Podcasts > Stuff You Should Know > Selects: How ESP Works (?)

Selects: How ESP Works (?)

By iHeartPodcasts

In this episode of Stuff You Should Know, the hosts explore extrasensory perception (ESP) and its various forms, including telepathy, clairvoyance, and precognition. They examine the historical context of ESP research, from J.B. Rhine's pioneering work with Zener cards at Duke University in the 1930s to more recent experiments by researchers like Darryl Bem.

The hosts discuss both the scientific studies supporting ESP and the skepticism surrounding these findings. They cover various explanations for apparent ESP experiences, from electromagnetic theories to more conventional explanations involving unconscious observation of environmental cues. The episode also addresses James Randi's famous million-dollar challenge and the ongoing debate between parapsychology researchers and their critics in the scientific community.

Listen to the original

Selects: How ESP Works (?)

This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Oct 18, 2025 episode of the Stuff You Should Know

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.

Selects: How ESP Works (?)

1-Page Summary

Definition and Types of ESP

Extrasensory perception (ESP) encompasses various paranormal phenomena that extend beyond our normal senses. The term was introduced by J.B. Rhine in the 1930s and includes abilities such as telepathy (mind-to-mind communication), clairvoyance (seeing distant events), precognition (foreseeing the future), and retrocognition (viewing past events). In the 1940s, researchers introduced the term "psi" to suggest these abilities might be natural, though not well understood, rather than supernatural.

Scientific Studies and Experiments Investigating ESP

J.B. Rhine pioneered academic ESP research at Duke University using Zener cards, with some subjects showing remarkable results. Later, researcher Darryl Bem conducted experiments suggesting the possibility of precognition and retrocognition, including tests where participants showed above-chance success in predicting future events and remembering words they would later type.

However, these studies faced significant challenges. Critics point to issues like sensory leakage, where experimental subjects might have received unconscious cues from researchers. Additionally, many ESP experiments have struggled with reproducibility, though as Josh Clark and Chuck Bryant note, this issue isn't unique to ESP research.

Theories and Explanations for Beliefs in ESP

While some theorists propose electromagnetic or interdimensional explanations for ESP, skeptics offer more conventional explanations. Chuck Bryant and Josh Clark discuss how apparent ESP experiences might result from hyper-observation and intuition, where people unconsciously notice subtle environmental cues. For instance, what seems like predicting a phone call might actually stem from subconsciously noticing preliminary mechanical sounds.

Critiques and Skepticism of ESP Research

James Randi famously challenged the parapsychology community by offering $1 million to anyone who could prove psychic abilities under controlled conditions. Critics have scrutinized researchers like J.B. Rhine for potential bias in their eagerness to prove ESP's existence. The scientific community generally dismisses ESP due to inconsistent evidence and its conflict with known scientific principles. However, some psychologists continue to advocate for further investigation into paranormal phenomena, while acknowledging that many ESP experiences might be better explained through psychological principles rather than paranormal abilities.

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • ESP phenomena have not been reliably demonstrated under rigorously controlled conditions, which is a standard criterion for scientific acceptance.
  • The use of Zener cards by J.B. Rhine has been criticized for lack of proper controls and potential methodological flaws that could allow for cheating or unintentional cues.
  • Darryl Bem's experiments have faced replication failures, which is a critical aspect of the scientific process; successful replication is necessary to validate experimental findings.
  • Sensory leakage is a valid concern in ESP research, and experiments that do not adequately control for this cannot conclusively demonstrate the existence of paranormal abilities.
  • The issue of reproducibility is not unique to ESP research, but the field has been particularly plagued by this problem, which undermines the credibility of its findings.
  • Electromagnetic or interdimensional theories for ESP lack empirical support and do not align with established scientific understanding of physics and biology.
  • Hyper-observation and intuition are well-documented psychological phenomena that can explain many instances that some interpret as ESP, suggesting more mundane explanations for these experiences.
  • James Randi's challenge, while not a scientific refutation, underscores the difficulty of demonstrating ESP under controlled conditions that rule out deception or error.
  • The eagerness of some researchers to prove the existence of ESP may introduce confirmation bias into their work, affecting the objectivity of their research.
  • While the scientific community's general dismissal of ESP is based on the lack of consistent evidence, it is also true that some areas of science have evolved from fringe to accepted with new evidence and understanding.
  • Advocacy for further investigation into paranormal phenomena should be balanced with a rigorous scientific approach to ensure that research in this area adheres to the same standards as other scientific disciplines.

Actionables

  • You can explore your own potential for ESP by keeping a dream journal to document any instances that could suggest precognition or retrocognition. Write down your dreams each morning and then track real-life events to see if there's any correlation. This personal experiment can give you insight into whether you experience any phenomena that align with ESP claims.
  • Develop a game with friends that mimics the Zener card experiments to test for telepathy or clairvoyance in a casual, non-scientific setting. Create a set of symbols and have one person view a symbol while the other guesses what it is. Keep score and see if results are better than chance over time, which could spark discussions about the potential of ESP in everyday life.
  • Engage in mindfulness and meditation practices to heighten your awareness and intuition, which skeptics argue are the basis for ESP experiences. By becoming more attuned to your environment and internal states, you may be able to better understand the role of hyper-observation in your perception of ESP-like events.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Selects: How ESP Works (?)

Definition and Types of Esp

Extrasensory perception, commonly called ESP, encompasses several paranormal phenomena that extend beyond the known limits of our senses. It's often grouped together with the concept of psi, representing all types of unusual perceptual abilities.

Esp Includes Phenomena Like Telepathy, Clairvoyance, and Precognition

ESP includes abilities such as telepathy, clairvoyance, precognition, and retrocognition, each representing a unique type of extrasensory experience.

Esp Types: Telepathy, Clairvoyance, Precognition, Retrocognition

Telepathy is the ability to read or transmit thoughts from one individual to another without using any known human sensory channels. Clairvoyance allows a person to see events, objects, or actions taking place in a different location as if they were present there. Precognition involves the capacity to see into the future and predict forthcoming events. Retrocognition, on the other hand, is the uncommon skill of viewing events from the distant past. However, recent quantum discoveries have prompted a new definition, proposing that decisions made in the future could influence past events.

1930s Researchers Coined "esp" and "Psi" for Paranormal Abil ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Definition and Types of Esp

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • ESP, or extrasensory perception, includes various paranormal phenomena like telepathy, clairvoyance, precognition, and retrocognition. Telepathy involves reading or transmitting thoughts between individuals without using known sensory channels. Clairvoyance allows seeing events in distant locations as if present there. Precognition is the ability to foresee future events, while retrocognition involves perceiving past events.
  • ESP is a term used to describe various paranormal phenomena related to perception beyond normal senses. Psi, on the other hand, encompasses all types of unusual perceptual abilities, including ESP. The distinction lies in the broader scope of psi, which includes ESP as a subset. Psi suggests that these abilities are a standard part of humanity, while ESP is more commonly associated with supernatural connotations.
  • Retrocognition is the paranormal ability to perceive or see events that occurred in the past, essentially gaining knowledge of past occurrences without having been present during those events. It involves accessing information or experiences from historical moments through extrasensory means, which can include visions, feelings, or a sense of being present in a past time period. This phenomenon suggests that individuals with retrocognitive abilities can tap into the past and gain insights or knowledge that is not accessible through conventional sensory perception. Retrocognition is often considered alongside other forms of extra ...

Counterarguments

  • ESP and psi phenomena lack empirical evidence and are not recognized as legitimate by the mainstream scientific community.
  • The terms ESP and psi are often associated with pseudoscience because they have not been reliably demonstrated under controlled conditions.
  • The concept of telepathy, while popular in fiction, has no conclusive scientific support and many proposed experiments to test it have been criticized for lack of rigor.
  • Clairvoyance claims are difficult to test and often suffer from lack of repeatability, a key component of scientific inquiry.
  • Precognition and retrocognition are not supported by the current understanding of time and causality in physics, and studies claiming to show evidence of these phenomena are often flawed.
  • The suggestion that quantum discoveries could allow future decisions to influence past events is a misinterpretation of quantum mechanics and is not supported by mainstream science.
  • The historical context in which ESP and psi were coined does not lend credibility to their existence, as many ideas from ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Selects: How ESP Works (?)

Scientific Studies and Experiments Investigating ESP

Josh Clark and Chuck Bryant delve into the intriguing world of extrasensory perception (ESP), discussing various studies and experiments that have sought to investigate psychic phenomena such as clairvoyance, precognition, and retrocognition. They touch upon the pioneering work of J.B. Rhine, the controversial findings of Darryl Bem, and the perennial challenges of sensory leakage and reproducibility in ESP research.

Researchers Test ESP With Zener Cards and Random Number Generators

Various methods have been implemented to test ESP, including the use of Zener cards and random number generators to measure psychic abilities beyond the standard senses.

J.B. Rhine's Experiments Show Positive Zener Card Results

J.B. Rhine was one of the pioneers in conducting academic laboratory experiments to study psi at Duke University in the 1930s. Using Zener cards, which consist of a deck of 25 cards each marked with one of five symbols, Rhine tested the ability of individuals to correctly identify the symbol on a card without using their physical senses. Chuck Bryant tried a modern version of this test online with an automated process involving no other person, and he scored six out of 25. In Rhine’s studies, notable subjects like Hubert Pierce achieved seemingly remarkable results, including getting 25 guesses correct in a row and selecting 558 correct out of 1850 tests—a statistical rarity.

Experiments Suggest Significant Precognition and Retroactive Influence

Further experimenting with ESP, researcher Darryl Bem conducted nine experiments, which included tasks like predicting which curtain would reveal an erotic image on a computer screen, resulting in a slightly above-chance success rate and hinting at the possibility of precognition. Another of Bem’s experiments involved participants recalling words, with the findings suggesting that subjects were more likely to remember words that they would be prompted to type later, pointing towards retrocognition.

Critics Argue Experiments Face Sensory Leakage and Reproducibility Issues

Despite these findings, critics have raised concern ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Scientific Studies and Experiments Investigating ESP

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • ESP research, including Rhine's and Bem's studies, often lacks the methodological rigor found in other scientific disciplines, leading to questions about the validity of their findings.
  • The use of Zener cards and similar tests for ESP have been criticized for their susceptibility to chance and the psychological effect of the experimenter's expectations on the participants.
  • The statistical methods used in ESP research, such as those in Bem's studies, have been scrutinized for potential flaws in data analysis and interpretation, which could lead to false positives.
  • The decline in successful predictions in Rhine's later experiments could be attributed to better experimental controls, suggesting that earlier positive results may have been influenced by methodological weaknesses.
  • The reproducibility crisis is not unique to ESP research but is a widespread issue in many areas of science, raising questions about the singling out of ESP for this criticism.
  • The meta-analysis mentioned might suffer from publication bias, where only studies with positive results are published, skewing the overall analysis of the literature.
  • The concept of sensory leakage, while a valid concern, could also be used to dismiss genuine results without thorough investigation, potentially hindering the exploration of unexplained phenomena.
  • Controlled environments, ...

Actionables

  • You can explore your own potential for ESP by creating a personalized Zener card deck with symbols that resonate with you. Instead of the traditional circle, cross, waves, square, and star, choose five meaningful symbols or images. Use these cards regularly to test your intuition with friends or family, tracking your results over time to see if you can detect patterns or improvements in your guessing accuracy.
  • Develop a simple blind testing method to experiment with ESP in a controlled environment at home. Use a barrier to separate two participants and have one view a randomly selected image or object while the other tries to intuitively guess what it is. Record the sessions and results meticulously, ensuring no sensory information can be exchanged, to see if you can achieve a success rate above chance.
  • Engage wi ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Selects: How ESP Works (?)

Theories and Explanations For Beliefs In ESP

Various theories and explanations have been put forward to explain the phenomenon of extra-sensory perception (ESP), ranging from it being an innate human ability to simply a trick of the mind.

ESP: A Universal Ability or a Gift?

Some theorists and researchers believe that ESP, often referred to as psi, is a normal part of humanity. The term implies that ESP could be a universal ability or a special gift that we are yet to understand.

Theorists Propose ESP as Electromagnetic or Interdimensional

Chuck Bryant discusses the intriguing theory of spillover, which suggests that there could be another dimension with different laws of physics, and sometimes information from that dimension leaks into ours. This spillover could purportedly enable people to perceive events from the past or future.

Skeptics Say ESP is Explained by Cognitive Biases, Selective Attention, and Large Number Coincidences

However, skeptics challenge these ideas as unprovable and far-fetched. Josh Clark remarks that given the large number of people on Earth and the frequency of their thoughts, coincidences are bound to occur. Chuck Bryant agrees with the skeptics, suggesting that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. He believes that instances where someone's thoughts align with future events are merely coincidental.

Researchers Attribute ESP Experiences to Hyper-Observation and Intuition, Not Actual Paranormal Abilities

Researchers have speculated that what may seem like ESP could be the result of hyper-observation and intuition. Chuck Bryant and Josh Clark propose that people who seem to have ESP may actually be very observant and intuitive, noticing cues and information that others might not. They discuss how people with this heightened observance might detect micro-expressions or other subtle indicators, mistakenly attributing their ability to pick up such details to ESP.

For example, Clark suggests that subliminal cues in the environment may influence someone's conviction that they knew the phone was going to ring, rather than it being an instance of ESP. The brain is always processing sensory data, much of which doesn't reach our conscious awareness. Bryant further contemplates that his premonitio ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Theories and Explanations For Beliefs In ESP

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Chuck Bryant and Josh Clark are individuals mentioned in the text who provide differing perspectives on the topic of extra-sensory perception (ESP). They offer insights into the debate surrounding ESP, with Chuck Bryant discussing theories like spillover from another dimension, while Josh Clark presents a skeptical view on the phenomenon. Their viewpoints contribute to the overall discussion on the potential explanations for ESP experiences.
  • Hyper-observation and intuition suggest that individuals who appear to have ESP may actually be highly perceptive and intuitive, noticing subtle cues and information that others overlook. This heightened awareness can lead to the perception of extrasensory abilities when, in reality, it is a result of keen observation and intuitive processing of environmental stimuli. The brain processes vast amounts of sensory data, some of which may not reach conscious awareness but can influence one's perceptions and beliefs. This theory proposes that ESP experiences may be attributed to a combination of acute observation skills and intuitive insights rather than paranormal ab ...

Counterarguments

  • ESP as a universal ability or special gift lacks empirical evidence and is not supported by the scientific community at large.
  • The spillover theory is speculative and not falsifiable, making it difficult to test or validate scientifically.
  • Cognitive biases and coincidences may not fully account for all reported instances of ESP, as some experiences remain unexplained within the current understanding of psychology and probability.
  • Hyper-observation and intuition as explanations for ESP do not account for cases where individuals report knowledge that seems unattainable through normal sensory channels.
  • Subliminal cues and heightened awareness might not explain all instances where individuals claim to have accurate premonitions or knowledge of distant events.
  • The flaws in early ESP experiments, such as translucent Zener cards, do not necessarily invalidate all ESP research, as subsequent studies have used more rigorous methods.
  • The possibility of experimenters giving unintentional clues does not address the inst ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Selects: How ESP Works (?)

Critiques and Skepticism of ESP Research

Numerous experts and skeptics have raised concerns and skepticism regarding the validity and methodology of extrasensory perception (ESP) research.

James Randi Criticizes Parapsychology Research As Pseudoscientific and Prone to Fraud

Chuck Bryant discusses James Randi’s challenge to the parapsychology community by offering $1 million to anyone who can prove psychic abilities under controlled conditions. Randi's challenge, which has gone unmet, has been seen as a means to discredit attempts to legitimately disprove psychic abilities, potentially framing his skepticism as a belief system in itself rather than an objective critique.

Critics Claim Parapsychologists Like J.B. Rhine Eagerly Proved Esp, Manipulating or Ignoring Negative Results

Critics have scrutinized J.B. Rhine for being eager to prove the existence of ESP, which may have led to a biased approach in his research. An anecdote recounts that Rhine excluded certain test results that he suspected were purposefully incorrect in an attempt to skew his data and did not publish those findings. Furthermore, the Levy Affair, involving an engineer who tampered with equipment during a trial resulting in only positive ESP hits, further marred the credibility of his research. However, despite such setbacks and criticisms, Rhine was acknowledged for his willingness to address bias or fraud and he dedicated his career to the study of parapsychology.

Inconsistent Evidence for Esp Leads Science to Dismiss It As Unfounded

Josh Clark and Chuck Bryant point out that the scientific community often dismisses ESP due to its lack of consistent evidence and inability to be explained through current scientific understanding. Bryant notes that arguments claiming ESP does not diminish with d ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Critiques and Skepticism of ESP Research

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • ESP research methodologies have evolved, and some studies have employed rigorous scientific protocols to minimize bias and error, suggesting that not all ESP research can be dismissed as pseudoscientific.
  • The James Randi challenge, while significant, may not encompass all conditions under which psychic phenomena could manifest, and the parameters of the challenge may not be suitable for all types of claimed ESP abilities.
  • J.B. Rhine's work, despite its flaws, laid the groundwork for future parapsychological research, and some argue that his dedication to the field has inspired more methodologically sound studies.
  • Dismissing ESP due to inconsistent evidence may be premature, as many scientific discoveries begin with observations ...

Actionables

  • You can develop critical thinking by evaluating everyday claims using the scientific method. Start by identifying a claim you've heard recently, such as a product promising extraordinary results. Design a simple experiment to test this claim, like comparing the product's performance with another or with no product at all. Record your observations and analyze them to see if the claim holds up. This practice will sharpen your ability to assess claims critically, much like experts evaluate ESP research.
  • Enhance your understanding of psychological principles by keeping a journal of coincidences. Whenever you experience a coincidence that feels like ESP, write it down, and then reflect on possible psychological explanations, such as confirmation bias or the law of large numbers. This will help you recognize patterns in your thinking and understand how psychological factors can mimic paranormal experiences.
  • Engage with your commu ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free

Create Summaries for anything on the web

Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser

Shortform Extension CTA