In this episode of Stuff You Should Know, the hosts examine the history and evolution of mail-order marriages, from government-sponsored initiatives in early American colonies to modern international matchmaking. They explore how these arrangements initially helped stabilize frontier communities through favorable inheritance laws and property rights for women, and how personal matrimonial advertisements emerged as alternatives to traditional arranged marriages.
The episode also delves into the contemporary mail-order marriage industry and its regulations. The hosts discuss the International Marriage Broker Regulation Act of 2005, which requires agencies to provide background information about prospective husbands, and examine the challenges faced by mail-order brides, including language barriers, social isolation, and higher rates of domestic abuse compared to the general population.

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
Mail-order marriages were initially government-sponsored initiatives aimed at stabilizing frontier communities. In early American colonies like Jamestown, legislators created laws offering favorable inheritance conditions to attract women to male-dominated areas. Similar strategies continued as America expanded westward, with states like California offering enhanced property rights and divorce laws to women, successfully increasing the female population from 3% to 19% in the 1850s.
Parallel to these government schemes, women began using matrimonial advertisements to find husbands, bypassing traditional arranged marriages. While this represented increased agency for women, these personal ads faced significant social stigma.
The late 19th and early 20th centuries saw intense criticism of mail-order marriages, particularly those involving Asian women. Anti-immigrant legislation, including the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, restricted Asian immigration, though some found loopholes through marriage arrangements.
Chuck Bryant and Sonia Osorio from the National Organization for Women point out that mail-order brides often face vulnerability to trafficking and abuse due to isolation and economic dependence. The Tahirih Justice Center estimates that 11,000-16,000 women enter the U.S. annually through marriage brokers, with abuse rates approximately three times higher than average.
Josh Clark describes how mail-order brides frequently lack language skills and social support in their new country, making them entirely dependent on their husbands. This vulnerability is heightened by their conditional resident status, which lasts two years.
The industry has evolved significantly with the internet, allowing for increased communication and information-sharing. To address potential exploitation, the International Marriage Broker Regulation Act of 2005 requires agencies to provide women with comprehensive background information about prospective husbands, including criminal records, marital history, and financial status. The Act also ensures women receive information about domestic violence resources and their rights in their new country.
1-Page Summary
Historical accounts reveal that mail-order marriages were not just happenstances of love but were government schemes aimed at stabilizing male-dominated frontier communities.
Government involvement in facilitating mail-order marriages was a strategic approach to building early American colonies.
In the early American colonies like Jamestown, the acute shortage of women led to a government-sanctioned effort to entice women to migrate. Advertisements lured volunteers who sought greater rights and better opportunities than they had back home. Legislators crafted laws to make the proposition more attractive, such as offering favorable inheritance conditions. For instance, widowed women in certain colonies could retain much more wealth and run their own businesses compared to England, where they would receive only a small portion of their husbands' estates.
The “tobacco wives” of Virginia exemplify this strategy. These women had to ensure their prospective planters were financially viable by supplying a hefty quantity of tobacco as proof to the Virginia Company.
As America pushed westward, similar strategies emerged. California’s incentives, including more accessible divorce laws and property rights for women, led to a jump in the female population from 3% in 1850 to 19% in 1860. In Washington State, marriage brokers like Asa Mercer recruited "Mercer girls" from the East, advertising the prospering economy of the West. These government-supported programs aimed to stabilize the sometimes-lawless frontier towns.
Parallel to formalized schemes, an independent pathway to matrimony unfolded through personal advertisements.
Women exerted increased agenc ...
Historical Origins and Government Involvement in Mail-Order Marriages
In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, there was significant criticism and resistance to women from Asia entering the U.S. through what came to be known as mail-order marriages. Americans feared the country being overrun by immigrants, leading Congress to implement controlling laws. The Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 specifically targeted Chinese immigration. A later loophole was found through the 1907 gentleman's agreement, which permitted Japanese women and their children to immigrate if they were married to Japanese men already in the U.S. However, Japanese immigration eventually ceased with the enactment of the Immigration Act of 1924.
Asian women who sought marriage with American men were stereotyped and marginalized. There was widespread belief that Asian mail-order brides were merely seeking American citizenship or trying to escape their countries. They were often at risk of being deported unless married to an American and holding a green card. Another stereotype was that these women were essentially sex workers who posed as mail-order brides to enter the U.S.
Chuck Bryant and Sonia Osorio from the National Organization for Women refer to darker aspects of mail-order marriages, including vulnerability to human trafficking and abuse. Josh Clark acknowledges this as an issue but also points out the lack of hard data, with most understanding coming from anecdotal evidence. Josh Clark and Chuck Bryant discuss the judgments on men who seek mail-order brides, suggesting they may be after submissive women more pliable than their American counterparts.
Josh Clark touches upon moral panic, indicating that the fear of mail-order brides being murdered takes the spotlight away from other serious matters such as domestic violence. Marsha Zug's book argues that while mail-order marriages can be problematic, the more pressing issue is the plight of undocumented immigrant brides who lack legal rights and fear deportation.
The ridicule and stigma surrou ...
Public Views and Critiques of Mail-Order Marriages Over Time
Chuck Bryant and Josh Clark delve into the complexities and power imbalances inherent in mail-order marriages, highlighting the vulnerabilities of mail-order brides and the potential for exploitation and abuse within the industry.
Josh Clark describes mail-order brides as often lacking language proficiency in their new country, having no support system of family and friends, and being entirely dependent on their husbands. This dependency is exacerbated by the conditional resident status mail-order brides have for two years, during which they must marry the husband within three months of arriving in the U.S. Throughout this conditional period, the brides may face linguistic and cultural isolation, lack a social network, and are entirely economically dependent on the husband. This leaves them vulnerable to abuse, with a fear that the husband could send the bride home during this period.
Chuck Bryant and Clark raise concerns about the significant risk of abuse faced by isolated and dependent mail-order brides. They suggest that there can be situations where brides are mistreated or essentially treated as captive in their own homes. The skewed power dynamics favor the husband, particularly during the two-year conditional period, leading to potential mistreatment.
The mail-order marriage industry is often criticized for its portrayal of women as "submissive" and promoting antiquated and offensive stereotypes to attract male clients. One agency notably advertised women as "unspoiled by feminism," implying that mail-order brides could also serve as live-in domestic servants, thus promising savings on domestic labor for prospective husbands.
There are concerns that some m ...
The Power Dynamics and Controversies Surrounding Mail-Order Marriages
The mail-order marriage industry, historically a means for women to gain more agency, has been significantly transformed by the internet, leading to increased communication and information-sharing. However, these advancements have also highlighted the need for more rigorous regulation to prevent exploitation.
Marsha Zug's book suggests that historically, the mail-order marriage industry provided women with opportunities to gain more rights and agency at times when these might have been limited. The evolution from a catalog-based system to digital platforms has been fueled by the internet, with online platforms allowing women to take an active role in selecting their partners. Josh Clark indicated that the industry is now entirely online, implying significant changes from its traditional operations.
Online platforms have empowered women in the mail-order marriage industry, enabling them to be more discerning in their choices. With the rise of video chat, texting, Facebook, and Skype, women are no longer hoping for the best from being featured in a catalog but instead can actively participate in selecting their future husbands.
Despite the advancements, there's acknowledgment of problematic aspects within mail-order marriages, particularly regarding power imbalances that can lead to exploitation. Chuck Bryant's conversation on the topic hints at the potential need for increased oversight. As a result, further regulation of the industry has been suggested due to the vulnerabilities caused by power disparities.
The International Marriage Broker Regulation Act of 2005 was introduced to address these power imbalances directly by requiring agencies to disclose extensive background information about men to women considering marriage. This legislation necessitates that women receive details on prospective husbands, including their criminal, marital, and sex offender registry status, as well as their financi ...
Modernization and Regulation of Mail-Order Marriage Industry
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser
