In this episode of Jocko Podcast, Jocko Willink and Echo Charles explore when standard leadership principles like "Cover and Move" and "Extreme Ownership" may not serve a team's best interests. They examine how these principles, while foundational to effective leadership, can become counterproductive when applied without proper balance, particularly when dealing with problematic team members.
The discussion delves into strategies for managing difficult employees, including both high performers who create toxic environments and consistently underperforming team members. Willink and Charles outline a structured approach to addressing these challenges, from initial conversations to progressive discipline, while emphasizing the importance of documentation and allowing natural consequences to unfold when necessary.

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
Leadership principles like 'Cover and Move' and 'Extreme Ownership' provide essential frameworks for team management, but their effectiveness depends heavily on balanced application. While these principles are powerful tools, their overzealous application can lead to decreased effectiveness and team dysfunction.
Leaders must recognize when covering for underperforming or toxic team members becomes detrimental to the team's mission. This includes knowing when to stop protecting individuals whose behavior is unethical or harmful. Jocko Willink suggests that effective leadership requires tailoring approaches to specific situations and personalities, sometimes requiring the isolation of high-performers whose behavior negatively impacts team dynamics.
Willink and Echo Charles discuss a structured approach to handling problematic behavior. They recommend starting with open-ended questions to promote self-reflection, then gradually increasing directness if the behavior persists. Documentation becomes crucial when improvement plans and warnings are necessary. Charles notes that sometimes, after extensive coaching, leaders must allow employees to face the natural consequences of their actions. This clarity about consequences often spurs self-correction in problematic team members.
The discussion emphasizes the delicate balance leaders must strike between managing individual performance and maintaining team cohesion. When dealing with high-performing but problematic employees, Willink suggests isolation strategies that allow the team to benefit from their contributions while minimizing their negative influence on team dynamics.
1-Page Summary
Leadership principles like 'Cover and Move' and 'Extreme Ownership' offer frameworks for effective team management and personal accountability. Understanding the nuances of these principles is critical for truly successful leadership.
To maximize their effectiveness, leaders need to apply leadership concepts such as Cover and Move, which involves team members supporting each other, and Extreme Ownership, where leaders take full responsibility for their actions and their team, in moderation. An overzealous application of these concepts can lead to imbalance and reduce effectiveness.
Overreliance on 'Cover and Move' can sometimes be counterproductive, particularly when it means consistently picking up the slack for teammates who aren’t pulling their weight.
Leaders must recognize the point at which covering for a toxic or underperforming team member starts to harm both the team and its mission. Continuously protecting such individuals can create resentment within the team and hamper the mission's success, as it prevents the necessary feedback and growth for the underperforming member.
Similarly, employing the 'Cover and Move' strategy in the face of unethical or harmful behavior is detrimental. This leads to the perpetuation of such behaviors and can erode the moral fabric and credibility of the team.
Effective leadership isn't one-size-fits-all – it requires tailoring strategies to suit the specific situation and the individuals ...
Leadership Principles (E.G. Cover and Move, Extreme Ownership)
The management of problematic employees and toxic team members is an essential skill in the workplace. Jocko Willink, a leadership expert, provides strategies for handling these challenging situations effectively.
Willink suggests beginning the conversation with open-ended questions to allow problem employees to reflect on their actions. These questions can target how their behavior might be perceived by others, its impact on team unity, and the potential negative effects on the mission.
If an employee does not show improvement after indirect questioning, Willink advises leader to increase the directness of counseling. This is to prevent the team from suffering negative effects.
Willink mentions that if counseling doesn't yield results, documentation of the issues should begin. This includes writing up official paperwork and involving the employee in a personnel improvement program.
There comes a point after extensive coaching and support, according to Willink, where a leader must allow the problematic employee to face the natural consequences of their actions.
Willink also speaks to the importance of clarity regarding the consequences of poor ...
Managing Problem Employees and Toxic Team Members
Feedback, counseling, and progressive discipline are vital components of effective workforce management, as discussed by Willink and supported by Echo Charles' ideas.
According to Willink, it's essential to begin addressing employee behavior with indirect, open-ended questions to promote self-reflection. He suggests asking someone if everything is okay when they've been late as a subtle way to raise awareness about their punctuality and its broader impact on the team's perception and mission achievement.
Willink emphasizes the need to become more direct in counseling if there's no behavioral improvement following an initial indirect approach. The aim is to prevent negative impacts on the team stemming from unaddressed issues. The counseling approach should escalate and become increasingly direct, clearly conveying the consequences of continued poor behavior.
While not explicitly mentioned, the conversation implies a progressive discipline path, where discussions and warnings gradually escalate and are documented before a final consequence, such as termination, is considered.
Echo Charles brings up the point of allowing an employee to experience the natural consequences of their behavior after coaching. Willink agrees, suggesting that if employees ignore warnings and coaching, they should be left to "dig their own grave" by facing the outcomes of their actions. ...
The Importance of Feedback, Counseling, and Progressive Discipline
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser
