In this episode of I Will Teach You To Be Rich, financial advisor Ramit Sethi helps a high-net-worth couple struggling with financial stress. Despite having $1.35 million in net worth, Chris and Natalie face challenges stemming from their different financial backgrounds, overspending habits, and communication issues around money.
The episode explores how their relationship with their financial advisor has created an imbalance in their partnership, with one spouse being excluded from financial discussions. Sethi examines their investment strategies, discusses the impact of their current advisor's fees, and guides them toward developing a shared financial vision. The couple's journey includes addressing emotional blocks around money and implementing practical solutions like automatic savings transfers to help align their financial goals.

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
Financial advisor Ramit Sethi discusses the case of Chris and Natalie, a high-net-worth couple experiencing financial stress despite having $1.35 million in net worth. The couple overspends by $3,000 monthly, with fixed costs consuming 81% of their income. Their savings are minimal at $33,850, and they lack a consistent emergency fund system.
Their financial attitudes stem from their distinct upbringings: Chris comes from a wealthy but frugal background, while Natalie grew up in a lower-middle-class household with a single mother. These different money mindsets have created communication barriers in their relationship.
The couple's relationship with their financial advisor, Leonard, has created an imbalance. Leonard communicates exclusively with Chris, marginalizing Natalie from financial discussions. Ramit Sethi points out that their advisor's 1% fee could amount to $400,000 over 20 years. While the couple actively contributes to investments, including an ESOP, Sethi questions their strategy of prioritizing long-term investments over short-term liquidity.
Ramit Sethi emphasizes the importance of developing a shared financial vision. He challenges the couple to think beyond their current scarcity mindset, noting their potential to reach $6.3 million in wealth. Sethi encourages them to view money as a tool for possibility rather than just bill payment, suggesting they could benefit from automatic savings transfers to help unify their financial goals.
Chris tends to emotionally withdraw during financial crises, becoming "zombie-like" and focused solely on fixing problems. Ramit Sethi recommends therapy to help Chris develop better coping strategies. Meanwhile, Natalie feels excluded from investment decisions. The couple has begun addressing these issues through therapy sessions and is working to make their financial planning more collaborative, including setting up monthly auto-deposits into savings.
1-Page Summary
Chris and Natalie, a high net worth couple, face significant financial stress and conflict despite a sizable gross income and assets. Their current economic challenges and spending habits are inextricably tied to their upbringings.
Ramit Sethi brings to light that Chris and Natalie spend $3,000 more per month than they make, possibly leading to financial instability in about ten months. Despite an impressive net worth of $1,350,118 with $893,500 in assets and $634,624 in investments, liquidity is a concern, as they hover around $33,850 in savings.
Their fixed monthly costs, which make up 81% of their income, present a significant burden. These costs include daycare expenses of $2,000, a mortgage payment of the same amount, insurance around $1,000, groceries at $1,118, as well as payments for gas, clothes, phones, and subscriptions.
The couple's approach to savings is hesitant and inconsistent. They have no formal allocation of their income toward savings, and any savings contributions are sporadic, usually amounting to $100-$200 quarterly. They discuss the need for a solid emergency fund, but the amount in this fund fluctuates. While they hold $23,000, which is about three months of savings, Sethi advises against dipping into it regularly. He stresses the importance of maintaining an emergency fund and establishing a fund for house maintenance given their home's age.
Financial stresses, such as the necessity for continuous repairs on their 1970s home and the high cost of living, lead Chris to withdraw and push for household austerity measures, especially around year-end. The couple admits to padding their end-of-year finances with bonuses and tax returns but also acknowledges their high burn rate and a lack of cash on hand.
Chris's background is defined by a frugal mindset despite having access to wealth. Discussions on finance within his family centered on responsible spending, such as investing only in a house, a business, or education. Chris's skepticism towards spending is rooted in this upbringing, as he associates expenses with the number of workdays required to af ...
The Couple's Current Financial Situation and Spending/Saving Habits
Chris and Natalie face an imbalance with their financial advisor, Leonard, resulting in an expensive and disconnected investment strategy that they are now reconsidering.
Leonard, who has been Chris's financial advisor since his teenage years, has also served the financial advisory needs of his parents and grandmother. After marrying Chris, Natalie attempted to get involved in the financial advising process but has felt continuously excluded.
All communications regarding financial matters, such as emails and updates, are directed to Chris, never to Natalie, despite her efforts to be included. Natalie has never met Leonard and was unaware of his visit, making her feel marginalized and disrespected in the financial discussions.
Caller #1, presumably Chris, was under the impression that the advisor fees from Leonard were around $500 a year. However, discussions with Ramit Sethi point to calculations that suggest the 1% assets under management fee could round up to approximately $400,000 over the next 20 years, amounting to a significant $1,666 per month. Ramit criticizes the idea of paying such AUM fees.
Implicit in the conversation is the couple's decision to part ways with Leonard as their financial advisor. This change is seen as part of improving their financial situation and engaging with a more suitable investment strategy.
The couple has actively been contributing to an ESOP and other investments with the intent of creating significant long-term wealth.
...
Financial Advisor's Role and Investment Strategy Impact
Chris and Natalie are working to define and realize their "Rich Life," but they have not openly discussed their financial desires and needs.
Ramit Sethi emphasizes the importance of a shared financial vision for couples, pointing out that clear logic and reasoning should underpin financial decisions. He encourages open discussions about finances, but notes that relevant information about the couple's specific ideas for a "Rich Life" was not provided.
Natalie expresses a desire to focus on goals for themselves after ensuring their children's needs are met. Ramit illustrates the importance of this vision, particularly discussing how Chris and Natalie are treating money with a scarcity mindset despite being on track to have a significant sum in the future. He suggests that changing their mindset about money and understanding how to manage it effectively is crucial for their financial health, as simply inheriting money doesn't equip them with these skills.
Ramit challenges the couple to think beyond minor financial disputes and consider the larger financial picture, potentially reaching 6.3 million dollars. He encourages the couple to use money as a tool for possibility and empowerment, rather than just a means to pay bills.
Defining and Working Towards Their "Rich Life" Vision
Financial guru Ramit Sethi addresses the challenges faced by a couple, Chris and Natalie, as they navigate emotional distress and communication barriers related to their financial life.
Big unexpected expenses cause Chris to emotionally collapse, leading to prolonged stress and withdrawal from family life. He becomes "zombie-like," focusing solely on fixing financial problems, sometimes spiraling into concern if the issue cannot be resolved with hands-on efforts.
Ramit notes words such as "hurt" and "catastrophizing" used by Chris, suggesting significant emotional strain. Seeing that money issues trigger deep emotional reactions, Ramit suggests therapy or coaching might help Chris to progress through such events more constructively, addressing both the psychological and numerical aspects of their finances.
The emotional distance created by Chris during financial crises causes Natalie to feel the absence of her partner, putting strain on their relationship. However, they've started biweekly therapy sessions, where they seem more at ease, working on improving communication and managing their financial fears together.
Natalie, feeling excluded from financial conversations, especially regarding investments, wants to increase her involvement and knowledge.
Ramit encourages Natalie to ask Chris about financial decisions, like maintaining a $10,000 cushion in their account, and to feel included in discussions. It is essential for Natalie to engage meaningfully in investment discussions. Ramit stresses the importance of making finances a shared and collaborative aspect of t ...
Improving Communication and Overcoming Emotional Blocks Around Money
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser
