In this episode of Conspiracy Theories, Carter Roy examines The Simpsons' reputation for seemingly predicting future events, from Donald Trump's presidency to the Higgs boson discovery. Roy explores whether these "predictions" stem from the show's longevity and expert writing team, or if something more deliberate is at play.
The episode investigates the predictive programming conspiracy theory, which claims that global elites use popular media to condition the public for planned future events. Roy examines historical examples of government influence over Hollywood content, from FBI script approval in the mid-20th century to CIA involvement in post-9/11 entertainment. The episode also presents scientific explanations for perceived predictions, including hindsight bias and statistical probability, while addressing why some conspiracy theorists believe The Simpsons serves as a tool for social conditioning.

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
Carter Roy explores how The Simpsons has developed a reputation for predicting future events, with fans compiling lists of seemingly prophetic moments—some numbering as high as 1,224 predictions. Among the most famous examples is the 2000 episode "Bart to the Future," which depicted Lisa Simpson succeeding Donald Trump as president 16.5 years before his actual election. Other notable predictions include a 1998 episode where Homer writes an equation that approximates the mass of the Higgs boson (confirmed by CERN in 2012), as well as accurate depictions of smartwatches, civilian space travel, NSA surveillance before Snowden's revelations, and the 2014 Ebola outbreak. One particularly discussed moment involves a 1997 episode showing Lisa with a magazine featuring a large "9" next to the World Trade Center, which some interpreted as a subliminal 9/11 reference—though showrunner Al Jean dismissed this as an "insane coincidence."
Roy notes that the show's apparent foresight likely stems from its longevity and breadth: with over 40 years and 800+ episodes covering nearly every facet of society, statistical coincidences are inevitable. The show's satire closely mirrors American culture, increasing the probability of real-world correlations. Additionally, the writing team includes Harvard-educated mathematicians who embed sophisticated jokes and informed speculation into episodes, suggesting that accuracy stems from expertise rather than supernatural foresight.
The predictive programming theory posits that global elites orchestrate major events decades in advance and use popular media to acclimate the public to these changes. Roy explains that proponents claim milestone events—from DNA forensics to 9/11 to COVID-19—were planned by a covert faction that uses entertainment to condition society for acceptance of radical shifts. Examples cited include the 2011 film "Contagion," which depicted a pandemic with lockdowns eerily similar to COVID-19, and "The Simpsons Movie," which showed Springfield quarantined under a dome, allegedly priming audiences for future lockdowns.
According to this theory, The Simpsons writers embed hidden messages that condition viewers to accept authoritarian futures. Conspiracy theorist Alan Watt argues that Hollywood producers receive secret agendas from elite power brokers, with many writers unknowingly participating in a broader campaign to manipulate public consciousness. On April 19, 2024, Max Ozzarello set himself on fire outside a Manhattan courthouse, scattering pamphlets denouncing The Simpsons for brainwashing Americans into accepting totalitarianism through what he described as government-backed cryptocurrency schemes and fascist takeover by global elites.
Roy describes how the U.S. government has deeply influenced Hollywood for decades through equipment loans and script approval. From the 1930s through the 1960s, agencies like the FBI required studios to remove scenes depicting agents wiretapping, drinking, or behaving undignified, insisting on flawless heroic portrayals. During the Cold War, the CIA partnered with Paramount Studios to counter Soviet racial propaganda by casting well-dressed African-American actors who referred to themselves as "free men."
After 9/11, the CIA enhanced its Hollywood influence significantly. The TV show "24," premiering just two months after the attacks, featured Jack Bauer openly using torture—potentially normalizing the Bush administration's controversial interrogation techniques. In 2012, filmmakers for "Zero Dark Thirty" received unprecedented CIA access, including floor plans of headquarters and script advice. The resulting film heavily featured torture as a key intelligence tool, despite public claims that such tactics didn't aid bin Laden's capture. This government strategy of embedding messages into entertainment suggests that using beloved shows like The Simpsons could normalize controversial practices through satire, making the public less likely to object.
Roy explains that many Simpsons predictions are perceived as accurate due to hindsight bias—the "I knew it all along" phenomenon where people perceive past events as having been predictable after they occur. Writer Jay Kogan states that creating jokes and scenarios about everything over decades means some naturally become reality. The Higgs boson prediction, for example, arose from mathematicians embedding real equations as jokes for educated audiences, not from prophecy. The famous Trump presidency prediction was simply a topical joke using his name because he was publicly discussing running for president at the time.
Research doesn't support predictive programming claims. Roy cites a 2002 Princeton study where subliminal Coca-Cola images in a Simpsons episode produced only temporary, minor effects—a 27% increase in thirst—with no lasting behavior changes. Like Star Trek consulting the Rand Corporation to envision future communication devices, The Simpsons writers consult experts for informed speculation based on trends and research, not secret knowledge. The show even mocked conspiracy theories in a 1994 episode, jokingly suggesting that the Rand Corporation, saucer people, and reverse vampires secretly controlled Springfield—demonstrating the writers' skepticism toward grand coordination narratives.
1-Page Summary
The Simpsons has built a reputation for presciently mirroring and sometimes predicting real-world events, leading many fans and cultural commentators to jokingly—and sometimes seriously—wonder whether the show’s creative team possesses actual foresight. Carter Roy reflects on this phenomenon and recounts several now-famous examples where the world of Springfield appeared to anticipate reality.
A running gag within The Simpsons fandom, fueled by articles with headlines like "The 15 most unexpected Simpsons predictions that came true" and "34 predictions from The Simpsons that actually happened," is the idea that Homer, Marge, Bart, Lisa, and Maggie together form a modern-day Nostradamus. According to Roy, the longer you search online, the more supposedly prophetic Simpsons predictions you find, with some lists numbering as high as 1,224. This prevalence has led people to wonder if the show actually knows what’s coming or if, as some jokingly suggest, the creators have access to inside information from those shaping the future.
Among the most famous predictions is the episode “Bart to the Future,” which aired in March 2000. In this episode, a fortune-teller reveals to Bart his and Lisa's futures: Bart becomes a struggling musician, while Lisa follows Donald Trump as President of the United States. This plot point aired 16.5 years before Trump’s actual election, even before he became a media fixture with The Apprentice. The episode goes so far as to reference political decisions like inheriting “quite a budget crunch from President Trump,” further amplifying the uncanny resonance when it became reality.
Another notable example is from the 1998 episode "The Wizard of Evergreen Terrace," where Homer becomes an inventor. In a blink-and-you-miss-it moment, Homer writes an equation on a blackboard. The details initially passed over most viewers’ heads, but as Carter Roy explains, science author Dr. Simon Singh later analyzed the equation and found that it comes remarkably close to predicting the mass of the Higgs boson (the so-called "God particle"). This scientific breakthrough wasn't actually confirmed until CERN announced the discovery in 2012, 14 years after the episode aired.
The show’s hits keep coming—from an episode featuring a boss modeled after a tech billionaire with a flamethrower (mirroring real-life images of Elon Musk with a similar device) to the prediction of smartwatches, civilian space travel, and even accurate Super Bowl winners. The Simpsons Movie showed the NSA listening in on conversations before Edward Snowden’s leaks made public the agency’s broad surveillance. Other predictions cited include the 2014 Ebola outbreak and small but memorable events, such as three-eyed fish discovered near a nuclear plant in Argentina.
One of the most discussed moments involves a 1997 episode where Lisa holds a magazine advertising trips to New York. The cover displays a large "9" next to the World Trade Center, visually resembling “9/11.” Many fans and theorists interpreted this as a subliminal reference to the tragic events of September 11, 2001; longtime showrunner Al Jean, however, has dismissed the interpretation as an “insane coincidence.”
While the predicti ...
Simpsons' Accurate Predictions and Cultural Moments
The predictive programming conspiracy theory posits that global events are not random or spontaneous, but are instead orchestrated decades in advance by elite power brokers. According to proponents, these elites use popular media to acclimate the public to coming changes, ensuring that people accept dramatic societal shifts without resistance.
Carter Roy explains that, according to this theory, milestone historical shifts—from the introduction of DNA evidence in policing, to the attacks of 9/11, to the COVID-19 pandemic—have all been calculated and planned far in advance by a covert group of global elites. This secretive faction allegedly decides when to introduce world-changing events and how to reveal them to the public.
Supporters of predictive programming argue that the elite cannot simply impose radical change on society without triggering panic or rebellion. Instead, they slowly prepare the populace using mass media—movies, TV shows, and other forms of entertainment—to make shocking new realities seem normal or even inevitable. According to Roy, the public is “programmed” by repeated, subtle foreshadowing, which is meant to soften their reaction when sweeping new policies or events occur.
Roy cites the 2011 movie “Contagion” as a prime example. Nearly a decade before the COVID-19 pandemic, “Contagion” depicted a realistic global outbreak, with eerily similar details—lockdowns, quarantines, and public health responses—serving as what some believe was a public roadmap for how to behave during a real global pandemic.
Another frequently mentioned example is the 2007 “Simpsons Movie,” in which the town of Springfield is quarantined under a giant glass dome. While the plot is comedic, proponents claim it subconsciously primed audiences to view large-scale lockdowns as plausible and manageable, predisposing them to accept real-world stay-at-home orders years later.
The theory extends most notoriously to “The Simpsons.” According to one interpretation Roy describes, the show does not simply predict the future by accident; rather, it purposefully reveals the elite’s plans and conditions viewers for coming changes. Conspiracy theorist Alan Watt argues that Hollywood’s top directors and producers receive secret agendas from elite power brokers. Many writers, he claims, are unaware of the real purpose behind their assignments, unknowingly participating in a broader campaign to manipulate the public.
One episode referenced by believers features Mr. Burns giving H ...
The Predictive Programming Conspiracy Theory
The U.S. government has deeply influenced Hollywood’s portrayal of government agencies and policy for decades. Through equipment loans, script approvals, and active partnership with major studios, agencies like the CIA and FBI shape narratives, promote national interests, and manage the way America appears on screen.
From the early days of cinema, the U.S. government leveraged its power over Hollywood by providing access to military equipment—such as helicopters, tanks, and Navy ships—for film productions. In exchange for these resources, movie studios were required to submit scripts for review and approval. This gave agencies like the military and FBI the authority to change any scenes that did not align with their preferred image or interests, especially those that reflected on the government.
This influence was particularly strong from the 1930s into the 1960s. The FBI forced studios to cut scenes depicting agents wiretapping communists, drinking alcohol, or resting their feet on tables. The bureau insisted on presenting its agents as flawless heroes, not as individuals with ordinary vices or questionable ethics. These edits reinforced a heroized version of government agents for the American public.
During the Cold War, the CIA developed a partnership with Paramount Studios in the 1950s. In response to Soviet propaganda that highlighted American racism, the agency instructed Paramount to cast well-dressed African-American actors and have them refer to themselves as "free men" in movies. This maneuver aimed to project a progressive image internationally and counter narratives about racial injustice in the United States.
According to accounts cited by journalist Nicholas Scow in The Atlantic, the CIA embedded itself even deeper in Hollywood after September 11, 2001. As public fear of terrorism grew, the agency moved to influence film and television directly, ensuring that their agents and operations would be seen as heroic and essential to national security.
The TV show "24," which premiered just two months after 9/11, showcased Jack Bauer, a counter-terrorist agent who protected the nation "by any means necessary,” openly using torture to achieve his aims. The alignment of the show’s timing and its embrace of torture coincided with the Bush administration’s real-life controversial use of such practices. As torture became integral to the show’s plot, it may have contributed to Americans normalizing these interrogation tactics. The show’s narrative—America’s hero using torture to defeat terrorists—offered covert approval for the techniques that were officially revealed as policy in 2005.
The CIA’s media strategy did not end with television. In 2012, the film "Zero Dark Thirty"—about the mission to capture Osama bin Laden—saw filmmakers granted unprecedented acc ...
Government Control and Influence Over Hollywood
Many claims that The Simpsons predicts the future can be explained by hindsight bias, also known as the "I knew it all along" phenomenon. Once an event occurs, people often perceive past events as having been predictable, even if no one foresaw them at the time. For example, after a sports team loses, fans may say they "knew" the loss would happen, pinpointing moments that seem obviously flawed in retrospect. Carter Roy explains that viewers do this with The Simpsons, watching old episodes and making connections after events happen, rather than recognizing foresight at the time.
This tendency leads to what some refer to as the Simpsons bias—a distortion in the way the show's predictive accuracy is perceived. Even if a study shows that The Simpsons has seemingly “predicted” over 1,200 things, the writers themselves attribute this to probability. Jay Kogan, a Simpsons writer, states that writing jokes and scenarios about everything over decades means some naturally become reality with time. The show’s writers, many of whom are highly educated, draw from real events and societal trends, using satire rather than prophecy.
One striking example is a near-accurate prediction of the Higgs boson's mass. Dr. Simon Singh notes that many Simpsons writers are mathematicians, embedding real math jokes and equations throughout the series for educated viewers. These inclusions are not predictions but demonstrations of the writers' expertise and playful intellect. Singh even wrote a book about the mathematical content hidden in the show. The audience, however, tends to focus on the few cases that later coincide with reality—such as the Higgs boson—while ignoring the overwhelming majority of jokes that never come true.
A famous example is the “Bart to the Future” episode, in which Lisa Simpson, as president, inherits a budget crunch from "President Trump." The writers have clarified that the joke originated as a mad-lib style line—“President [blank]”—and Trump’s name was used simply because he was publicly talking about running for president at the time. The aim was topical humor, not genuine foresight. The Simpsons’ style relies on using current events to make jokes timely and relevant, which naturally results in the occasional coincidence with real-world developments.
Claims about predictive programming—that media like The Simpsons can subconsciously manipulate behavior—are not supported by science. Carter Roy cites a 2002 Princeton study in which subliminal images of Coca-Cola and the word “thirsty” were inserted into a Simpsons episode. The test group reported thirstier feelings, with a 27% increase, compared to a control group. However, participants did not immediately buy Coke or display lasting changes in behavior. Roy explains that subliminal messaging creates only temporary, minor effects, not robotic compliance, and its influence quickly fades. Therefore, there is no evidence that watching The Simpsons, regardless of content, can program viewers into automatic responses.
The Simpsons, like other shows, sometimes consult experts for realism and educated speculation. Star Trek, for example, famously included communicator devices that ...
Scientific Explanations for Apparent Predictions
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser
