In this episode of Modern Wisdom, Dr. Sarah Hill and Chris Williamson explore how hormones affect women's behavior throughout the menstrual cycle. They discuss how estrogen and progesterone influence everything from mate selection and social motivation to energy levels and relationship security. The conversation covers the biological mechanisms behind these changes and explains how different phases of the menstrual cycle trigger specific behavioral adaptations.
The discussion also examines how hormonal birth control affects women's experiences by creating a stable hormonal state that differs from natural cycles. Hill and Williamson address the gaps in hormone research, particularly how excluding women from studies or only examining them during specific cycle phases has led to misconceptions about hormones' impact on women's physiology and behavior.
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
Sarah Hill and fellow researchers explore how the menstrual cycle influences women's attraction mechanisms and pregnancy preparation. During the first half of the cycle, high estrogen levels enhance women's ability to attract and select potential mates. Hill notes that women experience increased energy, sexual desire, and heightened ability to detect subtle differences in potential mates through scent and appearance.
In the cycle's second half, Hill explains that progesterone dominates, triggering behaviors that support potential pregnancy. Women's bodies increase calorie needs, shift to energy conservation, and demonstrate heightened sensitivity to social and relationship threats. This phase is marked by increased caution and a stronger focus on relationship security.
According to Hill and Chris Williamson, hormonal fluctuations throughout the menstrual cycle serve adaptive functions. During high-estrogen phases, women experience increased social motivation and sexual desire, with enhanced ability to evaluate potential mates. Post-ovulation, when progesterone rises, women's focus shifts to safety and security, with decreased social motivation but increased desire for emotional connection.
Hill explains that hormonal birth control creates a stable hormonal state by maintaining high synthetic progesterone and low estrogen levels, effectively suppressing natural fluctuations. This can lead to mood disorders and reduced relationship satisfaction. The researchers note that hormonal birth control can simulate a perpetual state similar to the latter half of the menstrual cycle, potentially affecting women's sexual decisions and emotional experiences.
Hill and Williamson highlight significant research biases in women's hormone studies. They note that researchers often exclude women from studies or only examine them during low-hormone phases. This "bikini medicine" approach, as Hill describes it, has led to misconceptions about hormones' impact on women's physiology and behavior. The experts argue that dismissing women's hormonal experiences has resulted in inadequate treatment across medical, professional, and social contexts.
1-Page Summary
Sarah Hill and other researchers delve into the nuances of the menstrual cycle, exploring its functions in relation to attraction and preparation for potential pregnancy.
The purpose of the menstrual cycle is deeply rooted in reproductive functions, governing the way women interact with potential mates and how they prepare for the possibility of pregnancy.
During the first half of the menstrual cycle, as estrogen levels rise, women experience increases in energy and sexual desire. Hill points out that this period is when women feel their most attractive and are best able to differentiate between potential mates. Research supports these observations through various studies: women at high fertility have shown a lower threshold for noticing subtle differences in [restricted term] levels through scent and appearance.
The evidence for this heightened period of attractiveness is not just subjective; tangible measures such as the increased earnings by strippers not on birth control during their high fertility phase underscore the power of natural attraction mechanisms. Moreover, men have been found to prefer the scent of women when they are at high fertility, emphasizing the deep biological interplay of attraction. Men exposed to these scents exhibit higher levels of hormones like [restricted term] and cortisol, illustrating an innate physiological response.
Thus, the first half of the cycle, dominated by estrogen, marks a period when women are more appealing to men and more selective of them, preparing their bodies for possible conception through a fine-tuned biological interplay of hormones and behaviors.
Hill expands on the evolutionary functions during the latter half of the cycle, when progesterone takes precedence. The release of progesterone after ovulation signals emotional sensitivity and risk aversion, akin to a sensitive smoke detector, which may steer the brain and behaviors in pregnancy-favorable directions. This phase commonly triggers behaviors aligned with safety, protection, and energy conservation—key factors to foster a safe environment for potential pregnancy.
During this phase, women's basal metabolic rate rises, leading to a need for an additional intake of calories (around 150 to 200) per day. The body undergoes a shift from a pro-inflammatory to an anti-inflammatory immune response and an increase in body t ...
Biology and Evolutionary Functions of Menstrual Cycle
Sarah Hill and Chris Williamson delve into how menstrual hormones influence women’s psychology and behavior, suggesting that these changes have functional and adaptive benefits.
Hill explores the effects of estrogen on women's brains and behavior, suggesting that when estrogen is high and rising, it leads to positive changes in behavior and increased motivation for social and sexual activities. As estrogen gets released during the first part of the cycle, it increases women's energy and desire for sex, which reflects their biological need to reproduce at this stage. She mentions that high estrogen levels cause neurons to sprout new dendritic spines, making the brain more sensitive and attuned to the environment.
During this time, women are more outgoing, have a higher sex drive, and experience an increase in sexual desire, as noted by Chris Williamson. This heightened brain sensitivity translates to a greater ability to discern subtle differences in prospective mates, with attention to both scent and visual cues. This drive aligns with the biological function of optimizing partner selection when the likelihood of conception is high.
Hill poses that the negative feelings women have in the second half of their cycle, when progesterone is high, may be related to a focus on safety, decreased social motivation, and increased threat sensitivity. Progesterone makes the amygdala more sensitive to threats and is associated with a tendency to stay home, and a heightened ability to perceive danger signals. In the post-ovulation phase, women experience a shift toward focusing on safety, conserving energy for potential pregnancy, and a decreased motivation for socializing. Sex during the luteal phase tends to be about connecting with a partner, which likely aligns with safety and pair bonding.
Hill notes the heightened relational insecurity and the stronger desire for sex, particularly among women who sense a care gap in their relationship. She suggests that the increased sexual desire during the luteal phase is more about seeking connection and ensuring the partner’s commitment. The hosts discuss that sex during the second half of the menstrual cycle could lead to an increased likelihood of emotional bonding, which aligns with a heightened focus on safety and pair bonding.
The hosts discuss tha ...
Psychological and Behavioral Impacts of Menstrual Hormones
The discussion led by Sarah Hill and Chris Williamson delves into how hormonal birth control affects women's hormonal states and, subsequently, their overall experiences and behavior.
Hill explains that the birth control pill shuts down the natural flux between estrogenic and progesterone states, creating a stable hormonal state by maintaining a relatively high level of synthetic progesterone and a low level of estrogen every day. This misplaced mimicry of progesterone by progestins prevents natural estrogen production and ovulation, leading most women to feel a noticeable difference, often described as feeling awful. The discussion highlights that the synthetic progestins in hormonal birth control, differing from natural progesterone, act differently in the body and often lead to a flatlining state that suppresses natural hormonal fluctuations and behavioral changes associated with them.
As a result, women on the pill typically do not experience the "authentic self" moments tied to regular hormonal cycles, such as the estrogen surge that increases feelings of well-being and attractiveness. Moreover, because women on hormonal birth control do not ovulate, they miss out on the natural "hotness surge" of heightened estrogen levels.
Hill further discusses that hormonal birth control can simulate a perpetual state akin to the latter half of the menstrual cycle, characterized by decreased sexual desire and a lesser preference for masculinized traits in male partners. This constant hormonal state and the absence of natural estrogen peaks can affect women’s mood and possibly lead to reduced relationship satisfaction. Hill contemplates the impact of oral contraceptives on women's sexual decisions, suggesting that the suppression of menstrual cycle-related psychological experiences may also affect emotional states linked to non-conceptive sex.
Additionally, Williamson brings up that oral contraceptives raise the risk of depression by 40% in teens and women, and Hill notes that in Europe, hormonal birth control's mood-related side effects are recognized, whereas the American medical community has been slower to accept and communicate these risks to patients.
The link between hormonal birth control and mood disorders is further supported by the lack of allopregnanolone, a calming neurosteroid that promotes mental health and mood stability, in users of the pill. This is because synthetic progestins do not break down to produce allopregnanolone, resulting in lower levels ...
Influence of Birth Control on Women's Experiences
Experts Sarah Hill and Williamson highlight the biases and gaps in women's hormone research, emphasizing the need for a better understanding of sex differences and a shift in how society and science approach women's hormonal health.
Hill laments the approach taken by many researchers to the study of women, often excluding them from research or studying them only during the low-hormone phases of their menstrual cycles. Historically, researchers have favored studying men because it was simpler—men don't have the complication of pregnancy or hormonal cycles to consider.
Male and female bodies were traditionally assumed to be the same apart from reproductive functions, leading to a "bikini medicine" approach where the only differences considered were the organs covered by a bikini. Women, when included in research, were typically studied during the first nine days of their cycle when hormone levels are low, which researchers believed would make their physiology more comparable to that of males. This has resulted in a misconception that hormones do not have a significant impact on women, as most research ignores the full cascade of physiological changes that occur throughout a woman's cycle.
Sarah Hill points to robust evidence that hormonal changes lead to physical and psychological changes in women, including an increase in sexual motivation during high fertility when women report feeling and smelling "sexier." These widespread hormonal changes can also affect caloric needs, workout recovery, and muscle-building capacity. Hill emphasizes the different versions of themselves that women experience during their menstrual cycle and criticizes the broad range considered 'normal' for hormonal levels, which complicates the understanding of hormonal experiences.
Hill and Williamson discuss the societal trend of denying the importance of biological sex and hormonal differences, labeling the approach as "soft bigotry of male expectations." Hill argues that ignoring sex differences has led to women being mismanaged in science and medicine, which has far-reaching consequences for women’s treatment across various societal spheres, including work, medicine, and society.
Hill highlights significant sex differences in conditions like depression and autism spectrum disorder and finds it absurd that studies on these conditions often fail to look for sex differen ...
Biases and Gaps in Women's Hormone Research
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser