Podcasts > Jocko Podcast > 526: The 18 Things That Make You A Bad Soldier and a Bad Leader, In Battle and in Life.

526: The 18 Things That Make You A Bad Soldier and a Bad Leader, In Battle and in Life.

By Jocko DEFCOR Network

In this episode of Jocko Podcast, Jocko Willink examines what makes soldiers and leaders effective or ineffective in combat situations. Drawing from his military experience, he outlines key characteristics of successful combat personnel, including technical proficiency, tactical awareness, and equipment maintenance, while also identifying traits that can make soldiers and leaders liabilities to their units.

The discussion covers how strong leaders build trust through fair treatment and shared risks, while highlighting how poor judgment and temperament can compromise troop safety. Willink explores four essential components for battlefield success: technical proficiency, calm under pressure, dedication to duty, and effective teamwork. These principles demonstrate how military leadership extends beyond giving orders to creating a cohesive, capable fighting force.

Listen to the original

526: The 18 Things That Make You A Bad Soldier and a Bad Leader, In Battle and in Life.

This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Feb 4, 2026 episode of the Jocko Podcast

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.

526: The 18 Things That Make You A Bad Soldier and a Bad Leader, In Battle and in Life.

1-Page Summary

Characteristics of Effective Combat Soldiers and Leaders

In this episode, Jocko Willink draws from his extensive military experience to outline the key traits that make soldiers and leaders effective in combat situations.

Highly Effective Soldiers

According to Willink, exceptional combat soldiers demonstrate strong technical proficiency, including advanced weapon handling, tactical awareness, and problem-solving abilities under fire. He notes that the most reliable soldiers maintain their equipment diligently, ensure adequate supplies, and show genuine interest in their military duties. For example, Willink describes soldiers who innovatively solve problems in the heat of battle, such as using uniform pieces to handle hot weapons while providing cover fire for their squad.

Leadership Qualities

Willink emphasizes that effective combat leaders go beyond simply giving orders. They maintain composure under pressure, provide clear instructions, and ensure their troops are well-informed. Great leaders prioritize their troops' needs, checking everything from ammunition supplies to the quality of foxhole protection. They build trust by sharing risks with their men and treating everyone fairly, including rotating dangerous duties and creating advancement opportunities.

Characteristics of Ineffective Combat Personnel

Willink identifies several traits that make both soldiers and leaders ineffective in combat situations. Poor performers often require constant supervision, neglect their duties, or prioritize personal interests over team needs. Some soldiers are labeled as cowardly, showing excessive fear or requiring coercion to follow orders.

Ineffective leaders, Willink notes, often display poor judgment and temperament. They might avoid sharing risks with their troops, fail to admit mistakes, or make tactical decisions that compromise troop safety. He describes cases where leaders avoided dangerous situations or failed to provide proper guidance, ultimately becoming liabilities to their units.

Key Attributes for Success

Willink and Henderson discuss four essential components for success in battle situations. Technical proficiency and tactical awareness form the foundation of combat effectiveness. The ability to remain calm under pressure proves crucial for performance in high-stress situations. They emphasize that duty and camaraderie, demonstrated through actions like risking one's life to save colleagues, are fundamental to combat success. Finally, they stress the importance of effective teamwork, with leaders maintaining high morale through respectful treatment and prioritizing unit welfare over individual interests.

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • While technical proficiency is important, overemphasis on individual skills may overlook the necessity of adaptability and creativity in unpredictable combat scenarios.
  • The focus on equipment maintenance and supply management, while crucial, might not account for situations where improvisation is required due to resource constraints.
  • Innovation in combat is valuable, but there may be a risk of encouraging risky behavior that could endanger soldiers if not properly managed or if it goes against established protocols.
  • Composure under pressure is key for leaders, but this should not discount the importance of emotional intelligence and the ability to connect with and understand the emotional state of their troops.
  • Prioritizing troop needs is essential, but leaders must also balance this with strategic objectives and the overall mission, which may sometimes require difficult decisions that do not align with immediate troop welfare.
  • Fair treatment and risk-sharing are important, but leaders must also be able to make unpopular decisions that are in the best interest of the mission and long-term success.
  • The characterization of some soldiers as ineffective due to cowardice or requiring coercion could be overly simplistic and fail to consider underlying issues such as inadequate training, poor leadership, or mental health challenges.
  • The critique of ineffective leaders might not fully acknowledge the complex pressures and decision-making challenges leaders face in combat, which can lead to mistakes despite good intentions.
  • The emphasis on duty and camaraderie is important, but there should also be recognition of the need for self-care and the potential negative effects of self-sacrifice on long-term mental health.
  • Effective teamwork is crucial, but the text does not address how to manage or integrate individuals with diverse backgrounds and potentially conflicting perspectives within a unit.

Actionables

  • You can practice decision-making under stress by playing timed puzzle games or strategy-based video games that require quick thinking and adaptability. This simulates the need for tactical awareness and problem-solving in high-pressure situations, similar to a soldier's experience in combat, but in a safe and controlled environment.
  • Enhance your equipment maintenance skills by creating a routine checklist for your most-used items at home, such as cleaning and servicing your car, computer, or household appliances regularly. This habit mirrors the discipline of soldiers maintaining their gear and can improve your reliability and attention to detail in everyday life.
  • Develop your leadership and composure by volunteering to lead projects in your community or workplace, focusing on clear communication and equitable task distribution. This experience can help you learn to stay calm under pressure, make informed decisions, and build trust within a team, reflecting the qualities of effective combat leaders.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
526: The 18 Things That Make You A Bad Soldier and a Bad Leader, In Battle and in Life.

Characteristics of Effective Combat Soldiers and Leaders

Jocko Willink draws on extensive military experience to outline what makes soldiers and leaders effective in combat situations, highlighting key traits such as combat know-how, calmness in the face of danger, and attentiveness to the needs of troops.

Highly Effective Soldiers With Critical Combat Skills

Described as highly capable and reliable, effective combat soldiers possess a variety of critical skills that enable them to perform exceptionally on the battlefield.

Skilled Soldiers in Weapons, Tactics, and Problem-Solving Under Fire Are Exceptionally Capable

Good combat soldiers are quick to take appropriate action, with skills in weapon handling, reloading, setting up fields of fire, digging defensible positions, and strategic positioning. Such combat know-how is deemed a prerequisite for good performance. For example, a soldier who, under enemy fire and injury, continues to engage with the enemy by utilizing an alternate weapon like a .45 handgun after their machine gun is knocked out demonstrates exceptional weapon skills, tactical awareness, and problem-solving under fire.

Reliable and Efficient Soldiers Are Highly Regarded

Soldiers who are reliable and efficient command respect and trust. One soldier, praised for innovative thinking, used a uniform piece to insulate his hands while firing a hot machine gun to cover his squad. Another example includes a soldier who exhibited reliability and efficiency by returning to action after quick medical treatment. Good soldiers maintain their equipment, ensure they are stocked with essentials like ammo, and exhibit high motivation and interest in their duties, being described as career-minded.

Effective Leaders Inspire Loyalty and Direct Troops

Leadership in combat transcends the mere issuance of orders; it embodies calmness, decisiveness, resourcefulness, and fair treatment of troops.

Respected Combat Leaders Remain Calm and Provide Clear, Decisive Instructions

Effective combat leaders, as highlighted by Willink, provide clear, decisive instructions and keep their men well-informed. Remaining calm under fire is critical; a machine gunner who stayed composed during a mortar attack exemplifies such bravery. Willink recounts another First Scout who was consistently cool under fire, thereby reinforcing the importance of leaders maintaining composure.

Leaders Prioritize Troop Needs, Providing Resources and Support

Great leaders ensure their troops' needs are met, supervising and training with meticulous care for every d ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Characteristics of Effective Combat Soldiers and Leaders

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • While critical combat skills are essential, overemphasis on individual skills may overlook the importance of teamwork and coordination in combat effectiveness.
  • Quick and appropriate action is vital, but there may be situations where hesitation and restraint are strategically advantageous, preventing unnecessary escalation or casualties.
  • High motivation and career-mindedness are positive traits, but they could potentially lead to prioritizing personal advancement over the well-being of the team or mission.
  • Innovative thinking is valuable, but it should be balanced with adherence to standard operating procedures to ensure safety and predictability in combat operations.
  • Clear and decisive instructions are important, but leaders must also be adaptable and open to changing plans in response to new information or unforeseen circumstances.
  • Remaining calm under fire is crucial, but acknowledging and managing fear and stress can also be a part of effective leadership, as it can foster resilience and human connection among troops.
  • Prioritizing troop needs is fundamental, but leaders must also balance immediate welfare with long-term strategic objectives, which may sometimes require sacrifices.
  • Meticulous supervision and training are important, but there should be room for initiative and independent decision-making among ...

Actionables

  • You can enhance decision-making skills by playing strategy-based video games that require quick thinking and adaptability, similar to soldiers making split-second decisions in combat. For example, games like "Starcraft" or "Civilization" demand that you assess situations rapidly and make strategic choices, which can improve your ability to react under pressure in real-life scenarios.
  • Practice maintaining composure in stressful situations by engaging in activities like public speaking or performing, which mirror the calm required of leaders under fire. Joining a local theater group or signing up for a public speaking course can provide opportunities to develop the ability to stay collected and clear-headed when facing an audience, thereby building confidence and leadership qualities.
  • Develop a habit of regular equipment ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
526: The 18 Things That Make You A Bad Soldier and a Bad Leader, In Battle and in Life.

Characteristics of Ineffective Combat Soldiers and Leaders

The discussion delves into the qualities that define inefficacy in combat soldiers and leaders, underscoring the peril they pose to military operations.

Undisciplined, Irresponsible, or Self-Interested Soldiers Are Poor Performers

Negatively Viewed Soldiers Need Supervision, Neglect Duties, or Prioritize Self

Noted as needing constant supervision, poor combatants are characterized as lagging behind, irresponsible, self-interested, and preoccupied with personal affairs. They require motivation to follow through on tasks and are seen negatively if they prioritize themselves over duties. Complaining naturally occurs among soldiers, but excessive complaints are deemed problematic. One-on-one competition among soldiers is also viewed unfavorably.

Certain soldiers have been described as unreliable in combat, slowing down attacks, and unable to keep pace. Examples given include soldiers who avoid carrying equipment, lack endurance in challenging situations, and are reluctant to volunteer for duties.

Cowardly or Disobedient Soldiers Unfit for Combat

Some soldiers have been noted as too afraid to follow orders and are labeled as documented cowards, showing fear excessively by hiding or exhibiting nervousness. There are instances of soldiers needing to be coerced due to a lack of courage or being too scared to act when attacked.

Ineffective Leaders Exhibit Poor Judgment, Temperament, and Prioritization

Leaders Criticized For Harshness, Not Admitting Mistakes, or Avoiding Troop Risks

Ineffective leaders are often temperamental and resist admitting mistakes. They are portrayed as unwilling to share the same risks as their troops. One leader, for instance, avoided ordering a machine gun to fire at the enemy out of fear of drawing mortar fire.

Ineffective Leaders Fail to Guide and Support Troops

Leaders who avoid taking proper precautions for their men's safety are considered ineffective. In one scenario, a leader permitted men to carelessly discard ration cans, potentially revealing their position to the enemy. Another leader reportedly took less dangerous duties during a counter-attack and showed up later solely to in ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Characteristics of Ineffective Combat Soldiers and Leaders

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • Soldiers who appear undisciplined or self-interested might be struggling with personal issues or mental health concerns that require support rather than condemnation.
  • Complaining can sometimes be a valid form of feedback and a sign that there are underlying issues that need to be addressed within the unit.
  • One-on-one competition, if managed properly, can foster a spirit of excellence and improve performance.
  • Soldiers who hesitate to volunteer or seem to lack endurance might be experiencing burnout or physical limitations that need to be addressed with compassion and proper medical attention.
  • Fear in combat is a natural human response, and labeling soldiers as cowards could overlook the need for better training in managing fear and stress.
  • Leaders who avoid risks might be exercising caution and trying to preserve their troops' lives, which could be misinterpreted as self-preservation.
  • Admitting mistakes is important, but the context in which leaders operate can sometimes make this challenging due to the need to maintain authority and morale.
  • Tactical decisions that seem poor in hindsight might have been made with the best information available at the time, highlighting the compl ...

Actionables

  • You can enhance personal discipline by setting daily non-negotiable tasks for yourself, such as a morning workout or a reading hour, to build a routine that prioritizes responsibilities over personal affairs. This practice mirrors the military's structured environment and can improve your ability to stick to commitments in your personal and professional life.
  • Create a 'buddy check' system with a friend or colleague where you hold each other accountable for shared goals and tasks, reflecting the military's emphasis on unit cohesion and mutual support. This partnership encourages both parties to contribute equally, reduces the temptation to complain or compete, and fosters a sense of shared responsibility.
  • Volunteer for community projects or team-based ac ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
526: The 18 Things That Make You A Bad Soldier and a Bad Leader, In Battle and in Life.

Attributes For Soldiers/Leaders: Combat Skills, Calmness, Responsibility, Teamwork

Kaya Henderson and Jocko Willink elaborate on the essential attributes of good combat soldiers and leaders, such as combat skills, calmness, responsibility, and teamwork, which are all critical components for success in battle situations.

Combat Skills and Tactics Essential for Battle Success

The hosts describe soldiers and leaders who demonstrate technical proficiency and tactical awareness as essential for battle success. An outstanding characteristic of good combat men and leaders is their combat know-how. Good combat men can set men in good positions, are wonderful at estimating range, and are known as accurate gunners. Soldiers who are technically proficient with their weapons, able to fix them quickly, and hit targets within two rounds exemplify this combat readiness.

Calmness Under Pressure Crucial for Combat Performance

The ability to remain calm under fire is distinguished as a critical trait for effective combat performance. Willink highlights the value of soldiers and leaders who can effectively control fear and anxiety in high-pressure situations. Examples are given of soldiers who perform their duties effectively under heavy fire, such as a soldier who returned to battle after bandaging his own wounds.

Duty and Camaraderie: Hallmarks of Good Combat Performance

Traits of consideration and cooperation are often found among respected soldiers and leaders. Soldiers are described who show concern for their comrades, such as by risking their lives to save a colleague under heavy gunfire. Willink emphasizes the duty of soldiers to keep themselves and their equipment in good condition, which includes taking ownership of their roles.

Effective Teamwork and Cama ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Attributes For Soldiers/Leaders: Combat Skills, Calmness, Responsibility, Teamwork

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • While technical proficiency and tactical awareness are important, adaptability and creative problem-solving are also crucial in unpredictable combat situations where plans may need to change rapidly.
  • Overemphasis on individual marksmanship might overlook the importance of collective fire and maneuver tactics that can be more effective in certain combat scenarios.
  • The ability to quickly fix weapons and hit targets within two rounds is important, but so is the capacity to operate effectively with limited resources or in the event of equipment failure.
  • Calmness under fire is vital, but so is the ability to harness stress and fear in a way that heightens alertness and responsiveness without leading to panic.
  • The concept of duty and camaraderie is noble, but it must be balanced with the understanding that self-preservation is also a natural and valid response in life-threatening situations.
  • Teamwork and camaraderie are essential, but individual initiative and the ability to operate independently when cut off from the unit or in small ...

Actionables

  • You can enhance your problem-solving skills by practicing tactical games like chess or paintball, which require strategic positioning and quick thinking similar to combat scenarios. Engaging in these activities will help you develop an understanding of how to assess situations and make decisions under pressure, much like a soldier would need to do on the battlefield.
  • Improve your stress management by participating in high-intensity fitness classes or sports that simulate pressure, such as timed obstacle courses or competitive team sports. These environments can help you learn to remain calm and maintain focus when faced with physical and mental challenges, reflecting the composure needed in combat.
  • Foster a sense of responsibilit ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free

Create Summaries for anything on the web

Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser

Shortform Extension CTA