In this episode of Stuff You Should Know, the hosts explore extrasensory perception (ESP) and its various forms, including telepathy, clairvoyance, and precognition. They examine the historical context of ESP research, from J.B. Rhine's pioneering work with Zener cards at Duke University in the 1930s to more recent experiments by researchers like Darryl Bem.
The hosts discuss both the scientific studies supporting ESP and the skepticism surrounding these findings. They cover various explanations for apparent ESP experiences, from electromagnetic theories to more conventional explanations involving unconscious observation of environmental cues. The episode also addresses James Randi's famous million-dollar challenge and the ongoing debate between parapsychology researchers and their critics in the scientific community.

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
Extrasensory perception (ESP) encompasses various paranormal phenomena that extend beyond our normal senses. The term was introduced by J.B. Rhine in the 1930s and includes abilities such as telepathy (mind-to-mind communication), clairvoyance (seeing distant events), precognition (foreseeing the future), and retrocognition (viewing past events). In the 1940s, researchers introduced the term "psi" to suggest these abilities might be natural, though not well understood, rather than supernatural.
J.B. Rhine pioneered academic ESP research at Duke University using Zener cards, with some subjects showing remarkable results. Later, researcher Darryl Bem conducted experiments suggesting the possibility of precognition and retrocognition, including tests where participants showed above-chance success in predicting future events and remembering words they would later type.
However, these studies faced significant challenges. Critics point to issues like sensory leakage, where experimental subjects might have received unconscious cues from researchers. Additionally, many ESP experiments have struggled with reproducibility, though as Josh Clark and Chuck Bryant note, this issue isn't unique to ESP research.
While some theorists propose electromagnetic or interdimensional explanations for ESP, skeptics offer more conventional explanations. Chuck Bryant and Josh Clark discuss how apparent ESP experiences might result from hyper-observation and intuition, where people unconsciously notice subtle environmental cues. For instance, what seems like predicting a phone call might actually stem from subconsciously noticing preliminary mechanical sounds.
James Randi famously challenged the parapsychology community by offering $1 million to anyone who could prove psychic abilities under controlled conditions. Critics have scrutinized researchers like J.B. Rhine for potential bias in their eagerness to prove ESP's existence. The scientific community generally dismisses ESP due to inconsistent evidence and its conflict with known scientific principles. However, some psychologists continue to advocate for further investigation into paranormal phenomena, while acknowledging that many ESP experiences might be better explained through psychological principles rather than paranormal abilities.
1-Page Summary
Extrasensory perception, commonly called ESP, encompasses several paranormal phenomena that extend beyond the known limits of our senses. It's often grouped together with the concept of psi, representing all types of unusual perceptual abilities.
ESP includes abilities such as telepathy, clairvoyance, precognition, and retrocognition, each representing a unique type of extrasensory experience.
Telepathy is the ability to read or transmit thoughts from one individual to another without using any known human sensory channels. Clairvoyance allows a person to see events, objects, or actions taking place in a different location as if they were present there. Precognition involves the capacity to see into the future and predict forthcoming events. Retrocognition, on the other hand, is the uncommon skill of viewing events from the distant past. However, recent quantum discoveries have prompted a new definition, proposing that decisions made in the future could influence past events.
Definition and Types of Esp
Josh Clark and Chuck Bryant delve into the intriguing world of extrasensory perception (ESP), discussing various studies and experiments that have sought to investigate psychic phenomena such as clairvoyance, precognition, and retrocognition. They touch upon the pioneering work of J.B. Rhine, the controversial findings of Darryl Bem, and the perennial challenges of sensory leakage and reproducibility in ESP research.
Various methods have been implemented to test ESP, including the use of Zener cards and random number generators to measure psychic abilities beyond the standard senses.
J.B. Rhine was one of the pioneers in conducting academic laboratory experiments to study psi at Duke University in the 1930s. Using Zener cards, which consist of a deck of 25 cards each marked with one of five symbols, Rhine tested the ability of individuals to correctly identify the symbol on a card without using their physical senses. Chuck Bryant tried a modern version of this test online with an automated process involving no other person, and he scored six out of 25. In Rhine’s studies, notable subjects like Hubert Pierce achieved seemingly remarkable results, including getting 25 guesses correct in a row and selecting 558 correct out of 1850 tests—a statistical rarity.
Further experimenting with ESP, researcher Darryl Bem conducted nine experiments, which included tasks like predicting which curtain would reveal an erotic image on a computer screen, resulting in a slightly above-chance success rate and hinting at the possibility of precognition. Another of Bem’s experiments involved participants recalling words, with the findings suggesting that subjects were more likely to remember words that they would be prompted to type later, pointing towards retrocognition.
Despite these findings, critics have raised concern ...
Scientific Studies and Experiments Investigating ESP
Various theories and explanations have been put forward to explain the phenomenon of extra-sensory perception (ESP), ranging from it being an innate human ability to simply a trick of the mind.
Some theorists and researchers believe that ESP, often referred to as psi, is a normal part of humanity. The term implies that ESP could be a universal ability or a special gift that we are yet to understand.
Chuck Bryant discusses the intriguing theory of spillover, which suggests that there could be another dimension with different laws of physics, and sometimes information from that dimension leaks into ours. This spillover could purportedly enable people to perceive events from the past or future.
However, skeptics challenge these ideas as unprovable and far-fetched. Josh Clark remarks that given the large number of people on Earth and the frequency of their thoughts, coincidences are bound to occur. Chuck Bryant agrees with the skeptics, suggesting that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. He believes that instances where someone's thoughts align with future events are merely coincidental.
Researchers have speculated that what may seem like ESP could be the result of hyper-observation and intuition. Chuck Bryant and Josh Clark propose that people who seem to have ESP may actually be very observant and intuitive, noticing cues and information that others might not. They discuss how people with this heightened observance might detect micro-expressions or other subtle indicators, mistakenly attributing their ability to pick up such details to ESP.
For example, Clark suggests that subliminal cues in the environment may influence someone's conviction that they knew the phone was going to ring, rather than it being an instance of ESP. The brain is always processing sensory data, much of which doesn't reach our conscious awareness. Bryant further contemplates that his premonitio ...
Theories and Explanations For Beliefs In ESP
Numerous experts and skeptics have raised concerns and skepticism regarding the validity and methodology of extrasensory perception (ESP) research.
Chuck Bryant discusses James Randi’s challenge to the parapsychology community by offering $1 million to anyone who can prove psychic abilities under controlled conditions. Randi's challenge, which has gone unmet, has been seen as a means to discredit attempts to legitimately disprove psychic abilities, potentially framing his skepticism as a belief system in itself rather than an objective critique.
Critics have scrutinized J.B. Rhine for being eager to prove the existence of ESP, which may have led to a biased approach in his research. An anecdote recounts that Rhine excluded certain test results that he suspected were purposefully incorrect in an attempt to skew his data and did not publish those findings. Furthermore, the Levy Affair, involving an engineer who tampered with equipment during a trial resulting in only positive ESP hits, further marred the credibility of his research. However, despite such setbacks and criticisms, Rhine was acknowledged for his willingness to address bias or fraud and he dedicated his career to the study of parapsychology.
Josh Clark and Chuck Bryant point out that the scientific community often dismisses ESP due to its lack of consistent evidence and inability to be explained through current scientific understanding. Bryant notes that arguments claiming ESP does not diminish with d ...
Critiques and Skepticism of ESP Research
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser
