In this episode of All-In, Adam Carolla and David Friedberg examine California's current challenges, from its complex regulatory landscape to its economic difficulties. They discuss how the state's restrictive building regulations and lengthy permitting processes affect post-disaster reconstruction, and explore the growing ideological divisions within California that are influencing migration patterns to other states.
The conversation covers California's financial outlook, including its projected budget deficit and potential pension shortfall, while noting the departure of wealthy individuals and businesses to more business-friendly states. The discussion also examines changes in media coverage, particularly focusing on how newsroom demographics may influence reporting styles and the practice of political endorsements by major newspapers.

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
Adam Carolla and David Friedberg discuss California's complex regulatory landscape, particularly focusing on post-disaster reconstruction. Carolla criticizes the state's permitting process as prohibitively expensive and time-consuming, often discouraging residents from rebuilding after disasters like the Palisades Fire. He illustrates this point with the example of Suzanne Summers, who chose to relocate to Palm Springs rather than navigate the Coastal Commission's restrictive rebuilding regulations in Malibu.
The hosts explore California's growing ideological divide through what they term "safe space" versus "octagon" worldviews. Carolla describes "safe space" adherents as those prioritizing progressive policies and extensive regulation, while "octagon" individuals value freedom and self-reliance. Friedberg notes that this divide is leading to migration patterns, with "octagon" minded people moving to states like Florida and Texas, where business-friendly policies prevail.
The discussion turns to California's serious financial difficulties, including an projected $18 billion budget deficit for 2026-2027 and a potential pension shortfall ranging from $600 billion to $1 trillion. Friedberg points to proposals like the "Billionaire Tax Act" as catalysts for wealthy individuals and businesses leaving the state. Carolla notes high-profile exits, such as Elon Musk moving Tesla and SpaceX to Texas, which further strain California's tax base.
The conversation concludes with an examination of media bias. Carolla observes that increased female presence in newsrooms over the past 15-20 years correlates with what he sees as more emotional and partisan reporting. He criticizes major newspapers like the LA Times for endorsing political candidates, comparing it to an umpire choosing sides in a sports match, and suggests that such practices contribute to eroding public trust in media institutions.
1-Page Summary
Adam Carolla and David Friedberg delve into the complexities and consequences of California's regulatory landscape, especially in the wake of natural disasters such as the Palisades Fire.
Carolla criticizes the cumbersome permitting process in California as being prohibitively expensive and time-consuming, discouraging residents from undertaking building projects, particularly post-disaster reconstruction. He notes that people often do not want to deal with the extensive interactions with city officials, engineers, plan checks, and regulatory approvals. The process is so daunting that individuals sometimes choose to abandon their projects entirely rather than navigate the bureaucratic labyrinth.
Carolla continues his critique by observing that rebuilding efforts after disasters like the Palisades Fire are hampered by safety-focused regulations, which he feels are excessively burdensome. He argues that this safety-first mindset can lead to bureaucratic delays, overshadowing the need for timely reconstruction efforts.
Carolla uses the example of school closures during the COVID-19 pandemic to illustrate the unintended consequences of safety prioritization, suggesting that such policies can result in harm beyond their intended benefits. Furthermore, he uses the metaphor of a car loaded with safety features to demonstrate how an over-emphasis on safety can inflate costs to impractical levels.
Adding to Carolla's points, David Friedberg discusses how officials who are focused on increasing safety often fail to consider the economic impacts of their regulations. He alludes to the adverse effects on affordability and the community's ...
California's Regulatory and Bureaucratic Challenges
Adam Carolla and David Friedberg discuss the growing cultural and ideological chasm in California, framing it as a clash between "safe space" values and an "octagon" worldview.
The radio hosts examine how individuals are choosing sides in a state deeply divided by ideology and policy.
Carolla describes "safe space people" as prioritizing progressive policies such as free syringes and safe injection sites, open borders, and avoiding judgment of the homeless. He criticizes these priorities, suggesting they foster an overregulated and ineffective system. Carolla contrasts President Trump, characterized as wanting projects done quickly, with Karen Bass, representing a safety-first attitude that he believes leads to stifling overregulation and slow progress.
David Friedberg discusses policies in San Francisco meant to decrease needle-transmitted diseases, asserting that these policies may inadvertently increase drug fatalities rather than improving public health and safety.
On the other hand, Carolla implies that "octagon" people, characterized by their value for freedom and self-reliance, are migrating away from progressive cities like Portland, Oregon, and Los Angeles. The "octagon" worldview, though not explicitly defined, appears to emphasize personal liberty, minimal government interference, and the right to manage one’s own affairs independently.
Carolla describes these individuals as seeking states like Florida, Texas, and Tennessee that align more closely with their values. Furthermore, he characterizes "right-wingers" as simply wanting to be left alone, desiring personal freedom, and having minimal government involvement in their choices, such as property management or ownership of items like gas stoves.
The political divide is marked by people leaving "safe space" regions, such as Los Angeles, for "octagon" states that are business-f ...
The Ideological and Cultural Divide in California
California faces significant financial difficulties, with potential deficits and liabilities threatening the state's stability.
California is projected to face an $18 billion budget deficit in the 2026-2027 fiscal cycle. Additionally, the state's pension shortfall for public employees could reach between $600 billion to as much as a trillion dollars.
The speakers highlight the ongoing exodus of businesses and wealthy individuals from California, citing moves to more business-friendly locations, which diminishes the tax base essential for the state’s fiscal health. The migration is motivated by high tax proposals, such as Washington state's discussion of a 15% payroll tax on employees earning over $125k, leading companies like Amazon and Microsoft to consider relocating. Adam Carolla notes that Tesla and SpaceX are among the ventures Elon Musk is moving to Texas, signalling a troubling pattern of relocations for economic reasons.
David Friedberg refers to the proposed "Billionaire Tax Act," which levies a one-time 5% tax on net worths over a billion dollars, as another reason ultra-high net worth individuals and companies are contemplating leaving California.
Adam Carolla expresses the necessity for someone to step in and make unpopular decisions regarding fiscal responsibility. He suggests that, rather than cutting spending, the government may seek alternative ways to obtain rev ...
California's Fiscal and Economic Challenges
Adam Carolla and David Friedberg discuss perceptions on how the increased female presence in media and "woke" ideologies may be affecting news reporting bias and eroding public trust in media institutions.
These discussions focus on how the shift in staff demographics and ideological leanings within media organizations could be driving change in media practices and the presentation of news.
Adam Carolla notes a significant increase in women in media over the past 15-20 years and suggests a correlation between the increased female influence and a shift toward a safety-focused, emotional, and partisan perspective in reporting. He implies that more women in media have led to articles more likely to pick a side, using the differing treatment of political figures like Joe Biden and Donald Trump as evidence.
Carolla then articulates concern over news outlets being influenced by "woke" ideologies, affecting their objectivity. He criticizes the LA Times for publicly endorsing political candidates and compares it to the New York Times. He draws an analogy between newspapers' endorsements and an umpire endorsing a sports team, inferring that both situations would lead to doubts about impartiality.
Adam Carolla suggests that the media's tendency to side with certain political candidates or ideologies can create distrust among the public. This distrust could contribute to widening the societal divide between those seeking a "safe space" and ...
The Role of Media and Its Perceived Bias
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser
