Selects: How Forgiveness Works
In this episode of Stuff You Should Know, hosts Chuck Bryant and Josh Clark examine the science and psychology of forgiveness. They explore how both revenge and forgiveness serve evolutionary purposes, with roots in animal behavior, and discuss studies showing that various species—from chimps to dolphins—display reconciliation behaviors similar to humans.
The hosts break down the health implications of forgiveness versus holding grudges, explaining how letting go of negative emotions can lead to better stress management and overall well-being. They present practical approaches to forgiveness, including the REACH model, and explore the relationship between religious beliefs and forgiving behavior. The discussion frames forgiveness as a learned skill that primarily benefits the person who was wronged, rather than the wrongdoer.
This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Jan 10, 2026 episode of the Stuff You Should Know
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
1-Page Summary
The Evolutionary Basis of Forgiveness
In this episode, Chuck Bryant and Josh Clark explore how both revenge and forgiveness serve evolutionary purposes, with roots extending beyond human behavior into the animal kingdom.
Evolution and Social Dynamics
Clark explains that revenge serves as a signal to groups that an individual won't be exploited, increasing survival chances. However, forgiveness plays an equally important role. The "valuable relationship hypothesis" suggests that after revenge, reconciliation becomes crucial for maintaining group cooperation and survival.
Bryant and Clark note that these behaviors aren't uniquely human. Primatologist Franz de Waal has observed reconciliation behaviors among wild chimps, and similar patterns appear in various species including bonobos, sheep, dolphins, and hyenas, suggesting forgiveness is a natural phenomenon crucial for social cohesion.
The Psychological and Health Benefits of Forgiveness
The hosts emphasize that forgiveness primarily benefits the person who was wronged, not the wrongdoer. It's about releasing negative emotions without necessarily condoning the harmful action. Clark references studies showing that individuals who harbor grudges experience increased stress levels, while those who practice forgiveness often show better health outcomes, particularly in managing chronic stress.
Practical Methods for Practicing Forgiveness
The REACH model provides a structured approach to forgiveness: Recall the event objectively, Empathize with the wrongdoer (without excusing their actions), give an Altruistic gift of forgiveness, and maintain forgiveness despite negative emotions. Bryant and Clark emphasize that forgiveness is a learned skill rather than an innate trait, and while religious individuals often report being more forgiving, studies show actual forgiving behavior isn't necessarily tied to religiosity.
1-Page Summary
Additional Materials
Clarifications
- The "valuable relationship hypothesis" suggests that individuals forgive to preserve important social bonds that benefit their survival and well-being. It posits that maintaining cooperation with others outweighs the cost of holding grudges. This hypothesis explains why forgiveness follows revenge, allowing groups to function smoothly. It highlights the evolutionary advantage of repairing relationships rather than severing them.
- Revenge signals to others that an individual defends their interests and will respond to harm, deterring future exploitation. This reduces the likelihood of being targeted again, promoting personal survival. It also enforces social norms by punishing wrongdoers, which benefits the group. Thus, revenge helps maintain order and cooperation within social groups.
- In animals, forgiveness and reconciliation often involve specific behaviors like grooming, close physical contact, or vocalizations that reduce tension after conflicts. For example, chimpanzees may embrace or groom each other shortly after a fight to restore social bonds. These actions signal a willingness to repair relationships and maintain group harmony. Such behaviors help prevent ongoing aggression and promote cooperation within the group.
- Forgiving someone means letting go of anger and resentment toward them. Condoning harmful actions means accepting or approving those actions as right or justified. Forgiveness focuses on emotional release, not on excusing or ignoring the wrongdoing. This distinction allows people to heal without endorsing bad behavior.
- The REACH model was developed by psychologist Everett Worthington to guide forgiveness. It stands for Recall the hurt, Empathize with the offender, Altruistic gift of forgiveness, Commit to forgive, and Hold onto forgiveness. Each step helps individuals process emotions and rebuild trust gradually. This method encourages active, intentional forgiveness rather than passive forgetting.
- Forgiveness is considered a learned skill because it involves complex emotional regulation and perspective-taking that develop over time through experience and social learning. Unlike reflexive reactions, forgiveness requires conscious effort to manage feelings like anger and resentment. Cultural, familial, and social influences shape how individuals understand and practice forgiveness. This means people can improve their ability to forgive through intentional practice and guidance.
- Religiosity often encourages forgiveness as a moral or spiritual ideal, leading individuals to report higher levels of forgiveness. However, actual forgiving behavior involves complex emotional processes that may not align with these ideals. Social desirability bias can cause people to overstate their forgiveness in surveys or conversations. Thus, reported forgiveness reflects intentions or beliefs more than consistent real-life actions.
- Revenge deters others from harming an individual by signaling consequences, thus protecting resources and status. Forgiveness helps repair social bonds, which are vital for cooperation and mutual support in groups. Both behaviors balance conflict and alliance, enhancing group stability and individual survival. This dynamic promotes long-term relationships essential for thriving in social species.
- Forgiveness reduces stress by lowering the body's production of stress hormones like cortisol. It decreases rumination, which is repetitive negative thinking that prolongs emotional distress. This emotional relief improves immune function and cardiovascular health. Additionally, forgiveness promotes positive emotions that enhance overall psychological well-being.
Counterarguments
- While revenge may signal that an individual will not be exploited, it can also escalate conflicts and reduce overall group cohesion, which could be detrimental to survival in the long term.
- The "valuable relationship hypothesis" may not account for all instances of forgiveness, as some individuals may forgive without the prospect of reconciliation or maintaining a relationship.
- The observation of forgiveness-like behaviors in animals does not necessarily mean these behaviors have the same psychological underpinnings as human forgiveness; anthropomorphizing animal behavior can be misleading.
- The benefits of forgiveness for the person who was wronged might not always be immediate or clear, and in some cases, individuals may feel that forgiveness is not in their best interest or may struggle with the concept.
- The REACH model, while helpful for some, may not be universally applicable or effective for everyone, as individuals may have different processes and cultural backgrounds that influence how they approach forgiveness.
- The claim that forgiveness is a learned skill rather than an innate trait could be debated, as there may be innate predispositions that influence one's ability to forgive, which are then shaped by experience and learning.
- The relationship between religiosity and forgiveness is complex, and while studies may show that actual forgiving behavior isn't necessarily tied to religiosity, other factors such as community support, moral teachings, and personal beliefs could influence this relationship in ways not captured by the studies mentioned.
Get access to the context and additional materials
The Evolutionary Basis of Forgiveness
Chuck Bryant and Josh Clark delve into how both fighting back and forgiving play significant roles in evolution, suggesting that revenge and forgiveness are not only fundamental to humans but also deeply rooted in the animal kingdom.
Revenge and Forgiveness Serve Evolutionary Functions In Groups
Revenge and forgiveness may seem like opposites, but Bryant and Clark point out that they both have evolutionary advantages.
Revenge Signals: A Defense Against Exploitation
Josh Clark explains the evolutionary advantage of revenge in social groups. When an individual retaliates, it broadcasts to the group that they are not to be taken advantage of. This deters future exploitation and is key to survival and the likelihood of passing on genes. Clark underscores the innate human response to retribution, pointing to the popularity of revenge movies.
Interestingly, studies have shown that the presence of a third party observer increases the likelihood of physical retaliation in a dispute. This highlights the signaling aspect of revenge—indicating to others that one will not be exploited without consequence. Chuck Bryant talks about "negative reciprocity," which involves retaliating in kind if one is wronged, reinforcing the message to the group of the individual's unwillingness to be taken advantage of.
Forgiveness Restores Relationships, Preserving Cohesion and Cooperation
Forgiveness comes into play when considering the dynamics of tight-knit social groups. Clark notes that there are limitations on who individuals can feud with when survival depends on cooperation. The "valuable relationship hypothesis" suggests that after taking revenge, reconciliation is important to repair relationships and maintain the necessary cooperative interdependence for group survival.
Bryant furthers this point by suggesting that practicing forgiveness after an act of revenge allows for the restoration of relationships within the group. This signals to others that while one is not to be crossed, they are also capable of working with others, thus adding value to the group's cohesiveness and cooperative efforts.
Forgiveness Found Across Animal Kingdom, Not Just "Higher Virtue"
Contrary to the belief that forgiveness is a 'higher virtue' exclusive to humans, Clark and Bryant reveal that these dynamics are also present in the animal kingdom.
Primatologists Observe Reconciliation Among Chimps, Bonobos, and Others After Fi ...
Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary
The Evolutionary Basis of Forgiveness
Additional Materials
Clarifications
- Negative reciprocity refers to responding to harmful or unfair actions with similar negative actions, creating a cycle of retaliation. It helps enforce social norms by discouraging exploitation and signaling that harmful behavior will have consequences. This mechanism maintains balance in social groups by promoting fairness and deterring repeated offenses. It is a fundamental aspect of conflict management in both human and animal societies.
- The "valuable relationship hypothesis" suggests that individuals prioritize maintaining important social bonds because these relationships provide long-term benefits like cooperation and support. In evolutionary biology, it explains why forgiveness occurs after conflict—to preserve alliances that enhance survival and reproductive success. This hypothesis highlights that social animals balance retaliation with reconciliation to sustain group stability. It underscores the adaptive value of repairing relationships rather than severing them permanently.
- The presence of a third-party observer increases physical retaliation because it amplifies the social signal being sent. Retaliating publicly demonstrates strength and deters others from future exploitation. It also helps build or maintain a reputation for toughness within the group. This social reputation can influence an individual's status and access to resources.
- Revenge deters others from exploiting or harming an individual again, reducing future threats. This protection helps maintain access to resources like food, mates, and territory. By signaling strength and willingness to retaliate, it discourages aggression from rivals. Consequently, individuals who effectively defend themselves have higher chances of survival and reproducing.
- Forgiveness reduces ongoing conflict, which conserves energy and resources vital for survival. It helps rebuild trust, enabling individuals to cooperate effectively again. This cooperation increases the group's overall stability and success in facing environmental challenges. Over time, groups with forgiveness behaviors are more likely to thrive and pass on their genes.
- Reconciliation behaviors in non-human animals include grooming, hugging, and close physical contact after conflicts. These actions reduce tension and repair social bonds, which helps maintain group stability. Such behaviors indicate that animals value long-term relationships for cooperation and survival. This shows that forgiveness-like processes are evolutionary strategies, not just human moral choices.
- Many animals live in social groups where cooperatio ...
Counterarguments
- The interpretation of revenge and forgiveness as evolutionary strategies may be overly simplistic, as it may not account for the complexity of human and animal social interactions and the multitude of factors influencing behavior.
- The concept of "negative reciprocity" might not always lead to optimal outcomes in a group setting, as it could escalate conflicts and disrupt group harmony.
- The "valuable relationship hypothesis" may not apply universally across all species or within all contexts of a species' social structure, as different species and groups have varying social dynamics.
- The assumption that forgiveness is always beneficial for group cohesion might overlook situations where forgiveness could be exploited by repeat offenders, potentially undermining trust and cooperation in a group.
- The evidence for forgiveness in the animal kingdom, while compelling, may be subject to anthropomorphism, where human interpretations of animal behavior might not accurately reflect the animals' motivations or experiences.
- The focus on evolutionary advantages may neglect the role of cultural, societal, and individual learning in the development and expression of revenge and forgiveness behaviors.
- The idea that the presence of third-party observers increases the likelihood of retaliation might not ...
Get access to the context and additional materials
The Psychological and Health Benefits of Forgiveness
Research into forgiveness has highlighted its benefits primarily for the person who has been wronged, not the offender. Chuck Bryant and Josh Clark share their insights into how forgiveness can lead to psychological relief and improved health outcomes.
Forgiveness Is for the Wronged, Not the Wrongdoer
Forgiveness Releases Negative Emotions Like Anger and Resentment
The hosts elaborate that forgiveness is an action done by the forgivee—it is about that individual releasing negative feelings to feel better, rather than about the transgressor seeking or deserving forgiveness. In some instances, the act of forgiveness can make the transgressor suffer worse out of guilt, but it is not done for the wrongdoer, and can even occur without their awareness. Forgiveness is also a process of self-preservation, releasing a person from the turmoil inflicted by someone who wronged them, as discussed by Josh Clark.
Forgiveness Isn't Condoning or Forgetting
Forgiveness involves letting go of anger without condoning the action that caused the hurt. It does not excuse the past behavior or allow any future repetition of it. There are times when forgiveness is not appropriate, such as situations that could lead to further victimization. The hosts also mention that while forgiveness is not forthcoming, it is still possible to move on without resentment and anger, therefore not allowing the wrongdoer to maintain control over one's emotional well-being.
Forgiveness Linked To Improved Health Outcomes
Chronic Anger and Resentment Boost Stress, Blood Pressure, and Health Issues
Chronic stress, tied to chronic anger, can lead to serious health issues such as high blood pressure, diabetes, and poor cardiovascular health. Josh Clark speaks about a study where participants who harbored grudges exhibited increased stress levels, even afte ...
Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary
The Psychological and Health Benefits of Forgiveness
Additional Materials
Clarifications
- The forgivee is the person who has been hurt or wronged by someone else's actions. The transgressor is the person who committed the wrongdoing or caused the harm. Forgiveness is an act performed by the forgivee, focusing on their emotional healing. It does not require the transgressor's involvement or awareness.
- Forgiveness as a process of self-preservation means protecting your own mental and emotional health by letting go of harmful feelings. Holding onto anger or resentment can cause ongoing stress that damages your well-being. By forgiving, you reduce this internal conflict and create space for peace and healing. This act prioritizes your own recovery rather than focusing on the offender.
- When someone forgives, it can signal to the transgressor that their actions caused real harm. This realization may trigger feelings of guilt, even if the transgressor was unaware of the forgiveness. The guilt arises because forgiveness highlights the impact of their wrongdoing. This process can happen without the transgressor being directly informed or involved.
- Forgiveness means choosing to let go of anger and resentment toward someone who hurt you. Condoning or excusing behavior means accepting or approving the harmful action as acceptable or justified. Forgiveness does not imply that the behavior was right or should be repeated. It is possible to forgive while still holding the person accountable for their actions.
- Forgiveness is not appropriate in situations where it might enable further harm or abuse, such as ongoing domestic violence or repeated exploitation. In these cases, forgiving too soon can undermine personal safety and allow the wrongdoer to continue harmful behavior. Forgiveness should not replace accountability or justice, especially when serious harm has occurred. It is important to prioritize boundaries and protection before considering forgiveness.
- Chronic anger triggers the body's stress response, releasing hormones like cortisol and adrenaline. These hormones increase heart rate and constrict blood vessels, raising blood pressure. Prolonged high blood pressure strains the heart and arteries, increasing risk for cardiovascular disease. Elevated stress hormones also affect insulin regulation, contributing to diabetes development.
- Forgiveness reduces stress by lowering the body's production of stress hormones like cortisol. This decrease in stress hormones helps improve heart rate and blood pressure regulation. It also reduces inflammation, which is linked to many chronic diseases. Additionally, forgiveness promotes better sleep and healthier behaviors, contributing to overall well-being.
- The studies on forgiveness and health typically use psychological assessments and physiological measures like blood pressure to evaluate stress levels. Participants are often di ...
Counterarguments
- Forgiveness may not always lead to improved health outcomes, as individual responses to forgiveness can vary based on personal, cultural, and situational factors.
- The process of forgiveness can be complex and may require more than just a decision to let go; it can involve a lengthy emotional process that may not always result in the release of negative emotions.
- Some individuals may find empowerment and a sense of justice in not forgiving, which can also contribute to their psychological well-being.
- The studies mentioned may have limitations, such as small sample sizes, short durations, or lack of diversity among participants, which could affect the generalizability of the findings.
- The correlation between forgiveness and health outcomes does not necessarily imply causation; other factors may contribute to the health benefits observed in individuals who forgive.
- The idea that forgiveness is not about the wrongdoer could be challenged by perspectives that emphasize the relational or societal aspects of forgiveness, where the offender's acknowledgment and change are also considered important.
- The notion that forgiveness does not condone behavior might be at odds with how some individuals or cultures perceive forgiveness, potentially seeing it as a form of tacit acceptance.
- The conc ...
Get access to the context and additional materials
Practical Methods and Models For Practicing Forgiveness
Forgiveness is a complex process that can be facilitated by structured approaches, like Worthington's REACH model, and it is a skill that can be taught and developed rather than an innate trait.
Reach Model Provides a Structured Approach to Forgiveness
The REACH model offers a progressive structure to aid individuals in the journey of forgiveness.
Recall the Event Objectively, Without Judgment
Forgiveness begins with recalling the event objectively. This means remembering it without judging oneself or the other involved party.
Empathize With the Harm Doer, Not Excuse Actions
Empathy is crucial in the REACH model, where one strives to understand the offender's perspective without excusing their actions. This could involve reflecting on circumstances that led to their behavior.
Commit To a "Gift" of Forgiveness, Even if You Don't Tell
The A in REACH represents the altruistic gift of forgiveness. This involves recognizing that forgiveness is a gift, even if the forgiven party is unaware. One may reflect on times they were forgiven.
Reserve Forgiveness Despite Triggering Negative Emotions
Holding onto forgiveness despite experiencing a resurgence of negative emotions is essential. It's crucial to allow oneself to feel these intermittent feelings throughout the process.
Forgiveness Is a Learned Skill, Not Innate
Understanding forgiveness as a capability that can be developed is fundamental.
Techniques Can Teach People Forgiveness
Techniques exist that can teach individuals how to forgive. Chuck Bryant and Josh Clark suggest that upbringing plays a role, but one can still learn to forgive even if they grew up in an unforgiving environment. Clark also not ...
Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary
Practical Methods and Models For Practicing Forgiveness
Additional Materials
Counterarguments
- While the REACH model provides a structured approach, it may not be suitable for everyone, as individuals may have different needs and responses to trauma or betrayal.
- The idea that forgiveness can be taught and developed might overlook the deeply personal and sometimes unpredictable nature of emotional healing.
- Recalling the event objectively can be challenging, and the process may not be as straightforward as the model suggests, especially when dealing with deep-seated emotions or trauma.
- Empathy towards the harm doer might not always be possible or appropriate, particularly in cases of severe harm or where the offender shows no remorse.
- The concept of forgiveness as an altruistic "gift" could be seen as placing an undue burden on the victim to provide something to the perpetrator, which may not always be psychologically beneficial.
- Holding onto forgiveness despite negative emotions might not acknowledge the validity and importance of those emotions in the healing process.
- The assertion that forgiveness is a learned skill may oversimplify the complexity of human emotions and the unique ways people process hurt.
- The influence of upbringing on forgiveness might be overstated, as individual experiences and personalities can also play a significant role.
- The claim that ...
Actionables
- Create a forgiveness journal where you document your journey, starting with objective recollections of events that have hurt you. Writing down the facts without emotional bias can help you see the situation more clearly and begin the process of forgiveness. For example, describe an incident with a coworker without assigning blame, simply stating what happened.
- Practice empathy exercises by writing letters you never intend to send. In these letters, try to express understanding of the offender's perspective, considering their possible motivations and life experiences. This can be a safe space to explore empathy without condoning their actions. Imagine writing to a friend who let you down, and in the letter, explore what might have led them to act that way.
- Develop a personal ritual to symbolize your commi ...
Get access to the context and additional materials
Create Summaries for anything on the web
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser
