Podcasts > Jocko Podcast > 510: The Ego Trap In Leadership. The Need To Lead Pt.2. With Dave Berke.

510: The Ego Trap In Leadership. The Need To Lead Pt.2. With Dave Berke.

By Jocko DEFCOR Network

In this episode of Jocko Podcast, Jocko Willink and Dave Berke examine core leadership principles through their military experiences. They explore how leaders must take responsibility for problems rather than making excuses, using examples from Willink's own team experiences and Berke's transition between different fighter aircraft to illustrate the importance of humility and adaptability in leadership roles.

The discussion delves into how effective leaders build resilient teams through decentralized command and delegation of authority. Drawing from their military backgrounds, Willink and Berke explain how true leadership success is measured by a team's ability to function independently, even in the leader's absence. They demonstrate how this approach creates teams that remain effective through challenges and leadership changes.

Listen to the original

510: The Ego Trap In Leadership. The Need To Lead Pt.2. With Dave Berke.

This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Oct 15, 2025 episode of the Jocko Podcast

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.

510: The Ego Trap In Leadership. The Need To Lead Pt.2. With Dave Berke.

1-Page Summary

Responsibility and Challenges of Leadership

In this episode, Jocko Willink and Dave Berke explore the fundamental aspects of leadership responsibility. Willink emphasizes that "every problem is a leadership problem," and argues that making excuses or blaming external factors only hinders problem-solving. Through personal experience, he shares how failing to acknowledge his own leadership shortcomings after losing his teammate Chris prevented him from implementing crucial changes that could have protected future team members.

Adapting To Change

The discussion shifts to the challenges of adapting to new environments. Berke shares his experience transitioning from flying F-18s and F-16s to the F-22 Raptor, where he had to completely reframe his understanding of aerial tactics. He emphasizes the importance of humility in leadership, describing how he had to accept guidance from less experienced colleagues to master the new aircraft. Similarly, Willink's transition to elk hunting demonstrates how leaders must be willing to set aside previous knowledge and learn from others with more relevant experience.

The Importance of Decentralized Command

Willink and Berke discuss how effective leaders enable their teams to function independently. Through examples from their military experience, they demonstrate that successful leadership involves delegating authority and fostering trust rather than micromanaging. Berke notes that the true test of leadership is whether a team can continue to perform effectively in the leader's absence.

The Impact and Legacy of Leadership

The conversation concludes with reflections on how a leader's influence extends beyond their immediate presence. Willink shares experiences of teams maintaining effectiveness even after losing their leaders, while Berke emphasizes that a team's ability to operate successfully without their leader is the ultimate measure of leadership success. They explore how good leadership creates resilient teams that can face adversity and continue to function effectively, even in the face of tragic events or sudden losses.

1-Page Summary

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • While every problem might have a leadership component, not all problems can be solely attributed to leadership; external factors can sometimes be significant and outside of a leader's control.
  • Acknowledging leadership shortcomings is important, but it is also critical to recognize that not all issues can be foreseen or prevented, even with the best leadership.
  • Humility is valuable in leadership, but it must be balanced with confidence and decisiveness; too much humility could undermine a leader's authority and effectiveness.
  • Learning from others is essential, but leaders also need to critically evaluate new information and not accept guidance uncritically, especially if it conflicts with proven practices or their own expertise.
  • Decentralized command is effective in many situations, but there are circumstances where a more hands-on approach may be necessary to ensure coordination and quality control.
  • While a team's ability to operate without its leader is a sign of good leadership, it is also important for leaders to be involved enough to understand the challenges their team faces and to provide support and guidance when needed.
  • The impact and legacy of a leader are important, but focusing too much on legacy can lead to ego-driven decisions that may not be in the best interest of the team or organization.
  • Resilience in teams is crucial, but overemphasizing independence and resilience might lead to a lack of support structures for individuals within the team, potentially causing burnout or failure during particularly challenging times.

Actionables

  • You can start a "No Excuse" journal to cultivate accountability by writing down daily challenges and explicitly stating how you will take responsibility for them. This practice encourages you to look inward for solutions rather than blaming external factors. For example, if a project at work is behind schedule, instead of blaming team members, write down how you could have communicated expectations more clearly or provided better support.
  • Create a "Cross-Training" initiative in your team where each member periodically shadows another role or department for a day. This fosters humility and a learning mindset, as it allows everyone to appreciate the challenges and expertise of their colleagues. For instance, a salesperson might spend a day with the product development team to understand the intricacies of the product they sell.
  • Develop a "Team Autonomy Project" where you assign a project to your team and take a step back, only intervening when absolutely necessary. This project should be designed to test and build the team's ability to function without your direct input, thereby fostering independence and resilience. You might, for example, let your team organize a community outreach event from start to finish, observing how they handle planning, delegation, and execution without your guidance.

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
510: The Ego Trap In Leadership. The Need To Lead Pt.2. With Dave Berke.

Responsibility and Challenges of Leadership, Taking Full Ownership

Jocko Willink and Dave Berke delve into the weighty subject of leadership and the necessity of assuming absolute responsibility, even in the face of unpredictability and setbacks.

Leaders Must Take Responsibility For Team Outcomes, Even Amid Unpredictability and Setbacks

Willink sets the tone with an emphatic statement: "Every problem is a leadership problem... The solution is in your own hands." He asks leaders to consider their top challenges through the lens of leadership to recognize the importance of taking ownership for team outcomes.

Avoiding Blame and Excuses Hinders Problem Solving

Willink stresses the negative impact of making excuses and blaming external factors. He illustrates that without ownership, it's easy to attribute delays and failures to external forces, which does not contribute to solving the problem. Excuses may soothe the ego and create an illusion of innocence, but they inhibit addressing and remedying underlying issues, ultimately undermining successful leadership.

Leaders Must Transparently Acknowledge Their Failures to Improve

Reflecting on his own experiences, Willink remembers how he failed to acknowledge crucial shortcomings following the death of his teammate, Chris, during combat. Willink recognizes that by attributing Chris's death to a "lucky shot" by an enemy sniper and the randomness of war, he missed opportunities to learn and make the changes necessary for preventing future tragedies. This avoidance of ownership meant he lost control, which he identifies as a critical tool in his arsenal as a leader.

Similarly, Berke discusses the balance between acknowledging that some things in combat are beyond control while still reckoning with one's failures. Even though Berke may believe that he couldn't have changed that specific tragic outcome, he admits he didn't take actions that were within his power, which could have made a difference.

Leaders Must Own and Implement Changes to Prevent Similar Tragedies

Willink introduces the principle of preemptive ownership, where leaders proactively take steps to prevent mistakes and implement measures to avoid errors before they happen. After reading his own book, "Extreme Ownership," Willink expresses regret for not taking full ownership immediately after the incident. He admits that he ignored invaluable insights, such as counter-sniper tactics that could have safeguarded his team against similar incidents.

By taking radical ownership and eliminating excuses, Willink sees the dissolution of the most significant b ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Responsibility and Challenges of Leadership, Taking Full Ownership

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • While leaders should take responsibility for team outcomes, it's also important to recognize that not all factors are within a leader's control, and a distributed responsibility model can sometimes be more effective.
  • There are situations where external factors play a significant role, and acknowledging them can be important for a realistic assessment of the situation and to inform better strategies.
  • Transparency about failures is important, but there must be a balance to maintain morale and credibility; sometimes, discretion can be as valuable as transparency.
  • While owning and implementing changes to prevent tragedies is crucial, it's also necessary to understand that not all tragedies can be prevented, despite best efforts.
  • Preemptive ownership is valuable, but over-preparation can lead to analysis paralysis or resource misallocation if not managed properly.
  • Radical ownership can sometimes lead to burnout or an unhealthy sense of personal failure in leaders if not tempered with self-compassion and realistic expectations.
  • Listening to others is important, bu ...

Actionables

  • Start a personal "ownership journal" to reflect on daily decisions and outcomes. Each evening, write down key decisions you made that day, the outcomes they led to, and how you took responsibility for those outcomes. This practice encourages self-awareness and accountability, helping you recognize patterns in your decision-making and their effects on your life.
  • Create a "no excuses" challenge with a friend or colleague where you hold each other accountable for a week. During this time, if either of you starts to make an excuse or shift blame, the other person gently points it out. This can help build a habit of taking responsibility and looking for solutions rather than excuses.
  • Implement a monthly "preemptive planning" sess ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
510: The Ego Trap In Leadership. The Need To Lead Pt.2. With Dave Berke.

Adapting To Change: Learning New Skills and Mindsets

Changing environments and new challenges often require leaders to adapt by learning new skills and altering their mindsets. Dave Berke and Jocko Willink's experiences demonstrate the necessity for leaders to embrace humility and flexibility in the face of change.

Expertise Can Hinder New Approach Challenges

Individuals like Dave Berke find that their past experiences, while valuable, can become liabilities in new contexts. Their ingrained habits and instincts may not simply transfer over to different situations. Berke acknowledged the difficulty in transitioning from flying F-18 and F-16 fighter jets to the F-22 Raptor, stating that his usual tactics and skills proved ineffective with the newer jet's unique stealth capabilities.

Leaders Must Discard Biases and Reframe Understanding to Excel In New Situations

For Berke, mastering the F-22 demanded discarding previous biases and reframing his understanding of aerial tactics. The stealth functionality of the Raptor required a fresh perspective on flying where invisibility was prioritized over the visibility tactics of his former jets.

Humility Is Vital; Leaders Must Accept Guidance From Less Experienced Individuals

Berke emphasizes the importance of humility, mentioning having to accept guidance from younger and less experienced colleagues. This openness to learning was key to his adaptation and eventual success as the commander of the F-22 division. Similarly, Jocko Willink's transition from military operations to hunting elk demonstrated the need to disregard previous knowledge that didn't apply to his new pursuit and to value the insights from others more experienced in that area.

Leaders Must Overcome Biases and Ego to Embrace Change and ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

Adapting To Change: Learning New Skills and Mindsets

Additional Materials

Clarifications

  • The F-18, F-16, and F-22 are all different models of fighter jets used by the United States military. Each jet has unique capabilities and specifications tailored for specific combat roles. Pilots need to adapt their tactics and skills ...

Counterarguments

  • While adapting to change is important, leaders also need to balance new learning with the wisdom of past experiences, which can provide valuable insights and prevent repeating past mistakes.
  • Past experiences should not always be viewed as liabilities; they can also serve as a foundation upon which new skills and strategies are built, enhancing a leader's ability to adapt effectively.
  • Discarding biases is important, but it's also crucial to critically evaluate which aspects of one's understanding and expertise remain relevant in new situations, as not all previous knowledge is obsolete.
  • While humility is important, leaders must also maintain confidence in their abilities to guide their teams through change, ensuring that they do not undervalue their own expertise.
  • Accepting guidance from less experienced individuals is valuable, but leaders must also ensure that the advice is sound and aligns with the broader goals and strategies of the organization.
  • Overcoming biases and ego is a nuanced process; leaders must balance openness to change with the discernment to recognize when established methods and pract ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
510: The Ego Trap In Leadership. The Need To Lead Pt.2. With Dave Berke.

The Importance of Decentralized Command and Empowering Teams

Jocko Willink and Dave Berke discuss the essential concept of decentralized command in leadership, emphasizing how effective leaders enable their teams to thrive and decide independently, even in their absence.

Effective Leaders Enable Teams to Thrive and Decide Independently, Even When Absent

Willink and Berke stress that a leader's job is to prepare their team to outlast them by giving them the authority to perform their tasks independently and make decisions. By setting up a combat outpost and leaving the SEALs there while they went back to prepare for other tasks, Willink showcased decentralized command in action.

Delegating Authority and Instilling Ownership Build Resilience and Adaptability

Willink observes decentralized command as a proactive action taken by leaders. He notes the success of a team that managed itself in the absence of its leader, demonstrating that the leader had empowered the team to make decisions and act independently. Berke emphasizes the importance for a team to function without its leader, who might be absent at unexpected times.

Leaders Should Avoid Micromanaging and Foster Trust

The conversation highlights the negative consequences of micromanagement and lack of trust within a company. Leaders who do not listen to the fresh ideas of young employees are not empowering them to thrive. This lack of trust can lead to new hires feeling undervalued and considering leaving because their input is not taken into account.

Decentralized Command Ensures Team Succes ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The Importance of Decentralized Command and Empowering Teams

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • While decentralized command can foster independence, it may not be suitable for all types of decisions or teams, especially where specialized knowledge or clear hierarchical decision-making is crucial.
  • Delegating authority requires a balance; too much autonomy can lead to a lack of cohesion and inconsistent decision-making across different parts of an organization.
  • In some cases, micromanagement is a necessary evil, especially when dealing with inexperienced team members who require close guidance to perform tasks correctly.
  • Trust must be earned and can be a risk if not paired with proper oversight mechanisms, as it may lead to complacency or abuse of power.
  • Decentralized command assumes that all team members have the same level of commitment and understa ...

Actionables

  • You can start a "decision diary" to track and reflect on the choices you make when leading a team. This diary would be a personal log where you jot down the decisions you delegate, the outcomes, and your reflections on the process. Over time, you'll see patterns in your delegation style and learn where you can improve or where you've succeeded in empowering your team.
  • Implement a "team autonomy day" where you step back and let your team run without your input for a day. This could be a set day each month where you are hands-off, and team members are encouraged to make decisions and solve problems independently. Afterward, have a debrief session to discuss what went well and what challenges arose, using this as a learning experience for both you and the team.
  • Create a peer mentorship program ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free
510: The Ego Trap In Leadership. The Need To Lead Pt.2. With Dave Berke.

The Impact and Legacy of a Leader's Influence

Jocko Willink and Dave Berke reflect on the profound impact a leader has on their team, and how a leader’s true influence is revealed when they are no longer present.

A Leader's Impact Is Measured by Their Team's Performance in Their Absence

Leadership qualities are often tested in extreme situations, such as in combat, where the sudden loss of a team member can significantly impact the group.

Leader's Influence Revealed by Sudden Losses

Willink recounts a situation in which the team had to contend with the distressing event of a team member's injury and death. He discusses the steadiness of a Marine captain known as "Simple," whose ability to keep his emotions in check positively influenced his team during a crisis.

The effectiveness of a team in the face of such emotional trials, as showcased during unexpected events such as the deaths of the first SEAL and Anglico Marine in Iraq, reflects the depth of impact a leader has on the group. Willink and Berke speak to the idea that "good leadership outlasts the leader," illustrating the resilience of a well-developed team even in the absence of its leader. They explore the experiences of teams that continued to function effectively after a sudden loss, exemplified by a team that managed operations despite the emotional toll following the unexpected death of their leader, Jack.

Team's Effectiveness in Rallying Reflects Leader's Development Skills

Berke notes how his team's successful operation without him would be the ultimate measure of his performance as a leader, emphasizing the importance of developing a squad that can work independently. When discussing his experiences, Berke also comments on the emotional impact leaders face when losing a team member.

Willink shares a poignant instance when his teammate Chris was shot, highlighting the leader's feeling of devastation and responsibility for choices that may lead to tragic events. Such is the weight of a leader's decisions, which can sometimes lead to losses that test the leader's influence on the ...

Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary

Registered users get access to the Full Podcast Summary and Additional Materials. It’s easy and free!
Start your free trial today

The Impact and Legacy of a Leader's Influence

Additional Materials

Counterarguments

  • The measurement of a leader's impact by the team's performance in their absence might oversimplify leadership effectiveness, as it doesn't account for the unique dynamics and challenges that can arise when a leader is no longer present.
  • Sudden losses can reveal a team's immediate response but may not fully reflect the long-term influence of a leader, as teams may eventually adapt or change in ways that are not aligned with the leader's original influence.
  • The idea that good leadership outlasts the leader could be challenged by the notion that new leadership can bring necessary change and adaptation that the previous leader could not have instilled.
  • A team's effectiveness in rallying might reflect not only the leader's development skills but also the individual team members' resilience, adaptability, and other qualities that may not be directly attributable to the leader.
  • The concept ...

Actionables

  • You can foster team resilience by simulating unexpected scenarios during regular meetings. Start by dedicating a portion of your team meetings to role-playing exercises where you step back and let team members lead the discussion and decision-making process. For example, create a "What if?" segment where you present a hypothetical challenge, like a key team member being unavailable, and have the team brainstorm and decide on a course of action without your input.
  • Encourage team members to cross-train in each other's roles. Set up a buddy system where each person pairs up with another team member to learn about their responsibilities and tasks. This not only prepares the team for sudden losses but also promotes a deeper understanding of the team's collective goals and challenges.
  • Implement a "leader ...

Get access to the context and additional materials

So you can understand the full picture and form your own opinion.
Get access for free

Create Summaries for anything on the web

Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser

Shortform Extension CTA