PDF Summary:The New Climate War, by Michael E. Mann

Climate change is one of humanity's greatest challenges—yet powerful interests continue to sow doubt and delay action. In The New Climate War, Michael E. Mann exposes the tactics used by fossil fuel corporations and their allies to downplay the catastrophic consequences of inaction.

Mann pulls back the curtain on strategies like deflecting blame onto individuals, fostering divisions within the climate movement, spreading misinformation, and promoting "solutions" that merely kick the can down the road. While examining past environmental battles, he highlights the crucial role of public engagement, bipartisan cooperation, and addressing root causes rather than treating symptoms. Above all, Mann emphasizes our ability—and responsibility—to unite in tackling this crisis head-on.

(continued)...

Mann argues that these assertions divert attention from the essential systemic changes needed to address climate change effectively. By pointing to the perceived hypocrisy of individuals, inactivists aim to convince the public that climate action is about individual choices and personal sacrifice, rather than about holding corporate polluters accountable and reforming our energy system.

Scientists who support actions to address climate change frequently confront attacks on their reputations, with accusations of being hypocritical that may undermine trust in the substance of their communication and their professional honesty.

Mann describes how vocal climate scientists come under increased scrutiny and are often accused of hypocrisy, particularly when they emphasize the immediate need for action to combat climate change. He shares his own experiences with slander and assaults, highlighting that these offensives often focus on aspects of individual lifestyle, like dietary preferences and air travel habits.

Mann contends that inactivists seek to erode the credibility of scientists in the eyes of the public by depicting them as inconsistent, thereby impeding their role as trustworthy conveyors of information. Michael E. Mann's strategy is an intentional attack designed to erode confidence in scientific authorities, thereby cultivating doubt and skepticism about their findings and recommendations.

Climate researchers, through their endorsement of these critiques and by adopting simpler lifestyles, might unintentionally reinforce the belief that addressing climate issues requires individuals to make personal sacrifices.

Mann highlights the contradiction where climate scientists are criticized for not following their own recommendations, even though they adopt strict lifestyles and alter their personal habits substantially to reduce their ecological footprint. Michael E. Mann argues that while individual actions are praiseworthy, they could inadvertently support a misleading story spread by those opposed to progress, implying that solving climate problems requires sacrifice and self-denial.

Mann emphasizes the benefits and potential of shifting towards an energy infrastructure that is sustainable and minimizes pollution, instead of focusing on the idea of personal sacrifice. Michael E. Mann counsels climate scientists to embrace sustainable habits and to be wary of individuals who frame the fight against climate change as an onerous task rather than a positive shift for the community.

Practical Tips

• You can start a blog or social media page dedicated to highlighting systemic solutions to climate change, focusing on policies, corporate practices, and technological innovations rather than individual actions. By consistently sharing content that emphasizes the role of governments and businesses in addressing climate change, you contribute to shifting the narrative away from personal responsibility. For example, spotlight a city's transition to renewable energy or a company that has successfully reduced its carbon emissions through innovative practices.
• Create a simple online pledge that encourages people to support systemic climate solutions, such as voting for climate-conscious policymakers or backing green initiatives. The pledge could include a commitment to educate oneself on systemic issues, share information with friends and family, and engage in community discussions about large-scale environmental strategies. For instance, the pledge could be shared among your social networks, with a goal to get a certain number of signatories who are also willing to take these actions.
• Develop a habit of critically analyzing environmental messages in media and advertisements, and share your findings with your network to foster a more informed community. Whenever you come across a message that seems to shift the blame to individuals, take a moment to research and present the bigger picture. For example, if an ad promotes a product as 'eco-friendly' because it's recyclable, investigate the company's overall environmental impact and share your findings online to provide a more nuanced perspective.

"Non-Solutions" Solutions: Delays and Distractions

The text examines various proposed actions that seem to be supported by those resistant to change, yet are actually designed to delay or shift focus away from meaningful interventions to tackle the climate crisis. The narrative also promotes the utilization of natural gas as a transitional energy solution, delves into the possibilities associated with climate intervention techniques, and underscores the importance of adjusting to climatic shifts, while also upholding the viability of the notion of "clean coal."

The mistaken belief that natural gas serves as a bridge in the transition to renewable energy sources.

This section of the text confronts the false belief that supporting natural gas as an interim measure is advantageous, emphasizing that such an approach falls short in tackling climate change and hinders the progression toward renewable energy sources.

The conversation about supporting natural gas as an interim energy option involves assessing whether accidental methane emissions could undermine the benefits of its reduced carbon footprint.

Mann disputes the common perception that natural gas acts as an intermediary energy source paving the way toward a future of sustainable energy practices. Mann clarifies that although natural gas is frequently touted as a greener alternative to coal, its environmental benefits are negated by the release of methane that occurs throughout the extraction process. During the processes of extraction, transportation, and utilization, methane, which is primarily found in natural gas, is released into the atmosphere, where it significantly exacerbates the greenhouse effect.

Mann emphasizes the point that those who benefit from fossil fuels promote natural gas as a transitional energy source. Mann argues that this narrative misleadingly comforts us, which in turn sustains our reliance on fossil fuels, thereby delaying the critical transition to truly renewable energy sources.

The urgency of implementing strategies to combat climate change highlights the brief period available to cut down on carbon emissions and illustrates how using natural gas as a transitional solution impedes the true progression to renewable energy sources.

Mann emphasizes the urgent necessity of taking immediate action on climate change, highlighting the limited time frame we have to achieve the necessary reduction in emissions. Michael E. Mann argues that using natural gas as a temporary fix dangerously delays addressing the core problem, exacerbating it further. Choosing natural gas as an energy source might lock us into an energy infrastructure that is significantly dependent on carbon for the foreseeable future.

Mann emphasizes the critical need to direct funding towards initiatives for sustainable energy, the transition to electric power, and strategies that can currently have a positive impact on the climate. He underscores the rapidly closing window to implement significant actions that would mitigate the effects. Delaying the true transition to alternative forms of energy will undoubtedly lead to the need for more drastic and costly interventions in the future.

The notion of "clean coal" is a misleading assurance of technological advancement.

This section of the text critically examines the politically motivated misconception that coal can be made environmentally sustainable, particularly by highlighting the shortcomings of so-called "carbon capture and storage" methods as a viable solution.

The book examines the challenges related to the feasibility, cost, and reliability of using technology designed to reduce the ecological footprint of coal emissions by capturing and storing carbon.

Mann delves into the complexities and financial constraints associated with the technology for capturing and storing carbon. Mann underscores the significant challenges associated with the scalability, cost, and long-term effectiveness of carbon capture and storage, often proposed as a solution for coal-reliant installations to mitigate their carbon output. Concerns persist about the potential for carbon to leak and its long-term safe containment beneath the Earth's surface.

Mann emphasizes that the current technologies for capturing and storing carbon are not advanced enough to be relied upon as a primary response to the challenges of climate change. Michael E. Mann characterizes our predicament as one we have created ourselves, due to the movement of carbon from the ground into the air. Our first action should be to stop shoveling. The process of carbon sequestration involves returning a small fraction of the vast quantities of carbon to the Earth's interior. Michael E. Mann argues that promoting carbon capture and storage as a way to address climate change enables entrenched organizations to prolong the use of fossil fuels, which delays the essential shift toward renewable energy sources.

Investing in sustainable alternative energy sources not only boosts the economy but also safeguards our natural surroundings, as opposed to the risks associated with persistent reliance on fossil fuels, which is supported by financial investments in technologies designed to sequester and contain carbon.

Mann cautions that advocating for unproven technologies like CCS merely prolongs the existence of outdated sectors and delays the essential transition to energy sources replenished by natural means. He advocates for the allocation of government funds to foster growth in the renewable energy industry, a strategy that offers economic benefits while addressing the core environmental challenge.

Mann underscores the necessity of shifting focus from short-term technological fixes to enduring, sustainable strategies that tackle the climate crisis. He emphasizes the inherent limitations in creating technological responses to a crisis that stems from burning fossil fuels. He advocates for the implementation of strategies that accelerate our transition to an economy driven by sustainable energy resources.

The method of altering the environment through technological interventions carries significant risks.

This section delves into the allure and considerable hazards of geoengineering, an approach involving major modifications to Earth's weather systems.

Advocates for the fossil fuel industry and supporters of unregulated market ideologies are drawn to geoengineering because it offers the appearance of taking action without compromising their fundamental goals.

Mann reveals how proponents of fossil fuels and ardent supporters of the free market are drawn to geoengineering, as it appears to offer a simple technological fix that circumvents the necessity for profound systemic changes and the scaling back of fossil fuel extraction and usage.

Geoengineering presents an alluring excuse to preserve current business operations, implying a potential solution that permits ongoing activities without change, thus shifting focus away from the crucial transition to systems that rely on sustainable energy sources. The appeal originates from the captivating notion that we can sidestep the need for major changes in our lifestyle by adopting innovative technological fixes.

The potential hazards and unforeseen outcomes of various geoengineering approaches, including the dispersal of particulates in the upper atmosphere and the addition of iron to stimulate oceanic ecosystems, highlight the dangers of tampering with a complex system that we do not fully understand.

Mann highlights the considerable hazards and possible unforeseen outcomes of different geoengineering strategies. He emphasizes the dangers of interfering with the delicate systems of Earth's climate, examining strategies such as replicating the cooling effect of volcanic eruptions through the distribution of sulfur particles in the upper atmosphere, and enhancing algae proliferation and the sequestration of carbon by adding iron to marine ecosystems.

Mann emphasizes that our understanding of these complex systems is still incomplete. Making alterations to them on a global level might result in unexpected and potentially disastrous outcomes. Furthermore, geoengineering strategies are often aimed at mitigating the surface-level symptoms of global warming rather than addressing the fundamental issues, thus allowing the continuous emission of carbon into the atmosphere unchecked.

Advocating for geoengineering as a primary solution to climate change dangerously supports the continuation of our reliance on fossil fuel consumption.

Mann underscores the moral hazards associated with promoting geoengineering as the primary solution to combat climate change. Advocating for cutting-edge technological interventions, despite their unpredictability and potential hazards, might lead to the preservation of existing conditions and delay imperative measures. Proponents of fossil fuels might use the potential of forthcoming geoengineering innovations as a justification to challenge the implementation of existing measures aimed at cutting carbon emissions.

Mann contends that emphasizing geoengineering as a remedy for climate issues is not only unhelpful but could also pose significant risks. He advocates for a prudent approach that prioritizes established and proven techniques, including the expansion of clean energy options, the broader utilization of electric power, and the improvement of energy-saving practices. Mann contends that our focus should not be diverted to hypothetical innovations that may never come to fruition and that could pose significant risks.

The Vocabulary of Stagnation

The section scrutinizes how those opposed to action have co-opted critical concepts like "adjustment to climate impacts" and "the capacity to recover from climate effects," employing these terms as a tactic to delay decisive measures against climate change.

Politicians and business leaders frequently use the words "adaptation" and "resilience" in ways that can downplay the urgency of the risks linked to climate change, which in turn postpones the need for immediate measures, and this practice warrants careful scrutiny.

Mann delves into the tactics employed by certain politicians and industry factions to craft key approaches for managing and enduring climate change repercussions, utilizing these techniques to lessen the sense of urgency surrounding the climate emergency and to postpone substantial actions to reduce emissions.

They cultivate an attitude of resignation that treats the consequences of global warming as inescapable, instead of directly tackling the core problems. The phrasing erroneously implies that it is possible to adjust to climatic shifts without taking deliberate action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and prevent additional rises in temperature.

The escalating severity of issues linked to the climate, including the elevation of sea levels and more regular severe weather incidents, emphasizes the importance of adopting a forward-looking approach to tackle climate change instead of solely responding to its effects.

Mann highlights the difficulties in adjusting to and withstanding the intensifying consequences of climate change, using concrete examples like the devastating wildfires in Australia and the increasing threat of higher sea levels in Florida. He contends that depending solely on these tactics is insufficient and also poses significant risks.

Our infrastructure enhancements and reinforcements, though often well-intentioned, can only offer so much protection against the intensifying threats of climate change. Mann underscores the critical need for prompt measures to transition away from fossil fuels towards renewable energy, which is vital to ensure the longevity and health of our environment.

Other Perspectives

• Natural gas has a lower carbon footprint than coal and oil, and transitioning directly from coal to renewables may not be feasible for all economies, especially where renewable infrastructure is not yet developed.
• The transition to renewable energy sources requires significant investment and time to develop infrastructure, which may not align with the immediate need for energy in growing economies.
• Carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies are still in development and could become more feasible and cost-effective, potentially making "clean coal" a more viable option in the future.
• While investing in sustainable energy is beneficial, the economic impact of transitioning away from fossil fuels may negatively affect industries and workers dependent on the fossil fuel economy.
• Some forms of geoengineering, such as carbon dioxide removal, are less risky and could complement emission reduction efforts.
• Adaptation and resilience are necessary strategies, as some level of climate change is now inevitable, and communities need to protect themselves against current and future climate-related disasters.

The cohesive strength that a collective effort brings.

A mindset has emerged that concentrates on the certainty of disastrous climate consequences.

This section critiques the spread of climate doomism, arguing that this despair-mongering is not only unfounded, but actually undermines efforts to build a unified movement for change.

