In this episode of Creating Confidence with Heather Monahan, negotiation experts Chris Voss, Alex Carter, and Molly Fletcher share strategies for effective negotiation that go beyond tactics and counteroffers. They emphasize that successful negotiation depends on building strong relationships, understanding the other party's perspective, and asking the right questions to uncover true needs and concerns.
The conversation covers several practical techniques, including the use of open-ended questions that begin with "tell me," the strategic value of triggering "no" responses to help people feel in control, and the power of silence in negotiations. Fletcher and Voss particularly stress how pausing—whether for seconds or weeks—demonstrates confidence and often leads the other party to make concessions. Throughout the discussion, the experts highlight that thorough preparation and genuine listening are essential foundations that enable negotiators to use these techniques effectively.

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
Negotiation experts emphasize that success depends on building rapport, understanding perspectives, and asking the right questions—not just tactics and offers.
Molly Fletcher stresses that negotiation is fundamentally a conversation where strong relationships drive better and faster outcomes. She explains that approaching negotiation relationally rather than transactionally leads to healthier connections and future opportunities. Fletcher shares that stronger relationships with industry contacts consistently resulted in more effective deals throughout her career as an agent.
Chris Voss echoes this, noting that adversarial tactics can damage future opportunities. He explains that maintaining professionalism and respect is crucial, even in high-stakes situations like hostage negotiations. When people feel understood and cared for, they're more likely to feel satisfied even without major concessions. Alex Carter demonstrates how leveraging existing relationships and building trust-based networks can effectively mobilize groups and close deals. Heather Monahan emphasizes that negotiation is ultimately rooted in deepening and leveraging all types of relationships.
Voss advises that the biggest mistake negotiators make is not hearing the other side out first. He notes that listening calmly and empathetically, even adjusting vocal tone to a calming cadence, can resolve most issues before they escalate.
Alex Carter advocates replacing yes/no questions with open-ended prompts starting with "tell me." These conversational commands prompt people to share more information. Carter cites research showing that 93 percent of negotiators fail to ask the right questions to maximize deal value, and using "tell me" places negotiators in the top 7 percent who do. Fletcher reiterates that discovering what matters most comes from genuine preparation and active listening, which uncovers real concerns and forges deeper connections.
Chris Voss and Heather Monahan discuss techniques that deepen understanding and build genuine rapport through strategic questions that make the other party feel understood.
Voss argues that traditional "yes momentum" backfires by violating people's sense of autonomy. Instead, triggering a "no" response can be more productive. He intentionally asks questions like "Is this a bad idea?" because when people reply "no," they feel safe and in control, allowing them to be candid about concerns.
Monahan clarifies that this works because saying no allows the other person to take ownership, often leading them to defend the merits of the idea. Voss adds that after a "no," people are much more likely to reveal their true objections, providing invaluable information. He gives an example of suggesting potential clients might be better off with competitors—if they're committed, they'll explain why his team is the right choice, and if not, he can end the conversation respectfully.
Voss stresses the power of summarizing the other side's position until their only possible response is "That's right." This thorough summarization demonstrates empathy and validation. He considers this emotional validation a tremendous advantage in negotiations, crediting his hostage negotiation background for teaching him to always hear out the other side first using a calm tone and full listening.
Pausing during negotiations is a powerful yet often overlooked tactic that both Molly Fletcher and Chris Voss emphasize.
Fletcher identifies failing to pause as the biggest negotiation mistake. Silence demonstrates firmness and comfort with one's position. She shares a story where she paused for a minute and a half after making an ask, resisting the urge to make unnecessary concessions, which ultimately secured the deal. Voss builds on this, noting that in high-stakes negotiations, remaining silent after the other side speaks often leads them to make the concessions you desire.
Both negotiators agree that silence is critical thinking time, allowing the other side to reflect and often fill the void with information or concessions. Fletcher likens it to handing over a medicine ball—let the other side hold it.
Fletcher discusses the courage needed to pause confidently. A pause can last minutes, days, or weeks, signaling that the negotiator stands firm.
Preparation is key to pausing confidently. Fletcher emphasizes doing extensive work in advance—understanding needs, building relationships, and clearly communicating positions. When negotiators have settled all groundwork, they can pause without feeling pressured to fill the void or make concessions. More preparation equips negotiators to handle unpredictable turns and gives them confidence to let silence do its work.
1-Page Summary
Negotiation experts stress that success depends on more than just tactics and offers. Building rapport, understanding perspectives, and asking the right questions are essential for favorable outcomes and lasting relationships.
Molly Fletcher highlights that negotiation is essentially a conversation and that strong relationships drive better and faster outcomes. She emphasizes that approaching negotiation from a relational perspective, instead of a purely transactional one, leads to healthier, ongoing connections and opportunities for future deals. Fletcher recounts her own experiences as an agent, where stronger connections with manufacturers' reps, network executives, or athletic directors resulted in faster and more effective deals. She notes that trust becomes especially crucial when clients rely on her to navigate life-changing decisions within their finite careers. Maintaining connections within her industry allowed her to consistently serve her clients’ best interests over time.
Chris Voss echoes this, noting that using anger or adversarial tactics plants negative seeds in relationships—something that can come back to harm future opportunities. He explains that in high-stakes negotiations, such as hostage situations, all parties are repeat players in their environments. Maintaining professionalism and respect can lead to mutual esteem, as shown by a sociopathic hostage-taker later congratulating Voss on his skillful negotiation despite losing. Voss adds that when people feel understood and cared for, they are more likely to feel satisfied, even absent big concessions. Safety and trust are foundational; once established, only then can negotiators sincerely discuss needs and reach meaningful agreements.
Alex Carter demonstrates how leveraging existing relationships and building networks of “captains” in communities can mobilize large groups effectively, emphasizing the importance of strong, trust-based connections for spreading a message or closing deals. Heather Monahan sums up that the art of negotiation is rooted in deepening and leveraging all types of relationships—personal, professional, or otherwise.
Chris Voss advises that the biggest mistake negotiators make is not hearing the other side out first. In both business and personal life, listening calmly and empathetically resolves most issues before they escalate. He notes neuroscience shows that even changes in tonal voice—like the calming cadence of a late-night FM DJ—can reframe conversations and reduce tension substantially, with many disputes calming down if this technique is used from the outset.
Alex Carter advocates replacing yes/no questions with open-ended prompts starting with "tell ...
Rapport Building and Understanding Perspectives In Negotiation
Chris Voss and Heather Monahan discuss negotiation techniques that deepen understanding and build genuine rapport. They emphasize the importance of asking strategic questions and making the other party feel understood rather than maneuvered into agreement.
Voss argues that the traditional "yes momentum"—pushing people to say yes through micro-agreements—backfires by violating their sense of autonomy. He explains that when people feel trapped into saying yes, they often resent the process and the relationship suffers. Instead, triggering a "no" response can be far more productive. Voss and his team intentionally ask questions like "Is this a bad idea?" or "Are you against doing this?" rather than "Does this look like something that would work for you?" When people reply "no," they feel safe and in control, which allows them to be candid about any concerns.
Monahan clarifies that this approach works because saying no allows the other person to take ownership, and often they begin defending the merits of the idea. Voss adds that after a "no," people are much more likely to lay out their true objections or problems with the proposal, which provides invaluable information for moving the conversation forward. This candidness stems from the feeling that they are not being pushed or trapped into commitment.
Voss gives another example: if a potential client calls his company, he might list major competitors and suggest the caller might be better off working with them. If the potential client is committed, they offer reasons why Voss’s team is the right choice. This allows Voss to gauge their level of commitment or get clarity on their intentions. If it's not a fit, he’s quick to end the conversation respectfully, preserving goodwill and efficiency.
Voss also stresses the power of summarizing the other side’s position as a technique to build connection. He coaches his te ...
Strategic Questioning to Gather Information and Build Connection
Pausing during negotiations is a powerful tactic that both Molly Fletcher and Chris Voss emphasize as essential yet often overlooked. Mastering the art of silence and patience can lead to breakthroughs and yield superior outcomes.
Molly Fletcher identifies the biggest mistake in negotiation as failing to pause. She asserts that silence sends a strong message—demonstrating firmness in one's position and signaling that negotiators are comfortable with where they stand. Fletcher illustrates its impact with a story: during a phone negotiation, she paused after making the ask. The silence stretched to a minute and a half, becoming uncomfortable for even her husband listening in. Yet, the other party eventually broke the silence, agreed to the deal, and emailed over the term sheet. Fletcher notes that in that prolonged silence, there was ample opportunity for her to make unnecessary concessions, but holding the pause helped secure the outcome she wanted.
Chris Voss builds on this idea, sharing that in high-stakes negotiations—even with hostile and dangerous parties—remaining silent after the other side speaks often leads them to make the concessions or offers you desire. If you simply hear them out and then "shut up," they often give you an answer you want.
Both negotiators agree that silence is not merely empty space; it is critical thinking time. It allows the other side to reflect and, often, to fill the silence with information, concessions, or even acceptance of your terms. Fletcher likens it to handing over a medicine ball in a workout—let the other side hold it and "feel that you mean it."
Exercising patience is closely linked with successful pauses in negotiation. Fletcher talks about the courage and confidence needed to pause: negotiation is a conversation, but that conversation doesn’t have to be continuous. A pause can last minutes, days, or weeks, and it often signals t ...
Leveraging the Power Of Pausing In Negotiation
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser
