PDF Summary:The Private Equity Playbook, by Adam Coffey

Private equity operates at a speed and intensity that many business leaders find overwhelming—but understanding how PE firms function can help you navigate this challenging environment. In The Private Equity Playbook, Adam Coffey explains the mechanics of private equity funds, from their structure and timelines to how they measure performance and create value in the companies they acquire.

Coffey breaks down the roles of limited partners and general partners, the importance of metrics like EBITDA and IRR, and the three primary strategies PE firms use to grow portfolio companies: organic growth, margin expansion, and mergers and acquisitions. He also covers what it takes to succeed as a leader in a PE-backed company, including adapting to fast-paced expectations, building credibility with your PE firm, and assembling a team that can execute at the accelerated speed private equity demands.

(continued)...

Coffey adds that capital is returned to limited partners through distributions over time. Whenever a private equity fund divests a company or secures refinancing to generate a distribution, it provides capital back to its limited partners. The fund fulfills capital requests when making purchases, rather than upfront. After the first capital call, the fund's distribution to the limited partner happens once the company is sold.

(Shortform note: The timing of cash flows between private equity funds and their limited partners has evolved in recent years. Traditionally, as Coffey describes, funds would call capital from investors as needed to make investments and then distribute proceeds back to them as portfolio companies were sold. However, finance researchers have found that the increasing use of credit lines by private equity funds has changed this dynamic.)

Value Creation Strategies

In the following sections, we’ll examine value creation levers and portfolio company management.

Value Creation Levers

Coffey states that three primary strategies private equity firms use to create value are growth within the business, broadening profit margins, and merging with or acquiring other companies. 1. Organic Growth: This refers to the rate at which a business can grow by boosting production and improving sales within the company. 2. Margin Expansion: This method can boost EBITDA and increase shareholder value without having to increase prices, bring in more customers, or sell additional products or services. 3. Mergers & Acquisitions: These are the quickest means of business growth by buying other companies and incorporating them. Coffey says the primary aim when private equity owns a company is to reach the highest value when selling it. Sustaining organic growth of ten percent or more is among the three essential components for achieving this.

(Shortform note: While these three strategies can be effective, they can also lead to problems if not managed carefully. In Private Equity at Work, Eileen Appelbaum and Rosemary Batt argue that when private equity owners focus too much on short-term financial gains, they can inadvertently weaken a company's long-term resilience. For example, aggressive margin expansion might involve cutting costs in ways that hurt employee morale or product quality. This can lead to a decline in innovation and make the company less adaptable to market changes. Similarly, rapid mergers and acquisitions can create integration challenges that distract management from core operations. These issues might not show up immediately in financial reports, but they can damage a company's reputation and make it more vulnerable to economic downturns.)

Being one of the three levers for growth, it significantly increases shareholder value since every additional dollar in EBITDA produced is factored by the industry multiple at which the company is sold. For example, if the industry multiple is 10 times, then every extra dollar of EBITDA corresponds to $10 of value for shareholders. Marketing and sales are crucial to driving expansion organically. Coffey notes that companies are never completely optimized. Although you may think you've fully optimized, you must question your status quo annually. It's crucial to change with an evolving world. This means intentionally reorganizing your sales approach and methods, which often involves increasing your price.

(Shortform note: While every additional dollar in EBITDA is factored by the industry multiple at which the company is sold, this may not always be the case. In markets where buyers have many alternatives and a clear reference price, increasing your price to generate every additional dollar in EBITDA can lead to customer defection and a shrinking earnings base. This can prevent the expected industry multiple uplift to shareholder value from materializing.)

He suggests considering different tiers for what you offer, potentially by providing a cheaper option and a new, more expensive premium option. Coffey notes that internal expansion usually happens slowly and requires significant effort. It necessitates changing the approach, with fresh personnel, methods, and promotional content. It might require making strategic shifts to uncover untapped opportunities. It might be necessary to go out and engage directly, which is time-consuming but crucial for the business's future well-being. Lacking this, the company's sale price will be reduced. Margin growth involves increasing efficiency in handling existing earnings by improving your processes. The preferred method private equity uses to expand a company is a "purchase and construct" strategy.

(Shortform note: Coffey’s advice to add tiers, overhaul internally, chase margin gains, and rely on a purchase-and-construct strategy can be risky. These strategies can create the illusion of “synergies” that may not materialize, leading to overcomplicated operations and reduced sale value. In The Synergy Trap, Mark L. Sirower argues that managers often overestimate the value of synergies in acquisitions, underestimate the time and cost required to realize them, and end up paying premiums that can’t be earned back. He explains that even when the strategic logic of a deal seems compelling, the actual integration process can be far more disruptive and expensive than anticipated, leaving shareholders worse off. This suggests that Coffey’s recommendations, while potentially beneficial in theory, could lead to overcomplicated operations and reduced sale value if not carefully managed and realistically assessed.)

Regarding IRR, time is not on your side, and sadly, organic growth and margin expansion require time. Though they're still extremely important as they enhance value and support lasting growth, the quickest way to expand a company is by purchasing other businesses and integrating them. Create a foundational business that the PE company can further develop. Coffey offers three typical motivations for engaging in mergers and acquisitions, or a "buy-and-grow" approach:

(Shortform note: While the “buy-and-grow” approach can help PE firms achieve their IRR goals, it can also backfire. If the acquired company doesn’t integrate well with the existing business, the expected synergies may not materialize, leading to lower-than-expected returns. Additionally, if the PE firm overpays for the acquisition or underestimates the costs of integration, the deal can destroy value rather than create it. This is why thorough due diligence and realistic financial modeling are essential before pursuing a “buy-and-grow” strategy.)

1. To meet a strategic requirement by assisting the organization in adapting its strategy, discovering fresh opportunities, and entering untapped markets. 2. To concentrate resources in the current geographic area. 3. To broaden your geographic reach by moving into additional areas. Mergers and purchases help you consolidate your presence in current markets, break into new ones, or address strategic issues, but the main benefit of this approach is its ability to expand the company swiftly. Integrating another business results in rapid expansion.

(Shortform note: Another common reason for pursuing acquisitions is to gain access to unique capabilities that would be too costly or time-consuming to develop internally. This could include specialized technology, talent, or operational know-how. For example, a company might acquire a firm with advanced data analytics capabilities to enhance its own digital transformation efforts. This approach allows the acquiring company to quickly integrate new skills and technologies, accelerating its growth and innovation potential.)

Portfolio Company Management

Coffey says that private equity businesses offer assistance to their portfolio companies. These offerings range from connecting with recruitment agencies to aid in filling important roles to cost management—organizing collective buying plans to maximize the portfolio's scale for benefits in areas like shipping or telecom.

Private equity companies aim to find, acquire, enhance, and sell businesses using funds from limited partners. The available resources depend on the firm's size and complexity, but they usually offer significant assistance in boosting shareholder value at the portfolio company level. Coffey suggests being open to seeking help in a private equity-backed setting.

From Financial to Operational Engineering

In academic literature, this shift toward providing operational assistance is often described as a move from “financial engineering” to “operational engineering.” In a 2009 paper, Steven N. Kaplan and Per Strömberg argue that modern leveraged buyout investors have evolved from relying primarily on “financial engineering” toward what they term “governance and operational engineering,” in which private equity firms use specialized industry and operating expertise, more active boards, tighter monitoring, and hands-on involvement in strategy and operations as key sources of value creation in their portfolio companies. This shift is driven by increased competition for deals, the need to create value beyond financial leverage, and the recognition that operational improvements can drive returns.

Next, Coffey covers governance and incentives, operational expectations, and leadership topics.

Governance & Incentives

Coffey explains that firms specializing in equity investments establish governance structures to balance autonomy and oversight. These structures are rules that determine how much autonomy the company’s management has to make decisions and when they need to seek approval from the PE firm. Governance structures are important because they ensure that the company can operate efficiently while still allowing the PE firm to oversee major decisions that could impact their investment.

The Origins of Governance Structures

The governance structures Coffey describes are rooted in the academic tradition of corporate governance and agency theory. In their seminal 1976 paper, Michael C. Jensen and William H. Meckling introduced the concept of the firm as a nexus of contracts, highlighting the conflicts that arise when managers (agents) make decisions on behalf of capital providers (principals). Their work laid the foundation for understanding how formal governance mechanisms, such as decision rights and approval processes, can align interests and mitigate agency problems in complex organizational structures.

He also discusses incentive equity structures, which align the interests of management and private equity. These equity arrangements reward management for meeting performance targets. The most common structure is the ABC model, which consists of three stock classes:

1. Class A stockholders get their investment back first, plus any preferred yield.
2. Class B shareholders, typically those in leadership roles, receive a share of the profits once Class A is paid.
3. Class C shareholders, who are also management, receive a bigger portion of profits if the company performs exceptionally well.

When management has a stake in the business's success, they're motivated to work hard and make decisions that benefit everyone. This ensures that both parties have identical goals.

Critique of Equity-Based Compensation

In Pay without Performance, Lucian Bebchuk and Jesse Fried argue that stock-based compensation arrangements often fail to make executives faithfully pursue shareholder value. Instead, they can give executives powerful incentives to inflate short-term stock prices, exploit inside information, and influence disclosure and timing decisions in ways that enrich themselves even when long-term firm performance is not improved. Bebchuk and Fried argue that these pay packages are shaped by managerial influence over boards rather than by true arm’s-length bargaining. This leads to what they describe as “pay without performance.” They contend that the widespread use of stock options and other equity-based incentives has not produced the alignment of interests that proponents claim. Instead, it has often resulted in excessive compensation that is disconnected from actual company performance.

Operational Expectations & Leadership

Coffey emphasizes that leadership must adapt to the fast-paced environment of private equity. PE firms require performance that's timely and quantifiable. The executive managing your company is now accountable for your results, and their reputation is at stake. Therefore, you must reach your targets and establish your leadership team's credibility. If you establish credibility, take action, and execute on your plan, the private equity firm will step back. However, if your performance is lacking, they'll be more involved. Coffey highlights that the pace of private equity is extremely fast, often 24 hours daily, with associates working 60 to 80 hours weekly.

(Shortform note: Coffey’s emphasis on adapting to the “extremely fast” pace of private equity, with associates working 60 to 80 hours weekly, raises concerns about the sustainability and well-being of executives. Research shows that such intense work schedules can lead to burnout, decreased productivity, and impaired decision-making. A 2022 study found that 77% of private equity professionals reported feeling burned out, with 53% considering leaving their jobs due to stress. This high-pressure environment not only affects individual well-being but can also impact investment performance, as cognitive fatigue may lead to suboptimal strategic decisions.)

You need to adjust to the increased speed and figure out how to manage stress and frustration. You might need to enhance the organization and its essential staff to advance the business. You must quickly determine if your team can deliver and grow by twofold in size and pace.

(Shortform note: In High Output Management, Andrew S. Grove suggests that the best way to determine what a team can do is to run a short-term experiment. For example, you could temporarily increase the workload to see how the team handles it. This will help you identify bottlenecks and areas for improvement.)