In this episode of Stuff You Should Know, Chuck Bryant and Josh Clark explore the science, history, and cultural significance of smiling. They discuss the physiological mechanics behind genuine smiles versus fake ones, explaining how specific facial muscles create the expressions we recognize as authentic happiness. The episode traces the Western cultural evolution of smiling, from its historical association with impropriety to its modern status as a social norm, shaped in part by photography and advertising.
The conversation examines different types of smiles and their social functions, from genuine Duchenne smiles to dominant and coordination smiles used in various contexts. Bryant and Clark also investigate cultural differences in how smiles are interpreted globally and explore the debated question of whether forcing yourself to smile can actually improve your mood. The episode offers insights into both the universal and culturally specific aspects of this common human expression.

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
Smiling is a complex physiological process rooted in unique facial muscle structure and developmental patterns from infancy.
Chuck Bryant explains that facial expressions rely on fast-twitch myosin fibers in the face, which allow for rapid, intricate movements unlike larger muscles in the body. The Zygomaticus major muscles, categorized as "action unit 12" in the Facial Action Coding System, play a key role in smiling.
Genuine smiles—known as Duchenne smiles—involve both mouth and eye movements. Bryant emphasizes that true smiles contract the orbicularis oculi muscle around the eyes, creating characteristic creases or "crow's feet" and causing the fold between eyebrow and eyelid to lower. This involuntary movement is difficult to produce deliberately. French neurologist Guillaume Duchenne first studied these movements scientifically, linking genuine happiness to eye-involved smiles, though modern research has found this isn't always strictly true.
Infant smiling demonstrates important developmental changes. Bryant explains that newborns smile randomly without emotional context, but at 4 to 6 weeks, babies begin social smiling when recognizing caregivers. Research shows that smiling is innate rather than learned: studies on congenitally blind infants reveal they smile in response to voices just as sighted babies do, and blind athletes across 23 cultures display spontaneous expressions indistinguishable from sighted individuals.
The cultural history of smiling in Western society reflects changing norms about decorum and technology. For centuries, showing teeth in portraits was considered inappropriate—etiquette manuals forbade exposing teeth, and broad smiles were associated with drunkenness or insanity. Artists generally depicted smiling only to indicate mental instability or intoxication.
When photography emerged, subjects remained solemn, though by the 1850s and 1860s, exposure times had dropped to just seconds. The absence of smiling persisted due to cultural norms rather than technical limitations. However, in the 1930s, camera advertisements began encouraging people to smile, promoting it as attractive and modern. By the 1950s, smiling had become so normalized in American photography that serious expressions seemed unusual, marking a complete cultural shift.
Human smiles serve distinct psychological and social functions. Psychologist Paul Ekman identified the Duchenne smile as the hallmark of genuine happiness, involving both the zygomaticus major and orbicularis oculi muscles. Research suggests most people cannot replicate Duchenne smiles voluntarily, meaning some genuine happy expressions cannot be convincingly faked.
Different smile types serve various social functions. Reward smiles engage through eye contact and signal genuine interest. Affiliative smiles indicate friendliness and approachability. Dominant smiles are asymmetrical and project power, often leaving recipients uneasy. Embarrassment smiles appear involuntarily with upward lips, pressed mouth, and downward gaze. Coordination smiles, like the "business smile," maintain necessary politeness in formal settings. Uncanny smiles—featuring intense grins with upward gaze and downturned chin—are contextually jarring and unsettling.
Through extensive cross-cultural research, Ekman identified eighteen distinct smiles, underscoring their diversity across cultures and situations.
While smiling is often regarded as universal, interpretation varies significantly across cultures. Ekman's 1960s experiments showed widespread agreement on basic facial expressions, but a 2015 study revealed important nuances. In China, Germany, and Egypt, smiling was associated with intelligence, while in Japan, France, and Iran, people correlated smiling with lower intelligence or naivety.
East Asian cultures emphasize eyes over mouths in smile interpretation. Japanese and Chinese emoticons use eye symbols like triangles to represent smiles, reflecting cultural emphasis on action unit 6 eye movements as the primary indicator of genuine emotion.
Studies also show demographic factors influence smiling rates. High-immigration countries like the United States and Brazil use smiles more frequently to bridge cultural boundaries, while countries with low population densities report higher smiling rates, possibly due to lower daily stress.
The question of whether smiling can make you happier produces mixed research results. A 1988 study found that participants holding a pen in their teeth—mechanically forcing a smile—rated cartoons as funnier. A 2024 study by psychologist Sebastian Korb found that electrical stimulation creating involuntary smiles made participants perceive neutral faces as happy. However, Josh Clark points out that reliance on subjective self-reporting complicates distinguishing genuine emotional changes from biases.
Dialectical Behavior Therapy uses a "half-smile" technique, encouraging a subtle smile to boost positivity and approachability. While mostly anecdotal, practitioners argue the effect is modest but real.
Research on service industry workers reveals a concerning pattern: employees who must perform "surface acting" with forced smiles are more likely to engage in heavy alcohol consumption, suggesting that regularly faking expressions can have negative consequences. Overall, while there's some evidence that smiling might induce minor increases in positive emotion, research remains inconclusive, especially when smiles are fake or forced.
1-Page Summary
Smiling is a complex physiological process rooted in the unique muscular structure of the human face and evolving developmental patterns from infancy.
Facial expressions, including smiles, rely on the rapid movement of facial muscles, which is made possible by the abundance of fast-twitch myosin fibers in the face. Chuck Bryant explains that this allows for the subtle and quick expressions of emotion through facial muscles. Unlike larger muscles like the biceps, facial muscles can create varied and intricate shapes quickly.
The Zygomaticus major muscles play a key role in smiling, and their movement is categorized in the Facial Action Coding System (FACS) as "action unit 12." The FACS is a scientific system for categorizing the physical expression of emotions via specific muscle contractions.
Bryant highlights that fast-twitch myosin fibers in the face, unlike the muscle fibers found in other body parts, allow for the quick changes in facial expressions that are crucial for nuanced, rapid communication.
A genuine, joyful smile is not just a matter of moving the mouth; it also involves certain involuntary eye movements.
True smiles, known as Duchenne smiles, involve action unit 6: contraction of the orbicularis oculi muscle around the eyes, creating the characteristic creases or "crow's feet." This expression also causes the fold between the eyebrow and eyelid to lower. Bryant emphasizes that this involuntary movement is difficult to produce at will, serving as the classic distinguishing feature between genuine and fake smiles.
French neurologist Guillaume Duchenne was the first to study these involuntary muscle movements scientifically. Using electrical stimulation and photography, Duchenne categorized facial muscle action and associated genuine smiles with both mouth and eye movements. He claimed the orbicularis oculi would only contract from "the sweet emotions of the soul." Though modern research has found this is not always strictly true, the term "Duchenne smile" still denotes a smile involving both the mouth (action unit 12) and the eyes (action unit 6) as indicators of genuine happiness.
Infant smiling demonstrates important developmental changes from birth through the early weeks of life.
Bryant explains that newborn babies smile for random, reflexive reasons unrelated to emotional content. These early smiles are not socially motivated and o ...
The Science and Physiology Of Smiling
The cultural history of smiling in Western society reflects changing norms about decorum, technology, and the meaning of expression in visual representation. For centuries, showing teeth in portraits or photographs was rare and often frowned upon, shaped as much by etiquette as by technical limitations of early art and photography.
Painted portraits from earlier centuries nearly always feature subjects with serious expressions. This was partly practical: holding a spontaneous, realistic smile for the long sessions required for painted portraits was nearly impossible. More importantly, etiquette manuals of the period explicitly forbade the exposure of teeth. Boys were taught that “decorum forbids you to allow your teeth to be uncovered since nature gave us lips to conceal them.” Silent, closed-mouth laughter was considered the only acceptable form of amusement.
Across Europe, for hundreds of years, a broad smile in a portrait was associated with undesirable qualities such as immaturity, drunkenness, or insanity. Artists generally depicted people smiling only to indicate that they were mentally unstable, intoxicated, or meant to be the butt of a joke. For everyone else, maintaining a reserved, composed face was the standard for formal portraits.
When photography emerged, subjects also appeared rather solemn, a convention sometimes attributed to the long exposure times required by early cameras. However, by the 1850s and 1860s, exposure times had dropped to just a few seconds—far short enough to hold a smile. Despite this, the absence of smiling in photos persisted, likely due more to lingering cultural norms from the era of painted portraits than to technical limitations. Smiling in photos was considered undignified—“something you did candidly, not in a formal picture.”
Old yearbooks show that smiles were far from standard; serious expressions remained common well into the early twentieth century. The hesitancy to show teeth may also be attributed to the state of dental care at the time. This reluctance was a holdover from the portrait era’s standards for formality. However, over the decades, people began smiling more in photos, especially as the idea ...
Smiling In Western Society: History and Cultural Significance
Human smiles are not monolithic; they come in many varieties, each serving a distinct psychological or social function. Research shows that the mechanics and messages of smiles are more complex than they first appear, involving specific facial muscles and intertwining with context, emotion, and social dynamics.
A Duchenne smile, identified by psychologist Paul Ekman, is widely considered the hallmark of genuine happiness. It involves two key muscle groups: the zygomaticus major, which pulls the mouth upward (action unit 12), and the orbicularis oculi around the eyes (action unit 6). When both are activated, the eyes crinkle at the corners, creating a warm, authentic expression.
While Duchenne smiles are often seen as the standard of authenticity, not every flash of happiness brings about the full combination of mouth and eye muscle activation. Sometimes genuine happiness may present without strong eye involvement, blurring the line between a Duchenne and a non-Duchenne smile.
Research indicates it is extremely difficult for most people to voluntarily produce a full Duchenne smile. While some, like Tyra Banks, are known for “smiling with their eyes,” the nuanced movement—such as the downward motion of the eye cover fold and dipping of eyebrow ends—remains almost impossible to replicate on command. Even skilled “smilers” tend to fall short of this involuntary cue, bolstering the idea that some truly genuine happy expressions cannot be convincingly faked.
Different smile types serve a range of social functions, some signaling warmth and connection, others power, submission, or even unease. These categories reflect how context and facial features alter a smile’s meaning.
Reward smiles are characterized by strong eye involvement and communicate authentic enjoyment or approval. This type of smile, full of eye contact and enthusiasm, offers feedback to a conversation partner, letting them know their message or presence is genuinely appreciated.
Affiliative smiles, which one might flash at a passerby in the grocery store, indicate friendliness and social openness. These smiles tend to be relaxed and nonthreatening, reassuring others of benign intentions.
Dominant smiles are often asymmetrical, with one lip raised higher than the other. Rather than warmth, these smiles project power or superiority and can leave their recipients feeling uneasy or even threatened. Notably, some people capitalize on dominant smiles to exploit moments when others show vulnerability, as with an embarrassment smile.
The miserable smile reflects reluctant acceptance and is usually asymmetrical, layered atop an otherwise negative expression. This smile doesn’t hide dissatisfaction; instead, it communicates resignation, as if to say, “Well, I guess this is happening now.” It’s a visible marker of unhappiness or discontent.
Embarrassment smiles appear quickly and involuntarily. The lips tilt up slightly and are pres ...
Types of Smiles and Their Functions
Smiling is often regarded as a universal sign of happiness, but research reveals that the interpretation of a smile varies significantly across cultures. Psychological experiments and cross-cultural studies highlight the nuances in how societies around the world perceive and use smiling, shaped by cultural norms, historical context, and demographic factors.
In the 1960s, psychologist Paul Ekman conducted landmark experiments where he showed images of faces displaying various emotions to people from different cultures. Participants chose the matching emotion from a provided list, leading Ekman to assert that there are six universal facial expressions: anger, disgust, enjoyment, fear, sadness, and surprise—later adding contempt as a seventh. Despite criticism regarding his methodology, additional studies have generally confirmed that there is widespread agreement on identifying basic facial expressions, especially associating smiles with happiness.
However, subsequent research has also found important cultural nuances. A 2015 study presented photographs of different facial expressions to participants from 44 cultures. While smiles were most commonly linked to happiness, their social interpretation differed by society. For example, in China, Germany, and Egypt, smiling was associated with intelligence, but in Japan, France, and Iran, people correlated smiling with lower intelligence—sometimes viewing a broad smile as a sign of naivety or a lack of seriousness.
These findings underscore that while the physical act of smiling may be universal, the social and intellectual value attributed to a smile can be the opposite in different countries. In some cultures such as China, Germany, and Egypt, smiling can be a subtle cue for wit or cleverness, whereas in Japan, France, and Iran, it may be seen as silly or less intelligent. The breadth and display of one’s smile therefore carry different social weights depending on cultural context.
In East Asian societies like Japan and China, the eyes play a central role in interpreting and representing smiles. Rather than focusing on the mouth, people in these cultures pay attention to the subtle cues of the eyes—specifically, the action unit six muscle movements around the eyes—which are seen as the primary markers of genuine emotion. This preference is evident in the common use of eye-based emoticons in digital communication: Japanese and Chinese emoticons often depict smiles with triangl ...
Cultural Differences in Smile Interpretation Across Societies
The question of whether smiling can make you happier has captured the interest of scientists for many years, dating back to Darwin’s observation that facial expressions might influence emotions. Despite numerous studies, research produces mixed results and leaves the causal link between smiling and actual happiness unclear.
One frequently cited study from 1988 explored this phenomenon using an inventive method. Participants held a pen in their teeth, which mechanically forced their mouth into the shape of a smile, without telling them that the experiment was about smiling or happiness. Instead, they were told the pen-holding might be a new technique to help disabled people write. The researchers then asked participants to rate how funny Ziggy cartoons were. The group holding the pen between their teeth—mimicking a smile—rated the cartoons as funnier than those who did not, suggesting that engaging smiling muscles could influence emotional response.
A more recent 2024 study led by psychologist Sebastian Korb of the University of Essex offered a different approach. Researchers used a slight electric current to activate the fast-twitch muscles used for smiling, creating involuntary half-second smiles. When these smiles were induced, participants were more likely to assess neutral digital faces as happy. This suggests that even brief, physiologically-induced smiles might shift psychological perception toward positivity.
However, as Josh Clark points out, the major limitation of these studies lies in their reliance on subjective self-reporting. Whether participants are asked if they feel happier, find a comic funny, or perceive a face as happy, results rest on personal biases and self-evaluation. This subjectivity complicates drawing firm conclusions regarding smiling’s direct impact on true emotional state.
Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) offers a practical application called the "half-smile" technique. Rather than broadly grinning, individuals are encouraged to make a small, subtle smile—noticeable to themselves but not overt to others. This is intended to help the person feel a bit more positive and approachable, without appearing inauthentic or over the top in social situations.
While mostly anecdot ...
Whether Smiling Can Actually Make You Happy
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser
