In this episode of Stuff You Should Know, the hosts explore the mechanics and effectiveness of boycotts as a tool for social change. From the origin of the term in 1879 Ireland to modern social media campaigns, they examine how boycotts have evolved and what makes them successful, including the need for specific goals and the ability to impact a company's core customer base.
Through historical examples like the Montgomery Bus Boycott and the campaign against South African apartheid, the hosts illustrate how boycotts have contributed to significant social and political changes. They also analyze how social media has transformed modern boycotts, making them more common but potentially less focused, and discuss how companies navigate consumer reactions that can lead to both boycotts and "buycotts."
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
The term "boycott" originated in 1879 Ireland, named after Charles Boycott, a British rent collector who faced organized resistance from Irish tenant farmers. When Boycott strictly enforced rent collection during a famine, the Land League initiated a harassment campaign that made it impossible for him to operate his farm. The tactic proved so effective that within a year, over 1,000 similar boycotts occurred across Ireland.
Before the term was coined, similar protest strategies were used against British colonial rule. American colonists successfully employed boycotts against the 1765 Stamp Act and 1767 Townsend Revenue Act. Quaker abolitionists also used boycotts as a moral stance against slavery by refusing to purchase goods made by enslaved people.
For a boycott to be effective, it needs a specific goal and must target a company's core customers. The availability of substitute products can significantly increase a boycott's impact, as demonstrated by the Bud Light boycott, which led to a 28% drop in sales as customers easily switched to alternative beers.
Financial impact is crucial for success. For example, when North Carolina faced boycotts over a controversial bill, the collective actions of companies like PayPal, entertainers, and sports organizations cost the state $3.76 billion in a year, ultimately leading to the bill's repeal.
The Montgomery Bus Boycott demonstrated the power of community organization and dedication. The black community organized extensive carpools and shoe drives during the 382-day protest, which ultimately led to the Supreme Court ruling against bus segregation.
The international boycott against South African apartheid showed how multiple forms of pressure could create change. Starting with a call from ANC President Albert Luthuli in 1959, the movement grew to include sports organizations, cultural entities, and economic sanctions. Student activism across 150 US colleges helped push for divestment from South African companies, contributing to the eventual dismantling of apartheid.
Chuck Bryant and Josh Clark discuss how social media has transformed boycotts, making them more frequent but often less organized. While social media can amplify campaigns quickly, Bryant suggests that many modern boycotts lack the focus and dedication needed for lasting impact. For example, the Goya boycott resulted in a temporary 22% sales increase that eventually leveled out.
The hosts emphasize that successful boycotts still require more than just online engagement. Companies must carefully consider their stance on social issues, as consumer reactions can lead to both boycotts and "buycotts," significantly affecting their brand image and customer loyalty.
1-Page Summary
The concept of a boycott has been a tool for protest throughout history, with origins tracing back to colonial protests against British rule, even before the term itself was coined in Ireland in the late 19th century.
In 1879, Charles Boycott, an Englishman and rent collector for British landlords, faced a protest campaign that gave birth to the term we now know as "boycott." During this period of hardship caused by famine, Boycott was known for his strict enforcement of rent collection, which often resulted in the eviction of tenant farmers who could not pay. Reacting to these tough measures, Irish tenant farmers formed the Land League to contend with unfair rents and prevent further evictions.
The Land League members initiated a harassment campaign against Boycott, threatening his workers and socially ostracizing him, which made it impossible for him to have his farm tended or his crops harvested. Despite efforts by British newspapers to raise funds to hire Northern Irish loyalists, protected by troops to harvest Boycott's crops, the cost and effort were ineffective. Boycott left Ireland in disgrace, and the term "boycott" was coined by Father O'Malley, who suggested the same tactic be used against another landlord.
The method of protest proved highly effective, and within a year, more than a thousand similar boycotts took place in Ireland, sending a powerful message against British governance. These actions were part of a broader tool for colonial protest that sparked from earlier instances, such as those against the British acts in America.
Before the invention of the term "boycott," there were effective boycotts in the colonial era. Notable among them was the reaction to the 1765 Stamp Act, which saw Boston and New York merchants cease importing British goods, ultimately leadi ...
The History and Origins of Boycotts
A successful boycott involves a clear and specific goal and reaching the core customers of the target entity. The discussion also reveals that the availability of substitutes can notably increase the effectiveness of a boycott.
For a boycott to be truly effective, it needs to have a specific goal or desired outcome, such as forcing a company to change a particular policy or practice. It's necessary for the boycott to focus narrowly, targeting a single company or a specific product, rather than a broad industry or multipronged issue.
To gain traction, a boycott requires widespread awareness and education to garner the necessary support for it to truly influence the company in question.
The substitutability of the targeted product or service can significantly strengthen the impact of a boycott. In the case of Bud Light, the brand's sales suffered a 28% drop, and they fell from the top-selling beer in the U.S. to third place within weeks because customers could easily switch to similar beers like Coors Light, Miller Light, or Modelo Especial.
For a boycott to be considered successful, it must noticeably affect the company’s financial status, either through a direct impact on sales or stock prices. This was evident in the case of North Carolina's controversial bill, which led to PayPal canceling plans ...
Factors That Contribute To a Successful Boycott
Boycotts have played a significant role in advancing civil rights and social justice by leveraging the power of collective action and economic pressure. Two of the most historically significant boycotts are the Montgomery Bus Boycott and the boycotts against South Africa's apartheid.
One of the first American civil rights groups to use boycott strategies were the Quaker abolitionists with the Free Produce Movement. But it was the Montgomery Bus Boycott that served as a striking example of a successful boycott, which led to transportation desegregation.
The black community in Montgomery demonstrated exceptional solidarity and resourcefulness during the boycott of the city's bus system. Black taxi drivers charged passengers the same fare as the bus fare to support the cause. Volunteers organized extensive carpools, and there were shoe drives to provide fresh shoes for people who wore theirs out from walking as a form of protest.
The dedication of the Montgomery black community was evident as the boycott lasted 382 days. It was this unwavering commitment, combined with national support and widespread publicity, that led to the Supreme Court ruling that segregation on buses was unconstitutional.
Apartheid, South Africa's legal system of segregation, faced international condemnation and was ultimately dismantled thanks in part to widespread boycotts, sanctions, and divestment.
In 1959, ANC President Albert Luthuli called on Great Britain to boycott South African produce. This call for action snowballed and led to significant measures taken by sports organizations and cultural entities. International pressure further increased after the UN urged nations to sever ties with South Africa in 1962.
The first sports organization to cut ties with South Africa was the International Table Tennis Federation in 1956. The International Olympic Committee followed suit in 1964 by banning South African teams from the Olympics. This exclusion continued until 1992. Moreover, Britain saw boycotts and protests, such as the "battle for Swansea," which drew international attention to the issue.
The influ ...
Examples of Successful Boycotts Throughout History
Social media's influence has redefined the structure and reach of boycotts, requiring companies to weigh in their political or social stances given the immediate consumer reactions that can harm or propel their brand.
Chuck Bryant and Josh Clark discuss that in the current social media landscape, boycotts often lack the necessary focus and dedication to impact targets.
With the rise of social media, boycotts can start impulsively, which can lead to poorly thought-out actions such as boycotting one product while continuing to purchase another from the same company. Bryant suggests that these boycotts might not be as thought-out because many smaller brands are owned by larger conglomerates. Furthermore, the disorganized nature of social media boycotts, driven by short attention spans, often results in a lack of the focus and participation needed to effectively make an impact.
Social media has turned boycotts into a "spectator sport" where the progress and effectiveness of movements are publicly followed and reported. However, without dedicated participation, these boycotts may not have a lasting impact. Clark suggests that merely liking a tweet or momentarily abstaining from a product contributes to a complacency that undermines the effectiveness of boycotts. For instance, short-lived boycotts like the one Goya faced resulted in a 22% bump in sales that eventually leveled out as the new customers were not core patrons.
Clark discusses the fact that companies like Nike experienced a "buycott" instead of a boycott when they supported Colin Kaepernick, leading to an increase in sales. Other companies that backtrack on social issues or have inconsistent stances across different regions can sustain damage to their image.
The Impact of Social Media on Modern Boycotts
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser