In this episode of Stuff You Should Know, hosts Josh Clark and Chuck Bryant explore the development and implementation of rape kits, which are essential tools for collecting forensic evidence in sexual assault cases. They discuss how these kits evolved from their creation in the 1970s by sexual assault survivor Marty Goddard to become standardized evidence collection tools used by hospitals and law enforcement today.
The hosts also delve into significant challenges surrounding rape kits in the United States, including the discovery of large backlogs of untested kits in police departments across multiple cities. They examine how some departments have handled—or mishandled—these crucial pieces of evidence, and discuss various initiatives and funding efforts aimed at addressing the backlog of untested kits, along with the varying state laws that govern their preservation.
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
Rape kits, crucial tools for collecting forensic evidence from sexual assault victims, were developed in the 1970s through the pioneering efforts of sexual assault survivor Marty Goddard. Working with hospitals, police departments, and legal professionals, Goddard secured funding from the Playboy Foundation to create affordable kits. These early kits, known as "Vitullo kits," evolved into the Southwestern Sexual Assault Evidence Collection Kit by the late 1990s, which became the gold standard for evidence collection.
Chuck Bryant and Josh Clark explain that while the rape kit examination process can be traumatic for victims, it's essential for gathering evidence. They emphasize that victims should avoid washing or changing clothes to preserve evidence, and hospitals must obtain informed consent for each step of the examination. Importantly, victims can undergo forensic examination using a pseudonym without immediately involving law enforcement, allowing them to decide about prosecution later.
In the 2000s, investigative journalists uncovered thousands of untested rape kits in police evidence rooms across America. Cities like Detroit had 11,000 untested kits, while Memphis had 12,000. This backlog allowed serial rapists to continue offending while crucial DNA evidence remained untested. In response, initiatives like Mariska Hargitay's Joyful Heart Foundation and federal funding of $150 million have helped address the backlog, though challenges persist.
The issue of untested rape kits extends beyond backlogs to their destruction. As revealed in Fayetteville, North Carolina, some police departments have destroyed untested kits still within the statute of limitations. While the Justice Department recommends keeping rape kit evidence for 50 years, Josh Clark and Chuck Bryant note that state laws vary, leading to inconsistent handling of these crucial pieces of evidence and potentially denying victims future opportunities for justice.
1-Page Summary
Rape kits have been crucial in collecting forensic evidence from sexual assault victims since the 1970s, a transformation led largely by the efforts of a sexual assault survivor named Marty Goddard.
Marty Goddard, having survived sexual assault herself, recognized the inadequacies in evidence collection and the lack of seriousness with which police departments approached cases. To rectify this, she formed Citizens for Victims Assistance in the 1970s to create a system that would improve the situation.
Goddard engaged with hospitals, police departments, and legal professionals to improve the handling of sexual assault cases. With a determination to make a difference, she sought funding for rape kits. The Playboy Foundation stepped in, granting her the means to start assembling these kits affordably to eliminate barriers to their widespread adoption.
The first official use of rape kits, around 1978 in Chicago and then throughout Illinois, marked a significant advancement in the treatment of sexual assault cases. These early kits, often referred to as Vitullo kits after Louis Vitullo – a figure tied to their development – highlighted the collaboration of Goddard and Vitullo, ensuring that the needs of victims were prioritized.
The History and Development of Rape Kits
Chuck Bryant and Josh Clark highlight the emotionally challenging process of undergoing a rape kit examination for sexual assault victims, underlining the delicate nature of evidence collection and the importance of informed consent and victim support throughout the ordeal.
Bryant and Clark emphasize that obtaining a rape kit can be traumatic, almost akin to reliving the assault. Despite this, such evidence collection is vital to apprehend perpetrators. They note that victims should not be billed for the rape kit, which includes testing for STDs and offering emergency contraception, but they might still face charges for treating injuries, antiviral drugs, or emergency contraception, which is deemed inappropriate. Before the Affordable Care Act, being sexually assaulted might be considered a pre-existing condition, potentially affecting future healthcare coverage.
After a sexual assault, it is critical for victims to avoid washing, bathing, or changing their clothes to preserve crucial evidence. If changing is necessary, they should do so over a collection medium like butcher paper or a towel to capture any falling DNA, such as hair or skin particles. The clothing should be placed in a separate bag and brought along for evidence collection.
Clark and Bryant discuss that informed consent is paramount during the rape kit process. Victims should be treated gently and with the utmost respect, and medical professionals need to obtain explicit consent for each stage of the examination. It is also possible to undergo a forensic examination using a pseudonym without having to involve the polic ...
The Rape Kit Process and Victim Support
In the 2000s, investigative journalists revealed a staggering and unsettling discovery: thousands of untested rape kits had been left to gather dust in police evidence rooms across the United States.
Reporters uncovered that numerous police departments had tens of thousands of rape kits sitting in warehouses, neglected for many years. In Detroit alone, someone found a shocking 11,000 untested rape kits in a police storage facility. Other cities reported similar numbers, with 2,000 kits in Akron, Ohio; 3,000 in Phoenix; 4,000 in Dallas; and Memphis with 12,000 kits waiting to be tested. This backlog became symbolic of the negligence faced by sexual assault cases and the consequent lack of justice for victims. The failure to process these kits represents a violation in itself, considering each kit belongs to an individual who underwent an invasive procedure in the hopes of aiding police.
The untreated kits not only symbolized systemic apathy but also had dire real-world consequences. These kits contained DNA evidence that could have been cross-referenced against the CODIS database to stop serial rapists. With sexual offender recidivism ranging from 5 to 32% over a 15-year period, it's tragic to consider the potential 550 to 3520 additional sexual assaults that could have occurred due to the backlog.
Clark speaks to the gravity of the situation by underscoring how the eventual testing of backlogged rape kits led to the arrest of the notorious Golden State Killer. This serves as a stark reminder that many serial rapists continued their crimes unabated while critical DNA evidence sat unexamined.
In response to widespread outrage, various initiatives and individuals have taken strides to address the backlog problem. Mariska Hargitay's Joyful Heart Foundation, along with endthebacklog.org, have been instrumental in raising awareness and advocating for change.
Concerted efforts have shown signs of progress. For instance, Congress's allocat ...
The Backlog of Untested Rape Kits
The police chief of Fayetteville, North Carolina, has admitted to the public that untested rape kits within the statute of limitations were destroyed on his watch.
This harmful practice is not confined to a single agency but is widespread. Some law enforcement departments have official policies about the destruction of kits, while in others it comes down to decisions made by individuals.
The destruction of these vital kits exacerbates injustices for sexual assault victims. When evidence is discarded, the possibility vanishes for it to be tested later, potentially identifying the assailant and thereby impacting future investigations and prosecutions.
Josh Clark and Chuck Bryant voice concerns about the repercussions of destroying untested rape kits. These include missing the chance to bolster convictions or exonerate those who are wrongfully accused. Clark emphasizes that each kit is supposed to be documented by every person who takes custody of it, ensuring a traceable chain of custody.
The Destruction of Untested Rape Kits
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser