Podcasts > Stuff You Should Know > Selects: How Dyslexia Works

Selects: How Dyslexia Works

By iHeartPodcasts

Dive into the intricate world of learning disabilities with the "Stuff You Should Know" podcast, where hosts Chuck Bryant and Josh Clark, along with contributors Holly Frey and Tracy V. Wilson, unpack the complexities of dyslexia. They explore its evolution from a misunderstood condition linked with low intelligence scores and visual impairment to its recognition as a specific learning disability, reshaping the educational support afforded to those affected. The episode delves into the changing historical perspectives, spotlighting the shifts in understanding that have led to current teaching methods and strategies.

Amidst the advances in science and technology, this episode also grapples with the ongoing debates concerning dyslexia. Modern MRI imaging and genetic studies are discussed, shedding light on the brain activity of dyslexic individuals and the brain's adaptability to reading. Furthermore, the contention surrounding the existence of dyslexia as a distinct condition and the implications for educational resource distribution are thoroughly examined. The podcast navigates the challenges of defining and diagnosing dyslexia, exploring the broader implications for those with reading difficulties across a variety of demographic backgrounds.

Listen to the original

Selects: How Dyslexia Works

This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Mar 16, 2024 episode of the Stuff You Should Know

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.

Selects: How Dyslexia Works

1-Page Summary

Historical development of the understanding of dyslexia

Dyslexia's understanding has progressed from early misconceptions of it being a sign of low intelligence or visual problems to being widely recognized as a specific learning disability. Initially, in the 19th century, individuals with dyslexia were mistakenly viewed as less intelligent, a stigma exemplified by Pulitzer Prize winner Philip Schultz's experiences in the 1950s. The term 'dyslexia' was linked to visual impairments, with professionals like Hinshelwood and Samuel Orton emphasizing visual disturbances over cognitive deficits. It was only in the mid-20th century, with the work of educators like Orton, that dyslexia began to be seen as a reading disorder independent of intelligence and vision challenges. By the 1970s, McDonald Critchley's work helped solidify the view of dyslexia as a specific learning disorder, consequently affecting educational support for dyslexic individuals.

Use of MRI imaging and genetics to study dyslexia's causes

Advancements in MRI technology have helped identify brain differences in individuals with dyslexia, particularly in the language processing regions. These areas, vital for language and visual interactions with language, show different activity in dyslexic brains, suggesting a link to the disorder. However, it remains inconclusive whether these brain differences cause dyslexia or result from it. The debate continues, with some researchers arguing that these changes might be the effect of altered reading experiences over time. Studies comparing pre- and post-literacy brain scans in adults highlight the brain's structural adaptability to reading, further complicating our understanding of dyslexia's neurological underpinnings.

Teaching methods and strategies for people with dyslexia

Recent teaching strategies for dyslexia underscore the importance of patience and practice, recognizing that learning to read can be a more prolonged process for dyslexic individuals. Although there's no cure, Chuck Bryant points out that dyslexia is manageable with the right techniques. Historical attitudes towards teaching dyslexic students have evolved from impatience to an educational consensus that appreciates the need for extended learning periods. In addition to traditional teaching methods, assistive technologies like text-to-speech apps and real-time transcription services have become critical in helping people with dyslexia bridge the gaps in auditory and visual learning processes.

Debate around whether dyslexia actually exists as a distinct condition

The legitimacy of dyslexia as a distinct condition has been questioned by some, sparking debate over the allocation of educational resources. Josh Clark suggests that dyslexia, characterized by reading difficulties unrelated to intelligence levels, cuts across various demographics. There's no universally accepted definition or definitive diagnostic test, making it a contentious topic. While federal acts have earmarked funds for dyslexia support, critics argue that this may siphon resources away from children with reading challenges who do not fit the high-intelligence dyslexic profile. The controversial stance views dyslexia diagnoses as possibly unfair, advocating instead for equal support for all students struggling with reading, irrespective of a dyslexia diagnosis.

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Hinshelwood and Samuel Orton's focus on visual disturbances in dyslexia stemmed from their belief that difficulties in visual perception were the primary cause of reading challenges, rather than cognitive deficits. They proposed that addressing visual issues through specific interventions could improve reading abilities in individuals with dyslexia. This emphasis on visual processing differences influenced early theories and interventions for dyslexia, highlighting the complexity of understanding the condition beyond just cognitive aspects. However, as research progressed, the understanding of dyslexia evolved to encompass a broader range of factors beyond visual processing alone.
  • Advancements in MRI technology have revealed brain differences in individuals with dyslexia, but it's unclear if these differences cause dyslexia or are a result of the disorder. Some researchers argue that these brain variances could be a consequence of altered reading experiences over time, complicating the understanding of dyslexia's neurological origins. Studies comparing brain scans before and after literacy acquisition in adults highlight the brain's adaptability to reading, adding complexity to the debate on dyslexia's neurological underpinnings.
  • The controversy surrounding the legitimacy of dyslexia as a distinct condition stems from differing views on its definition and diagnostic criteria. Some argue that without a clear-cut diagnostic test, dyslexia may be overdiagnosed or misunderstood. Critics question the allocation of resources based on a diagnosis that lacks universal agreement, suggesting a need for more inclusive support for all struggling readers. This debate highlights the complexities in identifying and addressing learning differences like dyslexia in educational settings.
  • Dyslexia lacks a universally accepted definition or definitive diagnostic test due to its complex nature and varied presentations in individuals. The diagnosis often involves a comprehensive assessment of reading abilities, cognitive functions, and educational history. Different professionals and organizations may have slightly different criteria for identifying dyslexia, leading to variability in diagnosis. This lack of a clear-cut definition can sometimes lead to debates and challenges in providing consistent support and resources for individuals with dyslexia.

Counterarguments

  • Dyslexia's historical link to visual impairments may have been based on observable symptoms rather than misconceptions, as early researchers might have noted visual reading difficulties without the benefit of modern neurological insights.
  • The view that dyslexia is independent of intelligence and vision challenges could be oversimplified, as some research suggests that there may be a complex interplay between these factors.
  • While MRI technology has identified brain differences, some argue that neurodiversity is a spectrum and that these differences may not necessarily indicate a disorder but rather a variation in brain functioning.
  • The argument that brain changes might be the effect of altered reading experiences could be supported by the neuroplasticity of the brain, which allows for changes in response to learning and environmental factors.
  • The effectiveness of teaching strategies for dyslexia could be debated, with some suggesting that more research is needed to determine the best practices for different types of learners.
  • The management of dyslexia with the right techniques might not address the full range of challenges faced by individuals with dyslexia, and some may require more comprehensive support.
  • The evolution of historical attitudes towards teaching dyslexic students might not reflect the experiences of all individuals with dyslexia, as some may still encounter stigma or inadequate support.
  • While assistive technologies are helpful, they may not be accessible to all due to socioeconomic factors, and reliance on them might not address underlying literacy skills.
  • The question of dyslexia's legitimacy as a distinct condition could be seen as a call for more precise diagnostic criteria and a better understanding of the spectrum of reading difficulties.
  • The lack of a universally accepted definition or definitive diagnostic test for dyslexia could be viewed as an opportunity for the development of more nuanced and inclusive diagnostic tools.
  • The allocation of funds for dyslexia support might be justified by the specific challenges faced by individuals with dyslexia, and the need for targeted interventions.
  • The argument for equal support for all students struggling with reading could overlook the specialized support that individuals with dyslexia might require to achieve literacy proficiency.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Selects: How Dyslexia Works

Historical development of the understanding of dyslexia

Over time, the understanding of dyslexia has evolved significantly from initial misconceptions about intelligence and visual impairment to an established recognition as a specific learning disability.

Early theories of visual impairment or low intelligence

The term dyslexia was first introduced by Rudolf Berlin, an ophthalmologist, in 1872, in reference to what is now recognized as acquired dyslexia. Originally, dyslexia was misunderstood as a sign of low intelligence or a problem with vision. Students who struggled with dyslexia were often labeled as stupid or considered unable to keep up, not because of a learning disability but because they were thought to have low intelligence. Philip Schultz, who won a Pulitzer Prize and was diagnosed with dyslexia later in life, detailed his experience of being isolated in a 'dummy class' during the 1950s, highlighting the societal stigma and misunderstanding at the time.

Persistent misconceptions included the idea that dyslexia involved transposing letters or spelling words backwards. Clark and Bryant emphasize that these notions are not accurate and reflect a longstanding misunderstanding. Furthermore, terms like 'word blindness' or 'Wartblindheit' (in German) were commonly used up until the 1960s to describe dyslexia, and the term "congenital word blindness" also emerged, indicating an early theory that dyslexia was predominantly a visual or perceptual issue. Ophthalmologists such as Hinshelwood and a doctor named Samuel Orton described a condition implying a visual disturbance rather than a lack of intelligence, where individuals encounter difficulty in word recognition.

Shift in mid-20th century toward dyslexia as a specific learning disability

The misconception of dyslexia began to shift with contributions from professionals such as Hinshelwood, Morgan, and Samuel O ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Historical development of the understanding of dyslexia

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Acquired dyslexia is a form of dyslexia that can develop due to brain injury, stroke, or other neurological conditions, leading to difficulties in reading and language processing. Unlike developmental dyslexia, which is present from childhood, acquired dyslexia occurs later in life due to specific brain-related factors. It is characterized by various reading impairments, such as semantic errors and challenges in reading nonwords, often associated with specific brain damage or trauma. The term "acquired" distinguishes this type of dyslexia from the more common developmental form.
  • A specific learning disorder, as recognized by the US government, is a condition where an individual has difficulty learning and using academic skills like reading or math, ...

Counterarguments

...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Selects: How Dyslexia Works

Use of MRI imaging and genetics to study dyslexia's causes

Researchers are using MRI imaging to explore the brain differences associated with dyslexia, but the findings raise questions about whether these differences cause dyslexia or are a result of it.

MRI reveals differences in language processing regions of dyslexic brains

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have not conclusively pinpointed dyslexia in the brain but have identified certain regions of the left hemisphere as being significant. These regions, including the ventral occipitotemporal region, temporoparietal region, and inferior frontal cortices, are associated with language and visual processing of language and are thought to be implicated in dyslexia. The fMRI studies suggest that these regions in the brains of dyslexic individuals display different activity levels, indicating variations in language processing.

There is growing evidence that some brain regions appear different in dyslexic individuals. Understanding whether these differences are a cause of dyslexia or a cons ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Use of MRI imaging and genetics to study dyslexia's causes

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • The ventral occipitotemporal region is a part of the brain located in the lower surface of the temporal and occipital lobes. It is involved in processing visual information, particularly related to object recognition and word form processing. In the context of dyslexia research, abnormalities or differences in this region have been observed in individuals with dyslexia, suggesting its potential role in language and reading difficulties. Understanding the function and connectivity of this region can provide insights into how dyslexia affects visual processing and language comprehension in the brain.
  • The temporoparietal region, also known as the temporoparietal junction (TPJ), is an area in the brain where the temporal and parietal lobes meet. It plays a crucial role in various cognitive functions, including self-other distinctions, theory of mind, and moral decision-making. Damage to the TPJ can impact an individual's ability to make moral judgments and may lead to experiences like out-of-body sensations. Additionally, the TPJ is associated with a range of neurological and psychiatric conditions such as anxiety disorders, Alzheimer's disease, autism spectrum disorder, and schizophrenia.
  • The inferior frontal cortices, specifically the inferior frontal gyrus, are regions in the brain's frontal lobe that play a crucial role in language processing and speech production. These areas, including Broca's area, are involved in various aspects of language comprehension and production. The inferior frontal gyrus is divided into different parts, each with distinct functions related to language processing. Researchers have identified activity differences in these regions when studying dyslexia and its impact on language processing.
  • Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) measures brain activity by detecting changes in blood flow associated with neuronal activation. It uses the blood-oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) contrast to map neural activity in ...

Counterarguments

  • The correlation between brain differences and dyslexia observed in MRI studies does not necessarily imply causation, and further research is needed to establish a direct causal link.
  • The use of fMRI to study dyslexia is limited by the fact that it measures blood flow, which is an indirect measure of neural activity, and may not capture the full complexity of neural processes involved in dyslexia.
  • Differences in brain activity could be influenced by a variety of factors other than dyslexia, such as individual differences in cognition, education, and environment, which may not be fully accounted for in studies.
  • The focus on the left hemisphere may overlook the role of the right hemisphere or the interaction between both hemispheres in dyslexia.
  • Genetic factors contributing to dyslexia may interact with brain structure and function in ways that are not yet fully understood, and attributing dyslexia solely to observable brain differences may be an oversimplification.
  • The plasticity of the brain means that it is capable of significant change in response to learni ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Selects: How Dyslexia Works

Teaching methods and strategies for people with dyslexia

Understanding the educational needs of those with dyslexia has evolved over time, placing emphasis on patience, practice, and assistive technologies as key supports in learning to read.

Patience and practice as the main treatments for dyslexia

Teachers historically have not always had the proper knowledge or tools to effectively support students with dyslexia, but as research and understanding of dyslexia have grown, it's recognized that dyslexia is a life-long challenge that can be managed with proper strategies. Chuck Bryant emphasizes that while there's no cure for dyslexia, the treatment is steeped in patience and practice. With these, individuals with dyslexia can learn to read and create new neural pathways, although it might be a slower process than for other learners.

It has been acknowledged that by the 1970s, an educational consensus had formed around the idea that people with dyslexia could be taught to read through methods that involved continuous practice and patience. The process of learning for children with dyslexia is similar to that of others, yet they require more time to process and learn the same information. The historical lack of patience in school systems, unfortunately, led to many children with dyslexia being overlooked or abandoned educationally.

Bryant advises that not only those with dyslexia but also parents and teachers, need to exercise patience as it is a condition that will be present throughout a person's life. He discusses that schools can support those with dyslexia through programs which allow extra time for tests, embodying the understanding that these students' learning processes may require e ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Teaching methods and strategies for people with dyslexia

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Chuck Bryant is not a known figure in the field of dyslexia education or research. It seems that the text may have used a fictional or unidentified individual to present information and insights on dyslexia teaching methods. The focu ...

Counterarguments

  • While patience and practice are important, they are not the only treatments for dyslexia; structured literacy programs and explicit instruction in phonemic awareness and phonics are also critical.
  • Some experts argue that dyslexia is not just a challenge to be managed but a difference that can offer unique strengths in areas like spatial reasoning, creativity, and problem-solving.
  • The idea that creating new neural pathways is the main treatment for dyslexia might be oversimplified; the focus should also be on teaching strategies that play to the strengths of dyslexic learners.
  • Continuous practice and patience might not be sufficient for all individuals with dyslexia; some may require more specialized interventions or accommodations.
  • The assertion that children with dyslexia require more time to process and learn information might be too general; each individual with dyslexia has unique needs and learning speeds.
  • The historical perspective on the lack of patience in school systems does not address the full range of systemic issues, such as lack of resources or teacher training, that also contributed to the problem.
  • While extra time on tests is a common accommodation, it may not address all the challenges faced by students with dyslexia; other accommodations or modifications might be necessary.
  • Assistive technologies are helpful, but they are not a panacea; they should be used in conjunction with other tea ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Selects: How Dyslexia Works

Debate around whether dyslexia actually exists as a distinct condition

Josh Clark kicks off a contentious debate on the validity of dyslexia as a singular condition and the implications this has on educational resources and approaches.

Theory that reading struggles transcend intelligence level

Research has illuminated that dyslexia signifies an unexpected difficulty in reading for individuals who have the intelligence to be much better readers, which points out that overall intellectual capability does not correlate with this specific challenge. Clark stresses that dyslexia does indeed exist but disputes the idea that it is limited to intelligent, upper-middle-class children. He argues dyslexia is about a universal inability to read across various demographics.

Children identified as dyslexic, who are otherwise bright and share the same socioeconomic benefits, continue to struggle with reading and writing, which implies that their reading difficulties aren't connected to intelligence level. This is further supported as there's no official definition of dyslexia and no definitive test to diagnose it, contributing to the ongoing debate about its existence as a distinctive condition.

Moreover, a range of experts argue that the inability to read is not tied to intelligence and can affect people of any level of intelligence, refuting some prior beliefs that it exclusively impacts smart children.

Controversial view that special dyslexia diagnoses divert resources

A central focus of the debate is the management of educational resources. Josh Clark references the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, which recognizes dyslexia as a distinct learning disorder, a categorization that subsequently allows for additional learning support and resources for those diagnosed.

Clark notes that, likely due to federal acts like this, schools might have particular funding fo ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Debate around whether dyslexia actually exists as a distinct condition

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Dyslexia is a condition where individuals face unexpected challenges in reading despite having the intellectual capacity to read better, indicating that reading difficulties are not solely linked to intelligence levels. This theory suggests that dyslexia can affect individuals across various intelligence levels, debunking the misconception that it only impacts highly intelligent individuals. The idea that reading struggles transcend intelligence level highlights that the ability to read is a separate skill from general intelligence and can be impaired regardless of one's intellectual capabilities. This theory underscores the complexity of dyslexia and emphasizes the need for tailored support and interventions for individuals experiencing reading difficulties.
  • Dyslexia is a complex learning disorder that involves difficulties with reading, writing, and spelling. The lack of a universally agreed-upon definition stems from the varied ways dyslexia can manifest and the ongoing research in the field. Diagnosis typically involves a comprehensive assessment by professionals, considering factors like reading skills, cognitive abilities, and educational history. The absence of a definitive test means that diagnosing dyslexia relies on a combination of evaluations and observations rather than a si ...

Counterarguments

  • Dyslexia is a well-researched condition with specific neurological and genetic markers that differentiate it from general reading difficulties.
  • The existence of dyslexia as a distinct condition is supported by a substantial body of scientific evidence, including brain imaging studies that show differences in the way the brains of people with dyslexia process language.
  • Specialized interventions for dyslexia, such as structured literacy programs, are based on an understanding of these specific neurological differences and may not be as effective for individuals with other types of reading difficulties.
  • The argument that there is no official definition of dyslexia is contested by the presence of definitions and diagnostic criteria in various medical and educational texts, including the DSM-5 and educational systems across different countries.
  • While dyslexia can affect individuals of any intelligence level, the focus on unexpected difficulty in reading is to highlight the discrepancy in achievement, which can be a key indicator for identifying dyslexia and providing targeted support.
  • The allocation of resources for dyslexia does not necessarily divert resources from other struggling readers, as effective dyslexia interventio ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free

Create Summaries for anything on the web

Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser

Shortform Extension CTA