In this episode of Stuff You Should Know, hosts Chuck Bryant and Josh Clark explore the science and cultural history surrounding birthmarks. They explain the two main categories—vascular and pigmented birthmarks—detailing the various types within each category, their characteristics, and what medical science currently understands about their origins. The hosts also cover when birthmarks require medical attention and the treatment options available, particularly laser therapy for vascular marks.
Beyond the medical facts, Bryant and Clark examine the folklore and superstitions that emerged before scientific explanations existed, from personality predictions based on birthmark location to accusations of witchcraft. The episode addresses the social stigma faced by people with visible birthmarks, noting the absence of prominent facial birthmarks among celebrities and the bullying children often experience. The hosts discuss advocacy efforts to normalize facial differences and share approaches for teaching children about skin diversity to reduce stigma.

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
Birthmarks fall into two main categories: vascular birthmarks, which appear reddish due to blood vessel clusters near the skin, and pigmented birthmarks, which show brown or darker tones from concentrated melanin.
Vascular birthmarks include macular stains (nicknamed "angel kisses" or "stork bites"), which typically fade by age two or three. Port wine stains resemble spilled wine and never fade—instead darkening and potentially becoming lumpy over time. Hemangiomas, or "strawberry marks," usually develop weeks after birth and disappear by the time a child reaches their double-digit years, though larger ones may leave scars. Deeper hemangiomas appear bluish due to how deoxygenated blood reflects light below the skin.
Pigmented birthmarks arise from melanin-producing cells. Café au lait spots are light brown marks that, if six or more are larger than a dime, may indicate neurofibromatosis. Mongolian spots appear bluish-gray on infants with darker skin tones and typically fade by age six or seven. Congenital moles occur in about 1% of newborns and often have hair, while acquired moles develop later from sun exposure. Atypical moles with irregular shapes or colors signal increased melanoma risk and should be monitored.
Despite extensive research, the origins of most birthmarks remain unclear, though genetics are suspected to play a role. One genetic link has been discovered: a malfunctioning gene may cause port wine stains, and about 6% of children with these birthmarks develop Sturge-Weber syndrome, a neurological disorder.
Most birthmarks require no intervention—just observation through photographic documentation to track changes over time. When treatment is pursued, it's typically for vascular birthmarks, which respond well to laser therapy, unlike pigmented marks.
Pulsed dye laser therapy is the standard treatment for vascular birthmarks. The laser's light wavelength is absorbed by blood vessels in the birthmark, converting to heat that destroys targeted cells while leaving surrounding skin unaffected. Doctors recommend beginning treatment when children are young for optimal results, despite the painful sensation often compared to hot bacon grease splashing on skin.
Some individuals choose alternative approaches, including cosmetic camouflage. Organizations like the British Association of Skin Camouflage train makeup artists in specialized covering techniques. Doctors may also encourage acceptance, suggesting patients embrace their birthmark as a unique trait rather than pursuing medical removal.
Before scientific explanations existed, cultures worldwide created folklore about birthmarks. Chinese tradition held that birthmark location indicated personality traits—right foot for adventurousness, left foot for intelligence, abdomen for greed. Common superstitions claimed pregnant women's cravings caused birthmarks: strawberries led to strawberry-shaped marks, wine to port wine stains, coffee to café au lait spots.
Medieval societies viewed birthmarks more ominously, sometimes interpreting them as the "devil's mark" used in witchcraft accusations. In 17th-19th century Russia, birthmarks were occasionally considered proof of nobility. Some paranormal believers interpret birthmarks as evidence of reincarnation, viewing them as wounds from past lives. One Syrian case describes a boy with a scar-like birthmark who recounted details of being murdered with an axe in a previous life, ultimately leading to the discovery of the victim's body and the killer's confession.
Parents of infants with facial birthmarks often face immediate social pressure. Chuck Bryant describes witnessing parents feeling compelled to explain temporary birthmarks to strangers, while Josh Clark recounts a mother who printed explanatory cards to avoid draining conversations. Children with visible birthmarks frequently become targets of bullying, and Clark notes that throughout history, people with birthmarks have faced exclusion and prejudice.
Bryant and Clark observe that while "beauty marks" like those on Marilyn Monroe or Cindy Crawford are celebrated, prominent facial birthmarks are conspicuously absent among celebrities, suggesting media gatekeeping and narrow beauty standards prevent such visibility. This invisibility reflects broader societal biases.
Advocacy organizations are working to reframe facial differences as normal variations rather than defects. Clark emphasizes that birthmarked individuals differ only in appearance, not cognitively or functionally. These groups promote both practical solutions like camouflage makeup and larger cultural changes aimed at normalizing facial diversity. Bryant shares that his family discusses skin differences using scientific language—explaining melanin and heredity—to foster natural acceptance from a young age and reduce the stigma that leads to lifelong distress.
1-Page Summary
Birthmarks are generally divided into two large categories—vascular and pigmented—each with characteristic appearances and causes. Vascular birthmarks are typically reddish due to clusters of blood vessels close to the skin, while pigmented birthmarks appear in brown or darker tones due to concentrations of melanin.
Vascular birthmarks arise from abnormal clusters of blood vessels beneath the skin. The close proximity of numerous or enlarged vessels gives them a characteristic reddish, purplish, or even bluish hue, depending on the depth and oxygenation level of the blood.
Macular stains, sometimes called flat vascular birthmarks, are caused by enlarged blood vessels clustered near the surface. These often earn nicknames based on their location, such as "angel kisses" on the forehead or "stork bites" on the back of the neck. Macular stains are most common above the neck. They usually appear at birth and tend to fade away by the time a child is two or three years old, although some may persist longer.
Port wine stains are another distinct type of vascular birthmark. They appear as irregular patches that resemble spilled red or purple wine. Unlike macular stains, port wine stains never fade; instead, they may darken and become thicker or lumpy over time, sometimes becoming disfiguring or developing scars. Medical intervention may be recommended if located near sensitive areas like the eyes due to potential impacts on vision.
Hemangiomas, sometimes called "strawberry marks," typically manifest as raised, bright red spots. About 30% are visible at birth, but most develop a few weeks later (between four and six weeks), becoming fully apparent by six months if they're going to occur. While classified as birthmarks—even if not present at birth—most hemangiomas disappear by the time a child is in their double-digit years. Larger hemangiomas can sometimes leave scars once they have receded. They are most commonly found around the head and neck and are more frequent in Caucasian girls.
Some hemangiomas are deeper in the tissue and appear bluish rather than red. This is due to the way deoxygenated blood reflects light differently when it's deeper below the skin.
Pigmented birthmarks result from concentrations of melanin-producing cells (melanocytes) in the skin, leading to spots that range from light brown to black or even bluish-gray.
Café au lait spots are so named for their "coffee with milk" light brown coloring. They can appear anywhere on the body without a preferred location. Typically harmless, these birthmarks may be an indicator of neurofibromatosis if a person has six or more that are larger than a dime. Neurofibromatosis (NF1) is a nerve-related genetic condition—though having multiple café au lait spots is not definitive diagnosis, it should prompt medical attention to rule out NF1 or related conditions.
Mongolian spots are bluish-gray or bluish-green birthmarks that usually appear on the lower back or upper buttocks. They are most common in infants with darker skin pigmentation, such as those of African, Asian, or Hispanic descent. Though they may look like bruises, Mongolian spots are harmless and typically fade by age six or seven.
About 1% of babies are born with congenital moles, which can vary widely in size and darkness. Congenital moles often have hair, which may be fine or coarse and very dark, reflecting their origin in clusters of pigmented cells.
Types and Characteristics of Vascular and Pigmented Birthmarks
Birthmarks are common skin features, and while most require no medical intervention, various approaches exist for monitoring and managing them based on their type and location.
In most cases, medical treatment for birthmarks is unnecessary. Doctors typically follow a "wait and see" approach, closely monitoring birthmarks for any signs of change. The routine involves examining the birthmark, taking pictures, and observing it over time for changes in size, shape, or any unusual developments. This careful observation ensures early detection of any concerning alterations while avoiding unnecessary procedures.
Photographic documentation is standard, allowing physicians to track any physical changes in the birthmark’s appearance over the months or years. This monitoring is particularly important for distinguishing benign spots from those that may require intervention.
When treatment is considered, it is typically for vascular birthmarks—such as hemangiomas and port wine stains—especially if they are prominently located (like on the face, neck, or head). These marks, related to clusters of overdeveloped blood vessels beneath the skin, generally respond well to laser therapy. In contrast, pigmented birthmarks, such as café au lait spots, are less frequently treated since the results are not as reliable. While removal is possible, doctors usually favor observation unless the mark’s presence creates significant personal or medical concern.
The standard medical treatment for vascular birthmarks is pulsed dye laser therapy. This method leverages specific light wavelengths that are absorbed almost exclusively by the birthmark’s blood vessels.
When the pulsed dye laser is applied, the energy is absorbed by the blood vessels (or pigment cells) within the birthmark. The absorbed light converts into heat, which destroys the targeted cells. With enough treatments, the birthmark—such as a hemangioma or port wine stain—breaks up and can eventually disappear.
Doctors recommend beginning laser treatment when children are young for the best outcomes, as skin responds better and healing tends to be more complete. However, the procedure does cause a painful sensation often compared to the feeling of hot bacon grease splashing against the skin. Despite the discomfort, early intervention remains optimal.
The uniqu ...
Medical Causes, Monitoring, and Treatment Options For Birthmarks
Throughout history and across cultures, birthmarks have inspired a wide array of folklore and superstitions. Before scientific explanations for these skin marks existed, communities created creative stories and beliefs to account for their appearance and significance.
Across the globe, specific interpretations arose for the location, color, or appearance of birthmarks. In Chinese folklore, a birthmark on the right foot indicates adventurousness, while one on the left foot signifies intelligence, and an abdominal birthmark allegedly signals greed. These physical markers were often thought to hint at a person’s destiny or character traits.
A common superstition told of pregnant women: if a mother-to-be experienced a shock and touched her own face at that moment, her baby would be born with a birthmark in the very same spot. This idea constructed a mystical connection between a mother’s actions and her unborn child’s physical traits.
Other superstitions revolved around the mother’s cravings or diet. A strawberry-shaped birthmark on an infant was said to result from the mother indulging in too many strawberries. Similarly, a port wine stain suggested the mother drank a lot of wine, and a café au lait spot was humorously linked to coffee consumption. These explanations attempted to rationalize birthmarks by connecting them to ordinary foods and drinks.
Japan offered another explanation: if a pregnant woman looked at a fire or flame, it could cause a burn-like birthmark on the baby. The belief that a mother’s external experiences could leave visible marks on a child persists in some modern folklore.
In medieval societies, birthmarks took on more ominous meanings. They were sometimes interpreted as the “devil’s mark,” used as so-called evidence during witchcraft accusations, famously in cases such as Anne Boleyn’s. Although legend claimed her birthmarks fueled accusations of witchcraft, historical accounts dispute this, showing how folklore can distort historical truth.
Birthmarks could also indicate privilege. In Russia between the 17th and 19th centuries, possessing a birthmark was, at one time, considered proof of nobility. Aristocratic families like the Romanovs allegedly displayed birthmarks as a sign of their distinguished heritage.
Beyond folklore and ...
Historical and Cultural Superstitions About Birthmarks
Parents of infants with facial or neck birthmarks often experience immediate social pressures. Chuck Bryant describes witnessing parents of babies with “strawberry marks” on their heads feeling compelled to explain to strangers that the birthmark is temporary, reflecting an internalized shame or fear of judgment about facial differences. Josh Clark recounts a story from a British birthmark support group, where a mother printed cards explaining her child’s birthmark to avoid repeated, draining conversations with strangers. The mother’s use of cards illustrates not only a coping mechanism but also a profound sadness about the anticipated difficulties her child may face—not because of the birthmark itself, but because of society’s harshness.
Children with visible birthmarks often become targets of bullying and cruelty. Bryant and Clark joke darkly about needing to fight back against mean children, underlining how persistent and hurtful such bullying can be. The experience of being ostracized for birthmarks stretches back through history. Clark points out that since humanity’s earliest days, people with visible birthmarks have faced exclusion and prejudice, once being accused of witchcraft or association with evil. Over time, while the rationale has shifted and is less overtly superstitious, the social stigma endures. Even in modern, ostensibly rational Western societies, children and adults with birthmarks are still targets of social rejection and ridicule.
Bias and discrimination against birthmarked individuals stem entirely from societal prejudice, not any kind of medical concern or risk. Clark stresses that in the West—even as rational attitudes replace superstitious beliefs—ostracism persists simply because someone “looks different.” The stigma can be especially severe with facial marks, as faces are so immediately visible and central to social interactions.
Celebrity culture underscores these biases. Bryant and Clark observe that while so-called “beauty marks”—typically well-placed moles—have become celebrated features in pop culture icons like Marilyn Monroe, Liz Taylor, Cindy Crawford, Scarlett Johansson, and Natalie Portman, truly prominent facial birthmarks are conspicuously absent among well-known public figures. Despite compiling lists of celebrities, they struggle to name anyone famous with an unmistakable facial birthmark, suggesting that media gatekeeping and narrow beauty standards prevent people with such differences from achieving celebrity status. This near-invisibility in the public eye reflects broader societal biases and exclusion.
Advocacy and support organizations play a crucial role in shifting perceptions and providing resources. Instead of framing facial differences as defects to fix, these organizations promote acce ...
Stigma, Bullying, and Resources For Accepting Facial Differences
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser
