In this episode of All About Change, Lani Anpo examines the intersection of Native American and Jewish identities, sharing her perspective as someone who fully embraces both heritages. She discusses the complex dynamics within Indigenous advocacy spaces, where some groups support certain Indigenous rights while denying others, particularly regarding Jewish indigeneity to ancestral lands.
The discussion explores how Indigenous peoples and Jews face various forms of erasure, from physical violence to cultural destruction and political marginalization. Anpo addresses the challenges of building meaningful allyship between marginalized groups, the importance of preserving Indigenous cultures, and the role of Indigenous passports as tools for sovereignty and self-determination. Throughout the conversation, she highlights how certain arguments used to delegitimize Jewish indigeneity could potentially impact other Indigenous peoples' rights.
Sign up for Shortform to access the whole episode summary along with additional materials like counterarguments and context.
Lani Anpo, who identifies as both fully Indigenous and Jewish, challenges conventional notions of mixed-heritage identity. Rather than viewing her background as divided or partial, she embraces the completeness of both her Native American and Jewish lineages.
Anpo points out a significant contradiction within Indigenous advocacy spaces: while they support some Indigenous groups, they often deny the indigeneity of others, particularly Jews, using Eurocentric standards. She highlights how advocating for native land returns in the U.S. while condemning Jews as colonizers in their ancestral homeland represents a troubling double standard. This stance has led to personal backlash against Anpo, including hate messages and death threats from within native communities.
Indigenous peoples face multiple forms of erasure, as Anpo explains, including physical violence, cultural destruction, and political marginalization. She draws compelling parallels between the experiences of Indigenous peoples and Jews, particularly regarding their connections to ancestral lands. The rhetoric used to delegitimize Jewish indigeneity based on factors like skin color, DNA, and diaspora time could potentially threaten other Indigenous peoples' rights and status.
Anpo emphasizes that meaningful allyship requires deep self-reflection and confrontation of internal biases. She notes how some Jewish individuals claim to support Indigenous rights only when convenient, while some Indigenous advocacy spaces deny Jewish indigeneity despite shared experiences of colonization. These dynamics, Anpo argues, threaten the potential for global Indigenous solidarity.
Indigenous communities continue fighting to protect their lands, languages, and self-governance. Anpo advocates for Indigenous passports as symbols of sovereignty and self-determination, viewing them as crucial tools in resisting cultural erasure. She emphasizes the importance of ensuring future generations inherit more than just trauma, but also strong connections to their Indigenous identities and lands.
1-Page Summary
The discussions around indigeneity and ethnic identity continue to evolve as people like Lani Anpo courageously navigate the complexity of possessing mixed-heritage backgrounds.
Lani Anpo is an embodiment of embracement and resistance, identifying as fully Indigenous and Jewish and rejecting the idea of a partial identity. She grows up with a strong connection to her mother's Native American heritage while possessing knowledge of her Jewish lineage on her father's side, though without significant engagement with Jewish culture initially. Lani challenges the notion that mixed heritage should be seen as partitioned or incomplete; instead, she asserts the wholeness and totality of her identity, representing two distinct ethnic lineages.
Lani Anpo faces the complexities head-on as she reclaims truth and confronts hypocrisy within Indigenous and ethnic identity advocacy spaces. She points out an inconsistency within these spaces where support for some Indigenous groups is given precedence, while the Indigenous status of others, particularly Jews, is often denied based on Eurocentric standards. As an advocate, Lani argues against the hypocrisy of advocating for native lands being returned in the U.S. while also condemning Jews as colonizers in th ...
Indigenous Identity and Belonging
Lani Anpo illuminates the multifaceted aspects of the erasure suffered by Indigenous peoples, and she also reveals how similar tactics of delegitimization are used against Jews, reflecting a broader pattern of discrimination.
Colonial tools have historically aimed to erase Indigenous identities through various forms, with race and blood quantum policies being central strategies for the genetic elimination of Indigenous societies. Lani Anpo addresses this racial erasure and the connected discrimination due to her mixed heritage as vivid examples.
Indigenous erasure encompasses a range of tactics including physical violence, forced removal, and genocide, as well as sexual violence. Cultural erasure manifests in the destruction of languages, spiritual practices, and policies that criminalize Indigenous cultures. Legally and politically, sovereignty is denied, while historical erasure takes the form of rewriting or omitting Indigenous peoples from narratives.
Ruderman's discussion on the forcible removal of children from the Bad River Band of the Chippewa people, to Americanize them in schools, underscores the severity of these practices, alongside the trauma associated with being displaced from ancestral lands.
Lani Anpo draws parallels between Indigenous people and Jews, particularly concerning the rhetoric surrounding ancestral homeland connections and identity.
In her discourse, Anpo expresses profound concern over Indigenous peoples who echo agendas that are against Jews in Israel, in doing so, they inadvertently support strategies that could ultimately threaten Indigenous status and rights internationally. She also indicates the potential for employing arguments that delegiti ...
Experiences of Discrimination and Erasure
Anpo emphasizes that true allyship requires a deeper self-reflection and confrontation of one’s own internal biases. When she reconnected with her Jewishness, she had to address her own prejudices and emphasizes the significance of listening and learning as the cornerstone of authentic allyship rather than immediately jumping to action.
The notion of harmful allyship comes to the fore when Jewish individuals claim to support Indigenous rights but only to an extent that doesn’t inconvenience them, exposing underlying anti-Indigenous biases that they might not be fully cognizant of. This form of allyship doesn't challenge the entrenched anti-Native prejudices present in society and can, in fact, perpetuate harm.
Anpo highlights the issue within advocacy spaces that claim to uphold Indigenous rights yet deny the indigeneity of Jews, negating the parallels in their experiences of colonization and oppression. This denial is not only antithetical to the foundations of Indigenous rights advocacy but also undermines the potential for global solidarity.
Anpo points out the danger of anti-Jewish sentiment within some advocacy groups and the detrimental impact it has on solidarity between Indigenous populations, including Jews. She urges that Indigenous communities be cautious in sup ...
Allyship and Solidarity Between Marginalized Groups
Indigenous peoples continue to combat challenges related to their existence, identity, and the bond with their ancestral lands and cultures, with the intention to protect and revive their heritage for future generations.
Indigenous communities strive to ensure that their descendants inherit more than the legacy of past trauma. Anpo emphasizes the battle to safeguard land, languages, and stories as a testament to the enduring connection Indigenous peoples have with their heritage. The idea is to demonstrate to descendants that their ancestors never capitulated and were persistently linked to their Indigenous identity.
Anpo voices the hope that future generations will inherit a legacy that includes a robust connection to their Indigenous identities and lands. This goal underlies the efforts of Indigenous communities to remain actively engaged in the preservation and recognition of their traditional knowledge, spiritual practices, and the right to govern themselves.
The concept of Indigenous passports emerges as a symbol of sovereignty and self-determination. Anpo expresses a desire for Indigenous passports that would represent the unique status of Indigenous nations. Such passports would mark a significant reclaiming of Indigenous cultures, stories, and languages aimed at ...
Preserving and Reviving Indigenous Cultures and Rights
Download the Shortform Chrome extension for your browser