The danger of conveying a too pessimistic view, which can lead to feelings of hopelessness, lies in its potential to paralyze individuals just as thoroughly as blatant denial, a weakness that adversaries of ecological initiatives are eager to exploit.

Mann cautions that adopting a pessimistic outlook could be as obstructive to climate change action as outright denial. He underscores that portraying an unavoidable disaster, while seemingly opposing denial, is often employed by opponents of proactive measures to diminish the essential momentum and political determination to tackle the problem.

Doomism cultivates an atmosphere of despair and capitulation, convincing people that the environmental emergency is a challenge insurmountable. This could lead to an outcome similar to outright denial, potentially discouraging individuals from participating in measures that could mitigate the effects of climate change.

The conversation features instances from prominent media outlets and reporters that show a pervasive attitude of resignation about climate change, noticeable even among proponents of measures to combat it.

Mann laments the rise of a pervasive sense of hopelessness among individuals who appear dedicated to tackling climate challenges and endorsing actions to mitigate them. He demonstrates how negative storylines have permeated well-known media outlets, often accompanied by claims from reporters that surpass the factual scientific evidence.

Mann confronts the pervasive tales of hopelessness, emphasizing that a thorough understanding of scientific research highlights the urgency of tackling the climate crisis and the potential for mitigating its effects. He advises climate researchers and media representatives to thoughtfully choose their methods of conversation, avoiding the exaggeration of issues that might lead to public demotivation and perpetuate the false notion that it's too late to take action.

The publication titled "Hothouse Earth" has inadvertently contributed to a sense of hopelessness by scrutinizing how its exaggerated claims are used to discredit and cast doubt on the reputation of climate scientists.

Mann analyzes the discourse on "Hothouse Earth" as presented in the journal of the National Academy of Sciences, demonstrating how exaggerated claims can unintentionally foster a belief in an unavoidable disaster. The article underscored significant concerns about potential factors that might intensify climate change, yet portrayed these catastrophic ecological changes as inevitable, even though there are ongoing attempts to limit the increase in global temperatures to meet the targets established by the Paris Agreement.

Michael E. Mann addresses the inadvertent outcomes of the "Hothouse Earth" publication, pointing out that it inadvertently supplied skeptics of climate change with arguments by emphasizing specific hazards. Detractors took advantage of the speculative elements and extraordinary claims to ridicule and undermine the reputation of climate researchers. The concept was advanced that forecasts about the future state of the climate are frequently overstated and not dependable, thereby casting doubt on the credibility of scientific experts.

Addressing unfounded concerns about “runaway” warming and human extinction, clarifying the science and emphasizing our current ability to avert the worst impacts of climate change

Mann refutes the unfounded claims that climate change inevitably spells doom for human existence, emphasizing that while the situation is grave, it is not a cause for hopelessness. The author makes it clear that the perilous changes to our climate represent not a distant threat but an existing reality, with discernible and expensive consequences impacting individuals across the globe.

Mann underscores the urgency of the situation and highlights our continued ability to avert the most catastrophic outcomes. He emphasizes the critical need for immediate action in lowering carbon emissions with existing technology to prevent irreversible and disastrous changes to our planet's weather patterns. Mann emphasizes the opportunity to build a sustainable future but notes that such progress is hindered by a negative narrative that diminishes the optimism and motivation required to initiate substantial change.

Youthful Guidance Shall Prevail

Young environmental activists have significantly driven the revival of climate conversation and the call for immediate action, influencing both public opinion and political resolve, with Greta Thunberg standing out as a prominent figure in this movement.

Greta Thunberg's emergence and the global youth activist movement have significantly heightened awareness of environmental issues and have effectively applied moral pressure to address the inertia in political spheres.

Michael E. Mann regards the emergence of Greta Thunberg and the global youth-led climate activism as a critical juncture in the effort to tackle climate change. The unwavering commitment of activists has injected a fresh urgency into the issue, demanding accountability from political leaders and challenging any lack of action. Millions around the world have been persuaded by their messaging, which underscores the responsibility to maintain a livable planet for future generations, affecting the perspectives of both the general population and those who create policies.

Mann emphasizes the significant role played by young activists in garnering public support and reigniting hope for meaningful action on climate matters. He views the unwavering call for transformation as a formidable power capable of surmounting the stagnation and resistance that have long impeded advancement. The campaign initiated by Thunberg gave rise to the "Fridays for Future" movement, which has drawn in millions of youths to participate in weekly demonstrations.

The fossil fuel sector, together with allied media channels, has initiated attacks on young environmental activists, highlighting the threat these proponents pose to the conventional methods of operation within the industry.

Mann acknowledges the challenges that young individuals advocating for climate change encounter, originating from those who benefit financially from the fossil fuel industry and their allies in the media. He details the various tactics employed to question the legitimacy of Greta Thunberg and other young activists, aiming to diminish their concerns and portray them as naive and uninformed.

Mann contends that these criticisms underscore the fossil fuel industry's view of young activists as a disruptive force to their conventional operations. The mobilization of widespread support for initiatives aimed at addressing climate change, along with demands for substantial policy changes from governing bodies, has elicited a defensive response from groups that profit from the continued use of fossil fuels.

The importance of supporting and protecting young climate activists, arguing for a responsibility to act on their behalf and seize the opportunity they’ve created

Mann underscores the necessity of backing and safeguarding youthful environmental campaigners who face increasing attacks due to their brave deeds. We have an ethical obligation to back these individuals, enhance their messaging, and champion the changes they are striving for.

Mann inspires his audience to take advantage of the momentum generated by young activists and collaborate with these courageous advocates to work towards an environmentally sustainable future. He urges people to draw inspiration from the vigor of young activists, directing it towards concrete actions, and to build on their successes in championing a future that is fair and environmentally sound.

Fostering a united effort focused on transformative change.

This section offers a guide for those eager to engage in the battle against climate change, presenting actionable recommendations and tactical direction for confronting the impending ecological hurdles.

Addressing the urgent climate crisis underscores our ability to avert the most catastrophic outcomes and emphasizes the significance of conveying a message that fosters optimism and encourages action.

Mann advises that proponents of climate action should find a delicate balance between emphasizing the urgency of the problem and instilling a sense of empowerment to tackle it. He acknowledges the serious threats that climate change presents, yet also emphasizes our ability to avert enduring damage and forge a path toward a more sustainable tomorrow.

He advises against spreading despair or using scare tactics, emphasizing our shared ability to enact beneficial change and solve this issue together.

Education and constructive dialogue are crucial in countering denial, offering practical advice on how to effectively engage with others.

Mann emphasizes the critical role that education and productive conversations play in the fight against climate change. He encourages the audience to stay informed by continuously updating themselves with the latest advancements in science and policy changes.

He advises individuals to recognize and confront misinformation. However, he also underscores the necessity of engaging in conversations with those who are skeptical or misinformed, providing resources and guidance to facilitate substantive exchanges on the topic of climate change.

A comprehensive restructuring and implementation of policies by governmental bodies is essential.

Mann emphasizes the critical necessity for sweeping changes to address the climate emergency, highlighting the crucial role of government actions and collaborative initiatives. He encourages people to engage in the democratic process by voting for leaders who are committed to addressing the challenges posed by climate change.

Mann underscores the significance of supporting organizations focused on environmental challenges and participating in collective efforts that advocate for transformation. He concludes by emphasizing the significance of individual actions as catalysts for widespread change, urging people to passionately promote and push forward a vision of a future that ensures the well-being of the generations to come.

Other Perspectives

• While emphasizing the potential for catastrophic climate outcomes can lead to feelings of hopelessness, it can also serve as a powerful motivator for some individuals, galvanizing them into action by highlighting the severity of the situation.
• Media outlets may focus on negative storylines not just to spread doomism but to reflect the gravity of scientific findings and to hold entities accountable for lack of action on climate change.
• The publication "Hothouse Earth" could be seen as a necessary alarm bell that brings attention to the potential severity of climate feedback loops, rather than an inadvertent contributor to hopelessness.
• Concerns about “runaway” warming and human extinction, while potentially exaggerated, may be based on legitimate scientific hypotheses that deserve public attention and consideration in policy-making.
• The emergence of Greta Thunberg and the global youth activist movement, while influential, may not always translate into effective policy change or may overlook the complexities of implementing climate solutions at a global scale.
• Criticisms of young environmental activists by the fossil fuel sector and allied media channels could sometimes stem from legitimate disagreements over policy approaches rather than an attempt to undermine the activists themselves.
• The call for comprehensive restructuring and policy implementation by governmental bodies must be balanced with considerations of economic impacts, job displacement, and the need for a just transition for workers in traditional energy sectors.
• Education and constructive dialogue are important, but they must be coupled with actionable steps and policy changes to be effective; dialogue alone may not be sufficient to counter denial or drive change.
• The focus on fostering a united effort for transformative change must also acknowledge and address the diverse and sometimes conflicting interests of different stakeholders involved in the climate change debate.