What was the purpose of USAID?
In this episode of Stuff You Should Know, the hosts explore the history and impact of USAID, the U.S. Agency for International Development. They trace the agency's origins as a Cold War-era soft power initiative under President Kennedy, modeled after the Marshall Plan's success in post-WWII Europe. The episode examines USAID's major accomplishments, including its role in the Green Revolution and global health initiatives that have saved millions of lives.
The hosts also discuss USAID's challenges, including controversies over fund mismanagement and its complex relationship with U.S. foreign policy objectives. The conversation covers recent structural changes to the agency, including its merger with the State Department, and examines concerns from various political figures about the potential consequences of reduced U.S. aid funding on global health and international influence.
This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Jul 3, 2025 episode of the Stuff You Should Know
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
1-Page Summary
USAID's Origins and Early History
President Kennedy established the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) in 1961 as a Cold War strategy to expand American influence through "soft power." The agency's structure was inspired by the Marshall Plan, which had successfully rebuilt Europe after World War II while countering Soviet influence. MIT economists Walt Rostow and Max Milliken advocated for making this model a permanent fixture of U.S. foreign policy, leading to USAID's creation as a tool for promoting democracy and establishing American influence in strategic countries.
USAID's Major Achievements
USAID has led several transformative global initiatives. The agency dedicated substantial resources to the Green Revolution in the 1960s, working with Dr. Norman Borlaug to modernize agricultural practices in Asia, ultimately saving an estimated 250 million lives from starvation. In healthcare, USAID partnered with the CDC to eradicate smallpox globally and has saved approximately 58 million lives through tuberculosis prevention efforts. The agency's President's Malaria Initiative has reduced malaria deaths by 48 percent in participating countries, with The Lancet reporting that USAID-funded interventions have prevented roughly 91 million deaths overall.
Controversies and Challenges
Despite its achievements, USAID has faced significant criticism for mismanagement and questionable practices. A notable example is the $9.5 billion Chemonics contract, which was poorly managed and involved false reporting. In Afghanistan, 40% of USAID funds were reportedly diverted to government officials, warlords, drug lords, and insurgents, with some money even being used to purchase weapons against U.S. forces. Josh Clark notes that while USAID's work extends beyond humanitarian aid, it often serves as a tool for advancing American foreign policy interests.
Recent Structural Changes
USAID has recently been merged into the State Department under an initiative called "America First." Josh Clark expresses concern that this restructuring could create a vacuum in global influence that China might fill. The dismantling has drawn bipartisan criticism, with former Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama, along with activist Bono, expressing concern over its impact. According to The Lancet, this reduction in U.S. aid funding could result in approximately 14 million preventable deaths over the next five years.
1-Page Summary
Additional Materials
Counterarguments
- USAID's establishment as a Cold War strategy could be seen as a means to an end, rather than a purely altruistic endeavor, raising questions about the sincerity of its aid efforts.
- The inspiration from the Marshall Plan might suggest a one-size-fits-all approach to foreign aid, which may not be suitable for the diverse needs of different countries.
- The advocacy by Walt Rostow and Max Milliken could be critiqued for potentially prioritizing American interests over the needs of aid recipients.
- The promotion of democracy and American influence might sometimes conflict with the self-determination and cultural values of the countries receiving aid.
- The Green Revolution, while saving lives, has also been criticized for promoting industrial agriculture that may have long-term negative environmental impacts.
- The eradication of smallpox is a clear success, but some might argue that USAID's role in global health has at times overshadowed or undermined local health initiatives.
- The claim that USAID-funded interventions prevented roughly 91 million deaths overall could be scrutinized for the accuracy of such estimates and the attribution of outcomes to USAID's efforts.
- Criticisms of mismanagement and questionable practices could be expanded upon to discuss the need for greater accountability and transparency in foreign aid.
- The merging of USAID into the State Department under "America First" could be debated as to whether it truly undermines global aid efforts or streamlines operations for greater efficiency.
- Concerns about China filling a global influence vacuum could be countered with the argument that multipolarity in global aid might lead to more balanced and less Western-centric aid distribution.
- Bipartisan criticism of USAID's restructuring might overlook potential benefits of reform or the possibility that criticisms are politically motivated rather than based on the efficacy of aid delivery.
- The projected 14 million preventable deaths due to reduced U.S. aid funding could be challenged by questioning the methodology for such projections and considering the role of other global actors in compensating for any shortfall in aid.
Actionables
- You can educate yourself on the impact of foreign aid by reading books or articles on the history and outcomes of initiatives like the Marshall Plan and the Green Revolution. Understanding the historical context and the ripple effects of these programs can give you a deeper appreciation for the role of foreign aid and its complexities.
- Consider volunteering with or donating to organizations that focus on global health and democracy promotion. By supporting groups that align with the goals of agencies like USAID, you can contribute to efforts that combat diseases like malaria and tuberculosis, even if on a smaller scale.
- Engage in conversations with your community about the importance of global aid and its influence on international relations. Sharing insights about the role of foreign aid in advancing policy interests can help foster a more informed public discourse on the subject.
Related Shortform Content
Get access to the context and additional materials
The Historical Context and Rationale For Establishing USAID
The U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) was established in 1961 under President Kennedy as a strategy for advancing American foreign policy during the Cold War. Its origins and ethos can be traced back to the successful Marshall Plan which helped to rebuild Europe after World War II.
USAID Was Established In 1961 by President Kennedy to Advance American Foreign Policy
John F. Kennedy initially did not advocate for foreign aid when he was a young congressman. However, his perspective shifted after witnessing the importance of economic contributions through a seven-week congressional trip abroad, where he saw the need for economic aid to accompany military efforts.
Program to Combat Communism By Aiding Strategic Countries, Establishing American Influence, and Promoting Democracy
Kennedy sought to establish "soft power" for the United States, intending to create a counter against the influence of the Soviet Union and China. Through USAID, Kennedy aimed to combat communism by providing aid to strategic countries, encouraging them to adopt democratic values and become allies and trading partners with the U.S. Kennedy highlighted the importance of America's great ambitions with the establishment of USAID and the Peace Corps in March 1961, viewing them as tools to expand American influence and democratic principles across the globe.
USAID's Origins Trace Back to the Marshall Plan, Which Helped Rebuild Europe Post-World War II and Counter Soviet Influence
USAID's foundation was greatly influenced by the Marshall Plan, conceptualized by Secretary of State George Marshall after World War II for the purpose of rebuilding Europe’s economy while thwarting Soviet expansionism.
Rostow and M ...
Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary
The Historical Context and Rationale For Establishing USAID
Additional Materials
Counterarguments
- The establishment of USAID may have been motivated by geopolitical strategy rather than purely altruistic intentions to aid developing countries.
- The focus on combating communism might have led to prioritizing aid to strategic countries over those in greater need but with less geopolitical significance.
- The effectiveness of USAID in promoting democracy can be questioned, as the political systems in recipient countries often remained unchanged or did not evolve as intended.
- The comparison to the Marshall Plan may overlook significant differences in context, scale, and outcomes between post-World War II Europe and the diverse developing nations USAID serves.
- The influence of economists like Rostow and Milliken might have led to a one-size-fits-all approach to development, not accounting for the unique cultural, economic, and political landscapes of aid-receiving countries.
- The l ...
Actionables
- You can explore the impact of historical policies on current events by comparing past foreign aid initiatives to recent news articles about international relations. For example, when you read about a new foreign aid package or diplomatic effort, research a similar historical event and note the outcomes and strategies used. This will help you understand the long-term effects of foreign policy decisions and their evolution over time.
- Enhance your understanding of global economics by creating a simple timeline of major economic aid programs from the Marshall Plan to present-day initiatives. As you add to this timeline, include significant global events that might have influenced these programs. This activity will give you a clearer picture of how economic strategies are shaped by historical contexts.
- Develop a personal philosophy on international aid by refl ...
Related Shortform Content
Get access to the context and additional materials
Significant Programs and Achievements Of Usaid
The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has facilitated monumental global health and agricultural initiatives that have saved millions of lives and improved the livelihoods of countless individuals around the world.
Green Revolution By Usaid Saved 250 Million Lives By Modernizing Agriculture In Asia
Usaid and Dr. Borlaug Boosted Food Production With New Techniques, Irrigation, and Crops
In the 1960s, USAID dedicated over half of its funding to the Green Revolution, a movement aimed at fighting hunger in Asia by revamping agricultural practices. This effort was spearheaded by Dr. Norman Borlaug, and its strategies included enhancing irrigation methods, fertilization, crop rotation, and ensuring more reliable crop yields, even during periods of drought. Through these methods, the Green Revolution was a major success, overseen by USAID, and it is estimated to have saved around 250 million people from starvation.
Usaid's Role In Eradicating Smallpox and Reducing Tb and Malaria
Agency Partnered With Cdc to Implement Global Vaccination, Public Health Initiatives
On the public health front, USAID partnered with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to launch a widespread anti-smallpox campaign in countries afflicted by the disease. As a result, ...
Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary
Significant Programs and Achievements Of Usaid
Additional Materials
Clarifications
- The Green Revolution was a period of significant agricultural advancements in the 1960s and 1970s that aimed to increase food production globally. It involved the introduction of high-yielding crop varieties, improved irrigation techniques, and increased use of fertilizers and pesticides. The Green Revolution played a crucial role in addressing food shortages and improving food security in many developing countries. Dr. Norman Borlaug, a prominent figure in the agricultural sector, was a key figure in spearheading the Green Revolution efforts.
- Dr. Norman Borlaug, a renowned agronomist, played a crucial role in the Green Revolution by developing high-yielding wheat varieties. His innovative agricultural techniques significantly boosted food production in Asia, helping to alleviate hunger and save millions of lives. Borlaug's work focused on improving crop yields through scientific advancements, such as hybridization and improved farming practices. His efforts, supported by USAID, were instrumental in transforming agricultural productivity and combating food insecurity in the region.
- The Green Revolution, spearheaded by USAID and Dr. Norman Borlaug, employed techniques like improved irrigation methods, fertilization practices, crop rotation, and the development of high-yielding crop varieties to enhance agricultural productivity in Asia during the 1960s. These strategies aimed to ensure more reliable crop yields, even in challenging conditions like drought, ultimately leading to significant increases in food production and helping to alleviate hunger in the region.
- The partnership between USAID and the CDC for global health initiatives involves collaborative efforts to address public health challenges worldwide. CDC's expertise in disease control and prevention complements USAID's focus on international development, enabling comprehensive approaches to combat diseases like smallpox, tuberculosis, and malaria. This partnership leverage ...
Counterarguments
- The Green Revolution, while increasing food production, has also been criticized for promoting agricultural practices that may lead to environmental degradation, loss of local biodiversity, and increased dependency on chemical fertilizers and pesticides.
- The success of the Green Revolution is not solely attributable to USAID; it was a collaborative effort involving multiple countries, international institutions, and local governments.
- The claim that USAID saved 250 million lives through the Green Revolution is difficult to quantify precisely and may not account for the complex socio-economic factors that also contribute to food security.
- The eradication of smallpox was a global effort, and while USAID played a significant role, it was one of many contributors, including the World Health Organization and various national governments.
- The reduction in tuberculosis and malaria deaths can also be attributed to the work of other organizations and factors, such as improved living conditions, better diagnostics, and other health interventions.
- The figures presented, such as lives saved by actions against tuberculosis and malaria, are estimates and may be subject to debate or revision as more data becomes available or methodologies for calculation evolve.
- The long-term sustaina ...
Related Shortform Content
Get access to the context and additional materials
Criticisms and Controversies Surrounding Usaid
Usaid, known for its global humanitarian efforts, has recently come under scrutiny for mismanagement and its role in advancing American foreign policy.
Usaid Accused Of Fund Mismanagement, Waste, Fraud, and Ineffectiveness in $9.5 Billion Chemonics Contract
Chuck Bryant acknowledges that USAID has saved many lives and has had a significant influence across the world. However, there have been criticisms of wasted resources and fraud. He gives the example of Chemonics, which was awarded a $9.5 billion contract by USAID to streamline delivery of medical supplies worldwide. This project was poorly managed, involved false reporting between Chemonics and its partners, and continued to receive USAID funding despite its known problems.
Usaid Funds Diverted To Warlords, Insurgents, and Drug Lords
In Afghanistan, USAID faced serious allegations, with 40% of its funds reportedly going to government officials, warlords, drug lords, and insurgents. Insurgents even used the money to purchase weapons, ultimately fighting against the United States. Furthermore, U.S. aid aimed at helping Afghan farmers move away from opium production was misappropriated and used to increase opium production, particularly noted in Kandahar province between 2013 and 2015.
Usaid as a Tool For Advancing American Foreign Policy and Interests
Usaid's role has not only been humanitarian but also strategic. Foreign assistance from USAID sometimes aligned with U.S. foreign policy goals, such as toppling certain regimes. Josh Clark emphasizes U.S. aid's multifaceted nature — extending beyond goodwill and life-saving, it sometimes comes with expectations for military alliances o ...
Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary
Criticisms and Controversies Surrounding Usaid
Additional Materials
Clarifications
- USAID, the United States Agency for International Development, is a government agency responsible for administering civilian foreign aid and development assistance. Its mission is to promote U.S. national security and economic prosperity while demonstrating American values and goodwill globally. USAID operates in various sectors like health, education, economic growth, democracy promotion, and humanitarian assistance to support sustainable development in countries around the world. The agency works with governments, organizations, and local communities to address global challenges and improve the lives of people in need.
- The Chemonics contract mentioned in the text is a $9.5 billion agreement awarded by USAID to streamline the delivery of medical supplies globally. However, the project faced issues of mismanagement, false reporting, and continued funding despite known problems. This raised concerns about the effectiveness and integrity of USAID's handling of such large contracts.
- USAID's relationship with American foreign policy involves aligning aid with strategic goals, including supporting pro-democracy movements and furthering U.S. interests. This alignment sometimes extends beyond humanitarian efforts to include promoting democratic ideals and fostering alliances beneficial to American foreign policy objectives. The agency's activities can serve as a tool for advancing American interests by leveraging aid to influence political outcomes and support initiatives that align with U.S. foreign policy goals. This dual role of USAID, both humanitarian and strategic, underscores its significance in furthering American foreign policy objectives globally.
- In Afghanistan, USAID faced allegations of mismanagement where a significant portion of aid funds were reportedly diverted to government officials, warlords, drug lords, and insurgents. This diversion of funds led to misuse, including the purchase of weapons by insurgents, undermining the inte ...
Counterarguments
- USAID's work is subject to rigorous oversight and regular audits to ensure accountability and minimize mismanagement.
- The Chemonics contract, while facing issues, represents a complex challenge of global supply chain management, and lessons learned are being applied to improve future projects.
- Allegations of funds diversion in Afghanistan reflect the complex realities of operating in conflict zones, and do not necessarily indict the entire agency's operations.
- Efforts to reduce opium production in Afghanistan faced numerous external challenges, and some programs have shown success in alternative crop development.
- USAID's alignment with American foreign policy does not inherently negate the positive impact of its humanitarian work.
- Supporting pro-de ...
Related Shortform Content
Get access to the context and additional materials
The Recent Changes to Usaid's Structure and Status
Recent restructurings within the U.S. government have led to the consolidation of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) into the State Department, raising concerns about the implications for global influence and humanitarian efforts.
Usaid Merged Into State Department, Forming "America First" In 2023
As of the recording date, the previous day marked the end of operation for most USAID employees, with the agency ceasing to exist as an independent body. It was absorbed into the State Department as part of a new initiative called "America First." The restructuring raises concerns about the shift in U.S. global influence and the potential for creating a vacuum that China could fill. Josh Clark and Chuck Bryant acknowledged the mixed legacy of USAID but also recognized the agency's importance in international affairs.
Restructuring Raises Concerns About U.S. Global Influence and a Potential Vacuum For China
Josh Clark highlighted the worries that the dismantling of USAID could lead to a reduction in global democracy. He also expressed the concern that with the scale back of USAID's efforts, there might be an opportunity for China to step in and fill the void left by the U.S. in providing foreign aid, thereby increasing its global influence. This is particularly noteworthy given China’s heavy foreign aid spending in recent years, standing in contrast to U.S. spending accumulated over the last 80 years.
Bipartisan Criticism of Usaid Dismantling For Impact on Vulnerable Populations and U.S. Soft Power
Criticism of the dismantling of USAID has been bipartisan, highlighting the potential impacts on vulnerable populations and the importance of U.S. soft power. Former Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama, as well as musician and activist Bono, have all shown pride in USAID's accomplishments and expressed concern over its end.
Estimates: Reduced Aid Funding May Cause ...
Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary
The Recent Changes to Usaid's Structure and Status
Additional Materials
Counterarguments
- The consolidation of USAID into the State Department could lead to more streamlined and efficient aid delivery by reducing bureaucratic overlap.
- The "America First" initiative may prioritize aid that aligns more closely with U.S. strategic interests, potentially leading to more impactful use of funds.
- The restructuring could provide an opportunity for other nations or international organizations to step up and diversify the sources of global aid.
- The concerns about China filling the void may be overestimated if other democratic nations or coalitions increase their foreign aid contributions.
- The estimate of 14 million preventable deaths may not account for the potential increase in aid from non-governmental organizations, private charities, or other countries.
- Criticism regarding the impact on U.S. soft power might not consider the possibility that the U.S. can maintain influ ...
Actionables
- You can support global humanitarian efforts by donating to reputable international charities that focus on areas where USAID previously had a strong presence. By researching organizations that work on democracy promotion, healthcare, and poverty alleviation, you can contribute financially to causes that may be affected by the restructuring. For example, if you're concerned about preventable deaths, consider giving to health-focused NGOs that provide vaccines and medical care in developing countries.
- Engage in micro-lending through platforms that connect you with entrepreneurs in emerging economies. This allows you to directly support individuals and small businesses, fostering economic growth and stability in regions where reduced foreign aid might have an impact. Websites like Kiva enable you to lend small amounts of money to people who need it for business ventures, education, or healthcare, effectively filling some of the void on a personal level.
- Educate yourself and others about the importance of global aid and democracy by s ...
Related Shortform Content
Get access to the context and additional materials
Create Summaries for anything on the web
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser
