In this Modern Wisdom episode, behavioral scientist Coltan Scrivner examines why humans are drawn to dark and dangerous subjects. He breaks down morbid curiosity into four main categories: interest in violence, fascination with dangerous minds, curiosity about injuries, and intrigue with supernatural elements. Through these domains, Scrivner explains how morbid curiosity served as an evolutionary advantage, allowing our ancestors to learn about threats without direct exposure to danger.
The discussion explores how age and gender influence morbid curiosity levels, with younger people showing higher levels overall and women displaying particular interest in understanding dangerous minds. Scrivner also analyzes how different forms of media, particularly horror films and zombie content, tap into these natural curiosities by incorporating multiple elements of threat and danger, using specific techniques to create more engaging experiences for viewers.
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
Coltan Scrivner explores the fascinating paradox of human attraction to the macabre, examining how morbid curiosity serves as an evolutionary advantage. He explains that this curiosity helps humans learn about threats without direct exposure to danger, similar to how gazelles observe cheetahs from a safe distance to better understand predator behavior.
Scrivner identifies four key domains of morbid curiosity: interest in violence and aggression, fascination with dangerous minds and behaviors, curiosity about bodily injuries, and intrigue with the supernatural. These domains, he argues, reflect our innate drive to understand potential threats in our environment, whether they're tangible dangers or abstract supernatural forces.
According to Scrivner, morbid curiosity plays a crucial role in human survival by enabling "threat learning" without direct exposure to danger. This trait creates a delicate balance between our natural instinct to avoid threats and our need to gather information about potential dangers, which historically helped our ancestors prepare for and avoid environmental threats.
Scrivner's research reveals that disgust sensitivity and subclinical psychopathy explain about 50% of the variance in morbid curiosity levels. He notes that younger individuals tend to be more morbidly curious than older adults, and women show particular interest in understanding the minds of dangerous people, possibly as an adaptive response to potential threats.
Horror films, Scrivner explains, typically feature a vulnerable protagonist facing a powerful antagonist, creating scenarios that particularly resonate with viewers who have high morbid curiosity. He points out that zombie media is especially effective at engaging morbid curiosity as it encompasses all four domains: human danger, body violation, supernatural elements, and violence. Filmmakers enhance these effects through specific techniques, such as having threats emerge from the left side of the screen, exploiting our natural attention patterns to create more impactful experiences.
1-Page Summary
Coltan Scrivner delves into the reasons behind human fascination with the macabre, providing insights into how morbid curiosity can be both a paradox and an evolutionary advantage.
Scrivner is fascinated by the complex relationship humans have with violence and danger—how we simultaneously avoid it, venerate it, and seek it for entertainment. This paradox drives his research into understanding the role of morbid curiosity in our lives.
Humans, like any other animals, are attuned to potential threats in their environment. Scrivner explains that morbid curiosity is an emotion that helps us to learn about threats and how to mitigate them. This type of curiosity elicits a positive feeling that counteracts the natural avoidance of danger, encouraging individuals to approach situations where a learning opportunity about potential threats is presented, even when not in immediate danger.
Referring to a study observing gazelles and cheetahs, Scrivner points out that gazelles often inspect cheetahs rather than fleeing, especially adolescents, those in larger groups, or those at a safe distance. This behavior suggests an evolutionary strategy to learn and detect threats without direct danger. This translates to humans learning about threats through stories instead of firsthand experiences, reaping the benefits of predator inspection without the associated risks.
Scrivner also ties in evidence that threats frequently appear in dreams, not just nightmares. Our minds may simulate potential threats as a form of rehearsal for real-life situations, similar to how prey observes predators safely to learn.
He further illustrates this with the example of public interest in police body cam footage. This curiosity can provide critical insights into interactions with law enforcement ...
The Origins and Drivers of Morbid Curiosity
Coltan Scrivner delves into the complex human fascination with the morbid aspects of life, looking at the reasons behind our attraction to the macabre and the categorization of this intrigue into distinct areas of interest.
Scrivner identifies four key domains when discussing the concept of morbid curiosity, each reflecting a different aspect of this phenomenon.
Scrivner's work begins with an interest in why people are drawn to witnessing violence and learning about violent conflicts. Observing a violent encounter, such as a UFC fight or even police body cam footage, can be related to understanding the mechanics of fighting and what happens during such scenarios. Scrivner also notes that children from all cultural backgrounds exhibit behavior showing an interest in violence and aggression. For example, little boys may engage in more direct violent play, while little girls may partake in different kinds of violent games.
The interest in people who could be violent without directly witnessing the violent act itself is another domain of morbid curiosity. This includes fascination with zombies in films and how survivor groups often harbor conflicts and intergroup violence. The overlap between being curious about supernatural threats and dangerous minds is significant, Scrivner points out, due to the ambiguity and malice implied by beings whose full intentions are not known.
The outcome of violence — bodily injuries or violations — forms another domain of morbid curiosity. This is important for humans to understand injuries for treatment and to assess how dangerous the environment is based on the types of injuries observed. Scrivner posits that this curiosity extends to knowing what caused an injury and how one can avoid similar harm. People are typically more interested in non-infectious injuries caused by violence or accidents, as these can offer insights into potential threats without the direct risk of infection. Zombies are highlighted as examples of walking body violations that also create additional injuries.
Finally, Scrivner finds the interest in the supernatural or paranormal, which includes entities such as ghosts, aliens, w ...
The Taxonomy and Domains of Morbid Curiosity
Coltan Scrivner elaborates on how morbid curiosity plays a crucial role in human evolution by contributing to threat learning without requiring direct exposure to danger.
Scrivner suggests that observing dangers or learning about them through stories allows individuals to comprehend threats without direct exposure. This form of learning is advantageous as it minimizes the risks of injury while still imparting crucial information about the environment. For example, witnessing a severe injury like a missing limb signals to an observer that a significant danger exists; this ability to detect threats through observation of injuries is a key element of morbid curiosity.
Scrivner highlights a crucial dynamic that morbid curiosity modulates – the balance between the reflex to avoid danger and the need to approach a potential threat to collect information. This precarious balance allows for the safe gathering of information and education about the environment's dangers without undergoing harm directly.
Scrivner un ...
The Evolutionary and Adaptive Benefits of Morbid Curiosity
Coltan Scrivner's study delves into the facets of morbid curiosity, separating it from other personality traits and demographic factors.
Scrivner reveals that disgust sensitivity and subclinical psychopathy significantly explain the variance in an individual's morbid curiosity. Disgust sensitivity, influencing the type and intensity of morbid content a person is comfortable with, alongside psychopathy, predicts about 50% of people's scores in morbid curiosity. This takes into account the Big Five personality traits, sex, age, and other variables. Contrary to Scrivner's initial expectations, disgust sensitivity is only slightly correlated with morbid curiosity, with some sub-scales explaining about 10% of the variance.
Scrivner also found that higher levels of subclinical psychopathy are one of the factors most strongly correlated with morbid curiosity. Moreover, there was no relationship found between empathy levels and the enjoyment or aversion to horror.
Scrivner points out the decline of morbid curiosity with age, an observation that parallels studies on animals, such as adolescent gazelles engaging in predator inspection. He suggests that intense curiosity in children, observed in contexts like kids' camps with ages ranging from five to nine, has underlying links to the benefits of morbid curiosity for learning and environmental exploration. Observations show that kids are significantly morbidly curious, often exploring this curiosity in pretend play where they can manage the morbid scenarios' emotions.
In a discussion about the demographics of morbid curiosity, Scrivner notes that women exhibit more interest in understanding the minds of dangerous individuals, particularly men with dark personality traits. He shares research findings that indicate women high in morbid curiosity showed beha ...
Individual Differences and Demographic Factors in Morbid Curiosity
Exploring why people find morbid content intriguing, experts in psychology delve into the components of horror films and zombie media that captivate audiences.
Horror films often create a connection with the viewers through the scenarios they present, engaging with the audience's natural curiosity and emotional responses.
Coltan Scrivner highlights the classic dynamic in horror films—featuring a highly vulnerable protagonist facing off against a powerful antagonist. This dynamic creates an archetypal story where the protagonist, although an underdog, usually finds a way to survive. Scrivner suggests that this narrative particularly resonates with viewers who have a high morbid curiosity.
Scrivner also draws a parallel between the threats seen in dreams and those depicted in horror films, where a similar imbalance of power between the dreamer or viewer, and a seeming threat, mirrors our inherent interest in threat scenarios. He discusses the degree to which empathy plays a role in this enjoyment, suggesting that horror fans may be highly empathetic because of their ability to put themselves in the shoes of the vulnerable protagonist.
Zombies serve as a nexus for various elements that arouse morbid curiosity among audiences. Scrivner doesn't provide specific commentary on this, but it's implied that the zombie genre capitalizes on the human fascination with threats that are at once familiar and otherworldly.
Zombies are a potent example of morbid content because they encompass all four domains of fascination by representing danger from what was once human, engaging in acts of violence, possessing supernatural elements, and displaying and inflicting bodily harm.
...
Psychology and Appeal of Morbid Content Genres
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser