In this episode of All-In, investigative journalist Nick Shirley and David Sacks examine the details of major fraud cases in Minnesota involving public funds. The discussion covers several entitlement fraud schemes uncovered by federal prosecutors since 2018, including the misappropriation of funds from child nutrition programs, autism services, and Medicaid disability funds, totaling billions of dollars.
The conversation explores the demographic patterns among those charged in these cases and the political dynamics that may influence how officials address the fraud. Shirley shares insights from his investigative work, including footage of fraudulent daycare centers, while the hosts discuss the role of citizen journalism in bringing these issues to national attention when traditional media outlets were slow to report on them.

Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
In this podcast episode, Nick Shirley and David Sacks discuss extensive fraud cases in Minnesota involving public funds meant for vulnerable populations. Federal prosecutors have uncovered approximately $9 billion in entitlement fraud since 2018, with recent cases including $250 million stolen from child nutrition programs, $220 million from autism programs, and $300 million from Medicaid disability funds.
The fraud cases have revealed a significant pattern: of the 92 individuals charged in the Feeding Our Future fraud case, 82 are from the Somali community. According to Sacks, some progressive judges have shown reluctance to hold fraudsters accountable, even with strong evidence. Shirley suggests that political considerations, including the Somali community's voting power, may be influencing officials' hesitancy to address the fraud more aggressively.
The speakers discuss how these fraudulently obtained funds might be circulating back into political campaigns through contributions, creating what Sacks describes as a patronage system between fraudsters and politicians. They point to examples like the Minnesota flag change, which Sacks views as political pandering to the Somali community.
Nick Shirley's investigative work, particularly his viral video exposing fraudulent daycare centers, has brought national attention to these issues. His footage revealed centers receiving government funding despite showing no signs of operation, with boarded windows and no children present. While Jason Calacanis notes that local news had covered these stories for over a decade, national media outlets were slower to report on them, highlighting the growing importance of citizen journalism in exposing systematic fraud.
1-Page Summary
Nick Shirley and David Sacks discuss a series of fraud cases in Minnesota involving the theft of public funds intended for vulnerable populations.
The discussion reveals a sweeping scale of fraud in Minnesota, harming essential social services and those who rely on them.
Minnesota has faced a significant embezzlement of public funds through various schemes. In one extensive operation, dubbed the Feeding Our Future scandal, 47 defendants were charged in a fraud scheme that siphoned off $250 million supposedly for child nutrition. Additionally, the hosts mention that up to $220 million intended for kids with autism and $300 million from Medicaid for individuals with disabilities to avoid homelessness were also stolen. Medicaid claims for autism in the state astonishingly spiked 130x in merely five years, from $3 million in 2018 to $400 million in 2023, pointing towards systematic exploitation of the welfare system.
The extent of fraudulent activity is underscored with over 90 convictions accounting for more than $800 million in fraud since 2022 alone. Within this context, the 47 individuals charged in the Feeding Our Future case represent a substantial portion of this fraudulent activity against the state’s welfare programs.
Federal prosecutors have unearthed that approximately $9 billion in entitlement frauds have occurred in Minnesota since 2018. This figure represents an alarming portion of the total funds dedicated to the state’s 14 entitlement programs. Officials have labeled the magnitude of fraud as "staggering" and reflective of "industrial scale fraud," suggesting that the depth and breadth of these crimes against public funds cannot be overstated.
The demographics of those involved in the large-scale fraud cases have been a focal point of concern and discussion.
Details and Scale of Fraud in Minnesota
David Sacks and Nick Shirley detail how government programs are vulnerable to fraudulent activities and the political dynamics that might contribute to officials overlooking these issues.
The speakers indicate an environment of avoidance among governmental officials concerning fraud, due to political calculations.
David Sacks expresses disbelief regarding progressive judges voiding convictions of fraudsters. He details instances where three liberal judges have refused to hold Somali fraudsters accountable, even with strong evidence and jury convictions. These actions suggest hesitancy from parts of the judicial system to address fraud effectively.
Nick Shirley discusses possible reasons behind Minnesota officials' reluctance to address the fraud issue. He alludes to the considerable numbers of potential voters within the Somali community and insinuates that political figures, such as the mayor of Minneapolis and Governor Tim Walz, might not be vigorously acting against fraud to avoid losing favor with these constituents.
The conversation suggests a cyclical movement of funds that could reinforce political patronage systems.
Sacks and Shirley imply that a patronage system could be in play, where fraudulently obtained government funds may funnel back into the hands of politicians through campaign contributions. Shirley comments on mayors in California, suggesting they were complicit in a similar arrangement, with nonprofits opening by officials' family members to secure campaign contributions.
Systemic Factors and Political Dynamics Enabling Fraud
The investigative work of citizen journalist Nick Shirley is contrasted with the lack of comprehensive national media coverage on a particularly glaring case of fraud in Minnesota.
Nick Shirley has dedicated considerable time and effort to highlighting the fraud taking place in Minnesota. His series of videos, particularly a 42-minute viral piece, uncovered daycare centers that were receiving large sums of government funding while showing no signs of operating. David Sacks refers to Shirley's coverage as revealing how government fraud and entitlement programs are viewed.
Shirley's work has not only gained significant public attention but has also prompted responses from government officials such as Kash Patel and DHS Secretary Christy Noem, who sent agents to inspect the facilities Shirley reported on.
Shirley received factual support from a person named David, who passed by the daycare centers regularly but never saw any children. The centers, with misspelled signage and blacked out windows, continued to collect money even when showing no signs of activity. Shirley's evidentiary findings led him to suggest that official authorities continued to fund these centers despite clear signs of fraudulence.
Jason Calacanis acknowledges that the story had been covered locally for over a decade but gained national attention primarily due to Shirley's involvement. Despite a recent New York Times report, major news networks like CNN had not provided extensive coverage, reflecting a general lag in the national media's reporting.
Citizen Journalism's Role vs. National Media Coverage
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser
