’s escape.
Despite the encirclement, offers for evacuation from President Biden and European leaders, and relentless Russian pressure, Zelenskyy refused to abandon Kyiv. He famously responded, “I need ammunition, not a ride.” He remained in a bunker within his office, constantly communicating with world leaders, organizing defense strategies, and most critically, making a point to appear publicly and visibly in the capital to counter Russian disinformation claiming he had already fled. Zelenskyy’s choice was, by his own admission, both a constitutional duty and a moral one, crucially motivating soldiers and citizens, who drew strength from the knowledge that their president stood with them.
Ukraine’s army rapidly swelled as hundreds of thousands of volunteers mobilized, expanding from 200,000 to 800,000. Citizens fortified the defense, burning Russian vehicles, fighting street by street, and improvising to stall the Russian advance. Zelenskyy describes this as crisis management at unprecedented speed, making tactical decisions and inspiring both the military and civilian defenders. As resistance stiffened, Ukrainian forces succeeded in holding key positions and steadily degraded Russian units, eventually forcing a withdrawal from the Kyiv region.
Civilians not only aided soldiers but directly contributed to pivotal defensive actions, such as burning Russian armored vehicles and destroying infrastructure to hinder the Russian military, particularly near Kyiv.
One of the most decisive battles unfolded at Hostomel Airport. Russian paratroopers initially captured this crucial airfield in hopes of establishing an air bridge for rapid reinforcement.
Ukrainian National Guard units and special forces launched repeated counterattacks, and defenders deliberately destroyed the runway to prevent its use by Russian transport planes. Air defense units succeeded in shooting down several Russian helicopters, cutting the Russians off from vital supply lines.
Both Zelenskyy and milit ...
The Russian Invasion and Military Defense of Ukraine
Vladimir Putin, a former KGB intelligence officer and a staunchly Soviet-minded leader, has openly lamented the fall of the Soviet Union, calling it “the 20th century’s greatest tragedy.” This nostalgia for lost Soviet power drives his imperial ambitions, which focus on reversing what he perceives as a historic wrong and restoring Russian control over former Soviet territories.
Putin’s public statements reveal deep grief over the Soviet Union’s breakup. He envisions his leadership as an opportunity to restore Russia’s former status and territorial reach, directly shaping his foreign policy, particularly regarding Ukraine.
Ukraine holds a unique place in Putin’s vision. The Soviet Union regarded Ukraine as a “forge of talent,” producing leading scientists, engineers, intellectuals, and administrators who helped staff the Soviet bureaucracy and intelligentsia. Many Soviet-era institutions and ministries were run by Ukrainians, highlighting Ukraine’s role as the intellectual core of the former Soviet Union.
Beyond human capital, Ukraine’s strategic value was—and remains—immense. It housed key manufacturing facilities, especially for rockets and even nuclear weapons, although Ukraine surrendered its nuclear arsenal after independence. Ukraine’s industrial might and technical expertise make it a vital component for any Russian project to reassert regional dominance.
Putin began his practical pursuit of restoration in 2014 with Crimea. Russian forces—disguised and unacknowledged, dubbed “little green men”—took control of the peninsula. These operatives wore unmarked uniforms, creating plausible deniability for Russia and confusing both local populations and international observers.
At the time, Ukraine offered little organized military resistance. Russian denial and ambiguous tactics prevented a rapid and unified Ukrainian or international response. In hindsight, Ukrainian leadership admits that failing to resist the Crimea annexation militarily emboldened Putin, fostering his belief that further land grabs—even targeting Kyiv—might be just as easy. This sense of impunity directly set the stage for Russia’s subsequent full-scale invasion.
Russia’s refusal to openly declare involvement in Crimea’s occupation enabled diplomatic ambiguity. Russia denied that its soldiers were in fact operating on Ukrainian soil, muddying international response and avoiding immediate, direct conflict.
Putin argues that modern Ukraine is a creation of Bolshevik, communist Russia—asserting that Ukraine sprang into existence only after the 1917 revolution and dismissing centuries of prior Ukrainian history. He thus denies Ukraine’s long-standing, independent cultural and political traditions, despite evidence of Ukrainian statehood and civilization stretching back to Kievan Rus.
To justify aggression, Putin frames Russia’s actions as “liberating” Ukraine from fascist or Nazi influences—an assertion that deeply contradicts historical reality. Ukraine’s population, far from embodying fascism, suffered profoundly under Nazi occupation during World War II and contributed enormous sacrifices to the defeat of Nazi Germany.
Historical Context and Putin's Motivations
For nearly five years of ongoing war, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has willingly abandoned the idea of normal sleep, accepting it as part of his responsibility as a wartime leader. He often reminds himself, “I’ll be honest, I don’t sleep. It’s a huge terrifying pain that I wouldn’t wish on anyone.” Throughout this time, nightly communications with air defense operators and military commanders have become routine, with Zelenskyy receiving updates and engaging in tactical discussions on Ukraine’s security and resources. In the earliest days of the Russian invasion, he recounts surviving on just 15 minutes of sleep at a time, describing a cycle of urgent coordination and response.
Zelenskyy’s rest is reduced to irregular fragments, barely enough to sustain basic function but essential to stay available and responsive to crises around the clock. Even as the war entered its later stages, longer sleep remained elusive and, by his own words, nearly unheard of. Despite the severe psychological toll, he views the sacrifice of sleep as a necessary responsibility, stating, “I have this trait... to pull yourself together when, you know, shock. People around you are in shock... you realize that you need to act right now. Just act.” The effects of sleeplessness linger, becoming an accepted but draining part of his daily existence.
Visiting Bucha after its liberation became a defining trauma for Zelenskyy. He personally witnessed the aftermath: “Dead bodies lying everywhere. Kids, adults, elderly people, chopped meat, butchered them, hands tied, tortured, and then buried in pits.” He details finding mass graves containing around 500 people—men, women, children, animals—many tortured before execution.
Zelenskyy recounts evidence of systemic cruelty. Russian forces engaged in “hunting sprees,” shooting civilians and animals for sport, looting homes, carrying out sexual violence, and burying victims in mass graves. In conversations with survivors, including elderly residents who lived through both WWII and the Russian occupation, he heard that the Nazis, as occupiers, “never treated people like that.”
Before Bucha, Zelenskyy believed in forgiveness and the fallibility of humankind. Witnessing such atrocities transformed that belief into hatred and a sense that certain acts cannot be forgiven. These experiences scarred him deeply, leaving psychological wounds that, by his own account, “will never fully heal.” He emphasizes the impossibility of compromise or forgiveness for such evil, especially when outsiders suggest negotiation or gas trade with those responsible.
Another acute psychological burden for Zelenskyy is presenting Ukraine’s highest military honor posthumously to parents who have lost their sons or daughters in service. In these moments, Zelenskyy says, “I cease to exist... it’s not pain, it’s something terrible.” He meets parents who have lost soldiers, aware that no medal or recognition can replace their child.
Many parents request only a simple embrace. Zelenskyy notes, “You give an award to a father... he just quietly says to you, can we hug?” For them, a human connection means more than any formal honor.
He distinguishes between parents who lose children in military service—expected, though never truly prepared for—and those who lose loved ones to atrocity as civilians, whose grief is compounded by the senselessness of violence.
The war’s impact is vividly felt among Ukrainian children. Zelenskyy points out that many have never known a life without sirens, bomb shelters, and shelling. “There are children, a lot of them among the fallen as well, who never lived in peace... Their childhood passed during war.”
Every night, families descend into bomb shelters and return only when alarms cease. Some children die, and all live with enduring fear and disruption. Zelenskyy describes this as “horrifying,” a national trauma for an entire generation robbed of normal childhood.
He recognizes that this trauma will not fade quickly, predicting that “generational scarr ...
The Human and Psychological Toll of War
Russian forces currently occupy between 18 and 19 percent of Ukrainian territory, concentrating their control on Crimea, the coastal areas along the Azov Sea—including Mariupol and Berdyansk—and significant portions of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions in the east. This occupation forms a discontinuous but strategically vital zone, stretching from the Crimean peninsula through eastern Ukraine and cutting Ukraine off from access to the Black Sea in key areas. The Russians hold several critical cities and ports, essentially turning the Azov into an "inland sea" under their control. Areas like Kerch further restrict Ukraine's maritime access.
Crimea was annexed in 2014. Since the 2022 invasion, Russia has also claimed major cities along the Azov coast—Mariupol and Berdyansk—and extended into Donetsk and Luhansk, establishing a continuous occupation through these regions. However, they failed to maintain Kherson, which Ukraine has since liberated.
Russia's military objectives now target the eastern industrial belt for further expansion. Cities such as Sloviansk, Kramatorsk, and Drushkiivka are under constant threat, as their seizure would provide access into the Dnipropetrovsk region and key industrial centers like Kryvyi Rih and Nikopol. The area represents the "economy of our country," according to Zelenskyy, and its loss would expose additional industrial hubs and major population centers to Russian control.
While Russian forces hold territory mainly in the south and east, they also launch frequent missile and drone strikes across Ukraine. Cities from Lutsk in the west to Kyiv and the central regions routinely suffer attacks, leading to civilian casualties and destroying critical energy infrastructure. Zhitomir faces constant shelling; fewer strikes reach the far west, but nearly all regions remain at risk. These attacks cause widespread power outages, further deteriorating daily life for Ukrainians and aiming to degrade Ukraine’s defense and resilience.
Despite enormous pressure, the Ukrainian military retains control of significant territories, including Kherson, Zaporizhia, Mykolaiv, and nearby industrial cities. These areas, though liberated or held by Ukraine, continue to endure Russian shelling and sabotage aimed at undermining their defensive capacity.
Ukrainian forces successfully reclaimed Kherson, the only regional capital Russia captured since 2022. However, Kherson remains divided by the Dnipro River, with Russian forces entrenched on the east bank shelling the city regularly.
Other key cities like Zaporizhia and Mykolaiv remain under Ukrainian control, but they are constant Russian targets. Maintaining control over these industrial and population centers is vital, as surrendering them would jeopardize Ukraine's capacity to produce and protect, while giving Russia a gateway to further advances.
Zelenskyy warns that fortified positions in eastern Ukraine are absolutely vital. Losing them risks exposing the nation’s industrial heartland and could allow Russia a path toward controlling larger Ukrainian areas, including major cities and economic zones.
Recent diplomatic pressure, especially from former President Trump, urges Ukraine to agree to a ceasefire and possible territorial compromise. Trump has blamed Ukraine for rising diesel prices in the U.S., linking them to energy attacks and disregarding the minimal impact of Russian diesel exports on global prices. He’s also pushing for a change in Ukrainian leadership as part of a deal with Russia, and pressure on Ukraine to accept concessions remains high.
Trump claims that attacks on Russian energy infrastructure contribute to higher diesel prices in the U.S. Zelenskyy refutes this, explaining that Russian diesel exports are so limited they do not impact U.S. prices. Ukraine’s limited strikes on Russian energy assets are in direct response to Russian attacks destroying Ukraine’s electricity grid, leaving millions without power, not to influence global energy prices.
Polling shows that 76% of Ukrainians oppose elections under current conditions and prefer continued resistance over any form of territorial compromise. Despite this, Trump advocates for a change in Ukrainian leadership as a bargaining chip for settlement with Russia—an idea that is deeply unpopular and discordant with Ukrainian public opinion.
Zelenskyy’s primary demand is for more air defense systems to protect Ukrainian cities and energy infrastructure. Rather than ask for any concession or agreeing to a ceasefire on Russia’s terms, Zelenskyy requests necessary defensive resources, not handouts. He notes U.S. and European reluctance to provide air defense systems such as Patriot missiles, even as vital supplies go to other regions. Zelenskyy also stresses that while talks of ceasefire keep emerging, actual security guarantees for Ukraine’s territorial integrity remain elusive.
Zelenskyy insists that a ceasefire is already a major concession and that genuine peace must include justice for war crimes, security guarantees (ideally through NATO), and clear accountability for Russian aggression—not simply freezing the conflict along current frontlines or allowing Russia to hold onto gains.
Zelenskyy calls the ceasefire itself a profound compromise given the death and suffering endured by Ukrainians. He emphasizes that real peace requires justice for victims, including trials for those responsible for torture and atrocity. Without some form of accountability and justice, lasting peace is impossible and vengeance or renewed fighting remain likely outcomes.
Ukraine’s push for NATO membership remains a core demand, motivated both by a need for deterrence against further Russian aggression and the inadequacy of lesser security guarantees.
State of War and Path to Peace
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser
