In this Jocko Podcast episode, Jocko Willink and Echo Charles explore the debate around allowing dogs in jiu-jitsu gyms, particularly on training mats. The discussion examines several practical considerations, including hygiene concerns, potential facility damage, and the impact of a gym's size on its ability to accommodate dogs.
The hosts weigh different perspectives from gym owners and coaches on this issue. While some see dogs as contributing to a positive community atmosphere in smaller, family-like environments, others express concerns about cleanliness and safety. The conversation addresses how factors such as dog behavior, existing facility cleanliness, and member comfort levels influence decisions about allowing dogs in training spaces.

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
Jocko Willink and Echo Charles discuss the complex issue of allowing dogs in jiu-jitsu gyms, particularly on the mats. While Echo Charles supports the idea if the dog is well-behaved and the gym owner approves, Jocko raises several practical concerns. These include dogs tracking dirt onto mats, potential damage from claws, and shedding hair. Jocko notes that the gym's size can influence this decision - smaller gyms might accommodate dogs more easily than larger facilities where dogs could cause more disruption.
Echo Charles points out that jiu-jitsu mats already harbor various germs and bacteria from regular use. Adding dogs to this environment introduces additional hygiene challenges, as they can bring in outdoor contaminants and shed hair. Jocko Willink suggests that while a clean gym with a well-behaved, non-shedding dog might be acceptable, adding dogs to a facility with existing cleanliness issues would only compound problems.
The debate reveals a split in perspective among gym owners. Echo Charles describes how some owners welcome dogs to enhance the community atmosphere, particularly in smaller, family-like environments where trust exists between members. However, other owners take a more cautious approach, prioritizing hygiene and safety. Charles acknowledges that not everyone feels comfortable around dogs, and some people may have anxiety or negative experiences that make dogs' presence problematic in a training environment.
1-Page Summary
Jocko Willink and Echo Charles share their perspectives regarding dogs in the jiu-jitsu gym environment. Jocko recalls a dog named Victory at Victory Gym, noting that while Victory was allowed downstairs, the dog was never permitted on the mats. Echo Charles says that if the gym owner is okay with dogs on the mats, and if the dog is well-behaved, he personally supports the idea, especially as someone who likes dogs. For Echo, a well-mannered dog being present is not an issue if the owner approves.
However, Jocko raises several concerns about allowing dogs on the mats. He emphasizes that dogs don’t wear shoes, so they can easily track dirt from outside onto the mats. Since hygiene is crucial in jiu-jitsu, practitioners wear flip-flops or slippers to minimize contamination, making the notion of dogs walking on the mats problematic. He points out the risk of dogs' claws cutting or damaging the mat surface, which poses an additional concern. Jocko also notes that dogs shed hair, which could stick to the mats. He further adds that practitioners have a greater degree of intimate contact with the mats than with beds or couches, making cleanliness on the mats even more important. For these reasons, despite loving dogs personally and allowing his own dogs on his bed and couch, Jocko draws the line at letting them on the mats.
Acceptability of Dogs on Mats in Jiu-jitsu Gym
Concerns about hygiene are commonly raised regarding dogs being present in gyms, especially in environments like jiu-jitsu studios where mats are frequently used by multiple people. Both Echo Charles and Jocko Willink discuss the potential for increased exposure to germs and bacteria due to the presence of dogs in these spaces.
Echo Charles points out the uncertainty about what is being brought onto the mat, highlighting the history and hygiene practices of every individual who uses the mat are unknown. He emphasizes that there are likely “a lot of various germs and freaking bacteria and stuff” on gym mats already, noting how participants’ feet, fungus, and hands may contribute to contamination. This baseline of uncertainty and potential for germs sets the stage for further concern when animals are introduced to the area.
Jocko Willink states that dogs bring additional contaminants to the gym environment, such as dirt, because they do not wear shoes and move directly from outdoor areas onto the mats. Furthermore, Echo Charles adds that outdoor mats may already be exposed to environmental contaminants like trees, insects, and even rodents, and dogs can easily transfer more dirt and germs from the outside.
Both hosts discuss how dogs shed hair, compounding cleanliness concerns. Jocko Willink points out the problem of dog hair accumulating on mats. Echo Charles also references online claims about the cleanliness of dogs’ mouths but remains skeptical about the true hygiene of dogs, stating, “We don't know where that dog's been.” This skepticism extends to the risk of the dogs’ bodily fluids, unpredictable behavior, and shedding, all of which could potentially exacerbate germ and bacteria issues on frequently used gym surfaces.
The question of whether dogs should be allowed on gym mats ultimately comes down to overall hygiene standards within the gym.
Jocko Willink offers that if there is a “steady state of general cleanliness” in the gym, and if a dog is somehow well-behaved and does not shed, he might be more inclined to allow the ani ...
Hygiene Concerns With Dogs in Gyms
The topic of dogs in gyms sparks different perspectives among owners and coaches, reflecting varying priorities around atmosphere, comfort, and responsibility.
Echo Charles expresses support for allowing dogs in smaller, family-like gym environments, especially when the owner is responsible. He feels that a well-behaved dog, whose owner is clearly squared away, fits naturally into a close-knit gym community. Charles likens it to a family dynamic, where the dog is an accepted member, just as in a welcoming home where pets have leeway. For Charles and similar-minded owners, the trust placed in the dog's owner to control their pet and clean up after them outweighs the need for strict dog rules. The primary focus is on fostering a comfortable, familial environment rather than enforcing prohibitive regulations.
Despite this welcoming stance, Charles acknowledges and respects that not everyone feels comfortable around dogs in the gym. He highlights the potential risks that dogs could introduce, ...
Gym Owners' and Coaches' Views On Allowing Dogs
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser
