Podcasts > Modern Wisdom > #962 - Lyman Stone - The Real Reason Birth Rates Are Falling

#962 - Lyman Stone - The Real Reason Birth Rates Are Falling

By Chris Williamson

In this Modern Wisdom episode, researcher Lyman Stone examines the complex factors behind declining birth rates. He explores how neighborhood design affects family living, explaining that population density alone doesn't determine an area's suitability for families - rather, it's the presence of parks, schools, and well-maintained infrastructure that makes communities appealing to parents.

Stone also discusses how technology shapes attitudes toward family size, with increased internet and mobile phone usage leading to more rigid fertility preferences. His research reveals patterns in how socioeconomic status influences family planning decisions, and he addresses common assumptions about gender dynamics in household labor, including the distribution of work between married parents and the role of male status in partner selection.

#962 - Lyman Stone - The Real Reason Birth Rates Are Falling

This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Jul 3, 2025 episode of the Modern Wisdom

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.

#962 - Lyman Stone - The Real Reason Birth Rates Are Falling

1-Page Summary

The Relationship Between Neighborhood Design/Population Density and Fertility

Lyman Stone explores how neighborhood design affects family living. He describes how densely populated areas can be family-friendly when they include essential amenities like parks, schools, and well-maintained infrastructure. Stone points to examples like Phoenix neighborhoods and Montreal to illustrate how population density alone doesn't determine livability - rather, it's the thoughtful layout and maintenance of community spaces that matter most.

Stone notes that while child-free individuals might find family-oriented neighborhoods lacking in entertainment options, parents prioritize different features. Using Daybreak, Utah as an example, he explains how planned communities that emphasize safety, cleanliness, and order often appeal more to families than areas with abundant commercial amenities. He particularly advocates for townhouse neighborhoods, which can provide both density and family-friendly features like garages and stroller accessibility.

Impact of Technology on Fertility Preferences and Norms

According to Stone's research, technology significantly influences how people think about family size. He finds that increased exposure to mobile phones and internet access leads to more rigid fertility preferences, with individuals more likely to specify exact numbers of desired children rather than maintaining flexible attitudes. Stone notes that this shift particularly affects Western populations, where unmet fertility goals are more likely to lead to depression in middle age.

Stone also discusses how social media and celebrity culture, particularly K-pop, can influence fertility norms. He explains how the portrayal of childless lifestyles by celebrities and social media influencers may impact cultural perceptions of family size and personal fulfillment.

Gender Dynamics, Male Status, and Household Labor in Fertility Decisions

Stone's research reveals interesting patterns in how socioeconomic status affects fertility decisions. Through interviews, he found that women often use their fathers' status as a benchmark when choosing partners, seeking financial "insurance" against child-related income disruptions. He notes that contrary to common belief, women typically marry within their social class rather than pursuing hypergamy.

Regarding household labor, Stone challenges the notion of a widespread "second shift" for women. He cites statistics showing that married mothers and fathers report similar total workloads when combining paid and unpaid labor. However, he acknowledges that individual experiences vary, particularly for full-time working women who may not see a reduction in family responsibilities.

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Hypergamy is a social science term describing the practice of individuals marrying or dating someone of higher social status. It is often colloquially referred to as "marrying up." This concept contrasts with hypogamy, which involves marrying someone of lower social status, colloquially known as "marrying down." Hypergamy can be seen as a form of mate selection where individuals seek partners with higher social standing or resources.
  • The concept of a "second shift" for women refers to the additional unpaid domestic work and caregiving responsibilities that women often take on after completing their paid employment. This term highlights the unequal distribution of household and childcare duties, where women are expected to manage both work outside the home and domestic tasks inside the home. It underscores the idea that even after a full day of work, women frequently have a "second shift" of responsibilities waiting for them at home, leading to a heavier overall workload compared to men. This concept has been a focal point in discussions about gender roles, division of labor, and work-life balance.
  • Daybreak, Utah is a planned community located in South Jordan, Utah, in the United States. Planned communities like Daybreak are carefully designed and developed with specific amenities and features to create a cohesive and family-friendly living environment. Daybreak emphasizes safety, cleanliness, and order, making it an attractive option for families looking for well-designed neighborhoods with a focus on community living. Planned communities like Daybreak often incorporate green spaces, recreational facilities, and pedestrian-friendly layouts to enhance the quality of life for residents.

Counterarguments

  • While neighborhood design can impact family living, it is also important to consider the affordability of these areas. High costs can negate the benefits of well-designed neighborhoods.
  • The assertion that population density does not determine livability might overlook the stressors associated with high-density living, such as noise pollution and overcrowding, which can affect family life.
  • The preference for safety, cleanliness, and order in family-oriented neighborhoods might not account for the diversity of family needs and preferences, which can include cultural amenities and vibrant community life.
  • The impact of technology on fertility preferences might be more nuanced, with some arguing that technology can also provide access to a broader range of perspectives and information, potentially leading to more informed and flexible fertility decisions.
  • The influence of social media and celebrity culture on fertility norms could be overstated, as individuals' decisions about family size are complex and influenced by a multitude of factors beyond media consumption.
  • The idea that women use their fathers' status as a benchmark for choosing partners could be an oversimplification, ignoring the role of personal compatibility, love, and other non-material factors in relationship formation.
  • The claim that women typically marry within their social class and do not pursue hypergamy may not consider the full spectrum of social dynamics and individual choices that lead to marital selection.
  • The notion that married mothers and fathers report similar total workloads might not capture the qualitative differences in the types of work performed or the societal value placed on paid versus unpaid labor.
  • The variability in individual experiences of household labor, particularly for full-time working women, may require a more in-depth analysis to understand systemic issues such as gender roles and expectations.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
#962 - Lyman Stone - The Real Reason Birth Rates Are Falling

The Relationship Between Neighborhood Design/Population Density and Fertility

Lyman Stone explores how the layout and amenities of a neighborhood can significantly affect its appeal for family living, especially given today's challenges in housing affordability.

Neighborhood Design Influences Perceptions of Walkability and Family-Friendliness

Dense Neighborhoods With Parks, Schools, and Nearby Amenities Support Family Living Despite Fewer Commercial Establishments

Stone describes a Phoenix neighborhood that appears inviting, with parks and pools despite criticisms of its appearance from above. The area's residential density exceeds the national average, suggesting compactness conducive to family life due to its walkability, proximity to schools, and small lots size. He further points to Montreal as an example, noting that a neighborhood labeled walkable and cyclable was less so in practice because of poorly maintained infrastructure challenging for stroller navigation.

Moreover, Stone underscores that population density does not dictate neighborhood layout. Townhouses with tree-lined sidewalks, which have lower vacancy rates, high-rise towers surrounded by parkland, and mid-rise blocks with courtyards can all exhibit identical density but offer different living experiences. He advocates for townhouse neighborhoods, emphasizing access to facilities like parks and community centers, as these support a strong family-friendly environment.

Perceptions of a Neighborhood's Suitability Vary By Family Status

Child-Free See Walkable Areas As Boring, Parents Enjoy Community and Convenience

Stone contrasts the perceived lack of entertainment, such as bars and restaurants, in a densely populated community like Daybreak, Utah, with the benefits it offers to family life. The community's design enables walking to neighbors and friends, which he deems more crucial for families than proximity to entertainment venues. This planned, dense community appears to satisfy family priorities of safety, order, and cleanliness over commercial amenities.

Families Prioritize Safety, Order, and Cleanliness Over Amenities

In Daybreak, Utah, and similar locales, the absence of major highways signals safety, and the well-appointed public spaces speak to a community's orderliness and cleanliness. Stone argues that the ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The Relationship Between Neighborhood Design/Population Density and Fertility

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • Walkability in neighborhood design refers to how easily and safely residents can walk to various destinations like parks, schools, or shops within the neighborhood. Cyclability, on the other hand, focuses on the ease and safety of cycling within the neighborhood, including factors like bike lanes, paths, and infrastructure. Both walkability and cyclability are essential aspects of creating a neighborhood that promotes physical activity, community interaction, and overall well-being. These factors contribute to a more sustainable and livable environment for residents.
  • "Compactness conducive to family life" suggests that a neighborhood's design, which includes features like parks, schools, and amenities within a close distance, can create a convenient and comfortable environment for families. This design allows for easier access to essential services and recreational spaces, promoting a sense of community and making daily activities more manageable for families. The term highlights the idea that a well-planned, compact neighborhood layout can enhance the quality of family life by fostering social interactions, safety, and convenience. It implies that a neighborhood's physical layout and amenities play a crucial role in supporting family-friendly living conditions.
  • Child-free individuals often prioritize entertainment options like bars and restaurants in neighborhoods. In contrast, parents prioritize safety, order, and cleanliness over such amenities. Parents value community, convenience, and family-friendly environments more than entertainment venues. This difference in priorities can shape how child-free individuals and parents perceive the suitability of a neighborhood for their lifestyles.
  • In family-friendly neighborhoods, the emphasis on safety, order, and cleanliness reflects the priorities of families with children. These qualities contribute to a sense of security and well-being for residents, especially parents raising young ones. Families often prioritize these aspects over amenities like entertainment venues because they directly impact the quality of life and the environment in which children grow up. The presence of well-maintained public spaces and a lack of major highways can signal a community's commitment to safety and orderliness, making it more appealing for families.
  • Policing parks for maintaining safety and order is crucial as it helps create a secure environment for families and individuals to enjoy public spaces ...

Counterarguments

  • Dense neighborhoods can sometimes lead to overcrowding, which may negatively impact quality of life and stress levels.
  • The preference for townhouses over apartments may not be universal; some families may prefer the lower maintenance and community aspects of apartment living.
  • Safety and cleanliness are important, but the emphasis on policing could potentially lead to over-policing and a negative impact on community trust and cohesion.
  • The assumption that child-free individuals find walkable areas boring may not hold true for all; many enjoy the vibrancy and social opportunities that dense, walkable neighborhoods provide.
  • The focus on safety, order, and cleanliness might not fully account for the importance of cultural amenities and diversity in enriching family life.
  • The high cost of housing in safe and clean neighborhoods can perpetuate socioeconomic divides and limit access for lower-income families.
  • The idea that dense single-family homes are preferred may not consider the environmental and sustainability benefits of multi-family dwellings or the potential for innovative apartment design to meet family needs.
  • The text may not acco ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
#962 - Lyman Stone - The Real Reason Birth Rates Are Falling

Impact of Technology on Fertility Preferences and Norms

The relationship between technology adoption—including the widespread use of mobile phones and access to the internet—and changing fertility preferences is complex and multi-faceted, with nuances that Lyman Stone explores based on his research.

Mobile Phones and Internet Access Can Fix Fertility Preferences

According to Lyman Stone, increased exposure to technology is leading people to adopt more concrete and discrete preferences regarding family size.

Tech-Exposed People Are Less Flexible About Family Size, Often Stating a Fixed Number of Children

Stone's paper in review indicates that as access to mobile phones and the internet increases, individuals become more concrete in their preferences, specifying an exact number of children desired, moving away from the historically flexible attitudes toward family life. Factors such as early mortality and limited birth control previously contributed to a flexible approach, but exposure to Western media through technology appears to be reducing this flexibility.

Technology, particularly the use of mobile phones, is believed to drive the concretization of fertility preferences, making individuals lose flexibility and adopt more rigid familial norms. Stone points out that Western individuals who do not achieve their specific family size desires are more likely to experience depression in middle age compared to non-Western individuals with unmet fertility desires.

Furthermore, even if people in areas with mobile phone service have the same desired number of children as those without service, those with cell phones are less likely to actually intend to have that number of children.

Technology Reinforces Social Status Norms Around Family Size

Technology also plays a role in reinforcing social status norms around family size.

Childless or Single-Child Celebrities on Social Media May Make Larger Families Seem Undesirable

Lyman Stone points to the influence of celebrities, notably K-pop stars, over cultural norms, suggesting that their often contractually enforced childlessness may contribute to a culture that increasingly values not having children. He explains how K-pop, a South Korean government-backed cultural initiative, promotes groups of young, heavily surgically modified, and to an extent, celibate individuals who do not have ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Impact of Technology on Fertility Preferences and Norms

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • The relationship between technology adoption and changing fertility preferences is intricate. Technology, like mobile phones and the internet, influences individuals to have more defined and specific desires regarding family size. Exposure to technology can lead to a shift from historically flexible attitudes towards family size to more rigid preferences, impacting how people perceive and plan for their future families.
  • The concretization of fertility preferences refers to the process where individuals develop clear and specific desires regarding the number of children they want to have, moving away from vague or flexible ideas. This shift is influenced by factors like exposure to technology, which can lead people to articulate a fixed number of children they wish to have. As technology becomes more prevalent, individuals are more inclined to have a precise and unwavering preference for family size, rather than a more fluid or adaptable approach.
  • The influence of Western media on reducing flexibility in fertility preferences can be understood as the impact of exposure to Western cultural norms and values through media channels like movies, TV shows, and social media platforms. This exposure can shape individuals' perceptions and expectations regarding family size, leading to a shift towards more specific and rigid preferences rather than historically flexible attitudes. The portrayal of ideal family sizes, lifestyles, and societal norms in Western media can influence individuals to adopt fixed ideas about the number of children they desire, potentially impacting their mental well-being and decision-making regarding family planning.
  • The impact of not achieving specific family size desires on depression can be significant, as individuals who do not reach their desired number of children may experience feelings of sadness, regret, or unfulfillment. This can lead to emotional distress and a sense of loss, particularly in cultures where family size is closely tied to personal identity and societal expectations. Research suggests that unmet fertility desires can contribute to psychological challenges, affecting well-being and mental health outcomes in the long term. It's important to consider the emotional implications of not fulfilling one's family size preferences, as this aspect of life can deeply influence an individual's overall happiness and satisfaction.
  • Celebrities, like K-pop stars, can influence societal perceptions of family size through their public personas and lifestyles showcased on social media. In the case of K-pop stars, contractual obligations may lead to public childlessness, potentially shaping a cultural narrative that values not having children. This influence can impact how individuals view family planning decisions and societal norms around parenthood. Celebrity behaviors and representations can contribute to shaping attitudes towards family size within a given culture.
  • K-pop culture, particularly through the influence of celebrities like K-pop stars, can shape societal norms and perceptions of family size by showcasing lifestyles that prioritize career and personal pursuits over traditional family structures. The visibility of childless celebrities in K-pop may contribute to a cultural shift towards valuing independence and individual success over parenthood. This influence can impact how young people perceive family planning and the trade-offs between personal aspirations and traditional family expectations. K-pop's portrayal of glamorous, childless lifestyles on social media can influence attitudes towards family size and the prioritization of different life goals.
  • Social media platforms can influence perceptions of parenthood by showcasing childless lifestyles as more glamorous and carefree, potentially crea ...

Counterarguments

  • The correlation between technology exposure and concrete fertility preferences does not necessarily imply causation; other factors such as education, economic conditions, and cultural shifts may also play significant roles.
  • Some individuals may use technology to find support and resources for larger families, which could counteract the trend towards smaller family sizes.
  • The influence of celebrities on fertility preferences might be overstated, as individuals can have a variety of role models and sources of inspiration that may promote different values.
  • The perception that technology leads to less intention to have children could be influenced by broader societal changes, such as increased focus on career and personal development.
  • The association between unmet fertility desires and depression could be influenced by other variables, such as personal expectations, societal pressures, or mental health predispositions.
  • The impact of K-pop culture and celebrities on family size norms may vary greatly across different societies and demographic groups.
  • Social media platforms can also be used to promote p ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
#962 - Lyman Stone - The Real Reason Birth Rates Are Falling

Gender Dynamics, Male Status, and Household Labor in Fertility Decisions

The intricate interplay between socioeconomic factors and household dynamics impacts fertility decisions, as Lyman Stone discusses in interviews and statistics.

Fathers' Socioeconomic Status Shapes Daughters' Fertility Preferences

Through structured interviews, Lyman Stone found that women often compare prospective partners to their fathers, using their father's status as a benchmark for a potential mate's ability to provide. Stone's personal observations complement this finding; despite appearances of hypergamy, he noted that he and his wife's parents had similar occupations, suggesting a marriage within the same social class.

Women seek husbands as financial "insurance" against the income volatility that comes with having children, mirroring their fathers' socioeconomic status. Stone suggests that women look for a partner who can provide stability akin to what their fathers provided. Historical data corroborates that women usually do not marry men with higher status than their fathers. The implication is that women continue to select spouses who are likely to maintain a standard of living similar to their paternal experience.

Societal Views on Men's "Failure" Reduce Sympathy and Support For Their Economic Advancement

Stone discusses the negative societal views on young men perceived as lacking social competence, labeling them as creepy or weird. This stigmatization may contribute to harsh judgments regarding men's economic "failures." Society often attributes men's lag in the labor market to personal failings like laziness, instead of considering systemic external factors.

Men's Labor Market Lag Often Blamed On Laziness, Not External Factors

The podcast reveals that there is less societal support for aiding men who fall behind economically, based on the assumption that their failures are self-inflicted. This view can reinforce social stigma and limit support for government interventions that could assist struggling men.

Household Labor Division Doesn't Show Unfair "Second Shift" for Women

Lyman Stone contends that statistics indicate married mothers and fathers report nearly identical workloads when combining paid ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Gender Dynamics, Male Status, and Household Labor in Fertility Decisions

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • Women's mate selection criteria may be more complex than simply comparing to their fathers, including factors like personal values, attraction, and compatibility.
  • Some women may prioritize emotional support, shared responsibilities, or other non-financial attributes in a partner over financial "insurance."
  • There are instances where women marry men of lower socioeconomic status for various reasons, challenging the idea that they do not marry "down."
  • The negative labeling of young men may be a reflection of broader societal issues, such as mental health stigma or lack of social skills training, rather than an inherent bias against men.
  • Economic struggles of men might be due to a complex interplay of systemic issues, such as education disparities or economic downturns, rather than personal failings.
  • There may be societal support for economically struggling men, but it could be less visible or less formalized than support systems for women.
  • The measurement of workloads between married mothers and fathers may not capture nuances such as multitasking, mental load, or the quality of time spent on different tasks.
  • The concept of a "second shift" for women may be more percep ...

Actionables

  • Reflect on your relationship expectations by journaling about the qualities you admire in your father or father figures and how they influence your partner selection. This can help you become more aware of subconscious patterns and decide if they align with your current relationship goals. For example, if you notice a pattern of seeking financial stability over emotional connection, you might explore why that is and if it's truly what you want in a partner.
  • Initiate a monthly "household responsibilities audit" with your partner to ensure a fair distribution of labor. During this audit, list all household tasks, discuss how they're currently divided, and make adjustments to share responsibilities more equally. This can prevent feelings of unfairness and reduce the psychological burden often associated with house ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free

Create Summaries for anything on the web

Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser

Shortform Extension CTA