In this episode of Modern Wisdom, evolutionary biologist Dr. Jerry Coyne discusses key concepts in evolutionary biology, including how species form and remain distinct through reproductive isolation. He explores human evolution and genetic differentiation among populations, using molecular clock analysis and studies of various species to explain how populations diverge over time.
The discussion also covers biological sex differences, with Coyne examining evidence from MRI scans and great ape behavior to explain behavioral patterns in humans. He addresses current debates about evolutionary science, including how ideological views can affect the interpretation of scientific evidence regarding sex and race differences, and discusses what he terms the "reverse naturalistic fallacy" in scientific understanding.
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
Jerry Coyne has focused his research on understanding speciation—a key aspect that Darwin's "Origin of Species" left unresolved. Coyne's work examines how continuous evolution produces discrete species, analyzing genetic differences between populations and the mechanisms that maintain species boundaries. His research demonstrates that species remain distinct through reproductive isolation barriers, which prevent gene mixing between different species.
Using molecular clock analysis and studies of Drosophila populations, Coyne has mapped out how species diverge over time. He points to human evolution as an example, noting how major migrations out of Africa 50-60,000 years ago led to genetic differentiation among human populations, with modern genetic analysis showing remarkable accuracy in identifying self-reported racial groups.
Coyne argues that differences between men and women have both social and evolutionary foundations. He points to evidence from MRI scans that can detect sex differences in developing babies' brains, and notes similar behavioral patterns in our closest relatives, the great apes. According to Coyne, evolutionary psychology provides testable predictions about human behavior, including why men tend to be more risk-taking and show more sexual jealousy.
Coyne challenges the view that sex and gender are purely social constructs, emphasizing that while non-binary gender identities may reflect psychological aspects unique to humans, the biological reality of two sexes is universal across animal and plant species.
Coyne discusses how leftist ideology can distort scientific understanding, particularly regarding race and sex differences. He describes what he calls a "reverse naturalistic fallacy," where people expect nature to conform to their ideological views rather than accepting objective scientific evidence. According to Coyne, this preference for comfort over truth extends beyond science and represents a broader human tendency to favor beliefs that feel good over empirical evidence.
1-Page Summary
Jerry Coyne has made significant contributions to our understanding of speciation, the evolutionary process that gives rise to new species—a phenomenon Charles Darwin notably left unresolved.
Jerry Coyne targets one of the key issues that Charles Darwin's seminal work, "The Origin of Species," did not address due to the limited knowledge of the time—the mechanisms that lead to the formation of discrete species. Coyne was surprised to find that even modern evolution textbooks he reviewed when first teaching an evolution course did not include evidence for evolution. Instead, these texts took evolution for granted, skipping directly to topics like population genetics and the process of speciation.
Coyne has aimed to elucidate the nuanced genetic differences between human groups, often associated with race. By analyzing American individuals who self-identify with a particular race and comparing it to their genetic clusters, the self-identified races align with the genetic data with about 99.9% accuracy, illustrating the genetic distinctions within populations.
These genetic differences are a product of the same mechanisms that drive speciation. Isolated populations evolve independently when they do not exchange genes, leading to speciation. Coyne references major human out-of-Africa migrations around 50-60,000 years ago as an evolutionary milestone that contributed to genetic differentiation among human populations.
Coyne's technical book on speciation details how species come about and how they are defined. He also discusses using molecular clocks to determine the age of a pair of species by inspecting genetic divergences. This method is based on neutral mutation rates and population size rather than generation time.
Coyne clarifies that the "lumpiness" of nature—in other words, distinct species—is maintained by reproductive isolation barriers, which prevent the intermixing of genes from different species. These barriers include hybrid sterility or inviability, mating behavior differences, and temporal isolation, such as plants producing pollen and eggs at different times.
Darwin's book, which could have alternatively been entitled "The Origin of Adaptations" or "Natural Selection," does not elucidate how continuous evolution produces the discrete entities we recognize as species. Coyne took up this challenge because understanding why a continuous process results in discrete species remains an unanswered question in evolutionary biology.
Speciation and the Origin of Species
Jerry Coyne elaborates on the biological differences between sexes, arguing that these have an evolutionary basis and are not solely due to social constructs.
Coyne states that differences between men and women are not just a result of socialization but also a product of evolutionary processes. He points out that men tend to be more risk-taking, less choosy regarding mates, and show more sexual jealousy, which aligns with predictions from evolutionary theory. Coyne further mentions that our closest relatives, the great apes, exhibit similar behaviors and physical differences, reinforcing these ideas.
He touches upon evolutionary traits, such as pigmentation and body morphology, and how these traits, including cognitive and behavioral differences between genders, are seen across species. Coyne believes that evolutionary psychology is maturing, offering testable predictions on human behavior rooted in evolutionary theory.
For instance, Chris Williamson and Jerry Coyne discuss MRI scans capable of detecting sex differences in the brains of developing babies in utero after three months. They point out that an fMRI can identify the sex of a brain with 90% accuracy in children as young as age 10.
Coyne also introduces skin pigmentation as an adaptive evolutionary trait, which helps protect against melanoma in sunnier areas and aids vitamin D absorption in less sunny places. He remarks on other variations like hair shape and eye color but signals uncertainty about their evolutionary reasons.
By explaining sexual selection, Coyne posits that differences between males and females, such as competition for mates, stem from deep evolutionary roots. He references Darwin's theories from the 1870s, which tackled the evolutionary strategies of both sexes in terms of mating and survival.
Coyne criticizes the view that sex and gender differences are purely social constructs, emphasizing that they have a biological foundation scientifical ...
Biological Sex Differences and Evolutionary Psychology
Jerry Coyne highlights the tensions between ideology and science, particularly how leftist ideology can distort science, leading to the suppression of scientific understandings on topics like race and sex.
Coyne touches on the political aspects of accepting evolution and finds the general level of acceptance in America depressing. He discusses how leftist ideology has influenced evolutionary biology and evolutionary psychology, leading to misinformation spread by scientists and misrepresentation in the media. Ideology has eroded certain areas of science by limiting the understanding of the malleability of human and animal behavior, which Coyne identifies as anti-Marxist and anti-leftist. Additionally, he criticizes "wokeness" for undermining scientific understandings of sex differences, which he believes negatively impacts the Democratic Party.
Coyne criticizes the leftist ideology for distorting scientific understanding, including the denial of biological sexes and the idea that race has no scientific basis. Kevin Williamson suggests that discussions around evolution, behavioral genetics, psychology, and sex differences can become politically charged, with concerns about questions of sex and gender being used to push broader social beliefs regarding marriage and reproduction.
Coyne expresses the notion that the left has overcompensated for past injustices and suggests that the recognition of genetic diversity between different human groups is often, mistakenly, seen as racism instead of scientific observation. He also shares his experience with having an article removed due to it being considered offensive, illustrating the trend toward preferring comfort over truth. Coyne explains the "reverse naturalistic fallacy" as expecting nature to align with personal ideologies instead of accepting scientific evidence.
...
Ideological and Political Debates Around Evolutionary Science
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser