In this episode of NPR's Book of the Day, V. E. Schwab discusses her collaborative thriller about seven midlist writers competing to finish a deceased bestselling author's final manuscript on a remote Scottish island. The conversation explores the financial struggles of midlist authors—writers who once formed publishing's backbone but now face a collapsed middle market—and how these challenges shaped the novel's premise.
Schwab and her co-author Kat Clark explain their structured collaborative writing process and their decision to publish under the pseudonym Evelyn Clark. This pen name provided creative freedom to critique the publishing industry openly and explore new territory beyond their established brands. Schwab also discusses her approach to crafting endings, working backwards from the conclusion and layering multiple twists to keep readers guessing until the final revelation.

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
The novel centers on seven midlist writers invited to Scottish island owned by Arthur Fletch, a mega-bestselling thriller writer known for mind-blowing plot twists. After Fletch's death, his incomplete final manuscript becomes the focus of an unusual contest, with his publisher seeking an ending worthy of Fletch's legacy.
Seven authors from different genres—young adult, romance, science fiction, horror, and others—are summoned to Fletch's private island to collaboratively finish his final manuscript. The publisher hopes their diverse storytelling approaches will inspire a conclusion with the shock value Fletch was known for.
The remote Scottish island setting forces the writers into isolation, heightening stakes and tension. The 72-hour deadline is further complicated by dramatic weather shifts from sunny conditions to dangerous storms. The manor itself, modified by Fletch to suit his eccentric tastes, becomes a character reflecting his larger-than-life presence.
The prize is substantial: the winner receives payment, a three-book contract with Fletch's prestigious publisher, and exclusive marketing resources that could revitalize their midlist careers.
V. E. Schwab explains that midlist authors were once publishing's backbone—writers who sold respectable numbers and earned enough to make a living without blockbuster fame. Over time, this middle category has collapsed, leaving many authors struggling financially. Kate Newhouse, cited by Scott Simon and Schwab, exemplifies this hardship, reportedly surviving on day-old pastries rather than earning a livable wage. The erosion of steady midlist income forces writers into precarious positions, mirroring broader challenges within the publishing industry.
Schwab and Clark's co-authoring partnership developed organically from friendship and publishing frustrations, not premeditation. Despite Clark swearing never to write another book and Schwab vowing never to co-write, Schwab convinced Clark to join the project.
Their collaborative process was highly structured, approaching the book like building a house with blueprints. They worked scene by scene, with one drafting and the other revising until both were satisfied. This iterative method ensured a seamless product where readers couldn't detect where one writer ended and the other began.
To further unify the narrative voice, they published under the pseudonym Evelyn Clark. This persona allowed them to present a novel with a distinctive voice separate from either author's established style, avoiding any tonal shifts that could reveal individual contributions.
Schwab explains that she writes all her books backwards from the ending, treating it as the core from which all other narrative elements proceed. Their latest novel features multiple layered endings that Schwab likens to a magician's tricks. The first two endings are crafted for readers to anticipate, lulling them into confidence, while the third final ending is constructed to be impossible to predict. This approach ensures that while readers may feel they've unraveled the initial twists, the ultimate conclusion remains unexpected and impactful.
The pseudonym provides both authors with unique creative freedom and protection. It shields them to voice candid observations about the publishing world without fearing direct personal repercussions. Clarke explains that using the Evelyn Clark identity introduces vital distance, making criticism feel less personal since it's attached to the pseudonym rather than their established names.
The collaborative pen name also lets both writers explore beyond career-imposed limits. Schwab breaks free from expectations tied to her fantasy brand by excluding magical elements, while Clarke returns to writing without psychological baggage. The pseudonym offers a fresh perspective unburdened by previous successes or established reader expectations.
1-Page Summary
The novel revolves around seven midlist writers invited to the secluded Scottish island of Arthur Fletch, a mega-best-selling thriller writer known for his mind-blowing plot twists. After Fletch's death, his incomplete final manuscript becomes the focus of an unusual literary contest, as the publisher seeks an ending worthy of Fletch’s legacy.
Seven authors, each representing a different genre—young adult, romance, science fiction, horror, a debut author, and a crime-writing duo—are summoned to Fletch’s private island. The goal is to collaboratively finish Fletch’s final, unfinished manuscript.
Arthur Fletch’s reputation was built on epic, unpredictable twists. With his sudden death, his publisher grows desperate to find not just a mystery or thriller writer, but anyone who can deliver a conclusion with the same shock value and creative ingenuity as Fletch himself.
By gathering writers from across genres, the publisher hopes that their different perspectives and storytelling tools will inspire new directions. This, in turn, increases the odds of achieving the kind of mind-bending conclusion that would honor Fletch’s style and satisfy his readers.
The remote Scottish island setting ensures that the participants are isolated, eliminating any easy escape and forcing the writers to confront both the manuscript and each other. The lack of a way out heightens the stakes, making every interaction and revelation crucial to the story.
The Scottish climate plays a critical role; the writers arrive in beautiful, sunny weather, but within their 72-hour deadline, they face dangerous and shifting storms. This drastic change in conditions amplifies both the drama and the urgency as they work against the clock.
The manor on the island, purchased and modified by Fletch to suit his whims, becomes a character of its own. The house is fille ...
Premise: Midlist Writers Solve Murder Mystery Finishing Dead Author's Manuscript on Scottish Island
V. E. Schwab explains that midlist authors were once the backbone of the publishing industry. These writers didn't achieve massive bestseller status, but they were far from failures. They represented anyone in the middle—authors who sold respectable numbers of books and earned enough to make a living without the pressure or visibility that comes with blockbuster fame. Over time, however, this middle category has collapsed. The industry has shifted in a way that those who once made ends meet—selling enough to get by but not achieving runaway sales—now face increasing difficulty sustaining their careers.
The decline of the midlist has left many authors struggling financially. Kate Newhouse, a writer cited by Scott Simon and V. E. Schwab, exemplifies this hardship: she reportedly survives on day-old pastries rather than earn ...
The Collapse and Financial Struggles of Midlist Authors
V.E. Schwab and Kat Clark developed their co-authoring partnership organically, with no prior intention to write together. Schwab recalls venting to Clark about publishing frustrations over many years of friendship. Schwab then pitched a quirky thriller idea to Clark, initially suggesting that Clark write the screenplay adaptation. Despite both having made strong professional commitments—Clark swearing never to write another book after leaving publishing in 2018, and Schwab vowing never to co-write a novel or write anything without magical elements—Schwab soon realized the project required more than just a screenplay. Returning to Clark, Schwab declared that Clark would also need to co-write the book itself. Although Clark initially refused, Schwab convinced her by promising it would be fun, leading to the partnership.
Schwab explains that their collaborative process was highly structured. They approached the book as if building a house, first making a blueprint.
The authors proceeded room by room, laying down the structure scene by scene. One would draft a section, decorating it with details and style, while the other would then revise and alter those elements until both were satisfied.
This iterative process continued for every part of the book, with each author layering their voice over the other's work until the final scene met their shared standards.
By following this method, the co-authors ensured their novel displayed a unified and seamless narrative, making it impossible for readers to detect where one writer ended and the other began, even though this way of working proved more time-consuming. ...
How V.E. Schwab and Kat Clark Developed a Unified Voice In Collaborative Writing
V. E. Schwab explains that she writes all of her books backwards from the ending, always knowing the conclusion before she begins writing. She describes her obsession with endings as the very reason she writes stories, treating the ending as the core from which all other narrative elements proceed. With the destination in mind, Schwab carefully structures each part of the narrative to guide readers towards the ending, shaping every story element and twist with the conclusion as her guidepost.
Schwab’s latest novel features multiple layered endings that she likens to a magician’s tricks. She sets up the structure so that there are three endings. The first two endings are crafted for readers to anticipate, much like how a magician intentionally reveals the mechanics of initial tricks to convince the audience they understand the performance. This serves to lull readers into believing they've figure ...
Crafting Endings: Working Backwards and Structuring Twists
The use of the pseudonym Evelyn Clark by V.E. Schwab and Cat Clarke provides both authors with a unique sense of creative freedom and protection, opening new avenues for commentary, experimentation, and emotional detachment from their work.
Attributing industry frustrations and criticisms to the fictional persona of Evelyn Clark allows Schwab and Clarke to voice candid observations about the publishing world without fearing direct personal repercussions. The pseudonym transforms personal grievances into thoughtful commentary, enabling readers to hear unfiltered perspectives that are not directly linked to Schwab or Clarke themselves. This shield of fiction creates space for more provocative or challenging insights and observations.
Cat Clarke explains that using the Evelyn Clark identity introduces a vital layer of distance, reducing the intensity of any criticism received. If the book faces negative reactions, the critiques are attached to Evelyn Clark rather than to either V.E. Schwab or Cat Clarke by name. This detachment makes any criticism feel less personal, so it does not threaten their reputations or identities as established literary figures. The emotional risk and personal stakes associated with releasing a new work are thus mitigated by the buffer of the collaborative persona.
Creative Freedom of the Evelyn Clark Pseudonym: Distance, Liberation, and a Fresh Perspective
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser
