How Cognitive Biases Work
In this episode of Stuff You Should Know, hosts Chuck Bryant and Josh Clark examine cognitive biases through the lens of the "Pepsi Paradox." This phenomenon reveals how consumers consistently prefer Pepsi over Coca-Cola in blind taste tests, despite claiming loyalty to Coke—a disconnect that stems from the influence of branding and familiarity on our decision-making processes.
The hosts explore how cognitive biases, particularly loss aversion, affect consumer behavior and brand loyalty. They trace the century-long rivalry between Pepsi and Coca-Cola, including Pepsi's strategic use of this paradox in their marketing campaigns. The discussion shows how the Pepsi Challenge campaign capitalized on these blind taste test results, demonstrating the gap between stated preferences and actual taste experiences.
This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Feb 10, 2026 episode of the Stuff You Should Know
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
1-Page Summary
Pepsi Paradox and Pepsi Challenge Campaign
Chuck Bryant and Josh Clark explore an intriguing phenomenon known as the "Pepsi Paradox," where consumers consistently prefer Pepsi over Coca-Cola in blind taste tests, despite claiming loyalty to Coke. This paradox has been confirmed through numerous studies and focus groups, including Coca-Cola's own secret research.
Cognitive Biases Behind the Pepsi Paradox
Josh Clark explains that this disconnect between stated preference and actual taste stems from powerful cognitive biases. When people know they're drinking Coke, their brain responds differently due to branding and familiarity. Clark notes that loss aversion plays a significant role - the fear of "losing" their preferred Coke brand outweighs the potential "gain" of switching to better-tasting Pepsi.
History and Rivalry Between Pepsi and Coke Brands
The rivalry between these beverage giants spans over a century, with Pepsi consistently challenging Coke's market dominance. Pepsi leveraged the paradox through their famous "Pepsi Challenge" marketing campaign in the 1970s and 80s, conducting public blind taste tests in shopping malls that drew significant media attention. The challenge's success continues today - in the 2025 revival, 66% of participants preferred Pepsi Zero Sugar over Coke Zero Sugar, even in Coca-Cola's hometown of Atlanta.
1-Page Summary
Additional Materials
Counterarguments
- The preference for Pepsi in blind taste tests may not translate to real-world purchasing behavior, where branding, marketing, and consumer habits play a significant role.
- The studies confirming the Pepsi Paradox might not be representative of the entire population, as taste preferences can vary widely among different demographics and cultures.
- Cognitive biases are complex and multifaceted, and other biases beyond loss aversion could also influence the stated preference for Coke.
- The impact of branding and familiarity on taste perception could be seen as a testament to the strength of Coke's brand rather than a negative cognitive bias.
- Loss aversion might not fully explain consumer loyalty to Coke; other factors such as brand trust, product availability, and social influences could also be significant.
- The long-standing rivalry between Pepsi and Coke involves numerous marketing strategies, and the Pepsi Challenge is just one aspect of Pepsi's efforts to compete with Coke.
- The success of the Pepsi Challenge campaign might be influenced by the novelty and entertainment value of the event rather than a genuine preference for Pepsi.
- The results of the 2025 Pepsi Challenge revival could be influenced by the specific context or execution of the event and may not reflect broader consumer preferences.
Actionables
- You can explore your own taste preferences by conducting a personal blind taste test with friends or family. Gather a variety of cola brands, including Pepsi and Coke, and have someone serve them to you without revealing which is which. Rate each one on taste alone, and then see if your ratings align with your stated brand preferences. This can be a fun social activity and an eye-opener about your true preferences versus brand influences.
- Challenge your own susceptibility to branding by repackaging a familiar product. Buy a generic or less popular brand of a product you regularly use, and place it in the container of your preferred brand. Use it for a week and note any differences in your satisfaction or perception of quality. This experiment can help you determine if your loyalty is to the brand or to the product itself.
- Use your understanding of cognitive biases to make more informed purchasing decisions. Before buying a product, especially one with strong brand identity like Coke or Pepsi, list the reasons for your choice. Are you choosing based on past experiences, brand loyalty, or actual product quality? This reflection can help you become a more conscious consumer, potentially leading you to discover new preferences and save money by not defaulting to brand names.
Get access to the context and additional materials
Pepsi Paradox and Pepsi Challenge Campaign
Chuck Bryant and Josh Clark delve into the "Pepsi Paradox," a phenomenon showing that consumers often prefer Pepsi over Coke in blind taste tests, despite their professed preference for Coke.
Pepsi Paradox: Despite Preferring Coke, Blind Tests Show People Choose Pepsi
The paradox is quite simple: people say they prefer Coke, but blind tests reveal a preference for Pepsi. Studies and focus groups have repeatedly revealed this paradox, proving that when unaware of the brand they are tasting – the branding, marketing, and loyalty stripped away – people naturally trend toward choosing Pepsi's taste over Coke's.
Studies Show That People Prefer Pepsi When Unaware of the Brand They Are Tasting
Chuck Bryant and Josh Clark discuss this oddity, mentioning that blind taste tests consistently show people's innate preference for Pepsi. Contrasting these findings with professed loyalty to Coke, the paradox becomes clear.
Focus Group Reveals a Paradox: People Favor Coke but Prefer Pepsi's Taste
Even Coke's own secret focus groups confirmed this phenomenon: when the brand is unknown, people tend to choose the taste of Pepsi. This presents a direct contrast between expressed loyalty and actual taste preference.
The Pepsi Challenge: Blind Taste Tests Between Coke and Pepsi
This phenomenon was brought to public attention through the Pepsi Challenge, a clever marketing campaign by Pepsi.
Pepsi Challenge Promotion Drew Crowds and Media Attention At Malls and Venues
During the 1970s and 80s, Pepsi set up booths in shopping malls and in ...
Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary
Pepsi Paradox and Pepsi Challenge Campaign
Additional Materials
Counterarguments
- The preference for Pepsi in blind taste tests may not translate to real-world purchasing behavior, where brand loyalty, marketing, and other factors play a significant role.
- The sweetness of Pepsi could be a factor in the initial taste test preference, but it might not reflect long-term consumption preferences, as some people might find it too sweet over time.
- The methodology of the taste tests, including the sample size and demographic of participants, could influence the outcome and may not be representative of the general population.
- The context of the taste tests, such as the environment in which they were conducted and the presentation of the drinks, could affect the results.
- The Pepsi Challenge campaign itself could introduce bias, as it was a marketing strategy designed to promote Pepsi and might have influenced participants' expectations or perceptions.
- Taste is subjective, and individual preferences can vary widely, so the results of the Pepsi Challenge might not be indicative of a universal preference.
- The long-term success of Coke despite the Pepsi Challenge suggests that factors other than taste, such as brand image, cult ...
Actionables
- You can explore your own taste preferences by organizing a mini blind taste test at home with friends or family. Gather a variety of similar beverages, label them with numbers, and have everyone taste and rate them without knowing the brands. This can reveal surprising preferences and spark discussions about perceived versus actual tastes.
- Enhance your understanding of marketing influence by keeping a journal of your product choices for a week, noting when brand loyalty sways your decisions. Afterward, review your entries to identify patterns where brand perception might be influencing your choices more than the product quality itself.
- Develop a more informed shopping ha ...
Get access to the context and additional materials
Cognitive Biases Behind the Pepsi Paradox
Josh Clark delves into the intricacies of the Pepsi Paradox, offering insights into why people’s preferences don’t always align with their actual taste experiences.
Branding and Familiarity's Influence on Taste Perception
Josh Clark explains that the human brain relies on heuristics or mental shortcuts, which substantially impact taste perception and thereby contribute to cognitive biases.
Coke vs. Pepsi: Familiarity Influences Preference
Coke has focused on creating a brand that elicits a sense of identity and allegiance, influencing consumer choices to the point where the preference leans heavily toward Coke, even though blind taste tests often reveal a preference for Pepsi.
Cognitive Biases Make People Rate Coke Higher Despite Preferring Pepsi In Blind Tests
Clark discusses how, when individuals are informed about what they are drinking, their taste perception changes. Studies have shown that the awareness of drinking Coke or Pepsi makes the brain respond differently, revealing how branding and familiarity can eclipse the genuine taste preference for Pepsi as seen in blind tests.
Psychological Factors: Loss Aversion and Familiarity Preference
Josh Clark reflects on deeper psychological elements that play into the Pepsi Paradox.
"Losing" Preferred Coke Affects More Than Gaining Tasty Pepsi
Loss aversion, a tendency w ...
Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary
Cognitive Biases Behind the Pepsi Paradox
Additional Materials
Counterarguments
- The impact of heuristics on taste perception might be overstated, as individual differences in taste and preference can be significant and not solely attributable to cognitive biases.
- The preference for Coke in non-blind settings could be due to factors other than branding, such as taste profile differences that some consumers might genuinely prefer when aware of the brand.
- The influence of branding on taste perception might not be as strong in individuals who are less susceptible to marketing or who actively resist the influence of branding.
- Loss aversion might not be the primary factor in the preference for Coke; some consumers might have a genuine affinity for the taste of Coke that is unrelated to the fear of losing their preferred brand.
- The idea that Coke's brand familiarity hides the genuine taste prefere ...
Actionables
- You can explore your own taste biases by conducting a personal blind taste test with friends using generic and brand-name products. Invite a group of friends over and serve them two identical dishes or drinks, one labeled with a well-known brand and the other unbranded or with a lesser-known brand. After they've tasted both, ask them which they prefer and discuss how branding may have influenced their choice. This can be a fun social experiment to see how much brand loyalty affects taste perception.
- Challenge your loss aversion by switching your usual branded purchases to store brands for a month. Keep a journal to note any differences you perceive in quality or taste and how you feel about the switch. This exercise can help you become more aware of your purchasing decisions and whether they're based on actual product preference or just the fear of losing the familiar brand.
- Enhance your awareness of ...
Get access to the context and additional materials
History and Rivalry Between Pepsi and Coke Brands
Explore the enduring contest for soft drink supremacy between two beverage giant.
Pepsi, Invented 7 Years After Coke, Has Competed For a Century
Pepsi took direct aim at Coke from the beginning, setting the stage for one of the most legendary business rivalries in history.
Pepsi Marketed As a Digestion Tonic Before Rechristening
Initially introduced as a digestion tonic, Pepsi rebranded to become a direct competitor to Coca-Cola.
Famous Business Rivalry: Pepsi vs. Coke
For over a century, Pepsi has positioned itself as the main rival to Coke, consistently challenging Coke’s dominance in the beverage market.
Pepsi's Strategy: Challenging Coke Through the Pepsi Challenge
Pepsi Used Taste Test Results to Challenge Coke's Dominance
Pepsi conducted research and discovered that many preferred the taste of their cola over Coke's. This insight led to the aggressive marketing strategy known as the Pepsi Challenge.
Pepsi Challenge Boosted Brand Publicity
The Pepsi Challenge was more than a taste test; it was a marketing spectacle. Held in public spaces like shopping malls, it invited people to blind test Pepsi against Coke. This event attracted spectators and garnered local media attention. The newsworthy nature of the challenge reinforced Pepsi's brand presence.
Over the last century, Pepsi has mai ...
Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary
History and Rivalry Between Pepsi and Coke Brands
Additional Materials
Counterarguments
- The preference for Pepsi over Coke in taste tests like the Pepsi Challenge may not reflect consumers' preferences in real-world settings, as taste tests can be influenced by many factors, including the specific conditions of the test and psychological biases.
- The success of Pepsi's marketing campaigns, such as the Pepsi Challenge, does not necessarily translate to a definitive superiority of the product; it may simply demonstrate the effectiveness of marketing strategies in influencing public perception.
- Market share and sales figures are also critical indicators of brand dominance, and Coca-Cola has historically led in global sales, which could suggest that despite Pepsi's marketing efforts, Coke may still be the preferred brand overall.
- The claim that Pepsi won the Pepsi Challenge in 100% of the markets, including Atlanta, could be seen as an example of selection bias or marketing hyperbole, as it is unlikely that every single market would show unanimous preference without any exceptions.
- The focus on the Pepsi Challenge and taste tests may overshadow other important factors in consumer choice, such as brand loyalty, product availability, pricing, and the broader product portfolio of each company.
- The rivalry between Pepsi and Coke extends beyond just ta ...
Actionables
- You can explore your own preferences by conducting a mini blind taste test at home with friends and family using different brands of a product. Invite a small group over, label each product with a number or letter to keep it anonymous, and have everyone taste and rate them. This can be a fun social activity and a way to discover what you truly enjoy without brand influence.
- Develop your critical thinking by comparing the marketing strategies of two competing products in a category you're interested in. Take notes on how each brand positions itself against the other, what claims they make, and how they appeal to their audience. This exercise can sharpen your analytical skills and make you a more informed consumer.
- Enhance your decision-making by creating a personal challenge when choosing ...
Get access to the context and additional materials
Create Summaries for anything on the web
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser
