In this episode of Creating Confidence with Heather Monahan, guest Katherine Morgan Schafler details five distinct types of perfectionism and how they manifest: Classic perfectionists are structured and reliable, Parisian perfectionists focus on relationships, Messy perfectionists excel in ideation, Procrastinator perfectionists wait for ideal conditions, and Intense perfectionists maintain unwavering focus on goals.
The discussion examines how society views perfectionism through gender and cultural lenses, using examples like Martha Stewart and Serena Williams to illustrate these dynamics. Schafler and Monahan also explore strategies for managing perfectionist tendencies, including the practice of self-compassion and the importance of reframing negative thought patterns. They emphasize how support groups can help perfectionists understand their shared experiences and maintain perspective during challenging moments.

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
Experts Schafler and Monahan explore perfectionism as a complex trait that can be both empowering and destructive. According to Schafler, perfectionism manifests in several distinct types: "Classic" perfectionists are reliable and structured but can be impersonal; "Parisian" perfectionists prioritize meaningful relationships over achievements; "Messy" perfectionists excel in ideation but struggle with follow-through; "Procrastinator" perfectionists wait for ideal conditions, often becoming paralyzed by fear; and "Intense" perfectionists maintain laser focus on objectives but risk social isolation.
Schafler discusses how society judges perfectionism differently based on gender and cultural factors. While men are often celebrated for their ambition, women face criticism unless their perfectionism aligns with traditional feminine roles. She uses Martha Stewart as an example, noting that Stewart's perfectionism is accepted because it manifests through homemaking. Additionally, Schafler points out how racial factors influence these perceptions, citing Serena Williams's experiences of being penalized for displaying drive and assertiveness in tennis.
Schafler and Monahan emphasize three key components for managing perfectionism: self-kindness, recognizing common humanity, and mindfulness. They suggest that perfectionists should approach their struggles with empathy rather than criticism. Monahan highlights how sharing experiences in support groups can help combat feelings of isolation. Schafler adds that mindfulness helps perfectionists maintain perspective beyond moments of perceived failure, and advocates for reframing perfectionist behaviors in more empathetic terms, such as viewing "attention-seeking" as "connection-seeking" behaviors.
1-Page Summary
In a nuanced discussion on the nature of perfectionism, experts Schafler and Monahan explore the concept’s power, potential for destruction, and varied manifestations in people's lives.
Perfectionism is not a monolithic trait, but rather one that Schafler sees as an enduring identity marker, like being a romantic or an activist. It can be empowering when it taps into the cognitive ability of envisioning ideals, yet destructive if the reasons and methods of striving towards those ideals are hurtful to oneself or others.
Schafler points out that "classic" perfectionists are the pillars of reliability and structure. They follow through on their commitments and are known for their meticulous nature. However, their pursuit of perfection and focus on task completion may sometimes come across as impersonal or transactional. They are valued for what they do rather than for their ability to make deeper personal connections.
Unlike the classic type, the "Parisian" perfectionist measures success not by achievements, but by the quality of their relationships and connections. They seek the most engaging conversations and meaningful, deep connections with others, striving to be their best selves in their personal interactions.
"Messy" perfectionists abound with creative ideas and possess little anxiety about starting new ventures. However, their struggle arises with the monotony and persistence required to continue past the initial, exciting phases of a project — they may lose interest or become disillusioned when instant results do not manifest.
The Different Types and Expressions of Perfectionism
Schafler discusses how perceptions of perfectionism are influenced by gender and cultural factors, leading to double standards in how ambition and assertiveness are judged in different contexts.
Schafler argues that when women express power and ambition they often face significant pushback, especially if their drive falls outside traditional "homemaker" domains.
In contrast to men who are celebrated for the same traits, ambitious and powerful women who express perfectionism often face criticism. Schafler uses Martha Stewart as an example, noting that her perfectionism is largely accepted and even admired because it manifests through traditional femininity, such as homemaking.
Homemaking, as an expression of ambition, like the cases of Martha Stewart and Marie Kondo, doesn’t garner the same negative scrutiny as other forms of ambition. Schafler suggests that this is because such expressions of perfectionism fit within accepted and traditional female roles.
Stewart’s perfectionism, which focuses on areas like weddings, color palettes, and social gatherings, is seen as less threatening and therefore not discouraged. Conversely, Schafler notes, women who exhibit ambition in areas less tradition ...
Gendered and Cultural Aspects of Perfectionism Perception
Understanding the role of self-compassion and reframing negative thoughts is crucial for those who grapple with perfectionism. Empathy, connections, and mindfulness offer a path to healthier self-perspectives and coping strategies.
Perfectionists are urged to reframe self-criticism as self-kindness and to recognize their shared humanity with others to mitigate feelings of isolation. Mindfulness practices further broaden their focus, helping to regulate responses to failure.
Katherine Morgan Schafler implies the need for self-kindess by urging perfectionists to assess whether their pursuit of faultlessness is causing self-harm. Self-compassion involves moving towards one’s own discomfort with empathy—understanding and addressing the pain with kindness rather than self-judgment. After an event like a bad meeting, one should acknowledge the embarrassment and pain they feel without sinking into negative self-talk.
Schafler and Heather Monahan discuss facing discomfort and fear as commonalities that bond people, allowing perfectionists to understand they are not alone. Schafler expresses that understanding that others experience similar struggles reduces feelings of isolation—a symptom of a narcissistic mindset—and encourages openness about taboo topics. Monahan highlights that experiences considered unique are often common, exemplified by support groups providing a space for discussion and connection.
Furthermore, Schafler suggests that realizing one's worth is immutable and unrelated to life events can cultivate connections and diminish isolation. Recognizing common humanity in struggles like domestic violence and suicide, which are common but stigmatized, helps individuals realize they are part of a shared narrative.
Schafler delineates mindfulness as the ability to recognize a negative experience—such as an embarrassing moment—while understanding that this is not the full scope of one's emotions. By asking oneself about the broader range of feelings beyond the immediate response, one can remember they are a complex human ...
Self-Compassion and Reframing Negative Thoughts In Perfectionism
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser
