In this episode of Modern Wisdom, Adam Aleksic and Chris Williamson explore how social media platforms are reshaping language evolution and communication. Aleksic explains how TikTok has become the dominant source of new slang, with algorithms determining which words and phrases go viral. The conversation examines how different platforms develop distinct linguistic cultures, how marginalized communities drive mainstream language innovation, and why certain creator speech patterns maximize engagement.
The discussion also addresses AI's growing influence on language, particularly how ChatGPT is causing vocabulary homogenization that users adopt unconsciously. Aleksic and Williamson trace the historical evolution of words, explain why language constantly changes to reflect contemporary identity, and consider what happens when algorithmic optimization prioritizes emotional arousal over substance. The episode reveals how platform mechanics, creator strategies, and artificial intelligence are fundamentally altering how humans communicate online and offline.

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
Social media platforms, particularly TikTok, are transforming how language evolves, driven by both user behavior and algorithmic constraints. Adam Aleksic and Chris Williamson discuss how these platforms have become engines of linguistic innovation while simultaneously reshaping what people feel they can say online.
Aleksic confirms that TikTok has surpassed Reddit, 4chan, and Twitter as the primary source of new slang, according to a 2022 Know Your Meme study. The platform's user interface encourages rapid, participatory conversation, but this innovation is now shaped more by algorithmic trends and echo chambers than organic creativity. Modern slang cycles turn over faster because users respond to what the algorithm rewards with visibility.
TikTok's virality mechanics deeply influence which words spread. Aleksic notes that certain terms like "maxing," "gooning," and "clavicular" are strategically deployed to trigger algorithms and facilitate viral reach. All words now function as keywords for search engine optimization within social platforms, with clip farming—generating short, algorithmically optimized moments—taking precedence over substance.
Aleksic likens different platforms to different "houses," each with unique commenting cultures and linguistic registers. LinkedIn users employ formal language, Twitter favors memetic slang, and TikTok evolves its own influencer vernacular. Users instinctively adapt their styles depending on the platform, switching registers like actors donning different faces.
Within platforms, micro-dialects emerge in communities like K-pop fandoms or Swiftie groups. Aleksic explains that founders and early adopters imprint specific communication styles through a "founder effect," which new users then copy. The "influencer accent" on TikTok became standard because new creators mimicked early successful figures.
Algorithms serve as bottlenecks that compress language into easily recognizable, maximally viral forms. Aleksic observes that language eliciting strong emotions—anger, fear, humor—thrives because algorithms reward engagement, while content inducing contentment quietly disappears for lack of clicks. This creates disincentives for creators whose material prioritizes calm without spectacle.
The alignment of algorithmic logic with emotional arousal means digital language is increasingly shaped by ragebait and clickbait. Aleksic warns this creates a dangerous misalignment between what is viral and what is beneficial, shifting public discourse toward more extreme views at the expense of nuance and careful thought.
Aleksic argues that language is fundamentally a tool of identity—every word choice reveals cohort or subcultural ties. Just as clothing styles signal community membership, so do speech patterns and slang.
Every individual has a unique idiolect shaped by upbringing and experience, yet social pressures push people toward conforming with their group's language practices. Aleksic notes that language change is primarily driven by young people, especially ages 10 to 25, motivated by a desire to create distinct generational identities separate from their parents.
Aleksic highlights how popular Gen Z slang like "slay," "serve," and "ate" originated in 1980s NYC Black and Latino gay ballroom scenes, where language boosted members' status in a society that denied them both. These terms eventually entered mainstream usage, first among straight friends of gay men, then throughout youth culture. Many slang words from African American English similarly enter mainstream use without credit or benefit to the originating communities.
The manosphere and forums like 4chan also generate terms like "maxing" and "pilled" that gradually filter into wider cultural consciousness. On anonymous platforms, mastery of specialized slang becomes essential for demonstrating community belonging. Marginalized groups have long created microlanguages like Polari and Swar speak to evade surveillance and establish secure communication.
Creators in the attention economy refine their speech using distinct vocal strategies to maximize engagement, with each archetype producing predictable effects.
Aleksic observes that influencers often begin videos mid-sentence to create an immediate sense of participation. The "influencer accent"—featuring uptalk, vocal fry, and lengthened vowels—creates a welcoming familiarity that fosters parasocial connection. Dead air is algorithmically penalized, so influencers use "floor-holding" techniques like strategic filler words to maintain conversational flow.
Educational influencers adopt a faster pace and more authoritative tone, emphasizing key words to establish expertise. Aleksic notes they use precise diction with clear consonants to enhance information retention. Meanwhile, creators like Mr. Beast embrace maximal intensity—often screaming or emphasizing extreme statements—to capture short attention spans and prevent viewers from scrolling away.
Uptalk and elongated vowels signal continuation, keeping viewers engaged, while downward intonation signals finality and prompts audiences to tune out. Williamson explains that consonants provide structure for educational content, while blended consonants in lifestyle content encourage bonding and authenticity.
Creators must balance optimization with authenticity. Williamson notes that over-optimization makes speech sound performative, triggering audience skepticism. Aleksic adds that platform-optimized speech styles, once purely performative, have become genuine elements of online identity through a feedback loop where optimization and authenticity blend—similar to how broadcasters historically adopted standardized "neutral" accents for authority and reach.
The rise of ChatGPT is rapidly reshaping how people use language, leading to vocabulary homogenization that most people don't notice.
Studies show "delve" usage surged 1,000% since ChatGPT's debut. Aleksic attributes this to biases in reinforcement learning that favor Latin-derived words over Germanic ones, as Latin-origin vocabulary projects prestige and authority. Similar increases in terms like "commendable," "meticulous," and "crucial" demonstrate how AI shapes real-world speech patterns. Evidence shows humans are adopting these tendencies subconsciously in spontaneous conversation, prompting Aleksic to warn: "The creature that programmed the AI is being programmed by the AI."
ChatGPT doesn't actually "speak" English—it converts input into tokens and neural network embeddings, processes them through complex algorithms, then transforms output back into text. At each step, distortions occur. Reinforcement learning injects regional and cultural preferences, while optimization creates "bottlenecks" that amplify certain language patterns. Aleksic notes that both overt political tweaking and covert biases shape what emerges as "English" rather than authentic human speech.
Aleksic estimates 13% of research abstracts now use AI models without disclosure, diffusing AI linguistic habits into peer-reviewed literature. In politics, phrases like "I rise to speak" signal AI-written speeches. This creates a feedback loop: AI-generated text permeates communication, which is then used to train models, reinforcing homogenized patterns and narrowing expression across professional and popular domains.
Language evolves alongside society, technology, and speakers' experiences, both shaping and being shaped by culture.
Williamson and Aleksic discuss how "silly" shifted from meaning "blessed" in Old English to "foolish" today, illustrating how emotional valence shapes meaning. Similarly, "awful" and "awesome" both derive from "awe" but diverged profoundly. Historical contexts linger in origins—"candidate" comes from Latin "candidus," referring to Roman office seekers who wore white robes to symbolize purity.
Aleksic identifies two primary sources of new words: institutional terms like "iPhone" and grassroots slang from youth and subcultures. Words contract over time for efficiency—"God be with you" became "goodbye," then "bye." Vocabulary loss reflects conceptual changes; modern English speakers use fewer plant terms than in the 1800s, reflecting diminished connection with nature.
Different languages encode reality uniquely. Aleksic references Potawatomi, where "Saturday" functions as a verb, and notes that agglutinative languages like German construct complex concepts in single words. The world faces a mass extinction of languages—one disappears every two weeks—meaning the loss of countless unique ways of experiencing reality.
Older generations often view youth linguistic innovations as degradation, yet language must adapt to remain functional. Aleksic explains that meanings emerge from collective usage and context, with dictionary inclusion validating rather than forcing change. Young people drive linguistic change due to cognitive flexibility and their need to differentiate themselves from parents, keeping language dynamic and attuned to contemporary life.
1-Page Summary
Social media platforms are transforming how language evolves and circulates, driven by both user behavior and the constraining logic of platform algorithms. TikTok, in particular, has become the preeminent engine of modern slang and cross-generational linguistic innovation, while algorithmically mediated attention and economic incentives are reconfiguring not only what people say but what they feel can be said online.
Adam Aleksic affirms that TikTok now surpasses Reddit, 4chan, and Twitter as the main source of new slang—a shift documented in a Know Your Meme 2022 study tracking the origins of trending terms. Initially, most linguistic innovation started on forums like 4chan and Reddit or on Twitter, but now TikTok and Twitter dominate, with TikTok rapidly accelerating the lifecycle and churn of modern slang.
On TikTok, the user interface encourages rapid-fire, participatory conversation, fostering a sense of collective innovation. However, Aleksic stresses that this innovation is now shaped less by organic linguistic creativity and more by algorithmic trends and echo chambers. Modern slang cycles turn over faster than ever because users respond to the platform’s incentive structures: what the algorithm boosts, spreads.
TikTok’s visibility and virality mechanics deeply influence which words and phrases spread. Aleksic notes examples like the "6-7" meme, which spread virally with users, politicians, and even brands deploying it for maximum reach. This is a conscious realization among users—clip farming and strategic keyword use are now the key to distribution. For many, distribution and algorithmic appeal have become more significant than the inherent meaning or quality of the language itself.
Aleksic explains that certain words ("maxing," "gooning," "Clavicular") are strategically used to trigger the algorithm, thus facilitating greater viral reach. All words are now keywords, functioning as search engine optimization tools within social platforms. The content creators purposefully design their language to push videos or posts to wider audiences, competing in an ecosystem where attention and data have been monetized and commodified. This results in a system where clip farming—generating short, algorithmically optimized moments primed for viral sharing—takes precedence, and where creators replicate attention-grabbing structures rather than focusing solely on substance.
The linguistic norms of social platforms are shaped by their unique audiences, interface constraints, and social cultures, creating distinct dialects and subcultural styles.
Aleksic likens different platforms to different "houses," each hosting its own commenting culture and linguistic register. LinkedIn users employ formal, professional language; Twitter is characterized by playful and memetic slang; TikTok evolves its own fandom and influencer vernacular. Users instinctively adapt their styles depending on the platform, behaving like sociologist Irving Goffman's actors donning multiple faces or registers, much like how people switch language between speaking with parents versus friends.
Even within a single platform, micro-dialects can emerge, such as within K-pop fandoms or Swiftie (Taylor Swift fan) subgroups on TikTok. Each micro-community innovates language unique to their culture, further stratifying the digital linguistic landscape.
Founders and early adopters imprint specific communication styles on new platforms—a "founder effect"—that guide future linguistic norms. The "influencer accent" on TikTok, for example, is now standard because new users copy the linguistic style of early, successful creators. Meme propagation and style choices, like popular thumbnail formats or newscaster voices, are similarly set by early standout figures and become reinforced by community consensus.
Social media algorithms do not merely boost v ...
Platform Algorithms and Language Change via Social Media
Language serves not just as a conduit for transmitting information but as a powerful marker of identity and community affiliation. Adam Aleksic and Chris Williamson explore how both the words we use and the ways we use them signal which groups we belong to, reflecting histories, subcultures, and pressures around conformity and self-expression.
Chris Williamson notes that specific language use instantly signals something about the person—a clear marker of in-group membership. Adam Aleksic argues that language is 100% a tool of identity, and every time someone chooses a word or phrase, they're also revealing their cohort or subcultural ties. Just as certain clothing styles flag membership in particular communities, so do speech styles, slang, and turns of phrase.
Aleksic points out that every individual has a unique idiolect, a personal dialect influenced by upbringing, experience, and cultural exposure. This individual linguistic identity is reflected in unique expressions and quirks, such as someone saying "eat your cake and have it too"—a reversal of the common phrase that, in the case of the Unabomber, helped police pinpoint his identity. These idiolects demonstrate that we all see and express our worlds uniquely. However, social pressures—such as generational identity or online personas—also push people towards conforming with their group's collective language practices, in effect making them interchangeable with others who share those labels.
Language change is primarily driven by young people. Teenage years, especially from about 10 to 25, are a hotbed for slang invention and adoption, motivated in part by a desire to create distinct generational identities separate from parents or older generations. The process of adolescence, marked by growing need for independence and peer affiliation, propels this constant renewal of linguistic style.
Aleksic highlights the trajectory of linguistic innovation, where marginalized communities generate novel language that later enters mainstream use. Popular Gen Z slang like “slay,” “serve,” “queen,” and “ate” originates in 1980s NYC Black and Latino gay ballroom scenes. In these spaces, language was a means of boosting members’ status and agency in a society that denied them both. Over time, terms from gay and Black subcultures trickled into broader usage—first among straight friends of gay men, then throughout general youth and internet culture.
Many new slang words in mainstream and internet English stem from African American English. Words and phrases that originated as tools for community and subversive expression are widely adopted—sometimes with detached or ironic undertones—while the originating communities often see little recognition or benefit from their linguistic creativity.
The manosphere and forums like 4chan also act as laboratories for slang, producing terms like "maxing," "pilled," and "gooning." These terms develop as in-group signals on anonymous online platforms and gradually filter into wider cultural consciousness through memes, jokes, or social media.
Language as a Tool of Identity and Belonging
Creators in the attention economy refine their speech and vocal performance using distinct linguistic and paralinguistic tactics to maximize engagement and hold audience attention, with each archetype shaping speech patterns for both platform optimization and identity signaling.
Adam Aleksic observes that creators often begin videos mid-sentence—starting with phrases like "no because"—to instantly draw viewers in by making them feel as though they are eavesdropping on an already-unfolding conversation. This tactic, described as in medias res, fast-tracks the sense of participation. The "hey guys, welcome to my podcast" influencer accent, originating from figures like Kim Kardashian, Paris Hilton, and early beauty YouTubers, persists on TikTok, preserving features like uptalk, vocal fry, and lengthened final vowels. This accent, according to Chris Williamson, creates a softness and welcoming familiarity, fostering a parasocial sense of inclusion and relatability.
Dead air is algorithmically penalized; lifestyle influencers drag out final syllables, use uptalk, and employ "floor-holding"—the strategic use of filler words like "um"—to maintain a continual conversational flow and signal that more is coming. This prevents listeners from disengaging while the creator transitions between thoughts. Aleksic adds that these vocal strategies build the influencer's identity and optimize for platform dynamics, creating a bond with the viewer that feels authentic and cozy.
For educational influencers, the goal shifts toward perceived expertise and trust. Aleksic and Williamson note that these creators deliver content at a faster, sharper pace, emphasizing key words with greater frequency and adopting a more authoritative tone. This style sacrifices the casual coziness of lifestyle content for the clarity and confidence needed to establish the creator as an authority. Educational influencers aim for precise diction with clear, accurate consonants, constructing a brisk, staccato rhythm that grabs attention and enhances information retention. The emphasis is on structure and certainty: the goal is not just to relate, but to inform with confidence.
The archetype exemplified by Mr. Beast embraces maximal intensity to capture and hold the short attention spans of a youthful audience. Aleksic describes how Mr. Beast pivots his vocal delivery—often screaming or emphasizing extreme statements like "I just bought a private island"—and continually escalates emotional stakes. Chris Williamson explains that this creates a promise of ongoing excitement and imminent payoff, which is crucial for preventing viewers from scrolling away before a video's conclusion.
Up talk, characterized by lengthening the last vowel and pitching the voice upward at the end of a statement, signals to listeners that a thought is unfinished, encouraging continued attention. Aleksic emphasizes that elongating the vowel effectively signals continuation—a cue that the speaker isn’t finished, enticing viewers to remain engaged. Conversely, downward intonation ("down talk") signals closure and prompts the audience to tune out, so experienced creators deliberately avoid it.
Chris Williamson shares that vowels add color and emotional nuance, while consonants provide speech structure and clarity. For educational content, creators articulate consonants carefully, ensuring clear transmission of ideas. In lifestyle and casual content, blending or dropping consonants, such as glottal stops found in Northeast UK dialects, make speech feel softer and less structured, which encourages a feeling of authenticity and intimacy. Aleksic observes that creators select pronunciation styles purposefully—clear and precise for instruction, blended and relaxed for social bonding.
Filler words and strategic silences—traditionally employed as floor-holding tools—help creators maintain conversational flow, avoid algorithmically penalized dead air, and give themselves time to formulate responses. However, as Williamson observes, elite creators and younger influencers increasingly train themselves to eliminate such fillers, preferring a more polished, status-signaling presentation style.
...
Optimizing Creator Tactics to Maximize Engagement In the Attention Economy
The rise of generative AI, especially language models like ChatGPT, is rapidly reshaping how people use language in daily conversation, research, and public communication. This subtle but pervasive influence leads to the homogenization of vocabulary and communication patterns in ways most people do not notice.
Recent studies show a dramatic increase in the use of the word “delve”—spiking by 1,000% since the debut of ChatGPT. Adam Aleksic attributes this phenomenon to biases in the reinforcement learning process used to train ChatGPT. While reinforcement workers in places like Nigeria and Kenya may contribute to the frequency (as “delve” is somewhat more common there), the main factor is a deeper, systematic Latin-derived word preference over Germanic vocabulary. Latin-origin words like "delve" are seen as more prestigious and confident, projecting knowledge and incisiveness, whereas Germanic synonyms like "dig in" appear more basic. This bias for “fancier”-sounding, Romance-language vocabulary is reinforced both by initial training data and by human feedback, which signals approval for such authoritative-sounding choices.
“Delve” is only the most visible example; there is a notable rise in terms like “commendable,” “meticulous,” “crucial,” and “significant”—all Latin-derived. This shift is not inherently negative, but Aleksic underscores how linguistic choices by these models are now visibly shaping real-world speech and writing. As humans read AI-generated responses filled with certain vocabulary, they begin to unconsciously mimic these patterns. Thus, the AI not only reflects user language but actively programs speakers and writers into new norms they may not be aware of adopting.
Evidence now demonstrates that humans are picking up these tendencies in spontaneous spoken conversation. Social channels, professional networks like LinkedIn, and ordinary speech all begin to echo the AI’s signature phrases, even down to preferred sentence structures like em dash segmentations and “negative parallelism.” Aleksic warns that, increasingly, the trainers become the trained: “The creature that programmed the AI is being programmed by the AI.”
Modern language models such as ChatGPT do not actually “speak” English. Instead, they convert input language into tokens—segments of words—which are mapped to high-dimensional coordinates, forming what’s called an embedding. These are processed through complex neural networks and predictive algorithms to generate output tokens, which are finally transformed back into readable text. At each of these steps, distortions and loss of nuance can occur. The frequent repetition of certain words or structures, such as “delve,” arises as meaning is reshaped through layers of optimization that prioritize coherence, authority, or other rewarded features.
The system of reinforcement learning—shaped by the click-choices or rewards of remote workers—injects its own regional, cultural, or personal linguistic preferences. Because reinforcement workers might not catch subtle overuse of certain words, these terms are baked into the language model and disproportionately reproduced. Furthermore, all AI platforms optimize aggressively for improvement and speed, creating “bottlenecks” in what kind of language is amplified and repeated.
Beyond inadvertent linguistic bias, overt political or ideological tweaks are present. Aleksic notes that prominent figures such as Elon Musk have openly modified their own AI models (“Grok”) to reflect personal or political leanings. Even companies that appear safety-conscious, like Anthropic, ultimately operate under optimization imperatives that can skew results in covert wa ...
Ai's Impact on Language and Vocabulary Homogenization
Language is not static; it evolves alongside society, technology, and the lived experiences of its speakers. By tracing the history of certain words and examining shifts in grammar, usage, and vocabulary, we see how language both shapes and is shaped by culture.
The origins and metamorphoses of English words illustrate how meaning is tied to emotion, context, and social shifts. Chris Williamson and Adam Aleksic discuss the word "silly," which in Old English, "seilig," meant "blessed" or "fortunate." Over centuries, it shifted to convey "innocent," then "naive," and finally "foolish." This transition shows how the emotional valence of a word can shape its meaning, just as "awful" and "awesome" both derive from "awe," yet diverged profoundly in connotation. Words describing intense feelings, such as "terrible" and "terrific," can oscillate across positive and negative meanings due to the complex nature of human emotions.
Historical contexts often linger in word origins. "Candidate" descends from Latin "candidus," referring to someone in a white robe. In ancient Rome, office seekers wore white to symbolize purity, and although the practice has ended, the connotation remains embedded in the term.
"Awful" and "awesome" both share the root "awe," but traversed in different directions semantically, one toward negativity and the other toward positivity. Aleksic notes that the emotional quality inherent in a word allows it to shift easily between meanings, further exemplifying language’s responsiveness to the cultural landscape.
Changes in technology, society, and generational perspectives fuel constant linguistic innovation. Aleksic identifies two primary sources: institutional terms and slang. Words like "iPhone" and "podcast" originate from corporate or mainstream sources, while video game slang—"NPC," "skill issue"—and cultural slang from groups like Black communities or incels are typically driven by youth and grassroots adoption.
Words often contract and simplify over time. "God be with you" contracted to "goodbye," and then further to "bye," demonstrating how speech evolves for efficiency and changing social interaction.
As lived realities shift, certain vocabularies fade. Aleksic observes that modern English speakers use fewer terms for plants compared to the 1800s, reflecting a dwindling connection with the natural world. Concepts and names are lost as they lose relevance.
Language shapes not only communication but also perception and cognition. Aleksic references Potawatomi, where "Saturday" can be expressed as a verb: "to Saturday," an idea unfamiliar in English yet natural in other linguistic systems. Such expressions reflect different cultural perspectives and priorities.
Agglutinative languages like Turkish and German construct complex concepts by tacking morphemes together, generating single words for nuanced ideas—such as German’s highly specific compound nouns. Inflectional languages like Latin or French modify word forms instead. In contrast, English often relies on phrases or multiple words, affecting the nuance and speed with which certain ideas can be communicated.
The world is facing a mass extinction of languages; Aleksic cites that a language disappears every two weeks. Of the 7,000 known languages, most are forecast to vanish by the century's end. This extinction event, accelerated by social homogenization via platforms like social media, means the loss o ...
The Evolution of Words and how Language Reflects Us
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser
