In this Modern Wisdom episode, Louise Perry and Mary Harrington explore shifting gender dynamics and relationship patterns in contemporary society. They examine data showing declining rates of sexual activity and births in the US, discussing how factors like smartphones, obesity rates, and changing social norms contribute to these trends. The guests analyze emerging male archetypes in modern dating and how they reflect post-#MeToo cultural adaptations.
The conversation also covers how technology has altered traditional relationship formation, contrasting historical social structures with today's online-dominated landscape. Perry and Harrington discuss the intersection of gender and political movements, examining how different ideologies appeal to women and how online spaces have transformed social dynamics, particularly in how people form connections and express moral judgments.

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
Recent data shows a striking decline in both sexual activity and birth rates in the United States. According to experts, sexual activity among American adults has dropped from 55% having weekly sex in 1990 to just 37% today. Louise Perry suggests this decrease might be linked to changing gender dynamics, obesity rates, and biological factors.
The experts note a paradoxical trend: while society has become more accepting of casual sex, there's actually less sex happening within committed relationships. Mary Harrington points to smartphones as a major disruptor of spontaneous intimacy, while both she and Alice Evans connect this technology to declining birth rates.
The discussion explores two emerging male archetypes in modern dating. Chris Williamson describes the "performative male," characterized by floppy hair, oversized clothes, and non-threatening behavior—a response to post-#MeToo expectations. This archetype represents men trying to appear less traditionally masculine while still seeking romantic attention.
In contrast, Louise Perry and Mary Harrington discuss the rise of the "himbo"—a physically impressive but emotionally open and politically ambiguous male archetype. Perry notes that many women prefer this type of partner, who can offer protection and support without being overly intellectual or aggressive.
The experts express concern about the decline of traditional social structures and in-person interactions. Harrington nostalgically references British village life as an example of organic relationship building through repeated interactions—a stark contrast to today's online-dominated social landscape.
The digital age has introduced new challenges to dating and intimacy. Harrington explains that without high-trust societies, direct approaches to potential partners can lead to negative responses. Perry notes the decline of structured social events like dinner parties where couples traditionally met, while Williamson discusses how fear of reputational damage affects men's willingness to initiate romantic contact.
The conversation turns to examining how gender influences political alignment and online discourse. Perry and Harrington explore women's attraction to "traditionalist" political movements, noting how certain political ideologies appeal to women through emotional connections and desires to protect vulnerable groups.
In online spaces, Perry observes that both "woke" and "anti-woke" movements exhibit similar patterns of behavior, particularly in their "purity spirals." Harrington adds that the internet can amplify traditional women's roles through moral dogpiling, creating a magnified version of historical village dynamics in the digital sphere.
1-Page Summary
Recent discussions among experts point to a stark decline in both sexual activity and birth rates in the United States, which could be due to emerging cultural norms and technological distractions.
Americans are presently experiencing a record low in sexual activity, with only 37% of American adults having sex weekly, a significant drop from 55% in 1990. Louise Perry raises the question of whether this decrease in sexual frequency is related to the rise of the "La Booboo male" archetype and the need for more defined gender dynamics, while also citing obesity, and biological factors such as xenostrogens as potential contributing factors.
A decline in coupling and birth rates is observed, with experts suggesting various contributing factors, ranging from changes in personal to socio-economic factors.
Perry observes that there are many desirable women at Christian mingle events desperate for a spouse but unable to find one, which suggests a decline in coupling. She notes that a paradox exists where society is more accepting of casual sex, yet there's less sex within committed relationships. The increased prevalence of role models who are single and childless may discourage traditional family structures.
Technology's intrusion into relationships is highlighted by all speakers. Harrington describes smartphone use as deeply absorbing and disruptive to spontaneous sexual activity, and both she and Alice Evans blame smartphones for impacting birth rates. The speakers worry about the presence of casual sex in the culture, arguing that it coexists with a decline in sexual activity due to fewer long-te ...
Demographic and Relationship Trends
Harrington, Williamson, and Perry explore the nuances of evolving gender roles and the impact of societal changes on male archetypes.
The discussion revolves around men adapting to new expectations for less traditionally masculine behavior and the emergence of the "performative male" archetype as a response to these societal shifts.
Chris Williamson describes the performative male as having an aesthetic that includes floppy hair, probably oversized clothes like flared jeans, carrying totes, and consuming trendy items like matcha drinks. This particular style is quickly satirized, much like the term "woke" was before it. Perry adds that this archetype might be consumer-driven, suggesting a trend towards embracing certain fashion attributes.
The performative male archetype, as Williamson mentions, includes traits such as non-threatening behavior as a response to post-Me Too expectations for less traditionally masculine behavior. Harrington notes that this is a result of men socialized within a progressive environment internalizing the idea that traditional forms of masculine aggression are undesirable. Williamson comments that Me Too's message for men not to be pushy has been over-applied by those who were never pushy to begin with, which has led to the prevalence of this new, more cautious male archetype.
Williamson and Harrington discuss how some men try to appear non-threatening while still seeking romantic attention, adopting a less aggressive and more consensual demeanor. This "La Boo Boo Man" is characterized by attempting to pose as softer or as someone who prefers less domineering and entitled forms of engagement in a romantic context, in line with current social expectations.
Louise Perry and Mary Harrington delve into the allure of the "himbo," a new ideal for some women in choosing a partner.
Williamson introduces the term "himbo" as someone beefy, placid, and politically ambiguous, representing a mix of physical impression with emotional openness. Chris Bumstead, a masculine figure embodying these qualities, is mentioned as an example of this archetype.
...
Shifting Gender Dynamics and Archetypes
The rise of technology and the shifting cultural landscape have significantly affected traditional social structures, dating, and relationships.
Perry, Williamson, and Harrington raise concerns about how modern life has lessened face-to-face interactions, with Perry expressing that she sees Donald Trump's face more than her neighbors’. They discuss the reduced opportunities for spontaneous social connections and the loss of mentorship and guidance from older generations.
Harrington nostalgically references classic British village life as a functioning social fabric, where people's repeated interactions at common gathering spaces naturally foster relationships—a stark contrast to modern relationships known more through online data and less through shared experiences.
Williamson points out the absence of wisdom-bearing figures in young people’s lives, such as "aunties" or trusted men, and notes their importance in community life. Harrington focuses on the disappearance of intergenerational networks, particularly affecting young men in fatherless households and identifies gangs as one of the remaining, yet harmful, mentorship options.
Perry, Williamson, and Harrington discuss various aspects of how technology affects the contemporary dating scene, often leading to impersonal and superficial interactions.
Harrington explains that historically, spouses were met through interlocking social networks rather than cold approaches, which, without a high trust society, could lead to negative responses, such as fear or police involvement. Perry notes the decline of dinner parties and structured social events where potential couples could be introduced. Williamson and Perry also discuss the impact of the MeToo movement on men's hesitancy to make the first move due to fear of reputational damage.
Harrington mentions the T-app as a flawed online substitute for the communal knowledge once used to assess individual trustworthiness, demonstrating the cha ...
Technology and Modern Culture's Impact on Relationships and Dating
The discussion delves deep into the nuanced gender dynamics influencing political and social landscapes, scrutinizing women’s attraction to certain political ideologies and the gender-coded interactions within online discourse.
Louise Perry and Mary Harrington explore women’s complex relationship with 'traditionalist' political movements, noting emotional and social considerations that drive this alignment.
Certain political movements attract women by leveraging maternal instincts to protect perceived vulnerable groups such as trans people or refugees. Perry notes young women’s strong emotional energy towards ethnic minorities and refugees as needing protection, a trait commonly associated with political movements on the left. Additionally, there may be a shifting perspective among working-class women in Britain who change focus to view their own children as the vulnerable group deserving protection.
The uncertain political and economic climate might lead women to reassess the traits they value in a partner. Harrington speculates that women without children might gravitate toward the "refugees welcome" movement as an expression of a more abstract set of affections, as opposed to the particular concerns a mother might have. She also suggests the appearance of young men who haven't been influenced by a less masculine archetype could be related to migration issues, implying that some women may find traditional masculinity appealing for its perceived stability and resilience.
As politics become increasingly digital, Louise Perry and Mary Harrington consider the way gender influences online political behavior and the impact this may have on wider cultural divides.
Perry discusses the “dissident right,” noting that while it often presents hyper-masculine views, these groups still engage in behaviors typically characterized as feminine, such as online gossip and bickering. She points out "purity spirals" within these groups, underlining that both "woke" and "anti-woke" movements exhibit similar patterns of social behavior.
Harrington talks about how the internet can amplify traditional women's roles by enabling moral dogpiling, where groups attack someone for moral infractions. This can be like a magnified, online version of women's village interactions, often with fewer real-life consequences.
Perry argues that "woke" politi ...
The Political/Cultural Divides Emerging Along Gender Lines
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser
