PDF Summary:Witness to a Prosecution, by Richard V. Sandler

In Witness to a Prosecution, Richard V. Sandler takes readers behind the scenes of the high-profile legal case against financial pioneer Michael Milken. The book explores Milken's rise to prominence through his pioneering use of high-yield bonds, and how his innovative financing strategies threatened the establishment and made him a target for overzealous prosecutors seeking a major conviction.

Sandler examines the aggressive tactics employed by the government—including selectively leaking information to the media and pressuring witnesses—to secure charges against Milken for violations that were previously not considered criminal offenses. The narrative also delves into Milken's personal life, detailing the emotional toll of the proceedings on his family as well as his post-incarceration philanthropic pursuits and eventual presidential pardon.

(continued)...

• You can enhance your understanding of legal agreements by drafting a mock plea agreement for a hypothetical situation. Start by researching the basic elements of a plea agreement, then create a document that outlines terms, conditions, and potential areas where misconduct could be alleged. This exercise will help you grasp the complexities and potential loopholes in legal agreements.
• Practice articulating your stance on complex issues to friends or family members to prepare for situations where you may face pressure to conform. Choose a topic you feel strongly about, research it thoroughly, and then discuss it, presenting your viewpoint and backing it up with facts. This will help you become more comfortable standing your ground in professional or public scenarios.
• Engage in role-playing exercises with a trusted friend or mentor where you defend yourself against hypothetical accusations. This can help you refine your communication skills, learn to remain calm under pressure, and better articulate your side of the story, which is invaluable if you ever face unwarranted allegations.
• Develop a personal code of ethics that outlines how you will handle situations where you might have conflicting interests, much like officials deciding on witness exemptions. This code should include clear guidelines on transparency, fairness, and accountability. By adhering to this code, you ensure that your actions remain consistent and ethical, regardless of the circumstances.
• You can enhance your critical thinking by practicing the expansion of arguments in everyday discussions. When you hear a claim or argument, take a moment to consider what underlying assumptions are being made and what additional actions or behaviors might be connected to it. For example, if a friend argues that electric cars are the best choice for the environment, think about the broader implications such as the sourcing of battery materials or the energy used to charge the cars.

The stance of the officials was adversarial regarding Milken's cooperation and the ensuing procedure for his conditional liberation.

The writer documents the relentless adversarial strategies used by law enforcement, continuing even after the individual's admission of guilt and the following punishment, particularly in their efforts to undermine his cooperation and hinder his chances of receiving a lesser sentence. Despite engaging in extensive discussions with authorities and offering evidence that implicated a former colleague, the prosecution downplayed the cooperative actions taken by Milken. Sandler also criticizes the prosecution for attempting to influence the parole board with an assessment of the economic impact of Milken's crimes, which contradicted the findings of the presiding judge. Richard V. Sandler argues that the persistent rivalry highlights the court system's emphasis on victory, frequently at the expense of fairness and equilibrium.

Practical Tips

• Improve your understanding of adversarial dynamics by observing real-life negotiations. Attend public city council meetings, court sessions, or watch recorded legal proceedings online. Take notes on how officials handle opposition, the tactics they use to maintain or break cooperation, and reflect on how these strategies could be adapted to your personal or professional life when facing resistance.
• Develop a personal policy for dealing with others' mistakes, focusing on constructive feedback rather than punishment. When someone errs, instead of criticizing, offer support and advice on how to improve. For instance, if a friend fails to keep a promise, discuss ways to help them remember commitments in the future, such as setting reminders, rather than dwelling on the lapse.
• Establish a personal advisory board consisting of trusted friends or colleagues to review and provide feedback on significant decisions. Before making important decisions or entering into cooperative agreements, present the situation to this group. Their diverse perspectives can help you identify potential pitfalls or areas where your cooperation might be taken advantage of, allowing you to adjust your strategy accordingly.
• Create a personal "brag sheet" where you list your cooperative actions and positive feedback received from others. This can be a simple document or spreadsheet where you note down instances where you've helped others, gone beyond your role, or received compliments on your teamwork. Refer to this sheet during performance reviews or when discussing your role in a project, to ensure your collaborative efforts are recognized and not downplayed.
• Develop a habit of discussing the potential societal impact of financial news stories with friends or family. When you hear about a financial crime or a major corporate decision in the news, initiate a conversation about the possible economic repercussions on various stakeholders. This practice can sharpen your critical thinking about the economic impact of such events and foster a deeper understanding of their significance.
• Develop a habit of asking "why" five times when faced with a statement or decision to uncover any underlying contradictions. This technique, often used in problem-solving, can help you dig deeper into the reasoning behind a statement or action. If someone says they're against a new community policy but can't provide consistent reasons why, asking "why" repeatedly can help reveal if their stance is based on a contradiction.
• Encourage equilibrium in your community by starting a fairness feedback loop. Create a simple online survey or suggestion box where peers can anonymously share if they feel treated fairly in group settings. Use the feedback to address imbalances and ensure that group decisions are more equitable.

The repercussions of media influence and the ensuing circumstances that arose from Milken's period of incarceration.

Sandler dedicates part of his book to examining the significant influence the media had on shaping public perception of Milken. Richard V. Sandler argues that the portrayal of Milken by the media was excessively negative and distorted due to their reliance on governmental sources rather than firsthand interactions, contributing to the public demonization that led to his harsh legal repercussions.

The media's vilification of Milken and its impact on public perception

Richard V. Sandler argues that the media's consistent portrayal in a negative light has unjustly stripped Milken of his humanity, portraying him simply as a symbol of greed. The author argued that the perspective of the story contributed to uniting the public in support of the stringent legal measures imposed on Milken.

Journalists frequently relied on data unintentionally revealed by state authorities because they could not directly contact Milken.

Sandler observes that journalists often relied on information from government sources when covering the Milken case, without sufficiently examining its accuracy or providing essential context. Milken concentrated exclusively on formulating his defense and did not engage with the media, thereby failing to offer an alternative narrative of the events. Sandler argues that this enabled media outlets to dominate the discourse, influencing public perception with a reductive and unfavorable depiction. He underscores the influence of James Stewart, a journalist from the Wall Street Journal, whose Pulitzer Prize-recognized reporting on the Dennis Levine case set the stage for his influential book that solidified the negative perception linked to Michael Milken.

Practical Tips

• Create a personal blog or social media page where you analyze and discuss the use of government data in major news stories. After researching a high-profile case or event, write a post that breaks down how the data was used by journalists and what other angles or insights the raw data might suggest. Share your findings with your network to encourage informed discussions and a more data-literate community.
• Use browser extensions that highlight reported facts with sources. There are browser extensions available that can automatically underline facts in news articles and provide links to their sources. By installing one, you can quickly click through to the original data or statements and assess their credibility yourself.
• Develop a habit of asking "why" when consuming news reports. Whenever you encounter a piece of information, especially if it's from a government source, ask yourself why the information is being presented in this manner, what the context is, and what might be missing. This practice encourages you to think more deeply about the information you're receiving and its potential implications.
• Develop a crisis management plan that includes a designated spokesperson and clear communication guidelines. This ensures that if you're ever in a situation that requires intense focus on resolution, like Milken was with his defense, you have a trusted individual or team to handle inquiries. This could be a family member, friend, or colleague who understands your stance and can articulate it effectively without your direct involvement.
• Improve your problem-solving skills by practicing narrative flexibility in everyday situations. Whenever you encounter a problem, consciously create at least two different narratives to explain why it happened and how it can be resolved. This could be as simple as coming up with different reasons for why your car won't start – one narrative might be a dead battery, while another could be a faulty ignition switch. Then, think of at least two ways to address each scenario. This practice will train your mind to quickly generate multiple perspectives and solutions, which is valuable in both personal and professional contexts.
• Develop a 'response template' for common misconceptions or questions about your work or character. This template should include polite but assertive language that clarifies your stance or corrects misinformation. Use this template to quickly and consistently address issues as they arise on platforms where your narrative is being discussed, such as LinkedIn comments or industry forums.
• You can analyze the influence of media figures by tracking sentiment changes on social media. Start by selecting a public figure and a journalist known for their coverage of that person. Use social media monitoring tools to track the sentiment of posts before and after major articles or reports are published. This will give you a sense of how media narratives can shape public perception.
• Enhance your critical reading skills by forming a small discussion group focused on analyzing the portrayal of individuals in different media sources. Choose a variety of sources – from tabloids to more reputable newspapers – and discuss how the language and framing used by journalists can lead to different impressions of the same person or event. This will help you understand the power of media in crafting public images.

Michael Milken was often depicted by the press as the epitome of immense wealth and avarice.

Sandler contends that journalists, in their quest for eye-catching headlines, depicted Milken as the ultimate emblem of 1980s avarice, yet failed to acknowledge his substantial role in making financial opportunities more accessible to the general public. Milken's reputation suffered even more due to the surfacing of new information and his habitual avoidance of public attention. Richard V. Sandler highlights the profound impact of this portrayal, indicating that it contributed to the harsher legal repercussions faced by Milken and influenced Judge Wood's sentencing verdict.

Other Perspectives

• The characterization of Milken as the ultimate symbol of greed could be seen as a narrative convenience, ignoring the fact that many others in the financial sector engaged in similar practices without receiving the same level of scrutiny or criticism.
• The press's depiction of Milken could reflect a broader societal concern about income inequality and the concentration of wealth, which overshadowed his contributions to financial accessibility.
• It is possible that the legal system, in its pursuit of justice, acted independently of media narratives and focused solely on the facts of the case.
• Judges are expected to be impartial and base their decisions on facts and law, not media portrayals.

Milken's incarceration significantly affected his personal life and the well-being of his family.

The story delves into the profound impacts that Milken's incarceration had on him and his family members. Sandler provides a personal perspective on the difficulties encountered, highlighting the mental strain of the inquiry, the unforeseen consequences of imprisonment, and the anguish resulting from missing important life events.

Michael Milken faced considerable upheavals that resulted in him missing key occasions.

Richard V. Sandler's account emphasizes the disruption to Milken's family ties, highlighting the strain of separation and the significant family occasions that went unattended. The personal journal written by Lori Milken provides a profoundly personal and moving view of the difficulties faced. Lori provides a detailed account of her experience celebrating Passover through a ceremonial meal held within the confines of the Pleasanton correctional facility, emphasizing the arbitrary rules that exacerbated her feelings of separation from her partner. Lori felt a deep sense of sorrow during their eldest son's high school graduation, a time when he received numerous accolades, as she grappled with the emptiness created by Milken not being there. The writer highlights that Milken, accustomed to devoting a significant amount of his time to his professional endeavors, frequently exceeding one hundred hours per week, faced substantial restrictions in his everyday activities, with his participation in his children's lives largely confined to helping them with their homework during the times he visited them.

Practical Tips

• Create a family mission statement together to reinforce unity and shared values, which can serve as a guiding principle during times of stress. Gather as a family to discuss and write down what you collectively believe in and what you stand for. This could include commitments to support each other's endeavors or to prioritize family time. Display this statement in a common area to serve as a daily reminder of your family's bond and to help navigate through challenging periods.
• Use technology to create a virtual presence for those who can't attend significant events, such as setting up a live video call or recording a video message from them. This allows for a sense of participation and inclusion, making the absent person feel present in some way. For instance, if someone can't attend a birthday party, have them send a video greeting to be played during the celebration.
• Schedule a daily "unplugged" hour where you turn off all work-related devices to focus on family time, ensuring you're fully present during moments spent with your children. This could be during dinner, before bedtime, or a dedicated play hour, which helps create a routine that both you and your children can look forward to.

Despite facing numerous obstacles, Milken's commitment to philanthropy remained steadfast.

During his incarceration, Milken demonstrated remarkable fortitude, keeping an optimistic attitude, engaging in significant pursuits, and continuing his philanthropic endeavors. He describes how Milken dedicated himself to educating his fellow inmates, assisting them in obtaining their GEDs, and arranging enjoyable events for relatives during visitation periods. After being freed and discovering he had prostate cancer, Milken devoted his efforts to creating an organization focused on enhancing understanding and preserving lives through prostate cancer research. Sandler argues that these actions demonstrate Milken's unwavering commitment and determination to support others, even in the face of difficult situations.

Context

• Milken's story is often cited as an example of personal transformation and resilience, illustrating how individuals can redirect their skills and influence towards positive societal contributions.
• Educating inmates can be challenging due to limited resources, varying educational backgrounds, and the need for security measures. Programs often rely on volunteers or partnerships with educational institutions to succeed.
• Organizing these events reflects a broader philanthropic approach, focusing on improving the well-being of others, even in challenging circumstances, and highlights a commitment to community and support.
• Prostate cancer is one of the most common types of cancer among men, and research into its causes, prevention, and treatment is crucial for improving survival rates and quality of life for patients.

After being released, Milken was pardoned and he reflected on past events.

This section of the narrative examines Milken's engagement in philanthropic activities and his cautious re-entry into the business world following his release. Sandler reflects on the abuse of power within the judicial framework, emphasizing the importance of resilience and loyalty when confronted with these obstacles.

Upon his return to the business world, Michael Milken focused his energy on philanthropic endeavors.

The story highlights Milken's life post-incarceration, focusing on his dedication to philanthropy and his cautious return to the business world as a consultant, all while maintaining compliance with the terms agreed upon in his arrangement with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Sandler emphasizes Milken's steadfast resolve and his ongoing, significant input in the face of numerous challenges.

Milken complied with the conditions of his SEC order and continued to provide consultancy while participating in significant commercial activities.

Sandler outlines Milken's return to consulting, emphasizing his adherence to the stipulations mandated by the SEC. He provides a detailed account of the person's role in orchestrating multi-billion dollar deals with entities, including but not limited to MCI, leveraging his vast knowledge and network, while remaining compliant with the limitations set upon him. Sandler describes how Milken's thorough approach reflected his commitment to following regulatory standards and his active efforts to avert further legal issues. He emphasizes the authenticity of his consultative positions, which have been validated by formal legal assessments, and notes that following a thorough review, no formal charges were brought against him by the financial regulatory authority.

Context

• Successfully adhering to SEC conditions can help rehabilitate an individual's professional reputation, demonstrating a commitment to ethical standards and legal requirements, which is essential for regaining trust in the financial community.
• Beyond consultancy, Milken has been involved in various philanthropic efforts, particularly in medical research and education, which have helped rehabilitate his public image.
• Milken's ability to engage in significant commercial activities despite restrictions highlights the importance of adapting business practices to comply with legal frameworks while still achieving strategic business goals.
• MCI was a major telecommunications company in the United States, known for its role in breaking the AT&T monopoly on long-distance telephone service. It was involved in significant mergers and acquisitions, including its eventual merger with WorldCom.
• Milken's network included a wide array of influential business leaders, investors, and financial institutions. This network was crucial in facilitating large-scale deals and collaborations, as it provided access to key decision-makers and potential partners across various industries.
• Despite restrictions, Milken's expertise allowed him to work as a consultant, a role that does not require the same regulatory approvals as direct financial management or trading.
• Legal assessments are often conducted to ensure that individuals like Milken are operating within the bounds of their restrictions. These assessments help validate their roles and protect them from potential legal challenges.
• His experience with legal challenges may have influenced his approach to business, emphasizing transparency and adherence to regulatory standards to prevent any potential legal infractions.
• In the financial industry, consultative roles can vary widely but generally involve providing expert advice on transactions, strategy, or market analysis. These roles must be clearly defined to avoid conflicts with any imposed restrictions.
• The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is responsible for enforcing federal securities laws and regulating the securities industry. Their decision not to bring formal charges suggests that Milken's activities were closely monitored and found to be within legal boundaries.

Milken was a proactive benefactor for numerous initiatives, especially those related to health research and educational pursuits.

The book by Richard V. Sandler describes the substantial impact of Milken's philanthropic activities on advancing medical research, educational initiatives, and the improvement of public health. The philanthropic efforts initiated by the Milken relatives played a crucial role in funding groundbreaking research and the development of new treatments, in addition to the support provided by the Prostate Cancer Foundation and the Melanoma Research Alliance. Richard V. Sandler argues that Milken's impact extends beyond his financial contributions, encompassing his active involvement in shaping strategies, guiding endeavors, and bolstering the ventures he endorses. The book by Richard V. Sandler emphasizes the crucial role played by Milken's commitment and hands-on approach in his unwavering effort to bring about substantial change.

Context

• Co-founded by Milken in 2007, this organization is dedicated to advancing research and treatment for melanoma, contributing to significant scientific breakthroughs in the field.
• In many philanthropic endeavors, family members play a crucial role by contributing resources, participating in decision-making, and helping to sustain long-term commitments to various causes, thereby amplifying the impact of their initiatives.

Other Perspectives

• The effectiveness of philanthropy in medical research and public health can sometimes be overshadowed by systemic issues that require policy change rather than private funding.
• Milken's role in bolstering endorsed ventures could inadvertently create a dependency on his support, which might limit the sustainability of these initiatives if his involvement were to decrease in the future.
• While Milken's hands-on approach may have been beneficial, it is possible that it could have overshadowed the contributions of other team members or collaborators, potentially underestimating the collective effort required for substantial change.

The bestowal of clemency by the president to Milken was an event of considerable importance.

This section of the narrative highlights the difficulties faced while seeking leniency for Milken, culminating in a pardon that acknowledged his beneficial contributions and the excessive hardships he endured.

The difficulties faced in seeking clemency from different governmental bodies and the hurdles that emerged.

Sandler narrates the arduous path towards clemency, detailing the efforts made during the administrations of Clinton and Bush. Initially viewing the situation with optimism, President Clinton eventually decided against granting the pardon, taking into account the concerns raised by both the Treasury Department and the Securities and Exchange Commission. Sandler outlines the substantial support the appeal garnered while under the administration of President Bush, securing endorsements from his father, the former president, as well as the respected Rudy Giuliani, although it was ultimately rejected. He underscores that in the process of contemplating clemency, the specifics of Milken's circumstances frequently yield to the influence of political authority, entrenched biases within institutions, and the dominant sentiments of the populace.

Practical Tips

• Develop a checklist of concerns to address before finalizing significant personal decisions. Just as concerns from authoritative bodies influenced a major pardon decision, create a list that includes input from trusted sources, potential risks, and ethical considerations to guide your choices.
• Engage in role-playing exercises to understand the complexities of clemency appeals. With a group of friends or colleagues, simulate a clemency hearing where one person acts as the petitioner, another as the government representative, and others as the deciding committee. This will give you insight into the persuasive strategies and counterarguments involved in such a process.
• Enhance your awareness of institutional biases by volunteering as a court observer. Many local organizations seek volunteers to observe and report on court proceedings. By participating, you'll gain firsthand insight into the judicial process and may be able to identify biases in how cases are handled. Take notes on the demographics of defendants and the outcomes of their cases, then reflect on how these might correlate with institutional biases you've learned about.

The act of clemency recognized both the beneficial contributions of Milken and the disproportionate challenges he encountered.

Sandler applauds the decision by President Trump to bestow a complete and absolute pardon on Milken, contending that this act was a belated acknowledgment of Milken's positive impact and the unfair hardships he faced. The government's leniency acknowledges, for the initial instance, issues that pertain more to procedural irregularities than to matters of substance. The leniency shown toward Milken acknowledged his lifelong and ongoing dedication to philanthropic activities, as well as confirmed the beneficial impact of his innovative work on the economy. Sandler perceives the act of pardoning as a symbolic exoneration but recognizes that it is incapable of reversing the endured injustices and mistreatment.

Other Perspectives

• Recognizing Milken's positive impact and unfair challenges could be viewed as minimizing the negative consequences of his actions on the victims and the integrity of financial markets.
• Clemency is often granted on the basis of substantive issues, such as a reevaluation of the severity of the crime, changes in societal values, or new evidence that mitigates the original conviction.
• The pardon does not address whether Milken's philanthropic activities were directly related to or a result of his financial success, some of which may have been gained through questionable practices.
• Symbolic exoneration through a pardon can significantly impact public perception, potentially leading to a reassessment of an individual's legacy, which is not merely symbolic.

The book provides a thorough analysis of the inner workings of the criminal justice system.

In the book's concluding section, Sandler presents a detailed examination of the legal actions concerning Milken, highlighting the intrinsic shortcomings of the criminal justice system, along with his own reflections on loyalty, perseverance, and the importance of relationships.

Prosecutors misuse their power by treating public figures unfairly.

The examination by Sandler centers on the abuse of power by legal prosecutors, emphasizing their tendency to prioritize convictions over justice and their often concentrated efforts on high-profile individuals. Richard V. Sandler's examination demonstrates how the legal action against Michael Milken epitomizes these flaws, revealing the extent to which prosecutors will stretch to pressure witnesses into giving statements, leak information to the media, and secure convictions for offenses that were previously overlooked. Sandler argues that the story demonstrates how the safeguarding of an institution's prestige and the pursuit of significant triumphs can sometimes result in the neglect of personal liberties. The writer emphasizes the danger of a legal system that is undermined by an excessive pursuit of guilty verdicts, especially when it pertains to powerful individuals, those with clout, or figures seen as symbols of affluence.

Other Perspectives

• Prosecutors are bound by ethical obligations to seek justice, not just convictions, and many take this duty seriously.
• The visibility of high-profile cases can lead to a perception of concentrated effort, whereas similar efforts may be applied to less visible cases without public knowledge.
• The term "pressure" can be subjective and may not necessarily equate to coercion or illegal tactics; it could simply refer to the normal rigor of legal inquiry.
• In high-profile cases, intense media scrutiny can lead to speculation and the appearance of leaks when in fact there may be none.
• Overlooking offenses, regardless of when they occurred, could set a precedent of selective enforcement, which undermines the principle of equality before the law.
• There might be an argument that personal liberties are not neglected, but rather that they must be balanced against the need to investigate and prosecute crimes effectively, which sometimes requires stringent measures.
• Powerful individuals often have access to resources and legal expertise that can be used to challenge prosecutorial actions, potentially leveling the playing field.

The importance of unwavering resolve, the strength found in relationships with others, and the commitment to surmounting obstacles.

Richard V. Sandler's book ultimately underscores the importance of loyalty, the strength of personal connections, and unwavering commitment. He emphasizes the importance of surrounding oneself with people who believe in your capabilities and the crucial significance of maintaining self-confidence, especially when faced with significant challenges. He recognizes the profound emotional toll and the strain on his personal and communal ties stemming from his participation in the inquiry. Richard V. Sandler's portrayal of the Michael Milken case not only highlights the flaws within the system but also illustrates the endurance of the human spirit, the value of genuine relationships, and the potential for recovery after facing considerable obstacles.

Practical Tips

• Create a "Connection Map" of your personal and professional relationships. On a piece of paper or digital app, draw lines connecting you to individuals you know, and label the lines with the type of connection or shared interest. Regularly review and update this map, looking for ways to strengthen these connections through shared activities or support.
• Initiate a 'capabilities club' with friends or colleagues where each member regularly shares their goals and the group provides constructive feedback and encouragement. This can be a simple monthly meetup where you discuss your aspirations and the progress you've made. The club's purpose is to create a structured support system that actively fosters belief in each other's capabilities.
• Create a 'challenge journal' to document your journey through significant challenges, noting down your feelings, self-talk, and the strategies you use to maintain confidence. This personal record will help you identify patterns in your behavior and thinking that either bolster or undermine your self-confidence. For example, you might notice that you feel more confident on days when you exercise or after a conversation with a supportive friend.
• Create a personal "emotional emergency kit" that includes activities or items that help you recover from emotionally taxing situations. This kit could contain things like a playlist of calming music, a list of comforting books or movies, contact information for supportive friends or a counselor, and reminders of relaxation techniques like deep breathing or meditation. When you notice that participation in a particular inquiry or event has left you feeling drained, turn to your kit for ways to help you recharge and regain balance.
• Engage in role-playing exercises with friends or colleagues to practice navigating ethical dilemmas. Create hypothetical scenarios based on the systemic flaws exposed by cases like Milken's, and act out different responses to these situations. This will help you prepare for real-life ethical challenges and reinforce your commitment to integrity in your professional life.
• Start a personal challenge to do something you find difficult for 30 days, like waking up early, to test and grow your own endurance. By pushing your limits in a controlled way, you'll experience firsthand the resilience and adaptability of the human spirit. For example, if you struggle with public speaking, commit to speaking in front of a group every day, whether it's a formal setting or just sharing a story with friends.
• Try the "one meaningful conversation a day" challenge where you go beyond small talk to engage with someone on a deeper level. This could be asking about their passions, challenges, or personal experiences. By doing this daily, you train yourself to seek and foster more substantial connections. For instance, instead of discussing the weather with a neighbor, ask about their gardening tips or what got them started with their hobby.
• Develop a "recovery roadmap" with short-term milestones leading to long-term goals. This visual representation can help you see the path to recovery as a series of achievable steps. Draw a simple map or timeline and mark milestones such as "first week without setbacks" or "mastered a new coping skill." As you reach each milestone, reward yourself to reinforce positive progress.