Rewriting the Rules: The SEC & CFTC on Crypto, IPOs & the Future of American Markets
In this episode of All-In, Paul Atkins and Michael Selig explore the transformation of capital markets over the past three decades. They examine how private markets have evolved, reducing the need for traditional IPOs, while discussing how blockchain technology and autonomous trading systems are reshaping the financial landscape. The conversation covers the challenges of regulating these innovations and the coordination between the SEC and CFTC.
The discussion also addresses the current limitations of accredited investor standards and potential solutions for expanding access to private investment opportunities. Atkins and Selig propose alternatives to wealth-based restrictions, such as sophisticated investor tests, while considering how to maintain appropriate protections for retail investors. The episode provides context for understanding the shifting dynamics between public and private capital markets, and the regulatory frameworks adapting to these changes.
This is a preview of the Shortform summary of the Mar 11, 2026 episode of the All-In with Chamath, Jason, Sacks & Friedberg
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
1-Page Summary
Evolution of Public vs. Private Capital Markets
Over the past three decades, Paul Atkins explains how capital markets have undergone significant changes. While early tech IPOs like Apple and Microsoft in the 1980s generated substantial returns for public investors, today's landscape favors insiders, private equity firms, and venture capitalists. The number of public companies has halved, as mature private markets reduce the need for traditional IPOs, and insiders find greater financial incentives in keeping companies private.
Impact of New Technologies on Capital Markets
Paul Atkins and Michael Selig discuss how blockchain technology promises faster settlement and enhanced efficiency in financial services. However, these innovations present unique regulatory challenges. Atkins emphasizes the importance of regulatory oversight, citing how LedgerX's CFTC-supervised segregated accounts protected customers during the FTX situation.
The rise of autonomous trading systems presents additional challenges. Chamath Palihapitiya describes how automated, agent-based hedge funds are reshaping markets, while Selig points out the unique risks of autonomous capital deployment. Both experts advocate for proactive regulatory measures that balance innovation with proper oversight.
Regulatory Coordination and Adaptability
Atkins and Selig highlight historical tensions between the SEC and CFTC, describing them as "two fortresses with no man's land in between." They discuss ongoing efforts to improve coordination between these agencies, particularly regarding emerging markets like cryptocurrencies. Both experts advocate for modernized, principles-based rules that can adapt to new technologies while maintaining market protection.
Increasing Access to Private Investment Opportunities
The current accredited investor standards, Atkins argues, unfairly exclude sophisticated investors who don't meet wealth thresholds. He proposes creating a sophisticated investor test as an alternative pathway to accreditation. Jason Calacanis and Atkins discuss ways to expand participation in venture capital and private funds, suggesting modifications to current restrictions while maintaining appropriate safeguards for retail investors.
1-Page Summary
Additional Materials
Clarifications
- An Initial Public Offering (IPO) is the first sale of a company's shares to the public, allowing it to raise capital from a wide range of investors. IPOs provide companies with funds to expand operations, pay debts, or invest in new projects. Going public also increases a company's visibility and credibility in the market. Investors buy shares in hopes of profiting from the company's future growth and success.
- Public investors buy shares of companies that are listed on stock exchanges, making their ownership stakes publicly traded and accessible. Insiders are company executives, employees, or early investors who hold significant private ownership and often have detailed knowledge of the company. Private equity firms invest directly in private companies or buy out public companies to take them private, aiming to improve and eventually sell them for profit. Venture capitalists provide early-stage funding to startups with high growth potential, usually in exchange for equity and active involvement in the company’s development.
- Mature private markets refer to well-developed ecosystems where private companies can raise capital through private equity, venture capital, and other non-public funding sources. These markets provide sufficient liquidity and valuation mechanisms, allowing companies to grow without going public. As a result, companies can access large amounts of funding and exit opportunities without the regulatory burdens and scrutiny of traditional IPOs. This reduces the incentive and necessity for companies to list on public stock exchanges.
- Blockchain is a decentralized digital ledger that records transactions across many computers, ensuring data integrity without a central authority. It enables faster, transparent, and secure settlement of financial transactions by eliminating intermediaries. Smart contracts on blockchain automate and enforce agreements, reducing manual processes and errors. This technology challenges traditional regulatory frameworks due to its borderless and immutable nature.
- The SEC regulates securities markets to protect investors, ensure fair trading, and maintain market integrity. The CFTC oversees commodity futures and derivatives markets to prevent fraud and manipulation. Both agencies enforce rules, monitor market activities, and promote transparency. Their coordination is crucial as financial products increasingly overlap between securities and commodities.
- LedgerX is a cryptocurrency derivatives exchange regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). During the FTX collapse, LedgerX's CFTC-supervised segregated accounts ensured customer funds were kept separate and protected from the exchange's operational risks. This segregation prevented customer losses linked to FTX's bankruptcy. It exemplifies how regulatory oversight can safeguard investors in volatile crypto markets.
- Autonomous trading systems use algorithms to execute trades without human intervention, reacting instantly to market data. Agent-based hedge funds deploy multiple automated agents that make independent trading decisions, simulating human strategies at scale. These systems can amplify market volatility due to rapid, large-volume trades and may malfunction or behave unpredictably in unusual conditions. Their complexity and speed challenge regulators' ability to monitor and manage systemic risks effectively.
- The SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) regulates securities like stocks and bonds, while the CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission) oversees futures and derivatives markets. Historically, their jurisdictions sometimes overlapped, causing regulatory gaps and conflicts. This division complicated oversight of emerging financial products, especially derivatives linked to securities. Efforts to improve coordination aim to close these gaps and create clearer, more efficient regulation.
- Principles-based regulatory rules focus on broad guidelines rather than detailed prescriptions. They allow flexibility for regulators and companies to adapt to new situations and technologies. This approach encourages innovation while ensuring core objectives like market fairness and investor protection are met. It contrasts with strict, rule-based regulations that can be rigid and slow to change.
- An accredited investor is an individual or entity allowed to invest in certain private securities not registered with regulators, based on financial sophistication. Current U.S. standards require individuals to have a net worth over $1 million (excluding their primary residence) or an annual income exceeding $200,000 ($300,000 with a spouse). These criteria aim to ensure investors can bear the risks of less regulated investments. Critics argue these thresholds exclude many knowledgeable investors who lack high wealth but possess financial expertise.
- A "sophisticated investor test" evaluates an individual's financial knowledge, experience, and ability to understand investment risks, rather than relying solely on their net worth or income. It may include criteria like investment history, professional certifications, or passing a financial literacy exam. This approach aims to identify investors capable of making informed decisions regardless of wealth. It contrasts with wealth-based accreditation, which only considers financial thresholds to grant access to certain investments.
- Expanding participation in venture capital and private funds aims to democratize access beyond wealthy accredited investors. Methods include lowering financial thresholds, introducing tests to assess investor sophistication, and creating regulatory frameworks that protect less experienced investors. This allows more individuals to invest in high-growth startups while managing risk. Such changes can increase capital flow to innovation and diversify investor opportunities.
Counterarguments
- The shift from public to private markets may not necessarily be negative for public investors; it could indicate a maturation of markets where companies go public when they are more stable and less risky.
- The reduction in the number of public companies could be due to market consolidation and efficiency improvements, rather than just the appeal of private markets.
- While blockchain technology offers potential benefits, it may not be the panacea for financial market efficiency, and overreliance on it could introduce systemic risks.
- Regulatory oversight is important, but too much regulation can stifle innovation and create barriers to entry for new market participants.
- Autonomous trading systems may introduce risks, but they also bring benefits such as increased liquidity and reduced human errors in trading.
- Coordination between regulatory agencies like the SEC and CFTC is important, but distinct regulatory frameworks can also provide checks and balances that prevent regulatory overreach.
- Principles-based regulatory rules are adaptable, but they may also be too vague and lead to inconsistent enforcement, which can create uncertainty for market participants.
- The idea of a sophisticated investor test could be subjective and difficult to standardize, potentially leading to a different set of exclusions.
- Expanding access to private investment opportunities could increase the risk exposure for less experienced investors, potentially leading to greater financial losses.
Get access to the context and additional materials
Evolution of Public vs. Private Capital Markets
As financial markets have developed over the years, the dynamics of public and private capital formation have undergone notable changes. Paul Atkins discusses these shifts to reflect how they reshaped the capital markets over the last three decades.
The Shift From Public to Private Capital Formation
Insider Gains and Declining Public IPO Participation Reshaped Capital Markets Over 30 Years
Comparing the past and present, Atkins reflects on the initial public offerings (IPOs) of companies like Apple and Microsoft in the 1980s. In these early tech IPOs, public investors received the lion's share of the returns over the years, a stark contrast to the modern landscape.
Today, it’s the insiders, private equity, venture capitalists, as well as corporate officers and employees, who amass the majority of returns from investments. As companies choose to go public later in their development, they offer less growth potential and thereby, fewer gains for public investors.
The Rise of Robust Private Capital Markets
Mature Private Markets Reduce Need for Traditional IPOs
Atkins observes that the number of public companies has halved compared to three decades ago. This significant reduction is indicative of mature private markets which have lessened the necessity of traditional IPOs for capital formation.
Insiders Gain More In Private ...
Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary
Evolution of Public vs. Private Capital Markets
Additional Materials
Clarifications
- An initial public offering (IPO) is when a private company sells shares to the public for the first time. Companies go public to raise large amounts of capital to fund growth, pay debts, or increase their market visibility. Going public also allows early investors and employees to sell their shares and realize profits. Public companies must follow strict regulations and disclose financial information to protect investors.
- Insiders are individuals with access to non-public company information, often including founders and early investors. Private equity firms invest directly in private companies, aiming to improve and eventually sell them for profit. Venture capitalists fund early-stage startups with high growth potential in exchange for equity. Corporate officers manage daily operations, while employees may receive stock options as part of compensation, aligning their interests with company performance.
- In early tech IPOs, companies went public at an earlier stage, offering substantial growth potential to public investors. This early access allowed public investors to benefit from significant increases in company value over time. Today, companies stay private longer, so much of the growth and value creation happens before the IPO. As a result, public investors now buy in later, capturing less of the overall returns.
- Capital formation is the process of raising funds to invest in business growth and development. Public markets involve selling shares to the general public through stock exchanges, allowing many investors to participate. Private markets involve raising capital from a limited group of investors, such as venture capitalists or private equity firms, without public trading. This distinction affects who controls the company and how returns are distributed.
- The halving of public companies is largely due to stricter regulatory requirements and higher costs of being public, which discourage smaller firms from listing. Additionally, private capital markets have grown, providing ample funding without the need for an IPO. Mergers and acquisitions have also reduced the number of standalone public companies. Finally, some companies choose to stay private longer to retain control and avoid public market pressures.
- Mature private capital markets provide companies with ample funding from private investors like venture capitalists and private equity without needing to sell shares publicly. These markets offer flexible investment terms and longer time horizons, attracting companies to stay private longer. Private investors often bring expertise and strategic support, enhancing company growth outside public ...
Counterarguments
- The concentration of returns among insiders could be seen as a natural evolution of market dynamics, where those taking the earliest risks are rewarded proportionately.
- Public markets still offer significant opportunities for investors, especially through diversified portfolios and mutual funds, which can include shares of companies at various stages of growth.
- The decline in the number of public companies might not solely be due to the attractiveness of private markets but could also be influenced by increased regulatory burdens and the costs associated with being a public company.
- The late-stage IPOs might offer less explosive growth, but they can provide more stability and lower risk, which can be attractive to a different class of investors.
- The rise of private markets could be seen as a response to the inefficiencies and constraints of public markets, rather than an inherent shift in where the best investment opportunities lie.
- The halving of public companies could also be a result of market consolidation and mergers and acquisitions, not just companies staying private longer.
- The ...
Get access to the context and additional materials
Impact of New Technologies on Capital Markets
Experts including Michael Selig, Paul Atkins, and Chamath Palihapitiya discuss the potential of new technologies, particularly blockchain and autonomous trading systems, to transform capital markets along with the regulatory challenges they pose.
The Promise of Distributed Ledger Technology
The conversation pivots on the transformational influence of blockchain technology on capital markets, promising rapid settlement and raising new regulatory issues.
Blockchain Assets Enable Faster, Efficient Settlement and Delivery
Paul Atkins underscores the benefits of distributed ledger technology for the financial services industry, such as the ability to execute immediate delivery versus payment (T zero) for digital asset transactions conducted on-chain. Michael Selig envisions innovation with blockchain as one of the key areas to enhance in the United States.
New Technologies Pose Unique Liquidity, Price Discovery, and Oversight Risks For Regulators
Experts argue that while distributed ledger technology inspires optimism, it also presents unique regulatory challenges. Paul Atkins points out, through the example of FTX’s investment in LedgerX, that regulatory oversight is crucial. LedgerX utilized segregated accounts, as supervised by the CFTC, which ensured that customers did not lose money. Additionally, Atkins clarifies that traditional securities laws pertain to tokenized securities, which means regulations against insider trading also apply to blockchain-based assets.
Michael Selig delineates a distinction between tokens as commodities or goods within networks like Ethereum or Solana and capital-raising activities. The vagueness of current legal definitions, as Atkins observes, fosters uncertainty and prompts companies to seek offshore solutions to eschew SEC complications.
The Growth of Autonomous Trading Systems
With the rise of AI and automated trading, new challenges around systemic risk management arise, demanding an innovative regulatory approach.
Agent-Based Trading Strategies Challenge Systemic Risk Management
Chamath Palihapitiya describes the emergence of automated, agent-based hedge funds that are reshaping the market landscape, potentially replacing traditional market juggernauts like Citadel and Millennium. Michael ...
Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary
Impact of New Technologies on Capital Markets
Additional Materials
Clarifications
- "Delivery versus payment (DVP)" is a settlement mechanism ensuring that the transfer of securities occurs only if the corresponding payment is made simultaneously. "T zero" means this settlement happens instantly, on the same day as the trade, eliminating delays. In digital asset transactions, this reduces counterparty risk by ensuring immediate exchange of assets and funds. This contrasts with traditional systems where settlement can take days, increasing risk and inefficiency.
- Distributed ledger technology (DLT) is a decentralized database where multiple participants maintain synchronized copies of data without a central authority. Unlike traditional databases controlled by a single entity, DLT ensures transparency and security through consensus mechanisms that validate transactions. Each transaction is recorded in a block linked cryptographically to previous blocks, creating an immutable chain. This structure reduces the risk of data tampering and enables trustless interactions among participants.
- The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) is a U.S. federal agency that regulates derivatives markets, including futures, options, and swaps. It ensures market integrity, protects participants from fraud, and promotes financial stability. Segregated accounts are special accounts where customer funds are kept separate from a firm's own money to protect clients in case of the firm's insolvency. The CFTC supervises these accounts to ensure proper handling and safeguard customer assets.
- FTX was a cryptocurrency exchange that invested in LedgerX, a regulated derivatives platform overseen by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). LedgerX’s use of segregated accounts means customer funds are kept separate from the company’s own assets, reducing risk of loss. This example highlights how regulatory oversight can protect investors in digital asset markets. It shows the importance of applying traditional regulatory principles to new blockchain-based financial products.
- Tokens classified as commodities or goods typically represent items used within a network, like utility tokens for accessing services. Capital-raising activities involve issuing tokens as securities to investors, implying ownership or profit-sharing rights. Securities tokens are subject to stricter regulations to protect investors, unlike commodity tokens. This legal distinction affects how tokens are regulated and traded.
- Tokenized securities are digital representations of traditional financial assets like stocks or bonds, issued and traded on a blockchain. They confer ownership rights and are subject to the same regulatory requirements as their traditional counterparts, including disclosure, registration, and anti-fraud rules. This means laws against insider trading, market manipulation, and investor protection apply equally to tokenized securities. The regulatory framework aims to ensure these digital assets maintain transparency and investor confidence.
- Companies seek offshore regulatory environments to avoid the SEC's strict and complex rules on securities offerings. Offshore jurisdictions often have more flexible or less stringent regulations, reducing compliance costs and legal risks. This allows companies to launch innovative financial products faster and with fewer restrictions. However, this can increase risks for investors due to less oversight.
- Agent-based autonomous trading systems use computer programs called agents that independently analyze market data and execute trades without human intervention. These agents follow predefined algorithms to identify trading opportunities and manage risk in real time. They can interact with other agents and adapt their strategies based on market conditions, creating complex, dynamic trading environments. This automation increases trading speed and volume but also introduces new risks related to system errors and market stability.
- Citadel and Millennium are leading hedge funds known for their advanced quantitative and algorithmic trading strategies. They manage large amounts ...
Counterarguments
- Blockchain technology, while promising, may not be the panacea for settlement efficiency due to potential scalability issues and the energy consumption associated with some blockchain networks.
- Immediate delivery versus payment (T zero) could introduce new types of risks, such as operational risks, and may not be suitable for all types of transactions or market participants.
- The assertion that blockchain innovation is a key area for enhancement in the U.S. financial services industry may overlook other critical areas needing attention, such as cybersecurity or financial inclusion.
- The unique risks introduced by blockchain, such as liquidity and price discovery challenges, may be overstated or similar to those present in traditional financial systems.
- The success of LedgerX under CFTC oversight does not necessarily guarantee that similar regulatory approaches will be effective for all blockchain-based financial services.
- The application of traditional securities laws to tokenized securities may not be straightforward, and existing regulations may need significant adaptation to be effective in the context of blockchain.
- Classifying tokens as commodities or goods may oversimplify the complex nature of these assets and their integration into various economic activities.
- The push for offshore regulatory environments might not only be due to legal vagueness but also due to the desire for more favorable tax treatments or less stringent regulations.
- The impact of AI-driven, agent-based autonomous trading systems on capital markets may be overestimated, and traditional market players may adapt and maintain their dominance.
- Th ...
Get access to the context and additional materials
Regulatory Coordination and Adaptability
Paul Atkins and Michael Selig share insights on the need for regulatory adaptability and enhanced coordination between agencies like the SEC and CFTC to keep pace with rapidly evolving financial technologies such as blockchain and AI.
The Historical Tension Between the Sec and Cftc
Turf Battles and Conflicts Hindered Product and Market Growth
Paul Atkins recalls the historical sniping between the SEC and CFTC, likening the agencies to “two fortresses with no man’s land in between.” Michael Selig also highlights the difficulties experienced by market participants due to confusing regulatory landscapes. Cross-jurisdictional products often suffered due to uncertainty about which agency's rules applied.
Improving Coordination and Harmonizing Agency Regulations
Atkins and Selig are committed to bridging the gap. They mention efforts to increase cooperation and potentially harmonize regulations to enhance market efficiency and safety. Both agencies are working on a memorandum of understanding to share information and better coordinate issues to prevent turf wars. This coordination focuses on emerging markets such as cryptocurrencies and aims to establish consistent standards across securities and non-securities trading on blockchain networks.
The Need for Modernized, Principles-Based Rules
Outdated Disclosure and Compliance Requirements Inhibit Public Listings, Requiring Review
Atkins addresses the challenges faced by private companies in going public due to heavy compliance burdens with rules and disclosure requirements. He suggests a review is necessary to streamline these processes, focusing on materiality to encourage more public listings. Additionally, the SEC is contemplating simplifying filing categories, which could benefit smaller companies with less frequent reporting requirements.
Regulators Should Adopt a Flexible, Materiality-Focused Approach for New Technologies
Selig and Atkins underscore the imperative to modernize rules and regulations to support innovative technologies such as blockchain and AI. They stress the importance of future-proofing rules to not only foster growth but also to protect consumers and the market in general from fraud.
There is a push for adaptable regulations that accommodate changes in purpose and delivery mechanisms within the financial sector. Selig cites the complexity of swap data reporting after the Dodd-Frank reform and calls for ...
Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary
Regulatory Coordination and Adaptability
Additional Materials
Counterarguments
- Regulatory harmonization may stifle innovation if not carefully implemented, as overly broad or rigid rules could limit the flexibility needed for new financial technologies to develop.
- Increased coordination between the SEC and CFTC could lead to a concentration of power and reduced checks and balances, potentially allowing for regulatory overreach.
- Simplifying regulations to encourage public listings might inadvertently lower the standards for investor protection, leading to increased risks for individual and institutional investors.
- A principles-based regulatory approach may result in inconsistent application and enforcement, as it relies heavily on the interpretation of regulators and market participants.
- The focus on materiality in disclosure requirements could lead to important information being omitted if deemed immaterial, which might affect investor decision-making.
- Adaptable regulations accommodating changes in the financial sector could create uncertainty for market participants who prefer clear and stable regulatory frameworks.
- Streamlining processes for companies with dual registration might privilege ce ...
Actionables
- You can educate yourself on the basics of financial regulations and emerging technologies by enrolling in a free online course or webinar. Understanding the landscape can help you make informed decisions about investments in cryptocurrencies or blockchain ventures. For example, look for courses that cover the roles of the SEC and CFTC, the impact of regulations on financial markets, and the basics of blockchain and AI in finance.
- Start a peer discussion group to explore the implications of regulatory changes on personal investments. Gather friends or colleagues interested in finance and technology, and use online platforms to discuss how evolving regulations might affect your investment strategies, especially in areas like cryptocurrencies and digital assets. This can be as simple as creating a group chat or a monthly virtual meetup to share insights and resources.
- Review and adjust your personal or small business financial practices in light of the principles-based regulation app ...
Get access to the context and additional materials
Increasing Access to Private Investment Opportunities
The podcast features a discussion about the potential need to modernize the accredited investor standards to allow more individuals access to private investment opportunities while ensuring adequate safeguards are in place.
Revisiting Accredited Investor Standards
Atkins raises concerns about the antiquated accredited investor standards that are nearly a century old.
Wealth Criteria Exclude Sophisticated Investors From Private Markets
Atkins notes that the current wealth criteria may unfairly exclude individuals who are sophisticated investors from participating in private markets just because they do not meet the financial thresholds. He points out that current standards might leave out a finance professor with extensive knowledge but without the requisite assets, due to the focus on asset-based criteria.
"Investor Test Alternative Ensures Access and Safeguards"
There is a discussion about the creation of a sophisticated investor test, similar to a driver's license, that would permit individuals to demonstrate their capability to trade in private companies, regardless of their wealth status. This test would provide an alternative pathway to accreditation, potentially offering insight and access to private investment opportunities while maintaining investor safeguards. Atkins suggests recognizing individuals with financial knowledge, such as those with a CPA or CFA, as accredited investors irrespective of their wealth.
Enabling Participation in Venture Capital and Private Funds
Atkins and Jason Calacanis propose methods to widen participation in venture capital and private funds.
Rules Limiting Investors Restrict Access to Opportunities
Calacanis discusses the limitations on venture capital fund formation, explaining that investor number restrictions have meant turning away interested parties from his last fund. He suggests that such restrictions hold back economic growth and the venture capital ecosystem by funding fewer startups.
Regulators Can Increase Participation, With Guardrails, to Democratize Access to Private Capital
Atkins discusses collaborating with the Department of Labor and the Treasury Department to open up private funds or products ...
Here’s what you’ll find in our full summary
Increasing Access to Private Investment Opportunities
Additional Materials
Counterarguments
- The current wealth-based criteria serve as a proxy for risk tolerance and financial stability, which might be lost with alternative accreditation methods.
- Sophistication or knowledge-based tests could be gamed or may not accurately reflect an investor's ability to bear financial risk.
- Expanding access to private markets could lead to an increase in fraud or exploitation of less experienced investors, despite their sophistication.
- The complexity and illiquidity of private investments might not be suitable for all investors, even if they pass a knowledge-based test.
- Increasing the pool of investors in private markets could drive up valuations and create asset bubbles due to increased demand.
- The administrative burden and costs of implementing and maintaining a sophisticated investor test could be significant.
- There may be unintended consequences of democratizing access to private markets, such as increased volatility or systemic risk.
- Basic controls and limits based on income or net worth might still not adequately protect investors from the r ...
Actionables
- You can enhance your financial literacy by enrolling in online courses that cover investment principles and private market dynamics. By doing so, you'll be better prepared to evaluate investment opportunities and understand the risks involved, similar to how a driver's license test prepares you for the road. For example, platforms like Coursera or edX offer finance courses from top universities that can increase your knowledge base.
- Start a virtual investment club with friends or online community members to simulate sophisticated investing without the financial risk. This can be a space where you collectively analyze private investment opportunities, share insights, and make mock investment decisions. Tools like Investopedia's Stock Simulator provide a realistic environment where you can practice without needing actual capital.
- Advocate for inclusive investment opportunities by submitting public ...
Get access to the context and additional materials
Create Summaries for anything on the web
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser
