In this episode of Hidden Brain, researcher George Bonanno and host Shankar Vedantam examine how people respond to grief and trauma. Through personal stories and research findings, they explore different patterns of coping with major life setbacks, revealing that resilience—a quick return to healthy functioning after temporary distress—is more common than previously believed.
The episode challenges popular beliefs about grief and trauma, including the theory of grief stages and the effectiveness of trigger warnings. Bonanno introduces the concept of the "resilience blind spot," explaining why people often struggle to recognize their capacity for recovery while experiencing distress. The discussion also addresses how positive emotions can naturally occur after significant losses and their connection to mental health outcomes.
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
Through personal accounts, the podcast explores how individuals respond differently to grief and trauma. George Bonanno shares his experience of unexpected peace following his father's death, while Julia's quick return to normalcy after losing her father concerned her mother. In another case, Jed showed remarkable resilience after losing his leg in a traumatic accident, surprising both himself and others with his ability to cope.
Researchers, led by George Bonanno, have identified several common patterns in how people respond to major life setbacks. These include "chronic grief," where individuals experience prolonged distress, "recovery," which involves gradual return to baseline functioning, and "delayed onset," showing gradual worsening of symptoms over time.
The most common pattern, "resilience," involves only temporary distress before returning to healthy functioning. Bonanno's research reveals that this pattern is more prevalent than previously thought. For example, during the COVID-19 pandemic, contrary to expectations, studies showed that people remained largely resilient, with suicide rates either staying consistent or declining globally.
George Bonanno and host Shankar Vedantam discuss how popular beliefs about grief often conflict with research findings. Bonanno explains that the widely accepted theory of grief stages lacks empirical support and may actually harm individuals who don't follow the expected pattern.
The discussion challenges common practices like trigger warnings, which Bonanno suggests may be unhelpful or even increase anxiety. He introduces the concept of the "resilience blind spot," describing people's difficulty in anticipating their eventual recovery while experiencing distress.
Bonanno's research also reveals that positive emotions and behaviors, such as genuine laughter and smiling, can occur naturally even after significant losses and are associated with better mental health outcomes. This finding challenges the assumption that prolonged suffering is a necessary part of the grieving process.
1-Page Summary
This article explores the intricate and often unpredictable nature of coping with grief and trauma through personal accounts.
The experiences shared demonstrate the varied responses individuals have to profound loss and physical trauma.
George Bonanno's father, despite his hard work, battled depression and severe health issues, including heart attacks and diabetes. Bonanno recounts leaving home at 17 with haunting final words from his father: "Don't come crawling back." Years later, at 23 and living in Colorado, Bonanno received the call of his father's passing. Unsure of how to feel, having never encountered such loss, Bonanno entered a state of peaceful silence instead of the anticipated tears and sorrow. He returned to work almost immediately, which worried his colleagues, who believed he wasn't allowing himself time to grieve. Nonetheless, Bonanno found his own way to cope and consulted his deceased father during imaginary conversations in his building’s elevator, addressing current challenges like parenthood and money matters.
Julia, a college student, was thrown into a state of shock and intense distress when she was informed about her own father's death following a tragic car accident. Despite the initial upheaval, Julia soon redirected her focus to her studies and social circle, avoiding discussions about her loss. This behavior raised alarms for her mother, who worried Julia was in denial and not properly grieving. Acting on this concern, her mother suggested grief counseling. Julia complied, attending sessions that were covered by insurance, yet she only did so to appease her mother and her mother remained disturbed by her daughter’s seemingly swif ...
Personal Experiences With Grief and Trauma
Researchers, including George Bonanno, have been exploring the various patterns of human response to challenging life events and trauma.
The study of responses to adversity like mass tragedies or personal loss has led to the identification of several common patterns which people follow in coping with these setbacks.
Bonanno defines "chronic grief" as a state in which an individual experiences symptoms of grief for an extended period — months or even years — and struggles to function normally. This form of grief, affecting about one in ten people, can impede abilities to think, concentrate, and maintain closeness with others.
Another recognized pattern is "recovery," where individuals start with high levels of distress and symptoms, which then gradually diminish over one to two years until they return to their pre-adversity state of functioning.
The "delayed onset" pattern signifies a trajectory where individuals seem to function adequately initially but then slowly experience worsening symptoms, eventually reaching a threshold of noticeable suffering. Contrary to popular belief, the onset is not sudden; this pattern involves a gradual decline.
"Resilience" is identified as the most common pattern and involves only temporary distress before returning to a state of healthy functioning. Research now suggests that this pattern is not rare as previously thought and does not indicate denial; most people exhibit resilience by managing to return to their normal lives after a period of upheaval. Bonanno's personal experience of relief and peace following his father's death exemplifies such resilience — a reaction that was not as fragile as others might have expected. Similarly, instances of less inte ...
Patterns of Response to Adversity
George Bonanno, alongside host Shankar Vedantam, discusses the disparity between research on grief and trauma and the prevailing cultural narratives that often pathologize common human experiences.
George Bonanno explains that the theory of grief stages, formulated by Elizabeth Kubler-Ross, lacks empirical support. Originally meant to describe the process of one's own death acceptance, the stages have been inaccurately appropriated by others to fit loss bereavement models. Bonanno's research contradicts this staged theory, highlighting that people cope with grief in varied and idiosyncratic ways. He notes that insisting on a specific sequence of stages may harm individuals who do not conform to this pattern, as society often incorrectly views deviations from the theory as unhealthy coping.
Bonanno asserts that the cultural expectation to exhibit grief in a certain manner can lead some people to believe that if they do not adhere to the stages, they are not properly honoring their loved ones or are subject to unhealthy coping. These societal pressures may stem from media and societal expectations which link trauma and grief to lasting mental health issues.
According to Shankar Vedantam, societal expectations have evolved to a point where exposure to certain adverse experiences, such as traumatic fairy tales, is seen to potentially cause lasting mental harm. Bonanno argues that the growing prevalence of diagnoses for grief and trauma may be attributed to books and media emphasizing the severity of these conditions. Moreover, therapists may overgeneralize the frequency of trauma because their clinical practice is not reflective of the general population.
Bonanno and Vedantam discuss trigger warnings, which are used widely in educational and media settings based on the assumption that people harbor unresolved traumas. However, Bonanno suggests this is an inaccurate belief, and research on trigger warnings has demonstrated that they may be unhelpful or exacerbate anxiety, further fostering the misconception that intense emotional responses equate to psychopathology.
The swift recovery observed in many individuals after tragedies like 9/11 contradicts the idea that intense emotional reactions are signs of psychopathology. Patricia Resick's statement, "Strong emotions do not equal psychopathology," supports the notion that it is normal to experience strong reactions to trauma without it indicating a men ...
Research vs. Cultural Narratives on Grief and Trauma
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser