Podcasts > Stuff You Should Know > Clue(do): Third Best Board Game Ever | STUFF YOU SHOULD KNOW

Clue(do): Third Best Board Game Ever | STUFF YOU SHOULD KNOW

By iHeartPodcasts

Dive into the intriguing world of deduction with "Stuff You Should Know" as hosts Josh Clark and Chuck Bryant dissect the enduring appeal and strategic depth of the classic board game, Clue. Designed to test your sleuthing skills, this episode will guide you through the delicate art of accusation and the importance of keen observation as you navigate the grand halls and secret passages of one of the world’s most beloved games.

Join the iconic duo as they explore effective strategies to crack the case of who, with what, and where. From the vital role of tracking which cards have been shown to the cunning ploys that can keep opponents guessing, Josh and Chuck unveil how even the sliest of subterfuges can tip the scales in your favor. Whether you're Colonel Mustard in the study with the candlestick or Mrs. Peacock wielding a wrench, "Stuff You Should Know" promises to sharpen your detective skills for the next time you hear the shuffling of Clue cards.

Listen to the original

Clue(do): Third Best Board Game Ever | STUFF YOU SHOULD KNOW

This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Feb 7, 2024 episode of the Stuff You Should Know

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.

Clue(do): Third Best Board Game Ever | STUFF YOU SHOULD KNOW

1-Page Summary

The basic components of playing Clue

Clue, a murder mystery board game, challenges players to identify the murderer, the murder weapon, and the location of the crime through deduction. At the start, players choose one of six characters: Colonel Mustard, Miss Scarlet, Mrs. Peacock, Professor Plum, Mrs. White, or Mr. Green. In addition to the suspects, players must consider six potential murder weapons: a knife, revolver, wrench, rope, candlestick, and lead pipe. The game board features nine rooms - hall, study, library, billiards room, conservatory, ballroom, kitchen, dining room, lounge - that serve as possible scenes of the crime.

Making suggestions and accusations to deduce the murderer

Suggestions play a pivotal role in Clue, wherein players propose theories about the what, who, and where of the murder when situated in a room. Other players refute these suggestions by showing a card that contradicts one element of the suggestion, thereby providing information for all players. If suggestions are not refuted, players may become confident enough in their deductions to make a formal accusation. If the accusation is wrong, they are out of the game; if correct, they claim victory. This process of making suggestions and accusations facilitates the key mechanism of deduction via elimination, even as eliminated players look on.

Strategies for more effective deduction

To improve at Clue, players should meticulously note which cards have been shown by whom, a fundamental strategy that facilitates the elimination of false possibilities. Players can also employ deceptive tactics, such as suggesting cards in their possession to misdirect opponents and maintain an advantage. Attention to detail is critical, especially to which suggestions go unrefuted, as these likely indicate cards in the confidential envelope. Consequently, paying close attention to all evidence and employing strategic suggestions profoundly impacts a player's chances of correctly solving the mystery.

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • In the board game Clue, players move around the board to enter different rooms where they can make suggestions about the suspect, weapon, and location of the murder. When a player makes a suggestion, other players can refute it by showing a card that contradicts the suggestion. This process helps eliminate possibilities and narrow down the solution. Making an accurate accusation by correctly deducing the suspect, weapon, and location leads to victory in the game.
  • In the game Clue, players make suggestions about the suspect, weapon, and room. Other players can refute these suggestions by showing a card that contradicts part of the suggestion. If a player is confident, they can make a formal accusation. If the accusation is correct, they win; if wrong, they are out of the game. This process helps players deduce the solution through elimination.
  • In Clue, effective deduction strategies involve noting which cards have been shown by other players to eliminate false possibilities. Players can use deceptive tactics like suggesting cards they possess to mislead opponents and maintain an advantage. Paying attention to unrefuted suggestions can hint at cards in the confidential envelope. By carefully analyzing all evidence and making strategic suggestions, players can increase their chances of solving the mystery correctly.

Counterarguments

  • While noting which cards have been shown is fundamental, it's not the only strategy; players must also interpret the behavior and patterns of other players' suggestions and accusations.
  • Deceptive tactics can be a double-edged sword; suggesting cards in one's possession might misdirect opponents, but it can also provide them with valuable information if they deduce the tactic.
  • The importance of making strategic suggestions might be overstated; sometimes, luck and the initial distribution of cards can significantly influence the game's outcome.
  • The text implies that once a player makes a wrong accusation, they are simply out of the game; however, they can still participate by showing cards to refute suggestions, which can influence the game's outcome.
  • The text does not address the potential for players to unintentionally give away information through non-verbal cues or patterns in their gameplay, which can be as important as the cards shown.
  • The idea that unrefuted suggestions likely indicate cards in the confidential envelope is not always true; players may not refute a suggestion because they do not have any of the cards in question, not necessarily because those cards are in the envelope.
  • The text suggests that attention to detail is critical, but it does not acknowledge that different players may have varying levels of deductive reasoning or memory recall, which can affect their ability to play effectively regardless of their attention to detail.
  • The text does not consider the social aspect of the game, where alliances and persuasive communication can also play a significant role in the gameplay and outcome.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Clue(do): Third Best Board Game Ever | STUFF YOU SHOULD KNOW

The basic components of playing Clue

Clue is a popular board game that involves solving a murder mystery by deducing the culprit, the murder weapon, and the location. Understanding the basic components of the game is crucial to play effectively.

The players choose to play as 1 of 6 suspects: Colonel Mustard, Miss Scarlet, Mrs. Peacock, Professor Plum, Mrs. White, or Mr. Green

Players embody one of six characters, each a suspect in the game's intriguing murder case. Jerry's nickname is Miss Scarlet, indicating his preference for playing as that character. The other characters players can choose from include Colonel Mustard, Mrs. Peacock, Professor Plum, Mrs. White, and Mr. Green.

There are 6 murder weapons: knife, revolver, wrench, rope, candlestick, lead pipe

Central to solving the mystery is determining which of the six available murder weapons was used in the crime. These include diverse items such as a knife, revolver, wrench, rope, candlestick, and lead pipe. There may be a playful suggestion that Jerry would likely use a lead pipe, adding a bit of personality to the gameplay discussion.

The board has 9 rooms in a home: hall, study, library, ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The basic components of playing Clue

Additional Materials

Clarifications

...

Counterarguments

...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Clue(do): Third Best Board Game Ever | STUFF YOU SHOULD KNOW

Making suggestions and accusations to deduce the murderer

In the classic game of whodunit, players use strategic suggestions and accusations to deduce the identity of the murderer. The aim is to gather information and eliminate possibilities until a confident accusation can be made.

A player makes a suggestion with the what, who, and where when in a room

A player, when in one of the game's rooms, can suggest a possible combination of murderer, weapon, and room. This suggestion presents a theory of who committed the crime, with what weapon, and in what location.

Other players refute suggestions by showing cards that "disprove" a suggestion

To disprove a suggestion, players must reveal one of their cards that matches one of the elements in the suggestion, but only if it's necessary to reveal a card. If a player has multiple cards that could refute a suggestion, they are only required to show one, shielding additional information.

If a player's suggestion is not refuted by any other player, and they do not hold any of the suggested cards in their own hand, the player can be more confident in their guess about the details of the murder.

Once suggestions narrow possibilities sufficiently, a player can make a formal accusation

As the game progress and suggestions reduce possible solutions, a player may reach a point where they feel sufficiently confident to make an accusation. If no one is able to disprove a player's suggestion, this may prompt a formal accusation.

If wrong, the accuser loses; if correct, the accuser wins

When a player makes an official accusation and it's incorrect, the consequence ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Making suggestions and accusations to deduce the murderer

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • The Whodunit game is a murder mystery deduction game where players aim to uncover the murderer, weapon, and location through strategic suggestions and refutations. Players make suggestions with specific combinations of suspects, weapons, and rooms to gather information. Other players can refute suggestions by showing cards that disprove elements of the suggestion, helping narrow down possibilities. The game progresses as players eliminate options through a process of deduction until someone makes a confident accusation to solve the mystery.
  • When a player makes a suggestion in the game, others can disprove it by showing a card that matches an element in the suggestion. Players only need to show one card to refute a suggestion, even if they have multiple cards that could disprove it. This process helps eliminate possibilities and narrow down the potential solutions in the g ...

Counterarguments

  • While suggestions and accusations are key to deducing the murderer, luck in card distribution can also significantly affect the outcome of the game.
  • The strategy of making a suggestion is limited by the requirement to be in a specific room, which can sometimes hinder a player's ability to test their theories.
  • Showing only one card to refute a suggestion might not always be the most informative for the guessing player, potentially slowing down the deduction process.
  • A player's confidence in their guess might be misplaced if they are not considering the strategic play of others who may be withholding information.
  • Making a formal accusation carries a high risk, and the game does not always provide enough information for a player to be truly confident, leading to a guesswork element.
  • The rule that an incorrect accusation eliminates a player from winning can be seen as t ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
Clue(do): Third Best Board Game Ever | STUFF YOU SHOULD KNOW

Strategies for more effective deduction

Mastering the art of deduction can turn the tide in strategy games. Here are some methodologies to enhance your effectiveness in eliminating options and honing in on the truth.

Track what cards each player has revealed previously

Taking notes and tracking which cards each player has revealed is a crucial strategy. Remember, the process of elimination operates at the core of deduction games, helping you eliminate people, rooms, and weapons. By keeping a meticulous record of what is revealed, you're less likely to make redundant suggestions and more able to focus on the unknown elements.

Make "misleading" suggestions using cards you hold to throw opponents off

One counterintuitive yet effective tactic is to suggest cards you already hold. This cunning move can mislead your opponents about the true location of those cards and protect your knowledge advantage. Additionally, be observant of patterns, such as if a player repeatedly suggests the same weapon. This could signify that they either possess that card or have deduced it's part of the mystery.

Pay close attention to refuted and unrefuted suggestions to deduce what cards are in the envelope

The difficulty of elimination ri ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Strategies for more effective deduction

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Deduction games are board games where players use logic and reasoning to uncover hidden information. The core mechanic involves making educated guesses based on clues and eliminating possibilities to solve a mystery. Players typically gather information by making suggestions and observing how others respond, narrowing down the potential solutions. The goal is to deduce specific elements, such as the culprit, location, or weapon, by process of elimination and strategic thinking.
  • In deduction games, players suggest specific cards (like a suspect, weapon, or room) to gather information from other players. These suggestions help players eliminate possibilities and narrow down the solution to the mystery. By suggesting cards, players aim to deduce the hidden cards in the game, which are typically kept in a central envelope or hidden from view. Paying attention to how other players respond to suggestions can provide valuable clues in solving the game's mystery.
  • Tracking and noting opponents' revealed cards in deduction games involves keeping a record of which cards each player has shown during the game. This strategy helps in eliminating possibilities and focusing on unknown elements. By maintaining a meticulous record of revealed cards, players can make more informed deductions and avoid redundant suggestions. This tactic enhances the process of elimination, a key aspect of deduction games.
  • In deduction games, refuted suggestions are ones that other players can disprove with their cards, helping narrow down possibilities. Unrefuted suggestion ...

Counterarguments

  • While tracking and noting each player's revealed cards can be helpful, it can also be time-consuming and distract from the flow of the game, potentially causing a player to miss subtle cues or strategies in play.
  • Misleading suggestions can be a double-edged sword; if overused or used transparently, they may alert savvy opponents to your strategy, leading them to discount your suggestions and potentially gain information about your hand.
  • Observing patterns in opponents' suggestions is useful, but it can also lead to false assumptions if not combined with solid evidence, as players may use complex strategies that do not rely on simple patterns.
  • Focusing too much on refuted and unrefuted suggestions might cause a player to overlook other strategic elements of the game, such as bluffing or alliance-building, which can also be critical to winning.
  • The strategy of focusing on rooms by physically occupying them can be predictable and may allow opponents to anticipate your moves, which could be str ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free

Create Summaries for anything on the web

Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser

Shortform Extension CTA